The use of PD-1 functional knockout rats to study idiosyncratic adverse reactions to nevirapine.

Idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) are associated with significant patient morbidity/mortality and lead to considerable drug candidate attrition in drug development. Their idiosyncratic nature makes the study of IDRs difficult. In particular, nevirapine is associated with a relatively high risk of serious skin rash and liver injury. We previously found that nevirapine causes a similar skin rash in female Brown Norway rats, but these animals do not develop significant liver injury. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) is an immune checkpoint involved in immune tolerance, and anti-PD-1 antibodies have been used to treat cancer. However, they increase the risk of liver injury caused by co-administered drugs. We found that PD-1-/- mice are more susceptible to drug-induced liver injury, but PD-1-/- mice are not a good model for all drugs. In particular, they do not develop a skin rash when treated with nevirapine, at least in part because they lack the sulfotransferase in their skin that forms the reactive metabolite responsible for the rash. Therefore, we developed a PD-1 mutant (PD-1m/m) rat, with an excision in the ligand-binding domain of PD-1, to test whether nevirapine would cause a more serious skin rash in these animals. The PD-1m/m rat was based on a Sprague Dawley background, which has a lower incidence of skin rash than Brown Norway rats. The treated PD-1m/m rats developed more severe liver injury than PD-1-/- mice, but in contrast to expectations, they did not develop a skin rash. Functional knockouts provide a unique tool to study the mechanisms of IDRs.

The role of corticosterone in nevirapine-induced idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.

Nevirapine, an antiretroviral used in the treatment of HIV, is associated with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI), a potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction. Its usage has decreased due to this concern, but it is still widely used in lower-resource settings. In general, the mechanisms underlying idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) are poorly understood, but evidence indicates that most are immune-mediated. There is very limited understanding of the early immune response following administration of drugs associated with IDRs, which likely occurs due to reactive metabolite formation. In this work, we aimed to characterize the links between covalent binding of nevirapine, the development of an early immune response, and the subsequent liver injury using a mouse model. We describe initial attempts to characterize an early immune response to nevirapine followed by the discovery that nevirapine induced the release of corticosterone. Corticosterone release was partially associated with the degree of drug covalent binding in the liver but was also likely mediated by additional mechanisms at higher drug doses. Transcriptomic analysis confirmed metabolic activation, glucocorticoid signaling, and decreased immune activation; GDF-15 also warrants further investigation as part of the immune response to nevirapine. Finally, glucocorticoid blockade preceding the first dose of nevirapine attenuated nevirapine-induced liver injury at 3 weeks, suggesting that acute glucocorticoid signaling is harmful in the context of nevirapine-induced liver injury. This work demonstrates that nevirapine induces acute corticosterone release, which contributes to delayed-onset liver injury. It also has implications for screening drug candidates for IDILI risk and preventing nevirapine-induced IDILI.

Involvement of Extracellular Vesicles in the Proinflammatory Response to Clozapine: Implications for Clozapine-Induced Agranulocytosis.

Most idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) appear to be immune-mediated, but mechanistic events preceding severe reaction onset remain poorly defined. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) may contribute to both innate and adaptive immune phases of IDRs, and changes in extracellular vesicle (EV) cargo have been detected post-exposure to several IDR-associated drugs. To explore the hypothesis that EVs are also a source of DAMPs in the induction of the immune response preceding drug-induced agranulocytosis, the proteome and immunogenicity of clozapine- (agranulocytosis-associated drug) and olanzapine- (non-agranulocytosis-associated drug) exposed EVs were compared in two preclinical models: THP-1 macrophages and Sprague-Dawley rats. Compared with olanzapine, clozapine induced a greater increase in the concentration of EVs enriched from both cell culture media and rat serum. Moreover, treatment of drug-naïve THP-1 cells with clozapine-exposed EVs induced an inflammasome-dependent response, supporting a potential role for EVs in immune activation. Proteomic and bioinformatic analyses demonstrated an increased number of differentially expressed proteins with clozapine that were enriched in pathways related to inflammation, myeloid cell chemotaxis, wounding, transforming growth factor-ß signaling, and negative regulation of stimuli response. These data indicate that, although clozapine and olanzapine exposure both alter the protein cargo of EVs, clozapine-exposed EVs carry mediators that exhibit significantly greater immunogenicity. Ultimately, this supports the working hypothesis that drugs associated with a risk of IDRs induce cell stress, release of proinflammatory mediators, and early immune activation that precedes severe reaction onset. Further studies characterizing EVs may elucidate biomarkers that predict IDR risk during development of drug candidates. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This work demonstrates that clozapine, an idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis (IDIAG)-associated drug, but not olanzapine, a safer structural analogue, induces an acute proinflammatory response and increases extracellular vesicle (EV) release in two preclinical models. Moreover, clozapine-exposed EVs are more immunogenic, as measured by their ability to activate inflammasomes, and contain more differentially expressed proteins, highlighting a novel role for EVs during the early immune response to clozapine and enhancing our mechanistic understanding of IDIAG and other idiosyncratic reactions.

