Changes of the serum properties and its effect on the endothelial cells restoration in patients with chronic venous disease treated with sulodexide.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are important venous changes in patients with chronic venous disease (CVD). The use of the venoactive drugs remains an important treatment modality for patients with CVD, reducing the severity of the CVD-related symptoms and swelling but also reducing inflammation and protecting endothelial cells. In this research, the effects of the serum obtained from patients with CVD before and after sulodexide treatment were evaluated for in vivo and in vitro inflammatory markers and endothelial cell function. METHODS: Inflammatory markers (IL-6, matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9], vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1], and von Willebrand factor [vWF]) from the incompetent great saphenous veins (GSVs) and from the systemic venous circulation were studied in 10 patients with CVD (C2s) before and after 2 months of sulodexide (2 × 500 lipasemic units/d) therapy. Serum obtained from the vein blood before and after sulodexide treatment was evaluated for in vitro cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cell function. RESULTS: The serum collected from lower leg incompetent GSVs had significantly elevated levels of VCAM-1 (+29%, P < .001) compared with the serum from the systemic circulation. Endothelial cells exposed to the serum from the incompetent lower leg veins of the untreated CVD patients demonstrated higher stimulated synthesis of MMP-9 (+17%, P < .01), as well as increased markers of senescence (prolongation of population doubling time, ß-galactosidase activity, and expression of p21 and p53 genes). CVD serum-induced senescent endothelial cells had a higher expression of genes regulating IL-6, MMP-9, VCAM-1, and vWF synthesis. The overall proinflammatory effect on endothelial cells by the serum collected from the incompetent GSVs was stronger as compared with the serum from the systemic circulation. Serum collected from the veins after sulodexide treatment caused lower levels of endothelial cell inflammatory markers as well as respective gene expression than serum obtained at the beginning of the study (before sulodexide treatment). Sulodexide application also reduced the inflammatory secretory activity of the senescent endothelial cells. Sulodexide treatment resulted in the decrease of the majority of the studied inflammatory parameters in both lower limb incompetent vein and systemic blood. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CVD, there are significant differences between circulating inflammatory markers analyzed from the lower leg incompetent GSV segments compared with the systemic circulation, indicating a higher inflammatory condition in CVD. Treatment with sulodexide reduces the proinflammatory and endothelial cell activation properties of the serum from patients with CVD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study documented the significant proinflammatory human vascular endothelial cell activation when exposed to the serum collected from the varicose veins as compared with the serum from the systemic circulation in patients with chronic venous disease (CVD). The inflammatory marker expression, endothelial dysfunction, and endothelial cell senescence transformation can be successfully controlled and downregulated by patients' exposure to the glycosaminoglycan (sulodexide) treatment. Further studies are needed to confirm if glycosaminoglycan application can prevent further CVD clinical progression due to potential CVD-related pathological processes' modulation and their downregulation.

Recurrences and bleeding during extended treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism: results of the international, prospective, observational WHITE study.

BACKGROUND: Little data are available on real-life long-term treatments after a venous thromboembolism (VTE), and on recurrent VTE or bleeds events during treatments. METHODS: We investigated the complications occurring during follow-up (FU) in VTE patients who had received the treatment decisions given by the clinical centers, active in 7 countries (China, Czechia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, Tunisia), which participated in the international, prospective, observational WHITE study. RESULTS: FU information was collected in 1004 patients, recruited by 62 clinical centers (17 centers did not participate in FU collection). Extended treatments were proposed to 811 patients: direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (475), sulodexide (202), antiplatelet agents (73), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (45), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (16). All specific treatments were stopped in the remaining 193 patients. Patients who during FU used treatments different than those prescribed by the local investigators (263) or for other causes (26) were excluded from analysis. 50 primary events occurred throughout 1044 years FU in 715 patients, 4.8 incidence (×100 patient-years) [3.8 for recurrences, and 0.96 for bleeding (major or clinically relevant)]. Primary event incidence differed according to treatments (LMWH=33.3, antiplatelets =7.6, VKAs = 6.1, DOACs = 4.7, sulodexide = 4.2, all treatment stopped = 2.5), and differed across the involved countries. CONCLUSIONS: DOACs were the most used drugs for extended treatments. Overall, the rate of primary events during FU was low. The investigators identified patients at low risk of recurrence and high bleeding risk. Sulodexide use for secondary prevention deserves further studies.

