Liquid biopsy utilizing miRNA in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with cyclin­dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are the mainstay of treatment of hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Despite improvements in overall survival, most patients experience disease progression. Biomarkers derived from a liquid biopsy are appealing for their potential to detect resistance to treatment earlier than computed tomography imaging. However, clinical data concerning microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) in the context of CDK4/6is are lacking. Thus, the present study assessed the use of miRNAs in patients with ABC treated with CDK4/6is. Patients treated for ABC with CDK4/6is between June and August 2022 were eligible. miRNA expression analyses were performed using a TaqMan™ low-density miRNA array. A total of 80 consecutive patients with ABC treated with CDK4/6is at Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (Gliwice, Poland) were assessed, with 14 patients diagnosed with progressive disease at the time of sampling, 55 patients exhibited clinical benefit from CDK4/6i treatment and 11 patients were at the beginning of CDK4/6i treatment. Patients with disease progression had significantly higher levels of miR-21 (P=0.027), miR-34a (P=0.011), miR-193b (P=0.032), miR-200a (P=0.027) and miR-200b (P=0.003) compared with patients who benefitted from CDK4/6i treatment. Significantly higher levels of miR-34a expression were observed in patients with progressive disease than in patients beginning treatment (P=0.031). The present study demonstrated the potential innovative role of circulating miRNAs during CDK4/6i treatment. Plasma-based expression of miR-21, -34a, -193b, -200a and -200b effectively distinguished patients with ABC who responded to CDK4/6i treatment from patients who were resistant. However, longitudinal studies are required to verify the predictive and prognostic potential of miRNA.

Characteristics of in Vivo Model Systems for Ovarian Cancer Studies.

An understanding of the molecular pathogenesis and heterogeneity of ovarian cancer holds promise for the development of early detection strategies and novel, efficient therapies. In this review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of animal models available for basic and preclinical studies. The fruit fly model is suitable mainly for basic research on cellular migration, invasiveness, adhesion, and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Higher-animal models allow to recapitulate the architecture and microenvironment of the tumor. We discuss a syngeneic mice model and the patient derived xenograft model (PDX), both useful for preclinical studies. Conditional knock-in and knock-out methodology allows to manipulate selected genes at a given time and in a certain tissue. Such models have built our knowledge about tumor-initiating genetic events and cell-of-origin of ovarian cancers; it has been shown that high-grade serous ovarian cancer may be initiated in both the ovarian surface and tubal epithelium. It is postulated that clawed frog models could be developed, enabling studies on tumor immunity and anticancer immune response. In laying hen, ovarian cancer develops spontaneously, which provides the opportunity to study the genetic, biochemical, and environmental risk factors, as well as tumor initiation, progression, and histological origin; this model can also be used for drug testing. The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane is another attractive model and allows the study of drug response.

Establishment and Characterization of the Novel High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cell Line OVPA8.

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most frequent histological type of ovarian cancer and the one with worst prognosis. Unfortunately, the majority of established ovarian cancer cell lines which are used in the research have unclear histological origin and probably do not represent HGSOC. Thus, new and reliable models of HGSOC are needed. Ascitic fluid from a patient with recurrent HGSOC was used to establish a stable cancer cell line. Cells were characterized by cytogenetic karyotyping and short tandem repeat (STR) profiling. New generation sequencing was applied to test for hot-spot mutations in 50 cancer-associated genes and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was used to check for TP53 status. Cells were analyzed for expression of several marker genes/proteins by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and immunocytochemistry (ICC). Functional tests were performed to compare OVPA8 cells with five commercially available and frequently used ovarian cancer cell lines: SKOV3, A2780, OVCAR3, ES2, and OAW42. Our newly-established OVPA8 cell line shows morphologic and genetic features consistent with HGSOC, such as epithelial morphology, multiple chromosomal aberrations, TP53 mutation, BRCA1 mutation, and loss of one copy of BRCA2. The OVPA8 line has a stable STR profile. Cells are positive for EpCAM, CK19, and CD44; they have relatively low plating efficiency/ability to form spheroids, a low migration rate, and intermediate invasiveness in matrigel, as compared to other ovarian cancer lines. OVPA8 is sensitive to paclitaxel and resistant to cisplatin. We also tested two FGFR inhibitors; OVPA8 cells were resistant to AZD4547 (AstraZeneca, London, UK), but sensitive to the new inhibitor CPL304-110-01 (Celon Pharma, Lomianki/Kielpin, Poland). We have established and characterized a novel cell line, OVPA8, which can be a valuable preclinical model for studies on high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Advances in ovarian cancer therapy.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage. Current state-of-the-art surgery and chemotherapy result in the high incidence of complete remissions; however, the recurrence rate is also high. For most patients, the disease eventually becomes a continuum of symptom-free periods and recurrence episodes. Different targeted treatment approaches and biological drugs, currently under development, bring the promise of turning ovarian cancer into a manageable chronic disease. In this review, we discuss the current standard in the therapy for ovarian cancer, major recent studies on the new variants of conventional therapies, and new therapeutic approaches, recently approved and/or in clinical trials. The latter include anti-angiogenic therapies, polyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, inhibitors of growth factor signaling, or folate receptor inhibitors, as well as several immunotherapeutic approaches. We also discuss cost-effectiveness of some novel therapies and the issue of better selection of patients for personalized treatment.