The development and characterization of a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 functional knockout rat as a tool to study idiosyncratic drug reactions.

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are rare but serious adverse drug reactions unrelated to the known therapeutic properties of the drug and manifest in only a small percentage of the treated population. Animal models play an important role in advancing mechanistic studies examining idiosyncratic drug reactions. However, to be useful, they must possess similarities to those seen clinically. Although mice currently represent the dominant mammalian genetic model, rats are advantageous in many areas of pharmacologic study where their physiology can be examined in greater detail and is more akin to that seen in humans. In the area of immunology, this includes autoimmune responses and susceptibility to diabetes, in which rats more accurately mimic disease states in humans compared with mice. For example, oral nevirapine treatment can induce an immune-mediated skin rash in humans and rats, but not in mice due to the absence of the sulfotransferase required to form reactive metabolites of nevirapine within the skin. Using CRISPR-mediated gene editing, we developed a modified line of transgenic rats in which a segment of IgG-like ectodomain containing the core PD-1 interaction motif containing the native ligand and therapeutic antibody domain in exon 2 was deleted. Removal of this region critical for mediating PD-1/PD-L1 interactions resulted in animals with an increased immune response resulting in liver injury when treated with amodiaquine.

Potential Involvement of Sulfotransferase in the Mechanism of Lamotrigine-induced Skin Rash.

The mechanism of drug-induced skin rash is not well understood. Circumstantial evidence suggests that the covalent binding of a reactive metabolite is involved in the mechanism of most idiosyncratic drug reactions. However, there is a limited quantity of drug metabolizing enzymes in the skin, except for sulfotransferases. It is possible that some drugs are metabolized to reactive sulfate metabolites that are responsible for skin rashes. For example, nevirapine-induced skin rash involves metabolism of nevirapine to 12-hydroxy-nevirapine, which is further metabolized by sulfotransferase in the skin to a reactive benzylic sulfate that covalently binds to proteins. The working hypothesis is that lamotrigine, valdecoxib, and sertraline skin rashes involve the formation of reactive sulfate in the skin. Lamotrigine-N-oxide, hydroxy-valdecoxib, and hydroxy-sertraline were tested as substrates with known human sulfotransferases. Hydroxy-valdecoxib and the benzylic alcohol metabolite of sertraline were not substrates for human sulfotransferases. Therefore, this pathway is presumably not involved in the mechanism by which they cause skin rashes. In contrast, lamotrigine-N-oxide is a substrate for several human sulfotransferases and the sulfate is chemically reactive. Furthermore, lamotrigine-N-sulfate not only alkylates proteins as we described previously but also forms the sulfate of tyrosine, suggesting another possible mechanism for protein modification. This study has further added to the understanding of the potential of the sulfotransferase pathways and protein sulfation to play a role in drug-induced skin rash.

The Role of Myeloperoxidase in Clozapine-Induced Inflammation: A Mechanistic Update for Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Agranulocytosis.

The risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis (IDIAG) markedly constrains the use of clozapine, a neuroleptic with unparalleled efficacy. Most clozapine patients experience an early inflammatory response, likely a necessary step in IDIAG onset. However, most patients do not progress to IDIAG, presumably because of the requirement of specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, T cell receptors, and other unknown factors. We established that clozapine activates inflammasomes and that myeloperoxidase bioactivation of clozapine generates neoantigens, but the connection between these early mechanistic events remained unknown and, thus, was the aim of this work. We found that the myeloperoxidase inhibitor PF-1355 attenuated myeloperoxidase activity in phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-differentiated THP-1 macrophages, and it also attenuated clozapine-induced release of inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-1ß, CXCL1, and C-reactive protein). In vivo, pretreatment of Sprague Dawley rats with PF-1355 significantly attenuated clozapine-induced increases in neutrophil mobilization from the bone marrow to the blood and spleen, as determined using differential blood counts and flow cytometry. Moreover, the clozapine-triggered release of inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-1ß, calprotectin, CXCL1, and α-1-acid glycoprotein) from the liver, spleen, and bone marrow was dampened by myeloperoxidase inhibition. These data support the working hypothesis that oxidation of clozapine to a reactive metabolite by myeloperoxidase is critical for induction of the inflammatory response to clozapine. Ultimately, a better mechanistic understanding of the early events involved in the immune response to clozapine may elucidate ways to prevent IDIAG, enabling safer, more frequent therapeutic use of this and potentially other highly efficacious drugs.

Sulfation of 12-hydroxy-nevirapine by human SULTs and the effects of genetic polymorphisms of SULT1A1 and SULT2A1.

Nevirapine (NVP) is an effective drug for the treatment of HIV infections, but its use is limited by a high incidence of severe skin rash and liver injury. 12-Hydroxynevirapine (12-OH-NVP) is the major metabolite of nevirapine. There is strong evidence that the sulfate of 12-OH-NVP is responsible for the skin rash. While several cytosolic sulfotransferases (SULTs) have been shown to be capable of sulfating 12-OH-NVP, the exact mechanism of sulfation in vivo is unclear. The current study aimed to clarify human SULT(s) and human organs that are capable of sulfating 12-OH-NVP and investigate the metabolic sulfation of 12-OH-NVP using cultured HepG2 human hepatoma cells. Enzymatic assays revealed that of the thirteen human SULTs, SULT1A1 and SULT2A1 displayed strong 12-OH-NVP-sulfating activity. 1-Phenyl-1-hexanol (PHHX), which applied topically prevents the skin rash in rats, inhibited 12-OH-NVP sulfation by SULT1A1 and SULT2A1, implying the involvement of these two enzymes in the sulfation of 12-OH-NVP in vivo. Among five human organ cytosols analyzed, liver cytosol displayed the strongest 12-OH-NVP-sulfating activity, while a low but significant activity was detected with skin cytosol. Cultured HepG2 cells were shown to be capable of sulfating 12-OH-NVP. The effects of genetic polymorphisms of SULT1A1 and SULT2A1 genes on the sulfation of 12-OH-NVP by SULT1A1 and SULT2A1 allozymes were investigated. Two SULT1A1 allozymes, Arg37Asp and Met223Val, showed no detectable 12-OH-NVP-sulfating activity, while a SULT2A1 allozyme, Met57Thr, displayed significantly higher 12-OH-NVP-sulfating activity compared with the wild-type enzyme. Collectively, these results contribute to a better understanding of the involvement of sulfation in NVP-induced skin rash and provide clues to the possible role of SULT genetic polymorphisms in the risk of this adverse reaction.

Idiosyncratic Drug Reactions: A 35-Year Chemical Research in Toxicology Perspective.

