Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(7): e015629, 2020 04 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32208830

RESUMEN

Background Coronary artery disease is the primary etiology for sudden cardiac arrest in adults, but potential differences in the incidence and utility of invasive coronary testing between resuscitated men and women have not been extensively evaluated. Our aim was to characterize angiographic similarities and differences between men and women after cardiac arrest. Methods and Results Data from the International Cardiac Arrest Registry-Cardiology database included patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac origin, admitted to 7 academic cardiology/resuscitation centers during 2006 to 2017. Demographics, clinical factors, and angiographic findings of subjects were evaluated in relationship to sex and multivariable logistic regression models created to predict both angiography and outcome. Among 966 subjects, including 277 (29%) women and 689 (71%) men, fewer women had prior coronary artery disease and more had prior congestive heart failure (P=0.05). Women were less likely to have ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (32% versus 39%, P=0.04). Among those with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarctions, identification and distribution of culprit arteries was similar between women and men, and there were no differences in treatment or outcome. In patients without ST-segment elevation post-arrest, women were overall less likely to undergo coronary angiography (51% versus 61%, P<0.02), have a culprit vessel identified (29% versus 45%, P=0.03), and had fewer culprits acutely occluded (17% versus 28%, P=0.03). Women were also less often re-vascularized (44% versus 52%, P<0.03). Conclusions Among cardiac arrest survivors, women are less likely to undergo angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention than men. Sex disparities for invasive therapies in post-cardiac arrest care need continued attention.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Angiografía Coronaria/tendencias , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
3.
Circulation ; 137(3): 273-282, 2018 01 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29074504

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No practical tool quantitates the risk of circulatory-etiology death (CED) immediately after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. We developed and validated a prediction model to rapidly determine that risk and facilitate triage to individualized treatment pathways. METHODS: With the use of INTCAR (International Cardiac Arrest Registry), an 87-question data set representing 44 centers in the United States and Europe, patients were classified as having had CED or a combined end point of neurological-etiology death or survival. Demographics and clinical factors were modeled in a derivation cohort, and backward stepwise logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with CED. We demonstrated model performance using area under the curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test in the derivation and validation cohorts, and assigned a simplified point-scoring system. RESULTS: Among 638 patients in the derivation cohort, 121 (18.9%) had CED. The final model included preexisting coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.86; confidence interval [CI], 1.83-4.49; P≤0.001), nonshockable rhythm (OR, 1.75; CI, 1.10-2.77; P=0.017), initial ejection fraction<30% (OR, 2.11; CI, 1.32-3.37; P=0.002), shock at presentation (OR, 2.27; CI, 1.42-3.62; P<0.001), and ischemic time >25 minutes (OR, 1.42; CI, 0.90-2.23; P=0.13). The derivation model area under the curve was 0.73, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test P=0.47. Outcomes were similar in the 318-patient validation cohort (area under the curve 0.68, Hosmer-Lemeshow test P=0.41). When assigned a point for each associated factor in the derivation model, the average predicted versus observed probability of CED with a CREST score (coronary artery disease, initial heart rhythm, low ejection fraction, shock at the time of admission, and ischemic time >25 minutes) of 0 to 5 was: 7.1% versus 10.2%, 9.5% versus 11%, 22.5% versus 19.6%, 32.4% versus 29.6%, 38.5% versus 30%, and 55.7% versus 50%. CONCLUSIONS: The CREST model stratified patients immediately after resuscitation according to risk of a circulatory-etiology death. The tool may allow for estimation of circulatory risk and improve the triage of survivors of cardiac arrest without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction at the point of care.


Asunto(s)
Circulación Sanguínea , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Anciano , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Sistema de Registros , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 55(4): 659-68, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26628579

