Treatment of node-positive endometrial cancer: chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy.

OPINION STATEMENT: The standard of treatment for node-positive endometrial cancer (FIGO Stage IIIC) in North America has been systemic therapy with or without additional external beam radiation therapy (RT) given as pelvic or extended field RT. However, this treatment paradigm is rapidly evolving with improvements in systemic chemotherapy, the emergence of targeted therapies, and improved molecular characterization of these tumors. The biggest question facing providers regarding management of stage IIIC endometrial cancer at this time is: what is the best management strategy to use with regard to combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, other targeted therapeutics, and radiation that will maximize clinical benefit and minimize toxicities for the best patient outcomes? While clinicians await the results of ongoing clinical trials regarding combined immunotherapy/RT as well as management based on molecular classification, we must make decisions regarding the best treatment combinations for our patients. Based on the available literature, we are offering stage IIIC patients without measurable disease postoperatively both adjuvant chemotherapy and IMRT with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and with or without pembrolizumab/dostarlimab as primary adjuvant therapy. Patients with measurable disease post operatively, high risk histologies, or stage IV disease receive chemoimmunotherapy, and vaginal brachytherapy is added for those with uterine risk factors for vaginal recurrence. In the setting of endometrioid EC recurrence more than 6 months after treatment, patients with pelvic nodal and vaginal recurrence are offered IMRT and brachytherapy without chemotherapy. For measurable recurrence not suitable for pelvic radiation alone, chemoimmunotherapy is preferred as standard of care.

CD137+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes predicts ovarian cancer survival.

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy in the United States, and biomarkers of patient outcomes are limited. Data using immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis are mixed regarding whether and which tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) impact survival, and IHC does not adequately quantify rare cell populations, including CD137+ (4-1BB) tumor-reactive TILs. Our study investigates if a higher percentage of CD3+ CD137+ TILs is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in OC. METHODS: Flow cytometry was performed on viably banked OC digests. Chart review and statistical analysis were performed. Forty-seven patients were included, 40 of whom were diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), papillary serous carcinoma, or undifferentiated histology. RESULTS: A high percentage of CD3+ CD137+ TILs correlated with improved OS (n = 40, r = 0.48, P = 0.0016). Subjects were divided into CD3+ CD137+ TIL high and low groups by the median. Subjects with high CD3+CD137+ TIL frequencies (>9.6%) had longer OS (Wilcoxon rank-sum test; P = 0.0032) and improved OS (logrank test; P = 0.007). Differences in CD3+ or CD3+ CD8+ TILs did not impact survival. CD3+ CD137+ TILs were predictive of OS regardless of germline mutation or debulking status. Analysis of subgroups including late stage HGSOC and late stage HGSOC with primary optimal cytoreduction indicated CD3+ CD137+ TILs correlated with improved OS after adjusting for age and PARP inhibitor use (P = 0.034 and P = 0.016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of CD3+ CD137+ TILs in digested OC specimens is associated with improved OS, while general TIL markers are not. CD137 has the potential to be a novel biomarker for survival in OC.