When Larry Marnett founded Chemical Research in Toxicology, the study of idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) was in its infancy. There was evidence that IDRs involve chemically reactive metabolites, and many of the papers in Chemical Research in Toxicology investigated the bioactivation of drugs. However, it became clear that not all drugs that form reactive metabolites are associated with a high risk of IDRs, and some drugs that do not appear to form reactive metabolites do cause IDRs. Some of the early Chemical Research in Toxicology papers investigated involvement of the adaptive immune system in the mechanism of IDRs, and HLA associations provided strong evidence for an immune mechanism of IDRs. This led to the question of how reactive metabolites might induce an immune response. The classic hapten hypothesis provided an obvious explanation, but a new hypothesis the danger hypothesis, added another dimension. Although there are common features to IDRs, it is becoming increasingly clear that there are also many differences in the mechanisms caused by different drugs. Other pharmacological effects of drugs may also play a role in the mechanism, and that is obviously true of IDRs caused by biological agents. The requirement for specific HLA and T-cell receptors is presumably the major factor that makes IDRs idiosyncratic. However, an innate immune response is required to prime the adaptive immune response. In contrast to the adaptive immune response, the innate immune response is unlikely to be idiosyncratic, and studies of the innate immune response to drugs may provide a much more accurate way to screen drugs for their potential to cause IDRs. For essential drugs that are known to cause IDRs, it may be possible to markedly decrease risk by a slow dose titration to induce immune tolerance. Significant progress has been made in the study of IDRs, but there is still a long way to go.

Clozapine Induces an Acute Proinflammatory Response That Is Attenuated by Inhibition of Inflammasome Signaling: Implications for Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Agranulocytosis.

Although clozapine is a highly efficacious schizophrenia treatment, it is under-prescribed due to the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis (IDIAG). Clinical data indicate that most patients starting clozapine experience a transient immune response early in treatment and a similar response has been observed in clozapine-treated rats, but the mechanism by which clozapine triggers this transient inflammation remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize the role of inflammasome activation during the early immune response to clozapine using in vitro and in vivo models. In both differentiated and nondifferentiated human monocytic THP-1 cells, clozapine, but not its structural analogues fluperlapine and olanzapine, caused inflammasome-dependent caspase-1 activation and IL-1ß release that was inhibited using the caspase-1 inhibitor yVAD-cmk. In Sprague Dawley rats, a single dose of clozapine caused an increase in circulating neutrophils and a decrease in lymphocytes within hours of drug administration along with transient spikes in the proinflammatory mediators IL-1ß, CXCL1, and TNF-α in the blood, spleen, and bone marrow. Blockade of inflammasome signaling using the caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765 or the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra attenuated this inflammatory response. These data indicate that caspase-1-dependent IL-1ß production is fundamental for the induction of the early immune response to clozapine and, furthermore, support the general hypothesis that inflammasome activation is a common mechanism by which drugs associated with the risk of idiosyncratic reactions trigger early immune system activation. Ultimately, inhibition of inflammasome signaling may reduce the risk of IDIAG, enabling safer, more frequent use of clozapine in patients.

The Emerging Role of the Innate Immune Response in Idiosyncratic Drug Reactions.

Idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) range from relatively common, mild reactions to rarer, potentially life-threatening adverse effects that pose significant risks to both human health and successful drug discovery. Most frequently, IDRs target the liver, skin, and blood or bone marrow. Clinical data indicate that most IDRs are mediated by an adaptive immune response against drug-modified proteins, formed when chemically reactive species of a drug bind to self-proteins, making them appear foreign to the immune system. Although much emphasis has been placed on characterizing the clinical presentation of IDRs and noting implicated drugs, limited research has focused on the mechanisms preceding the manifestations of these severe responses. Therefore, we propose that to address the knowledge gap between drug administration and onset of a severe IDR, more research is required to understand IDR-initiating mechanisms; namely, the role of the innate immune response. In this review, we outline the immune processes involved from neoantigen formation to the result of the formation of the immunologic synapse and suggest that this framework be applied to IDR research. Using four drugs associated with severe IDRs as examples (amoxicillin, amodiaquine, clozapine, and nevirapine), we also summarize clinical and animal model data that are supportive of an early innate immune response. Finally, we discuss how understanding the early steps in innate immune activation in the development of an adaptive IDR will be fundamental in risk assessment during drug development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although there is some understanding that certain adaptive immune mechanisms are involved in the development of idiosyncratic drug reactions, the early phase of these immune responses remains largely uncharacterized. The presented framework refocuses the investigation of IDR pathogenesis from severe clinical manifestations to the initiating innate immune mechanisms that, in contrast, may be quite mild or clinically silent. A comprehensive understanding of these early influences on IDR onset is crucial for accurate risk prediction, IDR prevention, and therapeutic intervention.