Influence of clinical presentation, site, and extent of venous thrombosis on decision about duration of anticoagulation: Data from the international, prospective, observational WHITE study.

BACKGROUND: Low attention has generally been dedicated to the influence of clinical presentation, extent of venous thrombosis and presence of residual vein obstruction (RVO) on the decision about the duration of secondary prophylaxis after a first venous thromboembolism (VTE). AIM: This study aimed at investigating the role of the mentioned VTE characteristics on the therapeutic decision using the information collected in the international, prospective, observational WHITE study. RESULTS: 1240 patients were recruited by 79 clinical centers in 7 countries (China, Czechia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, and Tunisia). 35 patients had as index event a pulmonary embolism (PE) without a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and all continued anticoagulation. We focused on the 1205 subjects with DVT. The treatment decision differed among countries; altogether, more than 85% of patients with proximal (with or without distal) DVT continued a prophylactic treatment with anticoagulants, or antithrombotics; 34% of patients with isolated distal DVT stopped treatment, and more than 85% of patients with a PE associated to a DVT continued treatment. At multivariable analysis, the presence of proximal DVT, signs of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), residual vein obstruction (RVO), maintenance <180 days and concomitant diseases was associated with increased probability to continue secondary prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: The presentation as proximal DVT (with or without PE) or isolated PE influenced the treating physicians' decision in favor of extension of secondary prophylaxis, together with the presence of concomitant diseases and local conditions which may increase the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome.

Unprovoked or provoked venous thromboembolism: not the prevalent criterion to decide on anticoagulation extension in clinical practice of various countries-the prospective, international, observational WHITE study.

The decision on treatment after a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) to prevent recurrences may be influenced by many factors. The prospective, observational, WHITE study aimed to analyze how this issue was tackled in every-day clinical practice in various countries, which have sensibly different socio-economic conditions and healthcare systems. Doctors active in 79 Internal or Vascular clinical centers in 7 countries (China, Czechia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, and Tunisia) enrolled VTE patients after the maintenance treatment phase. The present report analyzed information, collected in the central database, regarding the baseline characteristics, index events, type and duration of anticoagulant therapy and decision on post-maintenance treatment. From April 2018 to December 2020, 1240 patients were enrolled, 58% with an unprovoked index event. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were used in > 85% of all cases in China, Poland, Portugal, Russia and Czechia, in 52% in Slovakia and in no patient in Tunisia. The maintenance anticoagulation lasted in average approximately 6 months. Altogether, anticoagulation was stopped in 20%, extended in about 50%, regardless of whether the event was unprovoked or provoked and shifted to antithrombotics (mainly sulodexide or aspirin) in the remaining patients. In conclusion, some differences in VTE patient management were found between countries. The provoked/unprovoked nature of the index event, instead, was not the prevalent criterion to drive the decision on extension of anticoagulation, without large variations between countries. DOACs were the most widely used anticoagulant drugs, whereas > 25% of patients received antithrombotic drugs instead of anticoagulants as extended treatment.

Anticoagulation Duration After First Venous Thromboembolism: Real-Life Data From the International, Observational WHITE Study.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend at least three months anticoagulation in all patients after acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and suggest those with unprovoked events be considered for indefinite anticoagulation if the risk of recurrence is high and the risk of bleeding during treatment non-high. Other authors have recently argued against using a dichotomy unprovoked/provoked events to decide on anticoagulation duration and suggest instead using overall risk factors present in each patient as the basis for deciding. AIM: This sub-analysis of the WHITE study aimed at assessing the reasons for the treatment decisions taken by doctors in different countries. RESULTS: 1240 patients were recruited in 7 countries (China, Czechia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, and Tunisia). Anticoagulation was extended in 51.7% and 49.3% of patients with unprovoked or provoked events (n.s.); stopped in 15.4% versus 28.9% (P < .0001), and changed to antithrombotic drugs (sulodexide or aspirin) in 32.9% versus 21.8% (P < .0001). In the 430 subjects with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) anticoagulation was stopped in 34.4%, continued in 37.0% (mainly those with post-thrombotic syndrome [PTS]) and switched to antithrombotics in the balance. High risk of recurrence was the most prevalent reason (>83% of cases) given to continue anticoagulation, regardless of nature and site of the index events, followed by risk of bleeding and presence of PTS signs. CONCLUSION: On average, attending physicians estimated the risk of recurrence in real life conditions, and the consequent therapeutic decision, using all the information available, not limiting to the location or nature of the index event.

