RESUMEN
Expressed emotion (EE) is an established prognostic factor for relapse in schizophrenia. Through critical comments (CC), hostility (H) and emotional overinvolvement (EOI), a relative can be rated as high or low EE, but the role of warmth should also be evaluated in order to consider the influence of a positive affect within the family context. In this study, EE was assessed in a sample of 48 relatives of patients with schizophrenia using the Camberwell Family Interview (CFI). Questionnaires assessing coping (brief-COPE), their wellbeing (World Health Organization Well-Being Index WHO-5) and the socio-demographic variables were also administered. Relatives who expressed a higher level of warmth were found to make fewer CC (5.2 ± 4.6 vs. 8.4 ± 4.6, p = 0.009) and have, on average, higher EOI scores (3.2 ± 1.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.1, p = 0.002) than those who expressed no or very little warmth. High EE was found to be associated with having fewer family members (p = 0.035), while relatives with a higher level of education expressed less warmth (p = 0.007). Relatives with a low level of warmth had higher maladaptive coping scores and tended to score worse for their overall wellbeing in comparison to relatives who showed a higher level of warmth (28.4 ± 5.0 vs. 24.1 ± 5.2, p = 0.006 and 39.1 ± 20.4 vs. 51.3 ± 22.0, p = 0.073, respectively). Since the role of warmth is important, it should be taken into account when designing family interventions, independently from lowering EE. Customized interventions to promote warmth and the routine screening of relatives are recommended.
RESUMEN
This study aimed to validate the Greek version of the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES). A sample of 340 psychiatric outpatients and controls was selected. Part of the sample went through a retest procedure after a two-week period. Due to the absence of equivalent tests, the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory (MDI), the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-Dissociative Disorders Revised (SCID-D-R), and the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale were used. Explanatory factor analysis was performed, resulting in a 28-item scale; the analysis revealed four factors, explaining 61% of total variation: Depersonalization, Amnesia, Absorption, and Miscellaneous. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the DES was 0.95. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the total score between the first and second interview was 0.84. Concurrent and convergent validity, as assessed by correlations with clinical assessment used as a "gold standard," (0.77), MDI (0.96), and Zung scale (0.75) were satisfactory to excellent. The total score on the DES was significantly higher in the clinical sample than in the controls (17.8 ± 16.2 vs. 5.8 ± 7.2, p < .001), indicating high discriminant validity. After the ROC analysis was run, the best compromise between sensitivity/specificity was achieved at the value of 20. The Greek version of the DES is a reliable and valid tool suitable to assess dissociation in clinical and healthy populations.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Disociativos , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Trastornos Disociativos/diagnóstico , Humanos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To explore mental health of patients with olfactory loss due to chronic sinonasal diseases and investigate the effects of age-, gender-, and socio-economic variables on anxiety and depression symptoms. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and eight patients (62 males; mean age: 39.78 ± 16.11 years), suffering from olfactory impairment due to chronic rhinosinusitis and allergic rhinitis and 30 healthy subjects (16 males; mean age, 37.03 ± 13.09 years) were studied. Olfactory function was evaluated using "Sniffin' Sticks" test. All patients completed four validated questionnaires specific for assessing anxiety and depression (Zung Anxiety Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-STAI, Zung Depression Scale, and Beck Depression Inventory-BDI). RESULTS: We found significantly more severe anxiety and depression symptoms in anosmic (all p < 0.001) and hyposmic patients compared to healthy controls. No significant differences were observed between normosmic patients and controls. Scores in all psychological measures were significantly higher in elderly and female patients as well as in low, compared to high, socio-economic status patients. No significant differences were found between low and medium socio-economic level. CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory loss in chronic sinonasal diseases was found to be associated with anxiety and depression symptoms. Moreover, anxiety was correlated with depression. With regard to patients' demographics, female gender and low socioeconomic status proved to be independently correlated with anxiety and depression levels.