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between tobacco smoking and disease activity, treatment adherence and treatment responses in patients with AS treated with their first tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (TNFi) therapy in routine care. METHODS: Observational cohort study based on the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. Kaplan-Meier plots, Cox and logistic regression analyses by smoking status (current/never/previous) were calculated for treatment adherence and BASDAI 50%/20 mm-response. Additional stratified analyses were performed for gender and TNFi-type. RESULTS: Of 1576 AS patients included in the study, 1425(90%) had known smoking status (current/never/previous: 43%/41%/16%). The median follow-up time was 2.02 years (IQR 0.69-5.01). At baseline, current smokers compared with never smokers had longer disease duration (4 years (1-12)/2 years (0-10)), higher BASDAI (61 mm (47-73)/58 mm (44-70)), BASFI (53 mm (35-69)/46 mm (31-66)) and BASMI (40 mm (20-60)/30 mm (10-50)) scores (all P < 0.01). Current and previous smokers had shorter treatment adherence than never smokers (current: 2.30 years (1.81-2.79) (median (95% CI)); previous: 2.48 years (1.56-3.40), never: 4.12 years (3.29-4.95)), P < 0.0001). Similar results were found in multivariate analyses (current versus never smokers, HR 1.41 (95% CI 1.21-1.65), P < 0.001), most pronounced among men. Current smokers had poorer 6 months' BASDAI50%/20 mm-response rate than never smokers (42%/58%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, current smokers had lower odds of achieving BASDAI50%/20 mm-response than never smokers, both overall (OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.35-0.65), P < 0.0001) and for the different TNFi-types (adalimumab 0.45 (0.27-0.76)/etanercept 0.24 (0.10-0.61)/infliximab 0.57 (0.34-0.95)). CONCLUSION: In this study of TNFi-treated AS patients in clinical practice, current and previous smokers had significantly poorer patient-reported outcomes at baseline, shorter treatment adherence and poorer treatment response compared with never smokers.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Fumar/epidemiología , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Fumar/efectos adversos , Espondilitis Anquilosante/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 54(12): 2156-65, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26175471

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of Danish RA patients currently on biologic monotherapy and compare the effectiveness and drug adherence of biologic therapies applied as monotherapy. METHODS: All RA patients registered in the Danish biologics database (DANBIO) as receiving biologic DMARD (bDMARD) treatment as monotherapy without concomitant conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) during the study period 1 May, 2011 through 30 April 2013 were eligible for inclusion. All patient files were checked to ensure that they were in accordance with the treatment registration in DANBIO. Descriptive statistics for prevalence, effectiveness and drug adherence of bDMARD monotherapy were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 775 patients on bDMARD monotherapy, adalimumab (21.3%), etanercept (36.6%) and tocilizumab (15.3%) were the most prevalent biologic agents administered. At the 6-month follow-up, the overall crude clinical disease activity index remission rate in patients still on a biologic drug was 22%, the 28-joint DAS remission rate was 41% and the response rate of those with a 50% improvement in ACR criteria was 28%. At the 6-month follow-up, the drug adherence rates were similar for the different bDMARDs, with the exception of infliximab, which had significantly poorer drug adherence (P < 0.001). The overall drug adherence (except for infliximab) was approximately 70% after 2 years. CONCLUSION: Nearly one in five (19%) biologic treatments for RA was prescribed in Denmark as monotherapy, of which 70% were on monotherapy from bio-initiation and 30% were on monotherapy after cessation of a concomitant csDMARD. Acceptable drug adherence and remission rates were achieved with bDMARDs. With the exception of infliximab, no statistically significant differences were observed between anti-TNFs and biologics with other modes of action.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Inducción de Remisión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 8(8): 1031-1040, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26117462

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and coronary angiographic findings in post-cardiac arrest patients with and without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: The 2013 STEMI guidelines recommend performing immediate angiography in resuscitated patients whose initial electrocardiogram shows STEMI. The optimal approach for those without STEMI post-cardiac arrest is less clear. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of a post-cardiac arrest registry was performed. RESULTS: The database consisted of 746 comatose post-cardiac arrest patients including 198 with STEMI (26.5%) and 548 without STEMI (73.5%). Overall survival was greater in those with STEMI compared with those without (55.1% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.001), whereas in all patients who underwent immediate coronary angiography, survival was similar between those with and without STEMI (54.7% vs. 57.9%; p = 0.60). A culprit vessel was more frequently identified in those with STEMI, but also in one-third of patients without STEMI (80.2% vs. 33.2%; p = 0.001). The majority of culprit vessels were occluded (STEMI, 92.7%; no STEMI, 69.2%; p < 0.0001). An occluded culprit vessel was found in 74.3% of STEMI patients and in 22.9% of no STEMI patients. Among cardiac arrest survivors discharged from the hospital who had presented without STEMI, coronary angiography was associated with better functional outcome (93.3% vs. 78.7%; p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Early coronary angiography is associated with improved functional outcome among resuscitated patients with and without STEMI. Resuscitated patients with a presumed cardiac etiology appear to benefit from immediate coronary angiography.