Mechanism of idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI): unresolved basic issues.

Clinical features of idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI) are well described in cases that have been assessed for causality using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), but our understanding of the mechanistic steps leading to injury is fragmentary. The difficulties describing mechanistic events can be traced back to the lack of an animal model of experimental idiosyncratic DILI that can mimic the genetic requirements of human idiosyncratic DILI. However, immune tolerance plays a dominant role in the immune response of the liver, and impairment of immune tolerance with immune checkpoint inhibitors increases DILI in both humans and animals. This may provide one method to study the individual steps involved. In general. the human DILI liver is a secret keeper providing little insight into what occurs in the diseased organ. Sufficient evidence exists that most idiosyncratic cases are mediated by the adaptive immune system, which depends on stimulation of the innate immune system, but the triggering factors are unknown. It is attractive to hypothesize that the gut microbiome plays a role; however, it is very difficult to study. Similarly, exosomes are likely to play an important role in communication between hepatic cells and the immune system, but there is a lack of data on blood exosomes in affected patients. Reactive metabolites are likely to play an important role. This is supported by the current analysis, which revealed an association between metabolism by cytochrome P450 and drugs most commonly involved in causing idiosyncratic DILI with causality verified by RUCAM. Circumstantial evidence suggests that reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by cytochrome P450 could be responsible for the initial steps of injury, but details are unknown. In conclusion, most of the mechanistic steps leading to idiosyncratic DILI remain unclear.

Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Mechanistic and Clinical Challenges.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) remains a significant problem for patients and drug development. The idiosyncratic nature of IDILI makes mechanistic studies difficult, and little is known of its pathogenesis for certain. Circumstantial evidence suggests that most, but not all, IDILI is caused by reactive metabolites of drugs that are bioactivated by cytochromes P450 and other enzymes in the liver. Additionally, there is overwhelming evidence that most IDILI is mediated by the adaptive immune system; one example being the association of IDILI caused by specific drugs with specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, and this may in part explain the idiosyncratic nature of these reactions. The T cell receptor repertoire likely also contributes to the idiosyncratic nature. Although most of the liver injury is likely mediated by the adaptive immune system, specifically cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, adaptive immune activation first requires an innate immune response to activate antigen presenting cells and produce cytokines required for T cell proliferation. This innate response is likely caused by either a reactive metabolite or some form of cell stress that is clinically silent but not idiosyncratic. If this is true it would make it possible to study the early steps in the immune response that in some patients can lead to IDILI. Other hypotheses have been proposed, such as mitochondrial injury, inhibition of the bile salt export pump, unfolded protein response, and oxidative stress although, in most cases, it is likely that they are also involved in the initiation of an immune response rather than representing a completely separate mechanism. Using the clinical manifestations of liver injury from a number of examples of IDILI-associated drugs, this review aims to summarize and illustrate these mechanistic hypotheses.

Testing Possible Risk Factors for Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Using an Amodiaquine Mouse Model and Co-treatment with 1-Methyl-d-Tryptophan or Acetaminophen.

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are unpredictable adverse reactions. Although most such adverse reactions appear to be immune mediated, their exact mechanism(s) remain elusive. The idiosyncratic drug reaction most associated with serious consequences is idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI). We have developed a mouse model of amodiaquine (AQ)-induced liver injury that reflects the clinical characteristics of IDILI in humans. This was accomplished by impairing immune tolerance by using PD-1-/- mice and an antibody against CTLA-4. PD-1 and CTLA-4 are known negative regulators of lymphocyte activation, which promote immune tolerance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become important tools for the treatment of cancer. However, as in our model, immune checkpoint inhibitors increase the risk of IDILI with drugs that have an incidence of causing liver injury. Agents such as 1-methyl-d-tryptophan (D-1-MT), an inhibitor of the immunosuppressive indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) enzyme, have also been proposed as anti-cancer treatments. Another possible risk factor for the induction of an immune response is the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Acetaminophen (APAP) is known to cause acute liver injury, and it is likely to cause the release of DAMPs. Therefore, either of these agents could increase the risk of IDILI, although through different mechanisms. If true, then this would have clinical implications. We found that co-treatment with D-1-MT paradoxically decreased liver injury in our model, and although APAP appeared to slightly increase AQ-induced liver injury, the difference was not significant. Such results highlight the complexity of the immune response, which makes potential interactions difficult to predict.

