Update on post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

Aims: Post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but serious. Few studies carried out on small cohorts have reported them in the literature. The aim of this work is to describe the specific characteristics of post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures, and the outcome of their surgical treatment in terms of function and complications. Methods: Patients with this type of fracture were identified retrospectively over a period of six years (January 2016 to December 2021). The following data were collected: demographic characteristics, date of insertion of the prosthesis, details of the intervention, date of the trauma, characteristics of the fracture, and type of treatment. Functional results were assessed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Data concerning complications of treatment were collected. Results: Our series included 20 patients, with a mean age of 77 years (46 to 90). All the patients had at least one comorbid condition. Radiographs showed that 75% of the fractures were pure transverse fractures, and a transverse component was present in 90% of patients. All our patients underwent surgical treatment: open reduction and internal fixation, revision of the acetabular component, or both. Mean follow-up was 24 months, and HHS at last follow-up was 75.5 (42 to 95). The principal complications observed were dislocations of the prosthesis (30%) and infections (20%). A need for revision surgery was noted in 30% of patients. No dislocation occurred in patients undergoing osteosynthesis with acetabular reconstruction. We did not note either mechanical loosening of the acetabular component nor thromboembolic complications. In all, 30% of patients presented acute anemia requiring transfusion, and one death was reported. Conclusion: Post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures frequently have a transverse component that can destabilize the acetabular implant. The frequency of complications, principally dislocations, led to a high rate of revision surgery. Improvements in preoperative planning should make it possible to codify management to reduce this high rate of complications. The best results were obtained when the surgical strategy combined osteosynthesis with acetabular reconstruction.

Minimally invasive femoral head fracture fixation using three-dimensional navigation: a technical note.

Femoral head fractures are rare traumatic injuries that are usually associated with hip dislocations. Open reduction and internal fixation are performed when indicated, but can be associated with a higher risk of avascular necrosis. We report the case of a 24-year-old patient with a Pipkin type II fracture dislocation of the femoral head fixed via a minimally invasive three-dimensional navigated internal fixation technique. This technique minimizes deep soft tissue dissection to the hip capsule and associated vascularity and allows for accurate implant positioning.Level of evidence: Therapeutic case report Level IV.

Computer Navigation-Assisted Resection of Heterotopic Ossification Around the Hip: A Technical Note.

Heterotopic ossification is a rare but debilitating situation. It occurs in patients who have undergone paralysis and/or immobilization. Hip osteoma is one of the most frequent locations and is associated with a significant functional handicap. Its treatment is based on surgical resection, which is a risky surgery that is not devoid of complications such as infections, hematoma, and recurrence. We describe in this paper a new surgical technique that adds to the classic hip osteoma resection: guidance with a navigation system coupled to a 3D imaging tool. We performed this technique on two patients (three hips, one bilateral case). We think that this technique makes the surgery safer with fewer complications.

The Saint-Joseph Acetabular score: a reproducible and accurate prediction of the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures.

PURPOSE: Acetabular fractures are associated to an increased risk of subsequent hip osteoarthritis. The only available score for post-operative reduction assessment in acetabular fractures (Matta's score) is x-ray based. CT-scan was shown superior to X-rays in post-operative reduction assessment. We aim to describe a CT-scan-based post-operative reduction score in acetabular fractures and evaluate its accuracy and reproducibility. METHODS: This is a retrospective study that includes 138 patients who underwent surgery for an acetabular fracture in our tertiary referral centre with a mean follow-up of 104.39±42.2 months. The post-operative CT-scan was reviewed and residual displacement (maximum gap and step) measured by three independent observers. The association between the occurrence of THA and the CT-scan measurements was evaluated. This led to a new prognostic score. The interobserver reliability and accuracy of this score were calculated. RESULTS: Interobserver reproducibility for the residual maximal gap was 0.82 (95% CI [0.70-0.89]) and 0.61 (95% CI [0.52-0.70]) for the residual maximal step displacement measurements. We created a score from a logistic regression model, attributing 1 point for every 1 mm of residual maximal step displacement and 1 point for every 2 mm of residual maximal gap displacement. The interobserver reproducibility of this score was 0.78 (95% CI [0.71-0.84]), and its AUC was 0.79 (95% CI [0.69-0.88]). CONCLUSION: This is the first CT-scan-based score for the assessment of residual displacement of a surgically treated acetabular fracture. It shows good interobserver reproducibility and accuracy in predicting the risk for secondary THA. It should be regularly used per-operatively (if per-operative 3D imaging is available) and post-operatively to predict the prognosis.

