[Prognostic Value of Isolated High Serum Cystatin C Levels Without Glomerular Filtration Rate Reduction]. / Valor pronóstico de la elevación aislada de los niveles de cistatina C sin reducción del filtrado glomerular.

OBJECTIVES: Cystatin C is increasingly used as a marker of renal function as a complement to serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We have assessed its efficacy as a predictor of mortality in a group of patients with increased cystatin C but GFR> 60mL/min. DESIGN AND METHODS: We included 608 patients, 65.9% male, 34.6% had diabetes mellitus. The mean age was 58.5±14.5 years and a mean GFR of 64.1±33.5mL/min. Patients were divided into 3 groups: CONTROL (normal cystatin C and GFR> 60mL/min, age 53.3±12.8years, GFR 96.6±22.4mL/min,n=193), INCREASED CYSTATIN (cystatin C>1.03mg/l and GFR>60mL/min, age 58.9±13,1years, GFR 72.2±10.4mL/min, n=40) and CKD (chronic kidney disease, increased cystatin C and GFR <60mL/min, age 61.4±14.8years, GFR 36.0±12.7mL/min, n=160). The relationship with overall mortality was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Mean cystatin C was 0.75±0.13 versus 1.79±0.54 in CKD group and 1.14±0.14mg/l, p <0.001). In CONTROL group survival was 93.9% at 5y, compared to 78.8% in the ERC group and 82.3% in the INCREASED CYSTATIN group (p <0.001) Five-year survival before renal replacement therapy was also different for the ERC group (73%, p <0.001 Log Rank) but not between the other two groups (CONTROL 99.0%, INCREASED CYSTATIN 94.3% p=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Increased plasmatic levels of cystatin C in patients with GFR> 60mL/min was a predictor of increased mortality but not of progression to end-stage renal failure. These results confirm the interest of routinely measuring cystatin C.

Antiretroviral Treatment and Antihypertensive Therapy.

The presence of hypertension among the population with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has become a new threat to the health and well-being of people living with this disease, in particular, among those who received antiretroviral therapy. The estimated prevalence of high blood pressure in HIV-infected patients is significantly higher than the rate observed in HIV-uninfected subjects. The approach to the HIV-positive patient requires the assessment of individual cardiovascular risk and its consideration when designing the individualized target. On the other hand, the numerous pharmacological interactions of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs are essential elements to take into account. Serum levels of any kind of antihypertensive drugs may be influenced by the coadministration of protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, or other antiretroviral. Similarly, plasma concentrations of antiretroviral drugs can be increased by the concomitant use of calcium channel blockers or diuretics. In this regard, the treatment of high blood pressure in HIV patients should be preferentially based on ACE inhibitors or thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics or their combination.

Sacubitril-Valsartan Improves Anemia of Cardiorenal Syndrome (CRS).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anemia is a common complication of heart failure and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Sacubitril-valsartan is a novel therapy for the treatment of chronic Heart Failure with a reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). We have evaluated the short-term effects of sacubitril- valsartan on the anemia of CRS. METHODS: The study group comprised 39 patients with HFrEF, who were followed-up for three months. The study is a retrospective analysis of clinical data. Data of 3 months' and baseline visits were recorded including plasmatic creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, cystatin C, kaliemia, haemoglobin, pro-BNP, and albuminuria. RESULTS: In all, 34 patients ended the follow-up. Mean sacubitril-valsartan dosage at baseline was 101 ± 62 mg/day and 126 ± 59 mg/day at end. Mean hemoglobin increased from 12.2 ± 1.1 g/dl at baseline to 12.9 ± 1.0 g/dl (p = 0.001,). Prevalence of anemia was 64.7% (95%CI, 47.9-78.5%) at baseline and 38.4 (95%CI, 23.9-55.0%) after the follow-up (p = 0.016). Serum cystatin C levels decreased from 2.71 ± 1.0 to 2.48 ± 1.0 mg/l (p = 0.028). Serum K levels remained unchanged (baseline 4.94 ± 0.60, three months visit 4.94 ± 0.61 mmol/l, p = 0.998). CONCLUSION: Sacubitril-valsartan improves anemia in CRS patients. An improvement in serum cystatin levels was observed. Few untoward effects were detected. These findings should be confirmed in wider clinical trials.

Alpha-1-microglobulin: Prognostic value in chronic kidney disease. / Alfa-1-microglobulina: valor pronóstico en la enfermedad renal crónica.