Can we predict and prevent the postthrombotic syndrome?

Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) remains one of the major late complications of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a reported prevalence from 10 to 50%. Many factors were found to be related with the development and severity of PTS such as ipsilateral recurrent DVT, advanced age, obesity, ilio-femoral DVT and primary chronic venous disease presence. Some PTS prediction models have been proposed based on risk factor weight. However, it is still difficult to predict which patient with DVT will develop PTS and thus, the clinical application of these models remains limited. Among the identified problems the heterogeneity of the DVT patient population together with the variety of PTS clinical presentations and difficulties concerning PTS severity assessment should be mentioned. Difficulties on the implementation of the specific and objective PTS identification method have also the significant influence on the research focusing on PTS prevention modalities including risk factor modification, compression treatment, anticoagulation and invasive DVT treatment. In this review, the current approach and knowledge on PTS prediction and prevention are presented, including the conservative and invasive DVT treatment possibilities.

Factors associated with the symptomatic status of carotid artery stenosis: identification in a cross-sectional study and development of a scoring system.

INTRODUCTION: The identification of asymptomatic patients at high risk of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis destabilization and symptom occurrence is crucial for prognosis estimation. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine differences between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic ICA stenosis and to develop a predictive model for the risk of symptomatic stenosis based on data collected in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 163 patients with asymptomatic and 182 patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis greater than 70%. The study groups were compared in terms of stroke risk factors and comorbidities, coexisting ICA stenosis on the contralateral side, atherosclerosis in other arterial territories, and the morphology of atherosclerotic plaque assessed by transcervical ultrasound. RESULTS: Independent risk factors for symptomatic ICA stenosis included: male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; 95% CI, 1.87-4.32; P <0.001), diabetes (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.62-5.12; P <0.001), body mass index >25 kg/m2 (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.72-1.86; P <0.001), chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.34-8.87; P = 0.007), increased­risk features of ultrasound plaque morphology (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.29-3.72; P = 0.009), and coexisting atherosclerosis in 3 or 4 vascular areas (OR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.77-7.23; P <0.001).The sensitivity and specificity of the scoring model designed to estimate the risk of symptomatic ICA stenosis reached 77.6% and 76.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This cross­sectional study indicated that the analysis of selected imaging and clinical parameters may enable clinicians to estimate the risk of symptomatic ICA stenosis. The proposed scoring system requires further prospective validation.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Thrombotic Risk Stratification in the Varicose Veins Surgery-Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: An invasive phlebological treatment is still not free from complications such as thrombosis. As in other surgical populations, not only the treatment modality, but also patient condition-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factors matter. The current protocols used in varicose vein surgery centers are based mostly on individual risk assessment as well as on an implementation and extrapolation of general surgery VTE prophylaxis guidelines. In the presented study, the efficacy of routine VTE pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing saphenous varicose vein surgery was prospectively evaluated. In the result assessment, VTE risk factor evaluation and Caprini score results were included; however, due to the limited size of the projected study group, as well as expected limited deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prevalence in this clinical scenario, it was not possible to perform the validation of the Caprini model efficacy in the projected study model. METHODS: In the study, 141 patients undergoing saphenous vein stripping and miniphlebectomy in spinal anesthesia were included. In all of the patients, VTE risk factors (including Caprini score evaluation) were assessed, and the routine thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin 40 mg for 10 days was used. The venous ultrasounds were undertaken before the surgery and on the 10th and 30th day after surgery. The study endpoint was the presence of symptomatic or asymptomatic DVT confirmed in the imaging study. The study safety endpoint was major bleeding occurrence intraoperatively or within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: The presence of a postoperative DVT was diagnosed in five cases (3.5%) In all of these cases, only distal DVT was confirmed. Despite extensive saphenous varicose vein surgery with stripping and miniphlebectomy performed in nontumescent but spinal anesthesia, no proximal lower leg episode was diagnosed. Three out of five DVT cases were diagnosed on day 10 postoperative control, while a further two were confirmed in the ultrasound examination performed 30 days after procedure. No clinically documented pulmonaly embolism (PE) as well as no bleeding episodes were noticed. Among the factors related to the statistically significant higher DVT occurrence, the results of the Caprini score were identified with odds ratio (OR) = 2.04 (95% CI = (0.998; 4.18)). Another factor that became statistically significant in terms of the higher postoperative DVT prevalence was the reported Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) results (OR = 1.98; 95% CI (1.19; 3.26)). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the patient age (OR = 0.86; 95% CI (0.75-0.99)), Caprini score evaluation results (OR = 4.04; 95% CI (1.26-12.9)) and VCSS results (OR = 2.4; 95% CI (1.23-4.7)) were of statistical significance as predictors for postoperative DVT occurrence, with a p value of 0.029 for age, and p = 0.017 and p = 0.009 for Caprini score results and VCSS results, respectively. Due to the confirmed limited number of the DVT events in our study cohort, as well as the descriptive and explorative nature of the achieved results, the final clinical potential and significance of the identified parameters, including Caprini score rate and VCSS rate, should be interpreted with caution and studied in the further trials in these clinical settings. CONCLUSION: All the patients undergoing varicose vein surgery should undergo VTE risk evaluation based on the individual assessment. In VTE risk evaluation, patient and surgical procedure characteristics based on the factors included into the Caprini score but also on specific chronic venous disease-related factors should be taken into consideration. Further studies are needed to propose an objective and validated VTE risk assessment model, as well as a validated antithrombotic prophylaxis protocol in this particular patient group.

