RESUMEN
Objective: Existing literature has sought to characterize the broad cognitive impact of non-central nervous system cancer and its treatment, including chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and hormonal regulation. However, despite the frequency of women that are diagnosed with breast and gynecological cancer, there is limited research on the specific cognitive experiences of women undergoing cancer treatment. Presently, the current literature lacks concise guidance for neuropsychologists to support the cognitive health of women facing cancer, despite the acknowledged impact of cancer interventions and chronic illness on cognitive outcomes. Method: Applying scoping review criteria outlined by Peters et al. (2015) and adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive examination of literature spanning multiple databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, PsychINFO) with a focus on the cognitive impact of cancer treatment on women. Conclusions: Women are subject to unique treatment-related outcomes due to the impact of hormonal alterations, differences in metabolization of certain chemotherapies, and psychosocial risk factors. Despite the known impact of cancer intervention, chronic illness, and cancer-related sequelae on cognitive outcomes, the current literature does not parsimoniously outline best practices for neuropsychologists to promote the health of women experiencing cancer. The current paper (1) provides an overview of the cognitive implications of cancer treatment with an intentional focus on cancers that are more prevalent in women versus men, (2) addresses the characteristics of this impact for women undergoing cancer intervention(s), and (3) provides possible intervention and treatment strategies for mental health providers and neuropsychologists.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: MRI guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (M-LITT) capsulotomy has proven to be efficacious in decreasing refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) related symptomatology yet capsulotomy either via radiosurgery or radiofrequency ablation has in some patients led to increased apathy following surgery. The current case series aims to investigate objective patient-reported change in apathy, disinhibition, depression, and executive dysfunction following anterior capsulotomy via M-LITT for OCD. METHODS: Ten consecutive patients pre- and post-M-LITT completed measures of OCD, apathy, disinhibition, executive dysfunction, and depression (Mtime between = 1.3 years; 0.42-3.7 years). Reliable Change Index (RCI) was used to evaluate change in pre- and post-M-LITT. OCD symptom response was evaluated using percent change (Y-BOCS scores: 24-34 % reduction indicating partial response; ≥35% reduction indicating full response). RESULTS: Positive post-surgical change was noted in OCD symptomatology with >65% reporting a partial or full response. However, six patients endorsed increased apathy with half of the non-responders (e.g., less than <24% score reduction on Y-BOCS) reporting increases in apathy. Patients reported relatively stable disinhibition and executive dysfunction, while over half reported a decrease in depression symptoms. Two of the non-responders and one responder endorsed increased apathy despite stable or improved depression symptoms, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients in the current cohort achieved full-or-partial OCD recovery. Yet, 60% of patients also reported significant increases in apathy, despite experiencing a decrease in depression symptoms, with stable disinhibition and executive dysfunction. Despite these promising improvements in OCD symptomatology following M-LITT, further investigations of the impact of surgery and lesion location on apathy levels is clearly warranted using objective, quantifiable methods.
