Analysis of lens cloudiness during endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures: Effects of a novel lens cleaner.

Objectives: We aimed to identify independent factors for intraoperative endoscopic lens cloudiness during gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections, investigate the effectiveness of Cleastay, an endoscope anti-fog solution, and examine factors associated with severe submucosal fat deposition. Methods: A total of 220 patients who underwent gastric or colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections in two institutions between January 2022 and October 2023 were included. Significant factors related to cloudiness were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. Patient background and tumor characteristics related to severe submucosal fat deposition were investigated, and the degree of intraoperative endoscopic lens cloudiness and outcomes were compared between the Cleash and Cleastay groups. Results: In the multivariate analysis, factors increasing lens cloudiness included long procedure time (odds ratio [OR], 17.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-202.08), stomach (vs. colon; OR, 5.08; 95% CI, 1.99-12.96), and severe submucosal fat deposition (OR, 12.19; 95% CI, 5.02-29.60). Conversely, the use of Cleastay (vs. Cleash; OR, 0.066; 95% CI, 0.021-0.21) was identified as a factor reducing cloudiness. Location analysis revealed that severe submucosal fat deposition was more common in the upper stomach and right colon. Conclusions: It was suggested that Cleastay is more useful for endoscopic submucosal dissection of the upper stomach and right colon, where severe submucosal fat deposition is expected.

A detailed intake-status profiling of seafoods in adult food-protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome patients.

BACKGROUND: Adults with food-protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) often develop severe abdominal symptoms after eating seafood. However, no investigation of a food elimination strategy for adult FPIES patients has been performed to date. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of seafood-avoidant adults by telephone interview, based on the diagnostic criteria for adult FPIES reported by González et al. We compared the clinical profiles, abdominal symptoms, and causative seafoods between FPIES and immediate-type food allergy (IgE-mediated FA) patients. We also profiled the detailed intake-status of seafoods in adult FPIES patients. RESULTS: Twenty-two (18.8 %) of 117 adults with seafood-allergy were diagnosed with FPIES. Compared with the IgE-mediated FA patients, FPIES patients had an older age of onset, more pre-existing gastrointestinal and atopic diseases, more episodes, longer latency and duration of symptoms, more nausea, abdominal distention, and severe abdominal pain, and more frequent vomiting and diarrhea. In particular, abdominal distention-reflecting intestinal edema and luminal fluid retention-may be the most distinctive characteristic symptom in adult FPIES (p < 0.001). Bivalves, especially oysters, were the most common cause of FPIES. Strikingly, intake-status profiling revealed that many FPIES patients can safely ingest an average of 92.6 % of seafood species other than the causative species. CONCLUSIONS: There are many differentiators between FPIES and IgE-mediated FA, which may reflect differences in the underlying immunological mechanisms. Although seafood FPIES is unlikely to induce tolerance, many patients can ingest a wide variety of seafood species after a long period from onset.

The efficacy of dupilumab in induction and maintenance of remission in an adult patient with steroid-dependent eosinophilic enteritis (EoN).

Eosinophilic enteritis (EoN) is associated with an eosinophilic infiltrate confined to the small intestine, but treatment options other than diet and corticosteroid therapy are scarce. There is only one report of the use of dupilumab for eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease, involving three pediatric patients. We report a case of successful induction of remission with dupilumab in a 53 year-old female patient with steroid-dependent EoN. The patient presented to the emergency room with uncontrollable abdominal pain and CT revealed a thickened ileal wall and small amount of ascites. Despite no abnormalities on endoscopy, histological examination revealed numerous eosinophilic infiltrates (> 100/HPF) and degranulation in the ileal lamina propria, diagnosing the patient with EoN. The patient achieved clinical remission with prednisolone, but EoN relapsed during tapering. Long-term steroid therapy was inappropriate due to mandibular osteomyelitis and osteoporosis, and she was switched to 9 mg budesonide, an intestine-soluble topical steroid without effect. Dupilumab administration resulted in resolution of abdominal pain, and remission was maintained after discontinuation of budesonide. Histological remission was confirmed 2 months after dupilumab administration. This is the first report of remission induced and maintained with dupilumab in an adult patient with EoN.

Development of risk scores for early and late recurrence of colonic diverticular hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: Colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH) often recurs. Although several studies have suggested that early rebleeding (ER) and late rebleeding (LR) should be treated independently, and several ER/LR risk factors have been identified, an integrated system for risk evaluation is still lacking. This study aimed to develop risk scores for early and late rebleeding of CDH. METHODS: This two-center, retrospective cohort study included 218 patients between 2008 and 2021. ER and LR risk factors were identified using multivariate analysis, and risk scores were developed using the odds ratios of each risk factor. RESULTS: The ER and LR rates were 32.6 and 25.7%, respectively. High heart rate on admission, early endoscopy from the visit, no bowel preparation and no endoscopic treatment were identified as risk factors for ER. On the other hand, LR risk factors included a history of hypertension and diabetes, early endoscopy from the visit, and the use of endoscopic clips. The ER risk score [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.71] was highly sensitive (90.3%) at a cutoff point of 6 and highly specific (98.0%) at a cutoff point of 15. The LR risk score (AUC = 0.70) was highly sensitive (91.1%) at a cutoff point of 2.6 and highly specific (88.3%) at a cutoff point of 7.1. CONCLUSIONS: The ER and LR risk scores were established for the first time, and they can divide CDH patients based on their risk of rebleeding as well as provide clinicians with practical information about the CDH management.