OBJECTIVES: α1-microglobulin (α1M) is a tubular protein used for detecting acute lesions of proximal tubules. This study evaluated the use of urine α1M excretion as a marker of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and life survival. DESIGN AND METHODS: In all 163 patients were recruited (90 men), mean age 61.6±16.4 years. Urinary α1M was evaluated using an immunonephelometric assay. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to urinary α1M excretion (cut-off value: 32.85mg/24h). RESULTS: End stage renal disease-free survival was 94.2% at 5 years for patients with lower α1M. For patients in the highest percentile, renal function survival was 72.7% (P=.011). Life survival was 94.4% for patients with α1M in the lower percentiles. For patients in the upper percentile, live survival was 54.2% (P=.001). The Cox regression analysis showed an independent association of CKD progression with high α1M excretion (P=.043). CONCLUSIONS: α1M urinary excretion was associated with faster CKD progression and higher mortality. Further studies are needed to determine whether the association between α1M urinary excretion and excess mortality risk represents a causal link.

Renal potassium handling in chronic kidney disease: Differences between patients with or wihtout hyperkalemia. / Manejo renal del potasio en la enfermedad renal crónica avanzada: diferencias entre pacientes con o sin hipercaliemia.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalemia (HK) is a common electrolyte disorder in chronic kidney disease (CKD), mainly in the advanced stages. A positive potassium balance due to reduced renal excretory capacity is likely the main pathogenic mechanism of HK. Research into the relative role of each pathogenic element in the development of HK in CKD may help to implement more suitable therapies. OBJECTIVE: To investigate renal potassium handling in advanced CKD patients, and to determine the differences between patients with or without HK. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study in adult patients with stage 4-5 CKD pre-dialysis. Selection criteria included clinically stable patients and the ability to collect a 24hour urine sample correctly. Blood and urinary biochemical parameters were analysed including sodium and potassium (K). Fractional excretion of K (FEK) and K load relative to glomerular filtration (Ku/GFR) were calculated. HK was defined as a serum K concentration ≥5.5mmol/l. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 212 patients (mean age 65±14 years, 92 females) with a mean GFR of 15.0±4.2ml/min/1.73m2. 63 patients (30%) had HK. Patients with HK had lower mean bicarbonate levels with respect to patients with normal K levels (NK) (20.3±3.1 vs. 22.8±3.2 mEq/l, P<.0001), but no differences were noted in total urinary sodium and K excretion. While mean FEK values were lower in patients with HK (32.1±12.1% vs. 36.4±14.3%, P=.038), Ku/GFR values were significantly greater with respect to the NK subgroup (4.2±1.5 vs. 3.7±1.4 mmol/ml/min, P=0,049). FEK showed a strong linear correlation with Ku/GFR (R2=0.74), and partial linear regressions demonstrated that at a similar Ku/GFR level, the FEK of patients with HK was lower than that of NK patients. By multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses, both FEK and Ku/GFR were shown to be the main determinants of K serum levels and HK. CONCLUSIONS: Although the K load relative to glomerular filtration (Ku/GFR) is an important determinant of HK in advanced CKD, the most noteworthy characteristic associated with HK in these patients was the limitation of compensatory urinary K excretion, as indicated by lower FEK.

Detrimental effect of renin-angiotensin blockade on progression of chronic kidney disease at later stages: A matter of dosage adjustment? / Efecto negativo del bloqueo del sistema renina-angiotensina sobre la progresión de la enfermedad renal crónica avanzada: ¿una cuestión de ajuste de dosis?

INTRODUCTION: The renoprotective effect of renin-angiotensin (RAS) blockers (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers) has been questioned in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Moreover, combination therapy (dual RAS blockade) can further accelerate renal function decline in some populations at risk. However, it is unknown whether this adverse outcome is due to a dose-dependent effect or if it can be attributed more specifically to a drug interaction. Aim This study aims to investigate if the rate of renal function decline in advanced CKD patients is associated to the doses of RAS blockers, and if dual RAS blockade worsens renal function independently of major confounding factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational study in an incident cohort of adult patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 not on dialysis, treated with RAS blockers for at least 3 months prior to the study inclusion. Inclusion criteria were: having at least three consecutive measurements of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in a follow-up period >3 months. Decline in renal function was estimated as the slope of the individual linear regression line of eGFR over follow-up time. Equipotent doses of RAS blockers were normalised for a body weight of 70kg or a body surface area of 1.73m2 (END-RASI). Associations of END-RASI or dual RAS blockade with the rate of renal function decline were analysed by uni- or multivariate linear regression models, accounting for major confounding variables. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 813 patients (mean age 64±14 years, 430 males) with a mean eGFR 14.9±4.2ml/min/1.73m2; 729 patients were on RAS blockade monotherapy and 84 on dual RAS blockade. Median END-RASI in the whole group was 0.91 (I.Q. ranges: 0.69-1.20). Patients on dual RAS blockade had significantly higher END-RASI than the rest of study patients (1.52±0.49 vs. 0.93±0.44; p<0.0001). In univariate linear regression, END-RASI were significantly correlated with eGFR decline (R=-0.149; p<0.0001). Patients on dual RAS blockade showed a significantly faster decline of renal function than the rest of the study patients (-6.19±5.57 vs. -3.04±5.37ml/min/1.73m2/year, p<0.0001). By multivariate linear regression, while dual RAS blockade remained independent and significantly associated with faster renal function decline (beta=-0.094; p=0.005), END-RASI (normalised either for body weight or surface area) did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: END-RASI are significantly associated with the rate of renal function decline in advanced CKD patients. However, the detrimental effect of dual RAS blockade on CKD progression seems to be independent of END-RASI and other major confounding factors.

