Hepatitis C increases the risk of progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with glomerulonephritis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We have shown that hepatitis C does not increase the risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD), but it is not known if hepatitis C worsens progression of existing CKD. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with primary glomerulonephritis on biopsy over 4 years, evaluating the progression of CKD over time. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 111 patients: 21% were positive for hepatitis C, 61% were negative for hepatitis C and 18% were not tested. The hepatitis C-positive subjects were more likely to be African American (p = 0.031), followed for fewer days (p = 0.007) and have diabetes and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis on biopsy (p < 0.001). Longitudinal follow-up of CKD progression using multiple creatinine measures analyzed by repeated measures ANCOVA demonstrated that patients with hepatitis C had a worsening creatinine over time compared to the hepatitis C-negative and not tested groups (p < 0.001). By Cox hazards regression analyses, risk of death/end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was decreased in patients who tested negative for hepatitis C compared to testing positive (0.46, CI 0.27-0.88), but this became nonsignificant after adjustment for mean arterial pressure and hemoglobin. CONCLUSION: Our results support that infection with hepatitis C in patients with glomerulonephritis is associated with an increased risk of progression of CKD. Prospective studies are required to confirm these observations.

A randomized trial of cholecalciferol versus doxercalciferol for lowering parathyroid hormone in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a randomized, blinded, 3-month trial in vitamin D-deficient CKD stage 3 and 4 patients with parathyroid hormone (PTH) values above the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative target, comparing cholecalciferol (4000 IU/d x 1 month, then 2000 IU/d; n = 22) to doxercalciferol (1 microg/d; n = 25). RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline demographics or lab tests, except a slightly higher estimated GFR (eGFR) in the doxercalciferol group. There was a significant increase in vitamin D level in the cholecalciferol group (14 +/- 6 to 37 +/- 10 ng/ml; P < 0.001) but no change in the doxercalciferol group. The PTH decreased by 27% +/- 34% in the doxercalciferol group (P = 0.002) and decreased by 10% +/- 31% in the cholecalciferol group (P = 0.16), but the difference between treatments was NS (P = 0.11). Similar results were found when absolute PTH change from baseline to end point was analyzed in a repeated-measures ANOVA model. The serum calcium and urine calcium excretions were not different. Additional non-mineral-related end points, albuminuria, and BP were evaluated, and although trends were present, this did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized trial demonstrated a within-group reduction in PTH in the doxercalciferol-treated patients but no significant difference between the doxercalciferol and cholecalciferol patients. Larger, long-term studies are needed to demonstrate efficacy of mineral-related and non-mineral-related end points and safety.