Severe cutaneous adverse reaction associated with antiseizure medications: Diagnosis, management, and prevention.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are potentially life-threatening, with considerable morbidity and mortality. They are nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions that occur in specifically predisposed patients with delayed T-cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are among the drugs that can induce SCAR. Increased awareness of SCAR among clinicians treating patients with ASMs is critically important for early recognition of symptoms, prompt identification and removal of the causal drug, and early intervention to reduce SCAR-related acute and long-term morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis, management, and prevention of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) are reviewed, along with the current understanding of the pathomechanisms and role of genetics in SCAR development. Supportive care and immunomodulating treatments for SCAR are discussed.

Liver Injury Caused by Green Tea Extract in PD-1-/- Mice: An Impaired Immune Tolerance Model for Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is an idiosyncratic drug reaction that is specific to an individual and can lead to liver failure and even death. The mechanism of IDILI remains poorly understood, but most IDILI appears to be immune-mediated. We have developed the first validated animal model by using a PD-1-/- mouse model in combination with anti-CTLA-4 to block immune checkpoints and impair immune tolerance. Treatment of these mice with drugs that cause IDILI in humans led to delayed-onset liver injury with characteristics similar to IDILI in humans. The current study investigates the effects of green tea extract, a weight-loss dietary supplement that has been reported to cause IDILI in humans. Green tea extracts contain a highly variable content of catechins including (-)-epigallocatechin gallate, the major catechin in green tea formulations. If the liver injury caused by green tea extract in humans is immune-mediated, it may occur in our impaired immune tolerance model. Female PD-1-/- mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibody and green tea extract (500 mg/kg), a dose that is considered a no-observed-adverse-effect level for liver in rodents, produced a delayed onset increase in serum alanine transaminase levels and an increase in hepatic CD8+ T cells. In contrast, the response in male PD-1-/- mice was less pronounced, and there was no evidence of liver injury in wild-type mice. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the IDILI caused by green tea extract is immune-mediated and is similar to IDILI caused by medications that are associated with IDILI.

Investigating the Mechanism of Trimethoprim-Induced Skin Rash and Liver Injury.

Trimethoprim (TMP)-induced skin rash and liver injury are likely to involve the formation of reactive metabolites. Analogous to nevirapine-induced skin rash, 1 possible reactive metabolite is the sulfate conjugate of α-hydroxyTMP, a metabolite of TMP. We synthesized this sulfate and found that it reacts with proteins in vitro. We produced a TMP-antiserum and found covalent binding of TMP in the liver of TMP-treated rats. However, we found that α-hydroxyTMP is not a substrate for human sulfotransferases, and we did not detect covalent binding in the skin of TMP-treated rats. Although less reactive than the sulfate, α-hydroxyTMP was found to covalently bind to liver and skin proteins in vitro. Even though there was covalent binding to liver proteins, TMP did not cause liver injury in rats or in our impaired immune tolerance mouse model that has been able to unmask the ability of other drugs to cause immune-mediated liver injury. This is likely because there was much less covalent binding of TMP in the livers of TMP-treated mice than TMP-treated rats. It is possible that some patients have a sulfotransferase that can produce the reactive benzylic sulfate; however, α-hydroxyTMP, itself, has sufficient reactivity to covalently bind to proteins in the skin and may be responsible for TMP-induced skin rash. Interspecies and interindividual differences in TMP metabolism may be 1 factor that determines the risk of TMP-induced skin rash. This study provides important data required to understand the mechanism of TMP-induced skin rash and drug-induced skin rash in general.

Reactive metabolite of gefitinib activates inflammasomes: implications for gefitinib-induced idiosyncratic reaction.

