Body image and psychosocial outcomes in youth and young adults with differences of sex development: a multi-method study.

OBJECTIVE: Differences of sex development (DSD) can affect the physical health, appearance, and psychosocial functioning of affected individuals, but little is known about how subjective appearance perceptions (body image) impact psychosocial outcomes. This study evaluated body image and its associations with psychosocial outcomes including quality of life, resilience, and psychosocial adjustment. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multi-method study assessed body image and psychosocial outcomes including quality of life, adjustment, and resilience in 97 youth and young adults with DSD (mean age = 17 ± 3.7 years; 56% assigned female in infancy) using psychometrically sound instruments. A subsample (n = 40) completed qualitative interviews. RESULTS: Quantitative results indicated that overall, participants were satisfied with their physical appearance, although less so with their primary sex characteristics. Body image dissatisfaction was associated with poorer psychosocial adjustment, quality of life, and resilience. Qualitatively, youth and young adults reported a variety of perceptions, both positive and negative, related to their body image and the impact of living with a DSD condition. Themes identified included appearance management; effects of DSD on body image; diagnostic factors and features; attitudes about diagnosis; and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Body image is significantly associated with psychosocial outcomes in youth and young adults with DSD, with qualitative findings highlighting both positive and negative body image experiences. Results have implications for clinical care including screening for appearance concerns, normalization of appearance variations, and intervention development to better support healthy body image and psychosocial functioning in youth and young adults with DSD.

Healthcare communication satisfaction and psychosocial outcomes in adolescents and young adults with differences of sex development.

OBJECTIVES: We examined: (1) healthcare communication satisfaction and psychosocial outcomes (resilience, QoL, and psychological adjustment) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with differences of sex development (DSD), (2) differences in psychosocial outcomes between those who were highly satisfied and those who were less satisfied, and (3) group differences between adolescents (ages 12-17) and young adults (ages 18-26) regarding associations with healthcare communication and psychosocial outcomes. METHODS: AYA with DSD across four study sites reported on satisfaction with healthcare communication and psychosocial outcomes. Analyses included descriptive statistics (aim 1), independent samples t-tests (aim 2), and Pearson's correlations (aim 3). RESULTS: Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with healthcare communication. Higher healthcare communication satisfaction was associated with greater resilience (p = .01), better QoL (p = .02), and fewer internalizing problems (p = .04). For adolescents, higher healthcare communication satisfaction was associated with better psychosocial outcomes (p values ranging from.01-.04). No significant associations were found in the young adult group. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with healthcare communication is related to positive psychosocial outcomes in adolescents with DSD. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These data underscore the importance of optimizing communication with families, engaging AYA in early and ongoing discussions about their care, and including psychosocial providers in DSD care.

Surgical experiences in adolescents and young adults with differences of sex development: A qualitative examination.

BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention in youth with differences of sex development (DSD) is a controversial topic. Historically, evidence suggests that genital surgery in DSD is associated with mixed patient satisfaction. However, less is known about surgical outcomes under therapeutic advancements in the past several decades. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study is to provide an updated and empirical qualitative examination of the surgical experiences and responses to care of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with DSD in order to fill this gap in the literature and inform patient care. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 37 AYA (ages 12-26) with DSD. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Three major themes were identified: 1) knowledge related to surgery; 2) surgical and medical experience; and 3) psychosocial factors related to surgery. Results demonstrated that most AYA were not involved in the decision to pursue surgery and were observed to have varying levels of knowledge regarding their surgeries. Most participants in the current study had received a DSD-related surgery and the majority described having positive surgical experiences and few regrets. Nonetheless, AYA described both medical and psychosocial challenges related to their surgeries and recoveries and offered feedback on ways to improve the surgical process. DISCUSSION: The current study provides a qualitative examination of the surgical experiences of 37 AYA with DSD. Findings highlight the importance of regular and ongoing communication with providers to improve knowledge related to surgery during the decision-making process as well as after surgical intervention. Results underscore the benefits of multidisciplinary teams and the value of patient handouts and decision aids in assisting AYA in the decision to pursue surgical intervention. Other specific recommendations for providers include increased patient privacy during genital exams, greater emphasis on psychoeducation and pain management strategies, and the use of behavioral health services to assist with challenges and social support. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to pursue surgical intervention in youth with DSD remains a complex and controversial issue, and more information regarding patients' perspectives on surgery is needed. The current study provides novel insights into patient experiences of surgical intervention and highlights the need for psychosocial support throughout the shared decision-making process.

