Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Asunto principal
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cutan Ocul Toxicol ; 43(3): 154-160, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806172

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the ocular effects seen among eye cosmetic wearers in the Indian Population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on female participants who had fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A detailed history was obtained and thorough ophthalmic evaluation was done. Mann Whitney U test was used. Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS. p < .05 was taken as the level of statistical significance. RESULTS: Among a total of 225 participants in our study, the mean age was 24.23 ± 1.8, which comprised of young student females. Majority of the females used one eye cosmetic with Kajal (n = 156) being the most predominant. Most frequently encountered symptom upon using eye cosmetics was watering from eyes and ocular pain was the least encountered symptom. Anterior segment examination showed- allergic conjunctivitis and meibomian gland dysfunction being the most and least predominant, respectively. Our study highlights that Kajal predisposes the eyes to significant ocular morbidity with p = .039 for dry eye disease, p = .041 for allergic conjunctivitis, p = .036 for conjunctival pigmentation. Prolonged use of such formulations for more than 4 times a week (p = .046) or even daily (p = .031) for a duration of either 1-5 years (p = .033) or greater than 5 years (p = .027) was found to be statistically significant in causing ocular signs. Non removal of eye cosmetics at the end of the day was significant in causing allergic conjunctivitis (p = .035) and conjunctival pigmentation (p = .021). Plain tap water has been found to be the least effective technique in the removal of such ocular cosmetics with a statistical significance of p = .031 in causing ocular signs. CONCLUSIONS: Eye cosmetics are a significant contributor to the development of ocular surface diseases. Removal of products along with decreased usage seems to be a significant contributor in dampening unwanted adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Cosméticos , Humanos , Femenino , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/inducido químicamente , Estudios Transversales , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/inducido químicamente , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/inducido químicamente , India , Ojo/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Ocul Immunol Inflamm ; : 1-6, 2023 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36854139

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the prevalence and severity of dry eye disease (DED) among patients on atypical antipsychotics with controls. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients who were on atypical antipsychotic therapy (study group) and matched controls (control group). Prevalence of DED was assessed using tear break up time. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS. Chi-square test and t-test were used. p < 0.05 was taken as the level of statistical significance. RESULTS: Prevalence of DED was significantly more in study group. Polytherapy group has significantly high DED compared with monotherapy. Among monotherapy, clozapine had highest prevalence of DED (p-0.013) and among the polytherapy, clozapine-quetiapine had highest prevalence of dry eye. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of DED was higher among antipsychotics than the normal population, and in polytherapy than monotherapy group. The patients on clozapine (monotherapy) and clozapine with quetiapine (polytherapy) had highest prevalence of DED.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...