Post-inflammatory Polyp Burden as a Prognostic Marker of Disease-outcome in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Post-inflammatory polyps [PIPs] are considered as indicators of previous episodes of severe inflammation and mucosal ulceration. Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], namely Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC], exhibit a perpetuating, relapsing and remitting pattern, and PIPs are a frequent sequela of chronicity. The aim of this study was to determine whether a high PIP burden is associated with a more severe disease course in patients with IBD. METHODS: This was a multinational, multicentre, retrospective study. IBD patients previously diagnosed with PIPs were retrieved from the endoscopic database of each centre. PIP burden was evaluated and associated with demographic and clinical data as well as factors indicating a more unfavourable disease course. RESULTS: A total of 504 IBD patients with PIPs were recruited [male: 61.9%]. The mean age at IBD diagnosis was 36.9 [±16.8] years. Most patients [74.8%] were diagnosed with UC. A high PIP burden was present in 53.4% of patients. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, a high PIP burden was independently associated with treatment escalation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.75; p = 0.024), hospitalization [HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.24-2.90; p = 0.003], need for surgery [HR 2.28; 95% CI 1.17-4.44, p = 0.02] and younger age at diagnosis [HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: PIP burden was associated with a more severe outcome. Future prospective studies should focus on the characterization of PIP burden as to further risk stratify this patient cohort.

Validation of the 'United Registries for Clinical Assessment and Research' [UR-CARE], a European Online Registry for Clinical Care and Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The 'United Registries for Clinical Assessment and Research' [UR-CARE] database is an initiative of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] to facilitate daily patient care and research studies in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Herein, we sought to validate the database by using fictional case histories of patients with IBD that were to be entered by observers of varying experience in IBD. METHODS: Nineteen observers entered five patient case histories into the database. After 6 weeks, all observers entered the same case histories again. For each case history, 20 key variables were selected to calculate the accuracy for each observer. We assumed that the database was such that ≥ 90% of the entered data would be correct. The overall proportion of correctly entered data was calculated using a beta-binomial regression model to account for inter-observer variation and compared to the expected level of validity. Re-test reliability was assessed using McNemar's test. RESULTS: For all case histories, the overall proportion of correctly entered items and their confidence intervals included the target of 90% (Case 1: 92% [88-94%]; Case 2: 87% [83-91%]; Case 3: 93% [90-95%]; Case 4: 97% [94-99%]; Case 5: 91% [87-93%]). These numbers did not differ significantly from those found 6 weeks later [NcNemar's test p > 0.05]. CONCLUSION: The UR-CARE database appears to be feasible, valid and reliable as a tool and easy to use regardless of prior user experience and level of clinical IBD experience. UR-CARE has the potential to enhance future European collaborations regarding clinical research in IBD.