Trajectories of fatigue in actively treated patients with established rheumatoid arthritis starting biologic DMARD therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To define fatigue trajectories in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who initiate biological DMARD (bDMARD) treatment, and explore baseline predictors for a trajectory of continued fatigue. METHODS: One-hundred and eighty-four patients with RA initiating bDMARDs were assessed at 0, 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months. Swollen and tender joint counts, patient reported outcomes (PROMs), blood samples and ultrasound examinations were collected at each time point. Fatigue was assessed by the fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) questionnaire. Clinically significant fatigue was predefined as fatigue ≥4. Three trajectories of interest were defined according to level of RAID fatigue: no fatigue (≤3 at 5/6 visits), improved fatigue (≥4 at start, but ≤3 at follow-up) and continued fatigue (≥4 at 5/6 visits). Baseline variables were compared between groups by bivariate analyses, and logistic regression models were used to explore baseline predictors of continued vs improved fatigue. RESULTS: The majority of patients starting bDMARD therapy followed one of three fatigue trajectories, (no fatigue; n=61, improved; n=33 and continued fatigue; n=53). Patients with continued fatigue were more likely to be anti-citrullinated protein antibody and/or rheumatoid factor positive and had higher baseline PROMs compared to the other groups, while there were no differences between the groups for variables of inflammation including. Patient global, tender joint count and anxiety were predictors for the continued fatigue trajectory. DISCUSSION: A trajectory of continued fatigue was determined by PROMs and not by inflammatory RA disease activity.

Tender Joint Count and Inflammatory Activity in Patients With Established Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From a Longitudinal Study.

OBJECTIVE: The tender joint count (TJC) is included in composite disease activity scores (CDAS) (the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, the Clinical Disease Activity Index, and the Simplified Disease Activity Index). The impact of having predominantly tender joints was explored by use of the Tender-Swollen Joint Count Difference (TSJD), and ultrasound (US) provided a measure of joint inflammation. The current study aimed to explore the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between the TSJD and a spectrum of outcome measures, including US scores in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during follow-up and while receiving treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: This was an observational study of 209 patients with established RA consecutively included upon initiation of bDMARD treatment and followed-up with clinical, laboratory, and comprehensive US examinations at 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those with predominantly tender joints (TSJD >0) and those with predominantly swollen joints (TSJD ≤0). Statistical analyses included Pearson's correlation coefficient, an independent samples t-test, and regression analyses. RESULTS: The TJC had high correlations only with patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) (P < 0.001). Levels from CDAS and PROMs were significantly higher (P < 0.001) at all visits in patients with TSJD >0 compared to those with TSJD <0. Laboratory markers and assessor's global visual analog scale scores were similar, and US sum scores were significantly lower (P < 0.001-0.03). The baseline TSJD positively predicted levels of all CDAS at 6 months (P < 0.001-0.019) but was a negative predictor of US sum scores (gray-scale and power Doppler) at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with predominantly tender joints had higher CDAS but lower levels of inflammation as defined by US. These findings indicate that inclusion of the TJC in the CDAS may contribute to misleading information about inflammatory activity.

Fibromyalgia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A 10-year follow-up study, results from the Oslo Rheumatoid Arthritis Register.

OBJECTIVES: To examine cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between fibromyalgia (FM) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. METHODS: 636 patients in the observational Oslo RA register (ORAR) were invited to a clinical examination in 1999. 28-tender and swollen joint counts (TJC, SJC) and 18-tender points were assessed, the RA disease activity score (DAS-28) calculated. Fibromyalgia (FM) was diagnosed according to 1990 (FM-1990) and modified 2011 (mFM-2011) ACR criteria. At the 10-year follow-up patients completed the RA Disease Activity Index (RADAI) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID-3). Baseline and 10-year RA disease activity were compared across presence/absence of FM. Linear regression models were constructed with 10-year RADAI and RAPID-3 as outcome. RESULTS: 502 patients participated at baseline data-collection and 10-year data was available in 236. At baseline, mean (SD) age was 59.5 (12.5) years and 87% were female. 9% and 30% had FM-1990 and mFM-2011 respectively. RA-FM patients were predominantly female with higher SJC, TJC, and DAS-28 at baseline. Baseline RA-FM predicted higher levels of RADAI and RAPID-3 at the 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RA-FM was associated with significantly higher levels of cross-sectional and longitudinal RA disease activity. FM should be considered in patients with RA not reaching remission.

Gout, Hyperuricemia, and Crystal-Associated Disease Network Consensus Statement Regarding Labels and Definitions for Disease Elements in Gout.

OBJECTIVE: The language currently used to describe gout lacks standardization. The aim of this project was to develop a consensus statement on the labels and definitions used to describe the basic disease elements of gout. METHODS: Experts in gout (n = 130) were invited to participate in a Delphi exercise and face-to-face consensus meeting to reach consensus on the labeling and definitions for the basic disease elements of gout. Disease elements and labels in current use were derived from a content analysis of the contemporary medical literature, and the results of this analysis were used for item selection in the Delphi exercise and face-to-face consensus meeting. RESULTS: There were 51 respondents to the Delphi exercise and 30 attendees at the face-to-face meeting. Consensus agreement (≥80%) was achieved for the labels of 8 disease elements through the Delphi exercise; the remaining 3 labels reached consensus agreement through the face-to-face consensus meeting. The agreed labels were monosodium urate crystals, urate, hyperuric(a)emia, tophus, subcutaneous tophus, gout flare, intercritical gout, chronic gouty arthritis, imaging evidence of monosodium urate crystal deposition, gouty bone erosion, and podagra. Participants at the face-to-face meeting achieved consensus agreement for the definitions of all 11 elements and a recommendation that the label "chronic gout" should not be used. CONCLUSION: Consensus agreement was achieved for the labels and definitions of 11 elements representing the fundamental components of gout etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation. The Gout, Hyperuricemia, and Crystal-Associated Disease Network recommends the use of these labels when describing the basic disease elements of gout.