Sulodexide increases mRNA expression of glutathione-related genes in human umbilical endothelial cells exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation.

INTRODUCTION: Sulodexide (SDX), a heparinoid used to treat vascular diseases, exerts anti-ischemic properties. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Induction of glutathione (GSH)-dependent genes protects against ischemia. Here, we investigated the effect of SDX on GSH-associated gene expression in human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVECs) using an in vitro ischemia model. METHODS: The transcriptional expression of GSH-related genes (GCLc, xCT, GS, GPx1 and GR) in HUVECs treated without/with SDX (0.5 LRU/ml) under oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) condition for 1-6 h was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: GCLc and xCT were strongly up-regulated by SDX in HUVECs in the first 2 h of OGD. GS and GPx1 mRNA expression levels were significantly increased during any time interval in ischemic HUVECs treated with SDX. Furthermore, incubation of HUVECs with SDX in OGD for 1-4 h resulted in enhanced expression of GR. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies provide the first evidence that SDX activates GSH-related genes in OGD-injured HUVECs.

Compression therapy for leg oedema in patients with heart failure.

The presence of chronic heart failure (CHF) results in a significant risk of leg oedema. Medical compression (MC) treatment is one of the basic methods of leg oedema elimination in patients with chronic venous disease and lymphedema, but it is not routinely considered in subjects with CHF-related swelling. In the study, an overview of the current knowledge related to the benefits and risk of using MC in the supportive treatment of leg oedema in CHF patients is presented. The available studies dedicated the comprehensive management of leg swelling using MC in CHF patients published in the English language literature till December 2019 were evaluated in term of the treatment efficacy and safety. In studies performed on CHF populations, manual lymphatic drainage, MC stocking, multilayer bandaged, as well as intermittent pneumatic compression or electric calf stimulations were used. The current evidence is based on non-randomized studies, small study cohorts, as well as very heterogenous populations. The use of the intermittent pneumatic compression in CHF patients significantly increases the right auricular pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressures as well as decreases systemic vascular resistance in most patients without the clinical worsening. The transient and rapid increase in the human atrial natriuretic peptide, after an application of the MC stocking in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II patients was observed without clinical exacerbation. An application of the multilayer bandages in NYHA classes III and IV patients lead a significant increase in the right arterial pressure and lead to transient deterioration of the right and the left ventricular functions. In the manual lymphatic drainage study, aside from expected leg circumference reduction, no clinical worsening was observed. In a pilot study performed in a small cohort of CHF patients, electrical calf stimulation use resulted in a reduction in the lean mass of the legs without cardiac function worsening. The use of local leg compression can be considered stable CHF patients without decompensated heart function for both CHF-related oedema treatment and for treatment of the concomitant diseases leading to leg swelling occurrence. The use of MC in more severe classes of CHF (NYHA III and IV) should be the subject of future clinical studies to select the safest and most efficient compression method as well as to select the patients who benefit most from this kind of treatment.

