Effects of an integrative multimodal inpatient program on fatigue and work ability in patients with Post-COVID Syndrome-a prospective observational study.

Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) is characterized by a variety of non-specific symptoms. One of the leading symptoms is fatigue. So far, there is no evidence-based causal therapy established and treatment of PCS is primarily symptom-oriented. The Clinic for Internal and Integrative Medicine in Bamberg, Germany, offers a comprehensive multimodal integrative inpatient therapy for PCS patients. Within a prospective uncontrolled observational study, the results of N = 79 patients were analysed. Post-COVID fatigue patients were hospitalized for up to 14 days. The treatment consists of individual modules depending on the patient's needs. It includes a wide range of integrative non-pharmacological treatment modalities. Outcomes were assessed before and after the inpatient treatment as well as 6 months after discharge from the hospital. Results show that fatigue of post-COVID patients in this study (M = 76.30, SD = 10.18, N = 64) was initially significantly higher than in the subsample "women aged 60-92 years" of the general German population (M = 51.5, Schwarz et al. [Schwarz et al. in Onkologie 26:140-144, 2003]; T(63) = 19.50, p < .001). Fatigue was significantly and clinically relevant reduced directly after discharge (MT1 = 76.21, SD = 11.38, N = 42; MT2 = 66.57, SD = 15.55, N = 42), F(1, 41) = 19.80, p < .001, partial eta squared = .326, as well as six months after discharge (MT3 = 65.31, SD = 17.20, N = 42), F(1, 41), p < .001, partial eta squared = .371. Additionally, self-reported ability to work (NRS, 0-10) improved significantly from admission (MT1 = 2.54, SD = 2.23, N = 39) to discharge (MT2 = 4.26, SD = 2.60, N = 39), F(1, 38) = 26.37, p < .001, partial eta squared = .410), as well as to six months later (MT3 = 4.41, SD = 3.23, N = 39), F(1, 38) = 15.00, p < .001, partial eta squared = .283. The study showed that patients suffering from chronic post-COVID syndrome for several months can achieve a significant improvement in their leading fatigue symptoms and a significant improvement in the subjective assessment of their ability to work through a comprehensive two-week multimodal integrative inpatient program.

Evaluation of a Multimodal Stress Management and Comprehensive Lifestyle Modification Program on Quality of Life and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial with 9-Month Follow-Up.

INTRODUCTION: Stress and lifestyle factors impact the course of Crohn's disease (CD). Our primary objective was to assess whether patients with CD benefit from a mind-body-medicine stress management and lifestyle modification (MBM) program. METHODS: This 9-month two-arm pilot trial was conducted in Bamberg, Germany (2020-2021). Patients (18-75 years) with mild to moderate activity of CD and stable medication were enrolled and randomly assigned to either a 10-week MBM program (intervention group, IG) or a single 90-min education session (waiting list control group, CG). Primary endpoints were quality of life (IBDQ) and disease activity (HBI). Secondary endpoints were emotional distress, core self-evaluation, and inflammatory biomarkers 3 and 9 months after baseline assessment. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 37 patients (IG: n = 19, mean ± SD age 49.6 ± 13.1 years, 68% female; CG: 18, 46.8 ± 11.4, 67% female). Immediately after the intervention, 79% (IG) and 44% (CG) experienced a clinically relevant improvement (IBDQ score ≥16 points). This was similar after 9 months (63% vs. 44%). There was no difference in disease activity (3 months: p = 0.082, 95% CI -1.3 to 2.6; 9 months: p = 0.251, 95% CI -1.2 to 2.5). Secondary outcomes indicated improvements in emotional distress, core self-evaluation, erythrocyte sedimentation rate after three and in emotional distress, T-cell profiling in the blood, and fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin group after 9 months in the IG. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested benefits of a multimodal stress management and lifestyle modification program for patients with CD. Larger trials are needed to determine if the program can supplement or at least partially replace pharmacological treatment approaches.

Pre-treatment expectations and their influence on subjective symptom change in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Treatment expectations reportedly shape treatment outcomes, but have not been studied in the context of multimodal therapy in Crohn's disease (CD). Therefore, the current study investigated the role of treatment expectations for subjective symptom changes in CD patients who have undergone an integrative multimodal therapy program. METHODS: Validated questionnaires were completed at the start of the treatment program and post intervention. Pre-treatment expectations and experienced symptom change were assessed with the Generic Rating Scale for Previous Treatment Experiences, Treatment Expectations, and Treatment Effects (GEEE); stress levels were quantified with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and disease specific quality of life was quantified with the disease-specific Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ). We performed multiple linear and Bayesian regression to determine how expectations related to symptom change. RESULTS: N = 71 CD patients (66.2% female) were included. Stronger expectations regarding symptom improvement (b = 0.422, t = 3.70, p < .001) were associated with higher experienced symptom improvement. Additionally, Bayesian analysis provided strong evidence for including improvement expectations as a predictor of improvement experience (BFinclusion = 13.78). CONCLUSIONS: In line with research in other disorders, we found that positive treatment expectations were associated with experienced symptom improvement. In contrast, we found no indication that an experience of symptom worsening was associated with positive or negative baseline treatment expectations. Induction of positive expectations might be a potential avenue for improving treatment outcomes in CD therapy.