Pre- and postoperative MRI analysis of central decompression in MIS fusion with lumbar stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: Mini-invasive approaches have grown substantially these last decades in spinal surgery, notably for lumbar decompressions and fusion, with advantages over open approaches in terms of morbidity reduction. However, to our knowledge, no study has measured on MRI the amount of central decompression obtained by MIS approach. The goal of this study was to precisely measure the decompression of central stenosis by unilateral MIS approaches. METHODS: The files of 42 patients that had a MIS lumbar fusion with central decompression for central stenosis were reviewed. All patients had a pre- and postoperative MRI that allowed on T2 axial images to classify the central stenosis, according to Schizas' classification, and measure the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) and the anteroposterior diameter (DAP). The statistical analysis was made with paired t-test. RESULTS: Fifty-six levels were analyzed, mostly L4L5 (58%). The mean preoperative DSCA was 70.53mm2 and the mean postoperative DSCA was 172.2mm2. The mean preoperative DAP was 6.15mm and postoperative was 10.68mm. Preoperatively, the levels analyzed were rated B, C or D according to Schizas for 53 out of 56 levels and A1-4 for 51 out of 56 levels in postoperative. All the results were statistically significant (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Decompression, assessed by MRI, seems to be equivalent by MIS approach to open laminarthrectomy. MIS approaches have been studied clinically in these indications with very satisfying results. As a conclusion, MIS approaches seems to be a relevant and efficient option in the treatment of lumbar degenerative stenosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

Identification and treatment of atypical acetabular fractures having an independent acetabular roof fragment: Three-column fractures.

INTRODUCTION: A unique type of both-column fracture of the acetabulum that also has an independent roof fragment seems to occur relatively often. It is challenging to diagnose, thus our ability to detect it and its frequency are not known. This led us to analyze a database of acetabular fractures to 1) determine the incidence of this type of fracture, 2) describe its radiological characteristics, 3) attempt to set out a specific treatment strategy. HYPOTHESIS: The need for a dual surgical approach depends on the type and displacement of the independent roof fragment. METHODS: Four surgeons and radiologists independently analyzed a set of acetabular fractures that occurred between 2007 and 2017. The diagnosis was made using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstructions. Once the fractures had been identified, a detailed description was made of all 2D and 3D slices. A retrospective analysis was done of the reduction and fixation of the independent roof fragment relative to the chosen surgical approach. RESULTS: The study comprised 534 acetabular fractures, of which 96 where both-column fractures. In that subset, 41% (39 fractures) had an independent roof fragment. A detailed analysis resulted in the identification of two subtypes of three-column fracture with independent fragment: type 1 has a posterosuperior fragment (22 cases); type 2 has an independent fragment separated by a juxtatectal fracture line (17 cases). The best radiological outcomes were achieved when the independent fragment was minimally displaced and did not require additional reduction. CONCLUSION: The isolated roof fragment is common, as it occurs is more than one-third of both-column fractures. We were able to identify two subtypes that require different surgical strategies. Surgical treatment of these fractures is difficult; thus a combined surgical approach (anterior followed by posterior) may provide the best reduction, especially for subtype 1. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Clinical impact of intraoperative cone beam tomography and navigation for displaced acetabular fractures: a comparative study at medium-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The use of per-operative cone beam tomography imaging for displaced acetabular fractures yields increased post-operative articular reduction accuracy. This study evaluates the need for total hip replacement (THR) and hip-related functional outcomes in patients with displaced acetabular fractures treated with O-ARM guidance compared to those treated under C-ARM guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective matched cohort study. Adult patients (35) with acetabular fractures operated under O-ARM guidance were included. These were matched (age, fracture type) to classically treated patients (35) from our data base. The primary outcome was the need for THR during three year follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were functional scores [Harris Hip score (HHS), Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA)] and hip osteoarthritis grade at three year follow-up. Correlation between reduction gap and THR was evaluated. RESULTS: At three years, five patients were lost to follow-up in O-ARM group and four in control group. Two patients (6.66%) in the O-ARM group needed THR compared to eight patients in controls (25.80%) (p = 0.046). Hip X-ray osteoarthritis grade averaged 0.00 in patients without THR in O-ARM group compared to 0.22 in patients without THR in controls (p = 0.008). HHS averaged 95.79 in patients without THR in O-ARM group, compared to 93.82 in patients without THR in the control group (p = 0.41%). PMA averaged 17.25 in patients without THR in the O-ARM group compared to 17.04 in patients without THR in group 2 (p = 0.37). Evaluation of correlation between reduction gap and THR rate yielded OR = 1.22 (1.06-1.45). DISCUSSION: Increased accuracy in articular reduction, with per-operative three-dimensional control of impaction, in acetabular fractures led to significantly less need for THR in patients treated under O-ARM. Patients in both groups are comparable for functional outcomes because those with the lowest scores were offered THR. Per-operative cone beam guidance and navigation use are recommended in tertiary referral centres for acetabular trauma.