Asunto(s)
Coma/diagnóstico , Angiografía Coronaria , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Coma/mortalidad , Coma/terapia , Electrocardiografía , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Alta del Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
7.
Crit Care ; 19: 182, 2015 Apr 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25895673

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested an effect of gender on outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the results are conflicting. We aimed to investigate the association of gender to outcome, coronary angiography (CAG) and adverse events in OHCA survivors treated with mild induced hypothermia (MIH). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the International Cardiac Arrest Registry. Adult patients with a non-traumatic OHCA and treated with MIH were included. Good neurological outcome was defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) of 1 or 2. RESULTS: A total of 1,667 patients, 472 women (28%) and 1,195 men (72%), met the inclusion criteria. Men were more likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, have an initial shockable rhythm and to have a presumed cardiac cause of arrest. At hospital discharge, men had a higher survival rate (52% vs. 38%, P < 0.001) and more often a good neurological outcome (43% vs. 32%, P < 0.001) in the univariate analysis. When adjusting for baseline characteristics, male gender was associated with improved survival (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.78) but no longer with neurological outcome (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.67). Adverse events were common; women more often had hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia and bleeding requiring transfusion, while men had more pneumonia. In a subgroup analysis of patients with a presumed cardiac cause of arrest (n = 1,361), men more often had CAG performed on admission (58% vs. 50%, P = 0.02) but this discrepancy disappeared in an adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Gender differences exist regarding cause of arrest, adverse events and outcome. Male gender was independently associated with survival but not with neurological outcome.


Asunto(s)
Internacionalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Informe de Investigación , Caracteres Sexuales , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Crit Care Med ; 43(5): 965-72, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25654176

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of cardiac arrest survivors with myoclonus receiving modern postresuscitation care. DESIGN: Retrospective review of registry data. SETTING: Cardiac arrest receiving centers in Europe and the United States from 2002 to 2012. PATIENTS: Two thousand five hundred thirty-two cardiac arrest survivors 18 years or older enrolled in the International Cardiac Arrest Registry. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of patients underwent therapeutic hypothermia and 471 (18%) exhibited myoclonus. Patients with myoclonus had longer time to professional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (8.6 vs 7.0 min; p < 0.001) and total ischemic time (25.6 vs 22.3 min; p < 0.001) and less often presented with ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, a witnessed arrest, or had bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Electroencephalography demonstrated myoclonus with epileptiform activity in 209 of 374 (55%), including status epilepticus in 102 of 374 (27%). Good outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) at hospital discharge was noted in 9% of patients with myoclonus, less frequently in myoclonus with epileptiform activity (2% vs 15%; p < 0.001). Patients with myoclonus with good outcome were younger (53.7 vs 62.7 yr; p < 0.001), had more ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (81% vs 46%; p < 0.001), shorter ischemic time (18.9 vs 26.4 min; p = 0.003), more witnessed arrests (91% vs 77%; p = 0.02), and fewer "do-not-resuscitate" orders (7% vs 78%; p < 0.001). Life support was withdrawn in 330 of 427 patients (78%) with myoclonus and poor outcome, due to neurological futility in 293 of 330 (89%), at 5 days (3-8 d) after resuscitation. With myoclonus and good outcome, median ICU length of stay was 8 days (5-11 d) and hospital length of stay was 14.5 days (9-22 d). CONCLUSIONS: Nine percent of cardiac arrest survivors with myoclonus after cardiac arrest had good functional outcomes, usually in patients without associated epileptiform activity and after prolonged hospitalization. Deaths occurred early and primarily after withdrawal of life support. It is uncertain whether prolonged care would yield a higher percentage of good outcomes, but myoclonus of itself should not be considered a sign of futility.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/complicaciones , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Mioclonía/etiología , Mioclonía/fisiopatología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/complicaciones , Electroencefalografía , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
9.
Crit Care Med ; 42(12): 2537-45, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25083981