The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) have been approved for non-small cell lung cancer. Although EGFR TKIs are less toxic than traditional cytotoxic therapies, they cause many severe idiosyncratic drug reactions. Reactive metabolites can cause cellular damage with the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which is thought to be involved in immune activation. Inflammasomes can be activated by DAMPs, and this may be a common mechanism by which DAMPs initiate an immune response. We tested the ability of afatinib, dacomitinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib to induce the release of DAMPs that activate inflammasomes. Human hepatocarcinoma functional liver cell-4 (FLC-4) cells were used for bioactivation of drugs, and the detection of inflammasome activation was performed with the human macrophage cell line, THP-1 cells. Gefitinib is known to be oxidized to a reactive iminoquinone metabolite. We found that the supernatant from the incubation of gefitinib with FLC-4 cells for 7 days led to increased caspase-1 activity and production of IL-1ß by THP-1 cells. In the supernatant of FLC-4 cells with gefitinib, the heat shock protein (HSP) 40, 70 and 90 were significantly increased. In addition, activated THP-1 cells secreted high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein. These results support the hypothesis that the reactive iminoquinone metabolite can cause the release of DAMPs from hepatocytes, which in turn, can activate inflammasomes. Inflammasome activation may be an important step in the activation of the immune system by gefitinib, which in some patients, can cause immune-related adverse events.

Best practices for detection, assessment and management of suspected immune-mediated liver injury caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors during drug development.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown significant efficacy in patients with various malignancies, however, they are associated with a wide range of immune-related toxicities affecting many organs, including the liver. Immune-mediated liver injury caused by checkpoint inhibitors (ILICI) is a distinctive form of drug induced liver injury (DILI), that differs from most DILI types in presumed underlying mechanism, incidence, and response to therapeutic interventions. Despite increased awareness of ILICI and other immune-related adverse effects of ICIs reflected by recent guidelines for their management in post marketing clinical practice, there is lack of uniform best practices to address ILICI risk during drug development. As efforts to develop safer and more effective ICIs for additional indications grow, and as combination therapies including ICIs are increasingly investigated, there is a growing need for consistent practices for ILICI in drug development. This publication summarizes current best practices to optimize the monitoring, diagnosis, assessment, and management of suspected ILICI in clinical trials using ICI as a single agent and in combination with other ICIs or other oncological agents. It is one of several publications developed by the IQ DILI Initiative in collaboration with DILI experts from academia and regulatory agencies. Recommended best practices are outlined pertaining to hepatic inclusion and exclusion criteria, monitoring of liver tests, ILICI detection, approach to a suspected ILICI signal, causality assessment, hepatic discontinuation rules and additional medical treatment.

Mechanistic Studies of Idiosyncratic DILI: Clinical Implications.

The idiosyncratic nature of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) makes mechanistic studies very difficult, and little is known with certainty. However, the fact that the IDILI caused by some drugs is associated with specific HLA genotypes provides strong evidence that it is mediated by the adaptive immune system. This is also consistent with the histology and the general characteristics of IDILI. However, there are other mechanistic hypotheses. Various in vitro and in vivo systems have been used to test hypotheses. Two other hypotheses are mitochondrial injury and inhibition of the bile salt export pump. It is possible that these mechanisms are responsible for some cases of IDILI or that these mechanisms are complementary and are involved in initiating an immune response. In general, it is believed that the initiation of an immune response requires activation of antigen-presenting cells by molecules such as danger-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs). An attractive hypothesis for the mechanism by which DAMPs induce an immune response is through the activation of inflammasomes. The dominant immune response in the liver is immune tolerance, and it is only when immune tolerance fails that significant liver injury occurs. Consistent with this concept, an animal model was developed in which immune checkpoint inhibition unmasked the ability of drugs to cause liver injury. Although it appears that the liver damage is mediated by the adaptive immune system, an innate immune response is required for an adaptive immune response. The innate immune response is not dependent on specific HLA genes or T cell receptors and may occur in most patients and animals treated with a drug that can cause IDILI. Studies of the subclinical innate immune response to drugs may provide important mechanistic clues and provide a method to screen drugs for their potential to cause IDILI.