Clinical phenotype and management of individuals with mosaic monosomy X with Y chromosome material stratified by genital phenotype.

Individuals mosaic for monosomy X and a cell line with Y chromosome material can have genitalia that appear phenotypical female, male, or ambiguous. Those with this karyotype and typical female genitalia are diagnosed with Turner syndrome; however, this definition specifically excludes those with genitalia other than typical female. There is limited information on whether medical and neurodevelopmental risks are similar among individuals with monosomy X and Y chromosome material across genital phenotypes. This multicenter retrospective study compared comorbidities and clinical management in individuals with monosomy X and Y material and male/ambiguous genitalia to those with typical female genitalia. Electronic medical records for all patients with monosomy X and Y material (n = 76) at two large U.S. pediatric centers were abstracted for predetermined data and outcomes. Logistic regression was used to compare the two phenotypic groups adjusting for site and duration of follow-up. The male/ambiguous genitalia group was just as likely to have congenital heart disease (RR 1.0, 95%CI [0.5-1.9]), autoimmune disease (RR 0.6 [0.2-1.3]), and neurodevelopmental disorders (RR 1.4 [0.8-1.2]) as those with female genitalia. Despite similar risks, they were less likely to receive screening and counseling. In conclusion, individuals with monosomy X and Y chromosome material have similar medical and neurodevelopmental risks relative to individuals with Turner syndrome regardless of genitalia, but there are notable differences in clinical management.

Microtia and craniofacial microsomia: Content analysis of facebook groups.

OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of patients use social media for health-related information and social support. This study's objective was to describe the content posted on Facebook groups for individuals with microtia and/or craniofacial microsomia (CFM) and their families in order for providers to gain insight into patient and family needs and experiences to inform clinical care. METHODS: Two months of posts, images, comments, and "like" responses from two Facebook groups in the US and the UK were recorded and analyzed using content analysis. A secondary analysis identified statements of emotion. RESULTS: Posts (N = 254) had a total of 7912 "like" responses, 2245 comments, and 153 images. There were three categories of posts: seeking guidance (43%; 9 themes), promoting events/news (33%; 5 themes), and sharing experiences (24%; 3 themes). Across categories, 16% of posts had emotional content. Most comments were responding to posts seeking guidance, including medical care (20%), surgical care (9%), and hearing aids (5%). Promotional posts often aimed to increase CFM awareness. Posts sharing experiences were generally positive, with the highest number of "likes". CONCLUSIONS: Facebook groups members frequently exchanged health-related information, suggesting value placed on input from other families and the convenience of seeking information online. Posts also promoted awareness and shared experiences. Clinical care implications include the need for easily accessible accurate and tailored CFM-related health education. Additionally, providers should demonstrate awareness of health information on social media and may address the potential emotional impact of CFM by facilitating access to resources for social support.

Neurodevelopmental and Mental Health Screening for Patients with Turner Syndrome in Pediatric Endocrine Clinics: Results of a Pediatric Endocrine Society Survey.

INTRODUCTION: International Turner syndrome (TS) Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend screening for neurodevelopmental (ND) and mental health (MH) concerns in girls with TS; however, it remains unclear whether this is implemented in current practice. The objective of this mixed methods study was to assess screening practices for ND and MH in girls with TS from the perspective of pediatric endocrinologists. METHODS: Pediatric Endocrine Society members who provide care for girls with TS were invited to complete an electronic survey on screening practices. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize quantitative results concurrently with thematic analysis of free-text survey responses. RESULTS: A total of 124 surveys were completed (86% attending pediatric endocrinologists, 81% at academic institutions). Overall, 25% of providers reported their patients with TS received both ND and MH screenings. Only 9 (9%) respondents endorsed screening for ND concerns themselves, while more providers (26%) reported they screen for MH concerns. Multiple barriers to screening for ND and MH concerns within the clinical setting were endorsed. Nearly all providers (>93%) reported they would consider using a short, validated screening tool for ND and MH concerns if such tools were available. DISCUSSION: A minority of pediatric endocrinologists currently perform ND or MH screening for patients with TS, however, many would be interested in implementing a brief screening tool into their clinical practice. Given almost all girls with a TS diagnosis receive care from pediatric endocrinologists at least annually, this may be an effective method to increase the proportion of girls with TS who receive recommended screenings.