Linking Families and Teens: Randomized Controlled Trial Study of a Family Communication and Sexual Health Education Program for Rural Youth and Their Parents.

PURPOSE: This study describes the results of an impact evaluation of the Linking Families and Teens (LiFT) program, a 5-hour program for families in rural communities. LiFT's goal is to reduce unplanned teen pregnancies by increasing family connectedness and youth's self-efficacy, knowledge, and sexual health skills. METHODS: LiFT was externally evaluated using a cluster randomized controlled trial. Families, consisting of one or more dyads of high school aged youth and their parenting adults, were randomly assigned to a study condition. The program was implemented 57 times in rural communities in 9 states. The analytic sample includes 786 youth (407 program and 379 control) with baseline, 3-month, and 12-month data. The analysis used an intent-to-treat framework using ordinary least squares regression to measure effects on each outcome. RESULTS: Fewer LiFT participants experienced a pregnancy than control youth, which was significant at 3 months (net of baseline, 0 program vs. 4 control) and marginally significant at 12 months (net of baseline, 6 program vs. 14 control.) At both follow-up periods, the program had statistically significant effects on youth's frequency of communication with their parenting adults about sexuality and pregnancy prevention and on their perceived competence to prevent pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: LiFT achieved lasting effects on increasing parent-child communication and youth self-efficacy to prevent unwanted pregnancies a full year following the brief, family-focused workshop. LiFT's impact on pregnancy was significant at 3 months and trended in the right direction at 12 months. A larger experimental study of this promising program is warranted to show the long-term effect on pregnancy.

The Use of ACOG Guidelines: Perceived Contraindications to IUD and Implant Use Among Family Planning Providers.

Objectives The uptake and actual use of the current guidelines from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) is unknown. Methods Family planning providers across Colorado and Iowa were surveyed as part of statewide initiatives to reduce unintended pregnancy in 2010 and 2012, both before and after the release of the guidelines. These initiatives focused on the promotion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants. These surveys included questions on providers' views regarding the suitability and safety of the copper T IUD, hormonal IUD, and single rod implant for various subgroups of clients. The results are contrasted with guidelines provided in July of 2011 by ACOG. This strategy provides both baseline and follow-up models about the methods promoted in these guidelines. Results Findings show that there is some improvement in beliefs that IUDs are suitable and safe for women who are post-partum, post-abortion, have had an ectopic pregnancy, are nulliparous, teenagers, or have a history of STIs. However, these clinicians' views are not entirely in alignment with ACOG recommendations in their beliefs that these methods should not be used immediately post-partum or post-abortion. Notable percentages of these clinicians were hesitant to recommend these effective methods for other groups of patients, approved for use by ACOG. Conclusions While the cost of these methods is a barrier to adoption, these data suggest that there are continuing provider barriers to their use as well. The paper concludes with suggestions for further training for family planning providers.

Impact of years of clinical experience on perceived contraindications and barriers to the use of LARC: a survey of family planning providers.

BACKGROUND: Despite their efficacy in preventing unintended pregnancies, intrauterine devices (IUDs) are still relatively underutilized by American women. Although cost of these methods is clearly a barrier to use, IUDs have had a long and sometimes controversial history, and earlier versions were removed from the market. METHODS: This study explores the degree to which the length of licensure for providers is related to their attitudes toward or fears about these methods. Data come from a 2012 survey of 114 clinicians in Colorado and Iowa, collected as part of two, statewide initiatives to reduce unintended pregnancy. Providers were asked about service barriers to prescribing these methods and for which patients they perceived them to be suitable and safe. RESULTS: The most experienced clinicians were the least concerned about uterine perforation and history of the Dalkon Shield, but were more likely to fear a lawsuit over complications. More experienced clinicians were also less approving of Copper T IUDs for all 11 subgroups of women, including nulliparous women and those with histories of sexually transmitted infections. They were also less approving of hormonal IUDs for 10 groups of women, including those with histories of ectopic pregnancies. However, clinicians with the most recent licensure were more conservative in their approval of single rod implants than were the providers with the most years since licensure. CONCLUSIONS: This paper explores potential reasons for these findings and suggests trainings to recognize and overcome these barriers so as to promote consistent and accurate practice across clinicians, regardless of years of experience.

Same-day LARC insertion attitudes and practices.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding clinicians' attitudes about or the extent to which the recommendation to offer same-day insertions for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is applied in practice. STUDY DESIGN: Since 2006, 47 family planning agencies in Colorado and Iowa participated in two initiatives to reduce unintended pregnancy by increasing LARC provision. Clinic directors (n = 45) and clinicians (n = 114) participating in these initiatives were interviewed and surveyed regarding their LARC provision practices and attitudes. RESULTS: Agencies required fewer visits for the contraceptive implant than for the intrauterine device (IUD). Only 18% of agencies typically offered an IUD, and 36% typically offered an implant in one visit. Years of experience and professional title significantly predicted attitudes about the number of visits required to get LARC. DISCUSSION: Barriers must be overcome for full implementation of professional LARC guidelines and for more women to receive chosen methods without the extra burden of multiple visits.