Integration of membrane filtration in two-stage anaerobic digestion system: Specific methane yield potentials of hydrolysate and permeate.

Two-stage biogas systems consisting of a CSTR-acidification reactor (AR) and an anaerobic filter (AF) were frequently described for microbial conversion of food and agricultural wastes to biogas. The aim of this study is to investigate the integration of a membrane filtration step in two-stage systems to remove inert particles from hydrolysate produced in AR in order to increase the efficiency of the subsequent AF. Hydrolysates from vegetable waste (VW) and grass/maize silage (G/M) were treated in cross-flow ceramic membrane filtration system (pore size 0.2 µm). Organic acids were extracted efficiently through filtration of hydrolysate. For both the substrates, membrane permeability was stable and high (46.6-49.3 L m-2 h-1 bar-1). Filtration process effectively improved the specific methane yield of permeate by 40% (VW) and 24.5% (G/M) compared to hydrolysate. It could be shown that, the filtration-step increased hydrolysate's degradability, which lead to higher conversion efficiency in the following AF.

Treatment of thermophilic hydrolysis reactor effluent with ceramic microfiltration membranes.

For an undisturbed operation of two-stage high-pressure fermentation up to 100 bar, a particle-free hydrolysate appears to be necessary. This is even more important if the second stage, i.e., the methane reactor, is designed as fixed bed. Here, we present the potential of microfiltration membranes as separation unit after the first stage, which is the hydrolysis. The study included the selection of membrane material, membrane performance investigations, and long-term-behavior during the filtration period. In a series of experiments, the optimum type of membrane material and the mode of operation [either crossflow (CF) or submerged (S)] were determined. Ceramic membranes proved to be the better option to treat the process stream due to their chemical and temperature resistance. The crossflow filtration achieved a sustainable flux of up to 33 L/(m2 h), while long-term experiments with the submerged membranes confirmed a critical flux of 7 L/(m2 h). Comparative analyses of hydrolysate and permeate showed that the rejected chemical oxygen demand (COD) as well as total organic carbon (TOC) fraction and thereby the loss of organic carbon in the permeate does not reduce the methane yield.