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Despite a lack of randomized trials, practice guidelines recommend that mild induced hypothermia be considered for comatose survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest. This study describes the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of mild induced hypothermia treatment following in-hospital cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, registry-based study. SETTING: Forty-six critical care facilities in eight countries in Europe and the United States reporting in the Hypothermia Network Registry and the International Cardiac Arrest Registry. PATIENTS: A total of 663 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest and treated with mild induced hypothermia were included between January 2004 and February 2012. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A cerebral performance category of 1 or 2 was considered a good outcome. At hospital discharge 41% of patients had a good outcome. At median 6-month follow-up, 34% had a good outcome. Among in-hospital deaths, 52% were of cardiac causes and 44% of cerebral cause. A higher initial body temperature was associated with reduced odds of a good outcome (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.92). Adverse events were common; bleeding requiring transfusion (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.31-1.00) and sepsis (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30-0.91) were associated with reduced odds for a good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this registry study of an in-hospital cardiac arrest population treated with mild induced hypothermia, we found a 41% good outcome at hospital discharge and 34% at follow-up. Infectious complications occurred in 43% of cases, and 11% of patients required a transfusion for bleeding. The majority of deaths were of cardiac origin.


Asunto(s)
Coma/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco/complicaciones , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Hipotermia Inducida/mortalidad , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas , Temperatura Corporal , Comorbilidad , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 7(2): 244-50, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24594547

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to fibrinolysis if performed in a timely manner but frequently requires dislocation of patients and their families from their local community. Although patient satisfaction is increasingly viewed as an important quality indicator, there are no data on how emergent transfer for PCI affects patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and their families. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Minneapolis Heart Institute's Level 1 Regional ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction program is designed to facilitate emergent transfer for PCI in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction from 31 rural and community hospitals. To determine the effect of emergent transfer, questionnaires were given to 152 patients and their families who survived to hospital discharge with a 65.8% response rate (mean age, 63.9 years; 29% women). Ninety-five percent of patients felt the reasons and process of transfer were well explained, and 97% felt transfer for care was necessary. Despite this, 15% of patients would have preferred to stay in their local hospital. The majority of the families felt the transfer process (88%) and family member's condition (94%) were well explained. Although 99% felt it was necessary for their family member to be transferred for specialized care, 11% of families still would have preferred that their family members remain at the local community hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients and families can be informed, even in time-critical situations, about the transfer process for PCI and understand the need for specialized care. Still, a significant minority would prefer to stay at their local hospital, despite acknowledging transfer for PCI provided optimal care.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Cuidadores , Electrocardiografía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Hospitales Rurales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota , Prioridad del Paciente
11.
Crit Care Med ; 42(2): 289-95, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24107639

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: It is not known if aggressive postresuscitation care, including therapeutic hypothermia and percutaneous coronary intervention, benefits cardiac arrest survivors more than 75 years old. We compared treatments and outcomes of patients at six regional percutaneous coronary intervention centers in the United States to determine if aggressive care of elderly patients was warranted. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of registry data. SETTING: Six interventional cardiology centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Six hundred and twenty-five unresponsive cardiac arrest survivors aged 18-75 were compared with 129 similar patients aged more than 75. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac arrest survivors aged more than 75 had more comorbidities (3.0 ± 1.6 vs 2.0 ± 1.6, p < 0.001), but were matched to younger patients in initial heart rhythm, witnessed arrests, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and total ischemic time. Patients aged more than 75 frequently underwent therapeutic hypothermia (97.7%), urgent coronary angiography (44.2%), and urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (24%). They had more sustained hyperglycemia (70.5% vs 59%, p = 0.015), less postcooling fever (25.2% vs 35.2%, p = 0.03), were more likely to have do-not-resuscitate orders (65.9% vs 48.2%, p < 0.001), and undergo withdrawal of life support (61.2% vs 47.5%, p = 0.005). Good functional outcome at 6 months (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) was seen in 27.9% elderly versus 40.4% younger patients overall (p = 0.01) and in 44% versus 55% (p = 0.13) of patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Of 35 survivors more than 75 years old, 33 (94.8%) were classified as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at (mean) 6.5-month follow-up. In multivariable logistic regression modeling, age more than 75 was significantly associated with outcome only when the presence of a do-not-resuscitate order was excluded from the model. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients were more likely to have do-not-resuscitate orders and to undergo withdrawal of life support. Age was independently associated with outcome only when correction for do-not-resuscitate status was excluded, and functional outcomes of elderly survivors were similar to younger patients. Exclusion of patients more than 75 years old from aggressive care is not warranted on the basis of age alone.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Órdenes de Resucitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
12.
Resuscitation ; 85(1): 88-95, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23927955

