A Study on the Effect of Patient Characteristics, Geographical Utilization, and Patient Outcomes for Total Pancreatectomy Alone and Total Pancreatectomy With Islet Autotransplantation in Patients With Pancreatitis in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: A selective therapy for pancreatitis is total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation. Outcomes and geographical variability of patients who had total pancreatectomy (TP) alone or total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) were assessed. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database. Weighed univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effect of measured variables on outcomes. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2013, there were 1006 TP and 825 TPIAT in patients with a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, and 1705 TP and 830 TPIAT for any diagnosis of pancreatitis. The majority of the TP and TPIAT were performed in larger urban hospitals. Costs were similar for TP and TPIAT for chronic pancreatitis but were lower for TPIAT compared with TP for any type of pancreatitis. The trend for TP and TPIAT was significant in all geographical areas during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increasing trend of both TP and TPIAT. Certain groups are more likely to be offered TPIAT compared with TP alone. More data are needed to understand disparities and barriers to TPIAT, and long-term outcomes of TPIAT such as pain control and glucose intolerance need further study.

Correction: The Type of Bariatric Surgery Impacts the Risk of Acute Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Study.

In the original version of this Article, a footnote was missing. The PDF and HTML versions of the Article have now been corrected to include the following: This study was presented as an abstract at the World Congress of Gastroenterology (WCOG) at ACG 2017, Orlando Florida.

The Type of Bariatric Surgery Impacts the Risk of Acute Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Study.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) have a differential impact on post-operative risk of acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: This retrospective study uses the 2012-2014 National Readmission Database. We compared morbidly obese patients who underwent VSG (n = 205,251), RYGB (n = 169,973), and hernia repair (HR) control (n = 16,845). Our main outcome was rates of AP within 6 months post- vs. 6 months pre-surgery in VSG, RYGB, and HR. We also investigated risk factors and outcomes of AP after bariatric surgery. RESULTS: The rates of AP increased post- vs. pre-VSG (0.21% vs. 0.04%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.16, P < 0.05) and RYGB (0.17% vs. 0.07%; aOR = 2.26, P < 0.05) but not post-HR. VSG was associated with a significantly greater increase in AP risk compared to RYGB (aOR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.10, 4.73). Furthermore, when compared to HR controls, only VSG was associated with a higher AP risk (aOR = 7.58; 95% CI: 2.09, 27.58). Developing AP within 6 months following bariatric surgery was mainly associated with younger age (18-29 years old: aOR = 3.76 for VSG and aOR: 6.40 for RYGB, P < 0.05) and gallstones (aOR = 85.1 for VSG and aOR = 46 for RYGB, P < 0.05). No patients developed "severe AP" following bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: More patients develop AP within 6 months after VSG compared to RYGB and controls. This risk is highest for younger patients and those with gallstones. Prospective studies examining mechanisms and prevention are warranted.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Imaging for Differentiation of Branch Duct Versus Mixed Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative evaluation to detect main pancreatic duct involvement in pancreatic cystic lesions thus differentiating mixed intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) from branch duct (BD)-IPMN. METHODS: The pathology database of pancreatic resections from 2000 to 2014 was reviewed. Main pancreatic duct-IPMNs and IPMNs with intracystic mass/nodules were excluded. The preoperative test characteristics were analyzed using surgical histopathology as the "gold standard." RESULTS: Sixty BD-IPMNs and 23 mixed-IPMNs were identified. Mixed-IPMNs were larger (mean [standard deviation], 4.14 [2.9] vs 2.74 [1.9] mm; P = 0.03) and demonstrated frequent high-grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma (43% vs 12%, P = 0.004) than BD-IPMNs. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 78%; accuracy, 79%) had the best diagnostic accuracy, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 63%; accuracy, 68%) had the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of mixed-IPMN. A combination of EUS and MRI reached maximum sensitivity but with decreased accuracy (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 64%; accuracy, 67%). The area under the curve for receiver operation curve was 0.71 whereas the optimal cyst size to detect main duct involvement was 3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: For preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions without evidence of intracystic nodules, a combination of MRI and EUS should be considered for improved detection of main duct involvement.

The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Short Term Risk of Clostridium Difficile Admissions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is major health care concern with reports linking it to obesity. Our aim was to investigate the little known impact of the two most common bariatric surgeries, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), on risk of CDI admissions. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the 2013 Nationwide Readmission Database. We examined inpatient CDI rates within 120 days after RYGB (n = 40,059) and VSG (n = 45,394). In a time to event analysis we also evaluated inpatient CDI rates up to 11 months post-surgery. We chose morbidly obese patients that underwent non-emergent ventral hernia repair (VHR) as additional surgical controls (n = 9673). RESULT: CDI rates were higher after RYGB than VSG in the first 30 days (odds ratio [OR] = 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-4.20) with a similar but nonsignificant trend within 31-120 days. CDI rates were also higher after RYGB compared to VHR controls within 31-120 days after surgery (OR = 3.22, 95%CI: 1.31, 7.88, p = 0.01). In a time to event analysis with up to 11 months follow up, RYGB led to higher CDI compared to VSG (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.87; 95% CI, 1.12-3.13) with a trend towards higher CDI compared to VHR (HR = 1.95; 95% CI, 0.94-4.06). Similar CDI rates occurred after VSG vs VHR. CONCLUSIONS: RYGB may increase the risk of CDI hospitalization when compared to VSG and VHR controls. This data suggest VSG may be a better bariatric choice when post-surgical CDI risk is a concern.

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound for detection of pancreatic malignancy following an indeterminate multidetector CT scan: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis in part due to delayed diagnosis. Even with advances in cross-sectional imaging, small pancreatic malignancies can be missed. We sought to determine the performance of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in those without an obvious mass on multi-detector CT scan (MDCT), but with clinical suspicion for pancreatic malignancy. METHODS: Multiple databases were systematically searched to identify studies that assessed the diagnostic performance of EUS after negative or inconclusive pancreatic protocol MDCT for detection of pancreatic malignancy when clinically suspected. A total of four studies met the inclusion criteria. The point estimates in each study were compared to the summary pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity with the aid of forest plots. Funnel plots and Egger's test were employed to evaluate possible publication bias. RESULTS: EUS-guided fine needle aspiration was performed in all studies. EUS was performed in 206 subjects with a clinical suspicion of a pancreatic mass but with an indeterminate MDCT. A pancreatic mass (mean size 21 ± 1.2 mm) was identified in 70% (n = 144) of the subjects, and 42.2% (n = 87) were diagnosed with PDAC. The pooled estimates of EUS for diagnosing pancreatic malignancy in the setting of an indeterminate MDCT were a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 69-94%), specificity of 58% (95% CI 40-74%), positive predictive value of 77% (69-84%), negative predictive value of 66% (95% CI 53-77%), and an accuracy of 75% (95% CI 67-82). The summary area under the ROC curve was 0.80 (95% CI 0.52-0.89). The funnel plots and Egger's test did not show a significant publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: The yield of EUS is comparatively higher for the diagnosis of a pancreatic malignancy in patients with suspected cancer, but a non-diagnostic MDCT. Importantly, the majority of the lesions missed on CT represent PDAC, in which early diagnosis is essential.