Mind-body-medicine and comprehensive lifestyle-modification in patients with Crohn's disease-Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial under pandemic circumstances.

Introduction: Mind-body medicine (MBM) focuses on stress reduction and lifestyle changes. The primary objective of this pilot trial was to test study feasibility of a complex integrative MBM program for patients with Crohn's disease (CD), especially in rural regions, and under pandemic conditions. Methods: Patients were stratified and randomized to the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG). The intervention included a weekly 6-h session for 10 weeks. The CG (waiting list) received an initial 90-min workshop and started the intervention 9 months later. The primary outcome for study feasibility was recruitment and retention rates, as well as reasons for drop-out. The trial took place in Bamberg, Germany (September 2020 to December 2021). Results: Totally 700 members of the German Crohn's and Colitis Organization-DCCV-were contacted. A total of 15% (102/700; 95% CI 12-17%) expressed interest to participate. Following screening, 41% (95% CI 32-50) were randomized to IG (n = 22) and CG (n = 20). The patients were on average (±standard deviation) 48 ± 13 years old, 67% were female, and have been suffering from CD for 20 ± 12 years. Patients traveled 71.5 ± 48.7 km (range: 9-227 km) to the intervention with no differences between IG and CG. At the 6-month follow-up, 36/42 (86%, 95% CI 74-95%) participants completed final assessment and 19/22 (86%, 95% CI 70-100%) the intervention. The most important reasons for non-responding were work-related (12/60; 20%) and for or drop-out pandemic-related anxiety (3/6). No patient and staff member became infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the study. Conclusion: The feasibility of the MBM study was confirmed in terms of predefined recruitment and retention criteria, both despite difficult conditions (including the rural setting) and patients' fears associated with the pandemic. It was crucial to develop appropriate hygiene and safety concepts that enable chronically ill patients to participate in helpful group-based interventions even under pandemic conditions. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05182645.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): results from a German nationwide survey of 2019 compared to a previous survey of 2002.

INTRODUCTION: In 2002, 50% of patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) had used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Germany. This survey aimed to examine changes from 2002 to 2019 and predictors of CAM use in 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2019, a questionnaire was sent randomly to 1000 members of the German Crohn's Colitis Association, the same sampling strategy was chosen 2002. Items assessed included, demographic characteristics, IBD diagnosis and disease history, medication use, patients' symptoms/quality of life, anxiety/depression and use of complementary therapies. RESULTS: The 2019 sample only differed slightly in case of gender (55% women) and disease (43% Ulcerative Colitis) from the 2002 sample. In 2019, 54% (227/417) reported having ever used CAM and 75% (396/417) planned to use CAM for their IBD in the future, whereby there was an evidence of a decrease in exclusive CAM use from 2002 (28%; 96/344) to 2019 (16%, 37/277; BF<.01). In logistic regression analyses, ulcerative colitis compared to Crohn's Disease (OR 0.59, p=.005), side effects of standard therapy (OR 1.94, p=.012), the use of corticosteroids (OR 0.54, p=.038) or biologics (OR 1.90, p = .020) and lower quality of life (OR 0.96, p=.002) were associated with CAM use in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Every other patient with IBD used CAM and has thus indicated a need for a safe and evidence-based combination of conventional and complementary approaches. This would further support the desired decrease in exclusive -alternative- CAM use.

Multimodal stress reduction and lifestyle modification program for patients with ulcerative colitis: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Over 2 million people in Europe are affected by ulcerative colitis, which often severely impacts the quality of life of those concerned. Among other factors, lifestyle and psychosocial factors seem to play an important role in pathogenesis and course of the disease and can be addressed as a complement to pharmacotherapy in comprehensive lifestyle modification programs. METHODS: This qualitative study as part of a mixed methods approach was carried out in the framework of a randomized controlled trial that examined the effect of a comprehensive lifestyle-modification-program (10-week-day clinic program) on quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 out of 47 patients of the intervention group after the program. The aim was to deepen, supplement, and expand the quantitative results of the trial, i.e. to examine individual perceptions of the intervention, including subjective changes and the extent to which elements of the program were integrated into everyday life. Qualitative content analysis techniques utilizing the software MAXQDA were used. RESULTS: Patients with ulcerative colitis in our sample often experienced multiple negative effects on different levels (physical, psychological, and social) and impaired quality of life because of their disease. They reported generally positively about the program itself, and emphasized perceived positive changes regarding their psychological and physical well-being. The interviews indicated a good implementation of elements learned during the intervention in everyday life. CONCLUSIONS: Through participation in a comprehensive lifestyle modification program in the structure of a day clinic complementary to pharmacotherapy, patients with ulcerative colitis can reduce psychosocial stress and physical symptoms and thereby actively improve their well-being and general quality of life. This patient-centered, holistic approach was rated as useful in countering the complex disease manifestation as well as meeting the individual needs of the patients regarding their disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02721823.