RESUMEN

AIM: To determine if early cardiac catheterization (CC) is associated with improved survival in comatose patients who are resuscitated after cardiac arrest when electrocardiographic evidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is absent. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of a prospective cohort of 754 consecutive comatose patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) following cardiac arrest. RESULTS: A total of 269 (35.7%) patients had cardiac arrest due to a ventricular arrhythmia without STEMI and were treated with TH. Of these, 122 (45.4%) received CC while comatose (early CC). Acute coronary occlusion was discovered in 26.6% of patients treated with early CC compared to 29.3% of patients treated with late CC (p=0.381). Patients treated with early CC were more likely to survive to hospital discharge compared to those not treated with CC (65.6% vs. 48.6%; p=0.017). In a multivariate regression model that included study site, age, bystander CPR, shock on admission, comorbid medical conditions, witnessed arrest, and time to return of spontaneous circulation, early CC was independently associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.70, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In comatose survivors of cardiac arrest without STEMI who are treated with TH, early CC is associated with significantly decreased mortality. The incidence of acute coronary occlusion is high, even when STEMI is not present on the postresuscitation electrocardiogram.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Coma/mortalidad , Coma/terapia , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Anciano , Coma/etiología , Intervención Médica Temprana , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Sobrevivientes
14.
Resuscitation ; 83(7): 829-34, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22230942

RESUMEN

AIM: To assess differences in cerebral performance category (CPC) in patients who received therapeutic hypothermia post cardiac arrest by time to initiation, time to target temperature, and duration of therapeutic hypothermia (TH). METHODS: A secondary data analysis was conducted using hospital-specific data from the international cardiac arrest registry (INTCAR) database. The analytic sample included 172 adult patients who experienced an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and were treated in one Midwestern hospital. Measures included time from arrest to ROSC, arrest to TH, arrest to target temperature, and length of time target temperature was maintained. CPC was assessed at three points: transfer from ICU, discharge from hospital, and post discharge follow-up. RESULTS: Average age was 63.6 years and 74.4% of subjects were male. Subjects had TH initiation a mean of 94.4 min (SD 81.6) after cardiac arrest and reached target temperature after 309.0 min (SD 151.0). In adjusted models, the odds of a poor neurological outcome increased with each 5 min delay in initiating TH at transfer from ICU (OR=1.06, 95% C.I. 1.02-1.10). Similar results were seen for neurological outcomes at hospital discharge (OR=1.06, 95% C.I. 1.02-1.11) and post-discharge follow-up (OR=1.08, 95% C.I. 1.03-1.13). Additionally the odds of a poor neurological outcome increased for every 30 min delay in time to target temperature at post-discharge follow-up (OR=1.17, 95% C.I. 1.01-1.36). CONCLUSION: In adults undergoing TH post cardiac arrest, delay in initiation of TH and reaching target temperature differentiated poor versus good neurologic outcomes. Randomized trials assessing the range of current recommended guidelines for TH should be conducted to establish optimal treatment protocols.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Temperatura , Tiempo de Tratamiento
15.
Circulation ; 124(2): 206-14, 2011 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21747066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) improves survival and confers neuroprotection in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but TH is underutilized, and regional systems of care for OHCA that include TH are needed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Cool It protocol has established TH as the standard of care for OHCA across a regional network of hospitals transferring patients to a central TH-capable hospital. Between February 2006 and August 2009, 140 OHCA patients who remained unresponsive after return of spontaneous circulation were cooled and rewarmed with the use of an automated, noninvasive cooling device. Three quarters of the patients (n=107) were transferred to the TH-capable hospital from referring network hospitals. Positive neurological outcome was defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at discharge. Patients with non-ventricular fibrillation arrest or cardiogenic shock were included, and patients with concurrent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n=68) received cardiac intervention and cooling simultaneously. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 56%, and 92% of survivors were discharged with a positive neurological outcome. Survival was similar in transferred and nontransferred patients. Non-ventricular fibrillation arrest and presence of cardiogenic shock were associated strongly with mortality, but survivors with these event characteristics had high rates of positive neurological recovery (100% and 89%, respectively). A 20% increase in the risk of death (95% confidence interval, 4% to 39%) was observed for every hour of delay to initiation of cooling. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive TH protocol can be integrated into a regional ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction network and achieves broad dispersion of this essential therapy for OHCA.