Sulodexide up-regulates glutathione S-transferase P1 by enhancing Nrf2 expression and translocation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells injured by oxygen glucose deprivation.

INTRODUCTION: Sulodexide (SDX) is used for the treatment of many vascular disorders due to its anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory and anti-atherosclerotic properties. However, the detailed molecular mechanism of its endothelioprotective action is still not completely understood. There is increasing evidence suggesting that antioxidant enzymes play an important role in anti-ischemic properties of SDX. We postulate that up-regulation of glutathione-S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) mediated by the transcription factor Nrf2 could be associated with the antioxidant effect of SDX on vascular endothelial cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study, we investigated whether SDX affects GSTP1 and Nrf2 in oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) treated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The cells treated with/without SDX (0.5 LRU/ml) were subjected to OGD for 1-6 h. To study the influence of SDX on the Nrf2 nucleus accumulation, the cells were incubated with 0.5 LRU/ml SDX in OGD for 1 h. RESULTS: We found that after short-term OGD (1-3 h), the drug increased the expression of both GSTP1 and Nrf2 mRNA/protein in HUVECs (p < 0.05), as determined by real-time PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). SDX treatment also enhanced the nuclear accumulation of Nrf2 in HUVECs after 1 h of OGD (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SDX induces a rapid onset of the antioxidant response by up-regulating the expression of GSTP1 and Nrf2 in endothelial cells subjected to in vitro simulated ischemia.

Risks and contraindications of medical compression treatment - A critical reappraisal. An international consensus statement.

OBJECTIVES: Medical compression therapy is used for non-invasive treatment of venous and lymphatic diseases. Medical compression therapy-associated adverse events and contraindications have been reported, although some contraindications are theoretically based. This consensus statement provides recommendations on medical compression therapy risks and contraindications. METHODS: A systematic literature search of medical compression therapy publications reporting adverse events up until November 2017 was performed. A consensus panel comprising 15 international experts critically reviewed the publications and formulated the recommendations. RESULTS: Sixty-two publications reporting medical compression therapy adverse events were identified. The consensus panel issued 21 recommendations on medical compression therapy contraindications and adverse event risk mitigation, in addition to reviewing medical compression therapy use in borderline indications. The most frequently reported non-severe medical compression therapy-associated adverse events included skin irritation, discomfort and pain. Very rare but severe adverse events, including soft tissue and nerve injury, were also identified. CONCLUSION: This consensus statement summarises published medical compression therapy-associated adverse events and contraindications, and provides guidance on medical compression therapy. Severe medical compression therapy-associated adverse events are very rarely encountered if compression is used correctly and contraindications are considered.

The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards.

The CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) classification is an internationally accepted standard for describing patients with chronic venous disorders and it has been used for reporting clinical research findings in scientific journals. Developed in 1993, updated in 1996, and revised in 2004, CEAP is a classification system based on clinical manifestations of chronic venous disorders, on current understanding of the etiology, the involved anatomy, and the underlying venous pathology. As the evidence related to these aspects of venous disorders, and specifically of chronic venous diseases (CVD, C2-C6) continue to develop, the CEAP classification needs periodic analysis and revisions. In May of 2017, the American Venous Forum created a CEAP Task Force and charged it to critically analyze the current classification system and recommend revisions, where needed. Guided by four basic principles (preservation of the reproducibility of CEAP, compatibility with prior versions, evidence-based, and practical for clinical use), the Task Force has adopted the revised Delphi process and made several changes. These changes include adding Corona phlebectatica as the C4c clinical subclass, introducing the modifier "r" for recurrent varicose veins and recurrent venous ulcers, and replacing numeric descriptions of the venous segments by their common abbreviations. This report describes all these revisions and the rationale for making these changes.