Modified Stoppa Approach: Beyond Acetabular Fractures: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASES: We used the modified Stoppa approach in a 17-year-old man with a retained bullet in his acetabular fossa. The acetabular hole was used to irrigate the hip joint. We also used this approach in a 29-year-old woman with right hip pain and limping to remove an isolated tenosynovial giant cell tumor ("localized pigmented villonodular synovitis") in the acetabular fossa expanding through the acetabulum. DISCUSSION: We believe that this approach should become more familiar because it offers a simple alternative for treating acetabular pathologies mainly involving the acetabular fossa, sparing patients the hazards of capsulotomy, trochanteric osteotomy, dislocation, and traction and fluid pressure in hip arthroscopy.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Immobilization for First Episode of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Before the Age of 25: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The risk of recurrence after the first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation is high with nonoperative treatment in younger patients. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and nonoperative treatment for shoulder dislocation in patients younger than 25 years, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The hypothesis was that surgery would decrease the risk of recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: We included patients aged between 18 and 25 years after a first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation and divided them into 2 groups. The first group was treated surgically with an arthroscopic Bankart repair within 2 weeks after the dislocation; the second group was treated nonoperatively. Both groups were immobilized for 3 weeks in internal rotation and followed the same physical therapy protocol. Standard radiography and computed tomography were performed immediately after reduction of the dislocation, and follow-up was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome measure was instability recurrence, defined as another anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction by another person (the patient was unable to reduce the dislocated joint themselves), a subluxation, or a positive apprehension test. Secondary outcome measures included range of motion, return to sport, and functional scores such as the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score the Walch-Duplay score, and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in each group. The mean ± SD age was 21 ± 1.8 years, and there were 33 men (82.5%) and 7 women (17.5%) in the total sample. Recurrence of instability was significantly decreased in the surgical treatment group compared with the nonoperative group (2 [10%] vs 14 [70%], respectively; P = .0001). Fewer patients in the surgical treatment group versus the nonoperative group had another episode of dislocation (0 vs 6 [30%], respectively), subluxation (2 [10%] vs 13 [65%], respectively; P = .003), or a positive apprehension test (1 [5%] vs 11 [58%], respectively; P = .0005). The Walch-Duplay score (88.4 vs 70.3 points; P = .046) and WOSI (11.5 vs 17.7 points; P = .035) were significantly better in the surgical group versus the nonoperative group after a 2-year follow-up. Level of sport was the same or better in 89% of the surgical treatment group vs 53% of the nonoperative treatment group (P = .012). No surgical complication was recorded. We did not find any significant difference in range of motion. CONCLUSION: In patients with first-time shoulder dislocations, arthroscopic labral repair (Bankart procedure) reduced the risk of secondary shoulder dislocation and improved functional outcome versus nonoperative treatment after a 2-year follow-up. Surgical treatment after a first episode of shoulder dislocation could be offered as a primary treatment option in a younger population if these results are confirmed by larger studies with a longer follow-up. REGISTRATION: NCT03315819 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Iliosacral screwing under navigation control: Technical note.

Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is an essential osteosynthesis technique for pelvic fractures and requires precise imaging tools to assist correct screw placement. 3D imaging coupled to navigation has significantly improved this technique. Several possibilities exist, depending on the instrument set used, with varying degrees of difficulty and very variable risk of error. The techniques traditionally described use a guide to navigate a drill bit, where a one-degree difference in trajectory can alter screw tip placement by several millimeters. The present article proposes a standardization of the procedure by using navigated pedicular screw instruments that have the advantage of navigating the instrument itself and not a projection. In a series of 90 screws implanted in 62 patients using this technique, only one path had to be repeated in the light of intraoperative control. No improperly positioned screws were found on postoperative control.

Arthroscopic Foveal Reattachment of the Triangular Fibro Cartilaginous Complex.

Background Foveal attachment of the triangular fibrocartilaginous complex (TFCC) is essential for distal radioulnar joint stability. Controversy still exists as to which is the best treatment in case of foveal lesions. Actual arthroscopic techniques either require mini open steps or are complex and expensive. We present a simple all inside knotless repair, providing a strong bony fixation in the fovea. Materials and Methods Through 3-4 and 6R portals, the ulnar fovea is debrided and a wire is passed percutaneously through the TFCC to place a mattress suture at its free end. It is then reattached to the fovea with an impacted anchor. Retrospective Study Between 2013 and 2016, a cohort of 5 patients presenting with isolated Palmer 1B, EWAS 2 lesions of the TFCC were operated on with this technique. Clinical evaluation was based on a compared measurement of the grip strength, pain on a visual analogic scale (VAS), different ranges of motion, and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability. We also used functional scores: Mayo modified wrist score (MMWS), Quick disability arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), and patient-related wrist evaluation (PRWE). The average follow-up was 29.4 months (range 9-42 months). Results On postoperative evaluation, pain was reduced by 5 points (range 1-9) and grip strength averaged 94% of the unaffected side. Range of motion averaged 92% on the unaffected side. DRUJ instability was slight in 4 patients and mild in 1 patient. MMWS was excellent for 1, good for 1, and satisfactory for 3 patients. Quick Dash averaged 17.68 (range 0-38.6) compared with preoperative average of 59.48 (range 45-77) with an amelioration of 43 (range 34-57). PRWE averaged 20 (range 1-41.5) compared with preoperative average of 60.3 (range 33.5-76.5) with an amelioration of 41 (range 32-58). We reported no complications and particularly no lesions of the dorsal sensory branch of the ulnar nerve. Conclusions We present a simple arthroscopic technique using a single suture anchor placed in the ulnar fovea. Repairs performed with this technique are simple and the results achieved seem to be similar to those obtained with conventional open or arthroscopic techniques, although further investigation with an increased number of patients and follow-up are required. It however became our first choice of treatment in European Wrist Arthroscopy Society (EWAS) 2 lesions of the TFCC.

Anterior approach to the sacroiliac joint for pelvic ring fractures: Technical note.