Successful correction of metabolic acidosis is difficult to achieve in chronic kidney disease. / Acidosis metabólica en la enfermedad renal crónica: dificultades para una corrección adecuada.

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic acidosis (MA) is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with numerous adverse effects, which is why its correction is highly recommended. Oral sodium bicarbonate is the current treatment of choice. OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of MA in advanced CKD patients and to determine the clinical and biochemical characteristics associated with its successful correction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational cohort study in adult patients with CKD stage 4-5. The inclusion criteria were: not being treated with alkali therapy at the time of inclusion, and to have at least three consecutive glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements and biochemical parameters during a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. Incident patients with serum bicarbonate<22 mEq/l were included in the follow-up study and treated with oral sodium bicarbonate. Correction was considered successful when more than half of the samples and the mean bicarbonate levels during individual follow-up were≥22 mEq/l. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 969 patients (age 65±14 years, 507 males) with a mean GFR of 14.8±4.5ml/min/1.73 m2. At baseline, 530 patients (55%) had serum bicarbonate<22mEq/l. They were treated with sodium bicarbonate and followed for 15 months. Satisfactory correction of MA was only achieved in 133 patients (25%). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, the main characteristics of patients with adequate control of MA were: age (OR=1.03; 95% CI 1.01 - 1.05), baseline GFR (OR=1.07; 1.02 - 1.12), and treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (OR=1.61; 95% CI 1.06 - 2.44). Patients who achieved successful correction of MA showed slower CKD progression (-1.67±3.71 vs -4.36±4.56ml/min/1.73 m2/year, P<.0001), and lower average serum potassium concentration (5.1±0.5 vs 5.3±0.5, P<.0001) than those who did not. However, there were no differences in the hospitalisation or mortality rate. CONCLUSION: MA is a common complication of advanced CKD but difficult to manage with current therapies. Due to the significant potential benefit of controlling MA, new, more effective therapies should be further researched.

Association of hyperkalemia with clinical outcomes in advanced chronic kidney disease. / Asociación entre hiperkaliemia y evolución clínica en la enfermedad renal crónica avanzada.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at greatest risk of hyperkalemia (HK). The relationship between HK and negative outcomes (mortality or progression of renal insufficiency) in non-dialysis dependent CKD patients is controversial. AIMS: To determine the incidence, prevalence, and factors related with HK in a cohort of CKD patients, and its relationship with mortality, hospitalization rate, CKD progression, and dialysis initiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study in an incident cohort of adult patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD not on dialysis. Inclusion criteria were: having at least three consecutive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements in a follow-up period >3 months. Decline in renal function was estimated as the slope of the individual linear regression line of eGFR over follow-up time. HK was defined as serum K levels ≥5.5 meq/l. Associations of HK with outcomes were adjusted for major confounding variables in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 1079 patients (574 males, mean age: 65±14 years) with mean baseline eGFR 14.8±4.5 ml/min/1,73 m2. Mean follow-up time was 15 months with a median of 7 serum sample determinations per patient. HK was observed at baseline in 26% of patients; in at least one serum sample during the individual follow-up period in 68%; or chronically (>50% of samples) in 33% of patients. By multivariate logistic regression, the best determinants of chronic HK were: male sex (OR = 1.529; 95% CI [1.154-2.025], p = .003), serum bicarbonate (OR = 0.863 [0.829-0.900], p <.0001), diuretic treatment (OR = 0.743 [0.556-0.992], p = .044), and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (OR = 4.412 [2.915-6.678], p <.0001). Patients whose serum K levels were in the upper quartile showed a significantly faster CKD progression (-4.05±5.22 vs. -2.69±5.61 ml/min/1.73 m2/year, p <.0001), and more frequent dialysis initiation (63% vs. 57%, p = .115), though lower mortality (9% vs. 17%, p = .003) and hospitalization rates (2.68±5.94 vs. 3.16±6.77 days per year, p = .301) than the other study patients. However, in the multivariate analysis, average serum K levels were not independently associated with the clinical outcomes investigated. CONCLUSION: HK is a common biochemical finding in non-dialysis dependent CKD patients, mainly associated with prescribed medication. However, HK was not independently associated with major negative clinical outcomes.