Bis-anthracycline WP760 abrogates melanoma cell growth by transcription inhibition, p53 activation and IGF1R downregulation.

Anthracycline chemotherapeutics, e.g. doxorubicin and daunorubicin, are active against a broad spectrum of cancers. Their cytotoxicity is mainly attributed to DNA intercalation, interference with topoisomerase activity, and induction of double-stranded DNA breaks. Since modification of anthracyclines can profoundly affect their pharmacological properties we attempted to elucidate the mechanism of action, and identify possible molecular targets, of bis-anthracycline WP760 which previously demonstrated anti-melanoma activity at low nanomolar concentrations. We studied the effect of WP760 on several human melanoma cell lines derived from tumors in various development stages and having different genetic backgrounds. WP760 inhibited cell proliferation (IC50 = 1-99 nM), impaired clonogenic cell survival (100 nM), and inhibited spheroid growth (≥300 nM). WP760 did not induce double-stranded DNA breaks but strongly inhibited global transcription. Moreover, WP760 caused nucleolar stress and led to activation of the p53 pathway. PCR array analysis showed that WP760 suppressed transcription of ten genes (ABCC1, MTOR, IGF1R, EGFR, GRB2, PRKCA, PRKCE, HDAC4, TXNRD1, AKT1) associated with, inter alia, cytoprotective mechanisms initiated in cancer cells during chemotherapy. Furthermore, WP760 downregulated IGF1R and upregulated PLK2 expression in most of the tested melanoma cell lines. These results suggest that WP760 exerts anti-melanoma activity by targeting global transcription and activation of the p53 pathway and could become suitable as an effective therapeutic agent.

Unsupervised analysis reveals two molecular subgroups of serous ovarian cancer with distinct gene expression profiles and survival.

PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer is typically diagnosed at late stages, and thus, patients' prognosis is poor. Improvement in treatment outcomes depends, at least partly, on better understanding of ovarian cancer biology and finding new molecular markers and therapeutic targets. METHODS: An unsupervised method of data analysis, singular value decomposition, was applied to analyze microarray data from 101 ovarian cancer samples; then, selected genes were validated by quantitative PCR. RESULTS: We found that the major factor influencing gene expression in ovarian cancer was tumor histological type. The next major source of variability was traced to a set of genes mainly associated with extracellular matrix, cell motility, adhesion, and immunological response. Hierarchical clustering based on the expression of these genes revealed two clusters of ovarian cancers with different molecular profiles and distinct overall survival (OS). Patients with higher expression of these genes had shorter OS than those with lower expression. The two clusters did not derive from high- versus low-grade serous carcinomas and were unrelated to histological (ovarian vs. fallopian) origin. Interestingly, there was considerable overlap between identified prognostic signature and a recently described invasion-associated signature related to stromal desmoplastic reaction. Several genes from this signature were validated by quantitative PCR; two of them-DSPG3 and LOX-were validated both in the initial and independent sets of samples and were significantly associated with OS and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We distinguished two molecular subgroups of serous ovarian cancers characterized by distinct OS. Among differentially expressed genes, some may potentially be used as prognostic markers. In our opinion, unsupervised methods of microarray data analysis are more effective than supervised methods in identifying intrinsic, biologically sound sources of variability. Moreover, as histological type of the tumor is the greatest source of variability in ovarian cancer and may interfere with analyses of other features, it seems reasonable to use histologically homogeneous groups of tumors in microarray experiments.