Displaced pelvic fractures, combining an anterior lesion and sacroiliac disruption, most often require multiple surgical approaches. The technique we describe here allows these lesions to be treated by a single approach. It combines a Stoppa approach to address the anterior lesion and a pararectus approach to the sacroiliac joint through the same incision under the rectus abdominis muscle. This pararectus approach is done by passing laterally to the external and common iliac vessels. The entire anterior surface of the sacroiliac joint is exposed by the same passage through the abdominal wall. No neurological or vascular complications occurred in a 7-patient case series. Reduction was achieved in all cases. This approach is an interesting alternative to traditional approaches and enriches the surgeon's therapeutic arsenal for managing these complex fractures.

A New, Easy, Fast, and Reliable Method to Correctly Classify Acetabular Fractures According to the Letournel System.

BACKGROUND: Accurate classification of acetabular fractures remains difficult. To aid in the classification of acetabular fractures and to aid in teaching, our department developed a diagnostic algorithm that involves the use of 1 standardized 3-dimensional reconstruction of a computed tomography (CT) scan (an exopelvic view without the femoral head) with 8 anatomical landmarks. The algorithm was integrated into a smartphone application (app). The main objective of this study was to test the efficacy of this algorithm and smartphone app. METHODS: Fourteen reviewers (3 experts, 3 fellows, 3 residents, and 5 novice reviewers) evaluated a set of 35 CT scans of acetabular fractures in 2 phases. During the first phase, the scans (including axial 2-dimensional views and 3-dimensional (3D) multiplanar reconstruction views) were assessed by each reviewer twice, with an interval of 4 weeks between the readings to decrease recall bias. During that phase, the reviewers were provided with a diagram of the Letournel classification system with no guidelines for interpretation. During the second phase, performed 4 weeks after the first phase, 1 standardized 3D reconstruction (an exopelvic view without the femoral head) was reviewed twice, with an interval of 4 weeks between the readings. During that phase, the reviewers used the smartphone app. The primary outcome was the accuracy of classification. Interobserver reliability, reading time, and time needed for accurate classification were noted. RESULTS: The accuracy of fracture classification was 64.5% when the standard method of analysis was used and 83.4% when the app was used (p < 0.001). Improvement was noted in all groups, with the expert group showing the least improvement (88.6% to 97.2%, p = 0.04) and the novice group showing the most improvement (42.0% to 75.5%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, use of the app greatly increased the accuracy of classification of complex fractures. The average reading time was 71.8 minutes when the standard method was used and 37.4 minutes when the app was used. The interobserver reliability improved in all groups to an excellent reliability (interclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: The Letournel classification system is difficult to understand and to learn but remains the only system guiding the surgical strategy for acetabular fractures. The impact of diagnostic algorithms is debatable. The most important finding of the present study is the high accuracy for inexperienced groups when the app was used. Another important finding is the high reliability of this method for the diagnosis of complex acetabular fractures.

Standardized three dimensional computerised tomography scanner reconstructions increase the accuracy of acetabular fracture classification.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the role of four standardized 3D reconstruction views in the accurate diagnosis of acetabular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five acetabular fracture cases were selected from a tertiary centre database. Fourteen reviewers with different experience level evaluated this set of images which were provided in axial 2D views and multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) without 3D views in the first two readings then the standardized 3D views were added for the subsequent two readings. The primary outcome was the accuracy of diagnosis while inter-observer reliability and reading time as well as time needed for accurate diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: Accuracy of classification was 56.7% using the 2D and 73% using the described 3D (p < 0.001). Improvement was noted in all groups even though the expert group showed the least improvement (6.7% (p = 0.04)) and the least experience group showed the most improvement (35.7% (p < 0.001)). Average time of interpretation was 96 minutes for the 2D sets and 47 minutes for the 3D sets. Finally, the adding of the four standardized views increased the inter-observer reliability in all groups compared to the standard 2D sets with MPR. CONCLUSION: Acetabular fracture diagnosis according to Letournel classification is difficult and depends greatly on the experience of the reader. The described set of 3D images yields better accuracy and renders the diagnosis more repeatable and faster. We recommend the use of these images in classifying acetabular fractures.