Asunto(s)
Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Hipotermia Inducida/normas , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arritmias Cardíacas/mortalidad , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia
16.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 134(3): 388-92, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20716794

RESUMEN

Laboratory test results are the cornerstone for patient diagnosis and treatment, and the principles of high-quality laboratory testing are the same anywhere in the world. It is one area of health care that can and should be standardized. Resource-limited countries' laboratories lack equipment, proper funding, adequate training for laboratory workers, and systematic management of work, making it difficult to deliver accurate and reliable results. Quality management tools are being used to improve practices, with accreditation being a means to demonstrate that standards are being met. The World Health Organization (WHO), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute have assumed responsibility for leading a harmonized approach to the provision of education and training in laboratories by publishing a training tool kit. The WHO Regional Office for Africa is leading a new stepwise approach to accreditation.


Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Laboratorios/organización & administración , África del Sur del Sahara , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Países en Desarrollo , Cooperación Internacional , Laboratorios/normas , Personal de Laboratorio Clínico/educación , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Control de Calidad , Estados Unidos , Organización Mundial de la Salud
18.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 2(6): 648-55, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20031904

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the United States, efforts are underway to improve timely access to percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The Joint Commission (TJC) and the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) have developed standardized definitions and clinical performance measures for STEMI. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in 3 quality-assurance registries for STEMI patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: STEMI patients presenting to the Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital (Minneapolis, Minn) are tracked by 3 distinct quality assurance programs: NCDR, TJC, and the level 1 MI registry (a regional system for percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI which includes transfer patients). Over 1 year, we examined consecutive STEMI patients in level 1 and compared them with individuals meeting NCDR and TJC inclusion criteria. Of 501 STEMI patients treated using the level 1 MI protocol, 422 patients had a clear culprit (402 percutaneous coronary intervention, 13 coronary artery bypass grafting, 7 medical management). In the same period, 282 patients met inclusion criteria for NCDR (56% of the level 1 population), and 66 met inclusion criteria for TJC (13% of the level 1 population). Transfer patients (n=380) accounted for 87% of the discrepancy between level 1 and TJC. Pharmacoinvasive percutaneous coronary intervention (n=102) accounted for 47% of the discrepancy between level 1 and NCDR. CONCLUSIONS: Current inclusion criteria for enrollment in STEMI registries are not uniform. This may lead to variable quality assurance outcomes for the same patient cohort and has important implications for standardized quality measurement.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/estadística & datos numéricos , Protocolos Clínicos , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Transporte de Pacientes , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Crit Care Med ; 37(7 Suppl): S234-7, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19535952

RESUMEN

Therapeutic hypothermia has been shown in randomized clinical trials to improve neurologic outcomes following cardiac arrest. Whether therapeutic hypothermia improves important outcomes after acute myocardial infarction is an area of active research. Here we review recent experimental and clinical data that examine whether therapeutic hypothermia can improve functional outcomes or mortality rate in acute myocardial infarction. We conclude that the available clinical evidence does not support therapeutic hypothermia as standard therapy for acute myocardial infarction.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Animales , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Electrocardiografía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Predicción , Humanos , Hipotermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Hipotermia Inducida/tendencias , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Daño por Reperfusión/etiología , Proyectos de Investigación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Circulation ; 116(7): 721-8, 2007 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17673457

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is superior to fibrinolysis when performed in a timely manner in high-volume centers. Recent European trials suggest that transfer for PCI also may be superior to fibrinolysis and increase access to PCI. In the United States, transfer times are consistently long; therefore, many believe a transfer for PCI strategy for STEMI is not practical. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a standardized PCI-based treatment system for STEMI patients from 30 hospitals up to 210 miles from a PCI center. From March 2003 to November 2006, 1345 consecutive STEMI patients were treated, including 1048 patients transferred from non-PCI hospitals. The median first door-to-balloon time for patients <60 miles (zone 1) and 60 to 210 miles (zone 2) from the PCI center was 95 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 82 and 116 minutes) and 120 minutes (25th and 75th percentiles, 100 and 145 minutes), respectively. Despite the high-risk unselected patient population (cardiogenic shock, 12.3%; cardiac arrest, 10.8%; and elderly [> or =80 years of age], 14.6%), in-hospital mortality was 4.2%, and median length of stay was 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid transfer of STEMI patients from community hospitals up to 210 miles from a PCI center is safe and feasible using a standardized protocol with an integrated transfer system.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/normas , Protocolos Clínicos , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Programas Médicos Regionales/organización & administración , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA