RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the risk of neutropenia during treatment with anti-IL-23 antibodies in patients with psoriasis. METHOD: We conducted an observational study with cohort design using MID-NET® in Japan. We identified patients with psoriasis who were newly prescribed anti-IL-23 antibodies, anti-IL-17-antibodies, adalimumab, or apremilast between January 1, 2009, and March 31, 2021. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of anti-IL-23 antibodies compared to that of anti-IL-17 antibodies, adalimumab, or apremilast, for the risk of grade 2 (neutrophil count < 1,500/µL) or grade 3 (neutrophil count < 1,000/µL) neutropenia. RESULTS: Overall, 287 patients on anti-IL-23 antibodies, 189 patients on anti-IL-17 antibodies, 293 patients on adalimumab, and 540 patients on apremilast were included. Compared with anti-IL-17 antibodies, the aHR (95% confidence interval (CI)) of anti-IL-23 antibodies was 0.83 (0.27-2.51) for grade 2 and 0.40 (0.02-7.60) for grade 3 neutropenia; that when compared with adalimumab was 0.76 (0.28-2.06) for grade 2 but was not calculated for grade 3 as no cases were found; and that compared with apremilast was 3.88 (0.62-24.48) for grade 2 and 0.43 (0.02-11.63) for grade 3 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: No clear increase in the risk of neutropenia with anti-IL-23 antibodies was observed.
Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Interleucina-17 , Interleucina-23 , Neutropenia , Psoriasis , Talidomida , Humanos , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Adalimumab/inmunología , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/inmunología , Femenino , Masculino , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/inmunología , Neutropenia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Japón , Adulto , Interleucina-17/antagonistas & inhibidores , Interleucina-17/inmunología , Interleucina-23/antagonistas & inhibidores , Interleucina-23/inmunología , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The ICH E17 guidelines (2014-2017) on Multiregional Clinical Trials (MRCT) was a joint effort by the regulators and industry to facilitate simultaneous global drug development and registration through taking a strategic approach for clinical trials. In other words, the objective was to reduce the time it takes to bringing medications to patients around the world through minimizing unnecessary duplication of local or regional studies, which may add the regulatory burden to cost and time of bringing new therapies to patients. Under the auspices of ICH, training materials were created and provided to various stakeholders. Despite the successful promotion of the benefits of ICH E17 MRCT guidelines across the different regions, the uptake of some concepts (e.g., pooling strategy) in the ICH E17 guidelines has been slow. This paper describes various factors which could affect the conduct of MRCT at a global level, including ambiguity in definition of "region" (in MRCT), new regulatory requirements to enroll a diverse patient population, the use of decentralized clinical trials, use of data sources other than randomized clinical trials (e.g., use of Real Word Data), and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the conduct of MRCT.
Asunto(s)
Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Guías como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the post-marketing stage, cases of hypocalcemia associated with bisphosphonate preparations (BPs) have been reported in patients with decreased kidney function, despite warning against use of BPs in such patients in the package insert (PI) of Japan. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of BPs in patients with decreased kidney function. METHODS: The cohort study was conducted in patients with osteoporosis and newly prescribed bisphosphonate utilizing real-world data from MID-NET® in Japan. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for hypocalcemia (a corrected serum Ca level < 8.00 mg/dL) relative to the normal group were calculated in each decreased kidney function group (mild, moderate or severe group). RESULTS: A total of 14,551 patients were included in the analysis, comprising 2,601 (17.88%) with normal (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73m2), 7,613 (52.32%) with mild (60 ≤ eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73m2), 3,919 (26.93%) with moderate (30 ≤ eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2), and 418 (2.87%) with severe kidney function (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2). The aHRs (95% confidence interval) for hypocalcemia were 1.85 (0.75-4.57), 2.30 (0.86-6.21), and 22.74 (8.37-61.78) in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The increased risk of hypocalcemia depending on kidney function was also observed even when calculating the aHR for each specific BP such as alendronate sodium hydrate, minodronic acid hydrate, and sodium risedronate hydrate. Furthermore, similar results were obtained in the sensitivity analysis by altering the outcome definition to a 20% or more reduction in corrected serum Ca level from the baseline, as well as when focusing on patients with more than one laboratory test result per 30 days during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the risk of hypocalcemia during BP prescription is higher in patients with decreased kidney function, particularly those with severely decreased kidney function. The quantitative real-world evidence on the safety risk of BPs obtained in this study has led to the PI revision describing a relationship between hypocalcemia risk and decreased kidney function as a regulatory action in Japan and will contribute to promoting the proper use of BPs with appropriate risk management in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Hipocalcemia , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Hipocalcemia/inducido químicamente , Hipocalcemia/epidemiología , Japón/epidemiología , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , RiñónRESUMEN
We examined the development strategies of new molecular entities approved during a 10-year period (fiscal years of 2012-2021) in Japan to determine the differences in drug lag between Japan and foreign companies. The results demonstrated a clear difference in development strategies. For example, products were usually developed through a "only-Japan" strategy by Japan companies (51.1% of products), compared to a "MRCT (multi-regional clinical trials)" strategy by foreign companies (54.9% of products). Regarding types of licenses, for Japan companies, the percentage of original products was higher in the category of less drug lag, such as "no approval in the US and EU" (59.1%), whereas the percentage of "license-in" products was markedly higher in the "drug lag ≥ 5 years" category (52.5%). Such differences were not observed for products developed by foreign companies. Of 64 license-in products developed by Japan companies with a drug lag > 5 years, 51 (79.7%) had already been approved in the US or EU at initiation of clinical development in Japan. The origin of approximately half (34) of the products was from the emerging companies (non-member foreign companies of the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacture Association). These results suggest that more global cooperation of Japan companies, particularly with emerging foreign companies, is necessary in terms of the earlier timing of license-in and development strategies of products to promote drug development without drug lag or drug loss in Japan.
Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas , Industria Farmacéutica , Japón , Estados Unidos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Humanos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Medical Information Database Network (MID-NET®) in Japan is a vast repository providing an essential pharmacovigilance tool. Gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) is a critical adverse drug event, yet no well-established GIP identification algorithm exists in MID-NET®. METHODS: This study evaluated 12 identification algorithms by combining ICD-10 codes with GIP therapeutic procedures. Two sites contributed 200 inpatients with GIP-suggestive ICD-10 codes (100 inpatients each), while a third site contributed 165 inpatients with GIP-suggestive ICD-10 codes and antimicrobial prescriptions. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of the algorithms were determined, and the relative sensitivity (rSn) among the 165 inpatients at the third institution was evaluated. RESULTS: A trade-off between PPV and rSn was observed. For instance, ICD-10 code-based definitions yielded PPVs of 59.5%, whereas ICD-10 codes with CT scan and antimicrobial information gave PPVs of 56.0% and an rSn of 97.0%, and ICD-10 codes with CT scan and antimicrobial information as well as three types of operation codes produced PPVs of 84.2% and an rSn of 24.2%. The same algorithms produced statistically significant differences in PPVs among the three institutions. Combining diagnostic and procedure codes improved the PPVs. The algorithm combining ICD-10 codes with CT scan and antimicrobial information and 80 different operation codes offered the optimal balance (PPV: 61.6%, rSn: 92.4%). CONCLUSION: This study developed valuable GIP identification algorithms for MID-NET®, revealing the trade-offs between accuracy and sensitivity. The algorithm with the most reasonable balance was determined. These findings enhance pharmacovigilance efforts and facilitate further research to optimize adverse event detection algorithms.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Perforación Intestinal , Farmacovigilancia , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a MedicamentosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Prescription trends and patterns of anti-COVID-19 drugs in hospitalized patients were examined based on real world data to understand the use of anti-COVID-19 drugs in clinical practice in Japan. DESIGN: The longitudinal and cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing data from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 of the MID-NET® medical information database, which stored the electronic medical records, administrative claim data, and diagnosis procedure combination data of patients in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients with a COVID-19-related diagnosis who received at least one anti-COVID-19 drug between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021. EXPOSURES: The following 14 drugs were included in this study: remdesivir, baricitinib, combination product of casirivimab and imdevimab, favipiravir, dexamethasone, ivermectin, azithromycin, nafamostat mesylate, camostat mesylate, ciclesonide, tocilizumab, sarilumab, combination product of lopinavir and ritonavir, and hydroxychloroquine. RESULTS: We identified 5,717 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and prescribed at least one anti-COVID-19 drug. The entire cohort generally included patients over 41-50 years and more males. The most common prescription pattern was dexamethasone monotherapy (22.9%), followed by the concomitant use of remdesivir and dexamethasone (15.0%), azithromycin monotherapy (15.0%), remdesivir monotherapy (10.2%), and nafamostat mesylate monotherapy (8.5%). However, an often prescribed anti-COVID-19 drug differed depending on the period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study revealed the real-world situation of anti-COVID-19 drug prescriptions in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Japan. A prescribed drug would depend on the latest scientific evidence, such as efficacy, safety, and approval status, at the time of prescription. Understanding the prescription of anti-COVID-19 drugs will be important for providing the most up-to-date treatments to patients and evaluating the benefit and/or risk of anti-COVID-19 drugs based on the utilization of an electronic medical record database.
Asunto(s)
Benzamidinas , COVID-19 , Guanidinas , Masculino , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Japón/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Dexametasona , Prescripciones , Antivirales/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Introduction: This study was conducted to understand the impact of package insert (PI) revision in Japan on 18 June 2019 to allow metformin use for patients with moderately decreased kidney function (30 ≤ estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Methods: A new user cohort design was employed to examine the prescription trend and the occurrence of lactic acidosis in patients prescribed metformin before and after PI revision using the Medical Information Database Network (MID-NET®). Results: From 12 May 2016 to 31 March 2020, 5,874 patients (before, n = 4,702; after, n = 1,172) were identified as new metformin users, including 1,145 patients (before, n = 914; after, n = 231) with moderately decreased kidney function. Although no marked changes in metformin prescription were observed before and after PI revision, the daily metformin dose at the first prescription decreased after PI revision. For both before and after PI revision, less than 10 cases of lactic acidosis occurred in all patients prescribed metformin, and no lactic acidosis was observed in patients with moderately decreased kidney function. Conclusion: The results of this study are useful for understanding the safety of metformin use in patients with decreased kidney function and suggest no worse impacts of PI revision in Japan, indicating no further safety concerns on metformin use in patients with moderately decreased kidney function under the situation with careful use and safety monitoring of metformin.