The risk of renal function deterioration in abdominal aortic stent graft patients with and without previous kidney function failure - an analysis of risk factors.

PURPOSE: Kidney failure influences the treatment outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). A prospective study of renal function before and after aortic stent-graft treatment was performed. Special attention was paid to the influence of preoperative kidney function as well as the impact of the radiological follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 214 endovascularly treated AAA patients were included. In all cases, pre- and postope-rative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine were noted. Patients were prospectively followed up for a minimum of two years. RESULTS: The baseline eGFR was 69.38 ± 16.29 ml/min/1.73 m2. Chronic kidney disease at baseline was noted in 29% of patients. In the direct postoperative period, acute kidney injury was identified in 8.4% of cases. Additional endo-vascular procedures within two years of observation were performed in 5.6% of cases, and over the two years of follow-up, in the study group from one to six angio-computed tomographic scans (angio-CT) per patient were performed. The mean eGFR value after the 24-month follow-up was significantly lower than the preoperative value. Among the factors influencing kidney function, an angio-CT during the same hospital stay of the primary stent-graft procedures was identified. The type of stent-graft, contrast volume during the primary procedure, need for reintervention, concomitant disease presence, and statin use did not show statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Angio-CT followed by stent-graft implantation over a short time interval (within the same hospitalisation) significantly worsened renal function in the late follow-up and should be avoided in elective AAA cases.

The Association of SNPs Located in the CDKN2B-AS1 and LPA Genes With Carotid Artery Stenosis and Atherogenic Stroke.

Introduction: The aim of this project was to assess the prevalence of four selected SNPs rs4977574 and rs7857345 (CDKN2B-AS1 gene) and rs3798220 and rs10455872 polymorphisms (the LPA gene) in the subpopulation of patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Material and Methods: This study included 623 individuals (244 patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, 176 patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and 203 healthy people. All the participants underwent neurological examination, duplex Doppler ultrasound examination and molecular procedures. Results: In the first part of the analysis the assiociation of SNPs with stroke/TIA was investigated. The association was seen in symptomatic vs. control group for two SNPs: rs4977574 and rs7857345 (CDKN2B-AS1 gene); genotype distributions for rs4977574 and rs7857345 showed the statistically significant differences between patients and controls (p = 0.043 and 0.017, respectively). No association was observed for rs3798220 and rs10455872 located in the LPA gene. There were statistically significant differences between asymptomatic patients vs. control group in genotype distribution for the SNPs located in CDKN2B-AS1: rs4977574 and rs7857345 (p = 0.031 and 0.0099, respectively); and for the rs3798220 (LPA gene; p = 0.003); however, statistically significant differences did not occur for the rs10455872 polymorphism located in the LPA gene. In the next part of the evaluation, a comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was performed. Significant differences in genotype distribution were seen only for the rs3798220 polymorphism located in the LPA gene (p = 0.0015). The analysis of the prevalence of the polymorphisms in the total group (symptomatic and asymptomatic) patients in comparison with the control group showed significant differences for three polymorphisms: rs4977574 and rs7857345 (CDKN2B-AS1 gene; p = 0.015 and 0.0046, respectively) and rs3798220 (LPA gene, p = 0.044). Conclusions: The present research on the carotid artery stenosis patient cohort suggests the significant association between the rs4977574, rs7857345 and rs3798220 polymorphisms and carotid artery stenosis as well as between the rs4977574 and rs7857345 polymorphisms and atherogenic stroke. The rs4977574 and rs7857345 polymorphisms in patients with carotid artery stenosis appear to affect a person's susceptibility to atherogenic brain ischemia. Our results need to be replicated in future studies.