Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts bowel ischemia in non-strangulated adhesive small bowel occlusions: a retrospective analysis from an acute care surgical service.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a leading cause of hospitalization in emergency surgery. The occurrence of bowel ischemia significantly increases the morbidity and mortality rates associated with this condition. Current clinical, biochemical and radiological parameters have poor predictive value for bowel ischemia. This study is designed to ascertain predictive elements for the progression to bowel ischemia in patients diagnosed with non-strangulated ASBO who are initially managed through conservative therapeutic approaches. METHODS: The study was based on the previously collected medical records of 128 patients admitted to the Department of Acute Care Surgery of Padua General Hospital, from August 2020 to April 2023, with a diagnosis of non-strangulated adhesive small bowel obstruction, who were then operated for failure of conservative treatment. The presence or absence of bowel ischemia was used to distinguish the two populations. Clinical, biochemical and radiological data were used to verify whether there is a correlation with the detection of bowel ischemia. RESULTS: We found that a Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 6.8 (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.41-6.21), the presence of mesenteric haziness (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.11-5.88), decreased wall enhancement (OR 4.3; 95% CI 3.34-10.9) and free abdominal fluid (OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.08-6.16) were significantly associated with bowel ischemia at univariate analysis. At the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only NLR > 6.8 (OR 5.9; 95% CI 2.2-18.6) remained independent predictive factor for small bowel ischemia in non-strangulated adhesive small bowel obstruction, with 78% sensitivity and 65% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: NLR is a straightforward and reproducible parameter to predict bowel ischemia in cases of non-strangulated adhesive small bowel obstruction. Employing NLR during reevaluation of patients with this condition, who were initially treated conservatively, can help the acute care surgeons in the early prediction of bowel ischemia onset.

The esophageal pull-down technique improves the outcome of laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy in end-stage achalasia.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with end-stage achalasia with a sigmoid-shaped esophagus is particularly challenging. A modified technique (pull-down technique) has been developed to straighten the esophageal axis, but only a limited number of studies on this topic are available in the literature. This study aimed to compare the outcome of patients who underwent the pull-down technique with that of patients who had a classical laparoscopic Heller-Dor (CLHD) myotomy. METHODS: All patients with a radiologic diagnosis of end-stage achalasia who underwent an LHD myotomy between 1995 and 2022 were considered eligible for the study. All patients underwent symptom score, barium swallow, endoscopy, and manometry tests before and after the procedure was performed. Treatment failure was defined as the persistence or reoccurrence of an Eckardt score (ES) of >3 or the need for retreatment. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients who were diagnosed with end-stage achalasia (male-to-female ratio of 52:42), 60 were treated with CLHD myotomy, and 34 were treated with the pull-down technique. Of note, 2 patients (2.1%), both belonging to the CLHD myotomy group, developed a squamous cell carcinoma during the follow-up. The overall success of LHD myotomy was seen in 76 of 92 patients (82.6%). All patients in both groups achieved a lower ES after surgery. The failure rates were 27.6% (16/58) in the CLHD myotomy group and 5.9% (2/34) in the pull-down technique group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that LHD myotomy is an effective treatment of end-stage achalasia and that the pull-down technique further improves the outcome in patients with end-stage achalasia who are difficult to treat.

Manometric identikit of a functioning and effective fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the high-resolution manometry ERA.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiological and clinical value of performing High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) after laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is still unclear and debated. OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish the HRM parameters indicative of functioning fundoplications, and whether HRM could distinguish them from tight or defective ones. METHODS: The study involved patients with GERD who underwent laparoscopic Nissen (LN) or Toupet (LT) fundoplication between 2010 and 2022. HRM and 24-h pH monitoring were performed before and 6 months after surgery. The study population was divided into 5 groups: LN and LT patients with normal 24h-pH findings (LNpH- and LTpH-, respectively); LN and LT patients with pathological 24h-pH findings (LNpH+ and LTpH + groups, respectively); and patients with a postoperative dysphagia intensity score >2 (Dysphagia group). The novel Hiatal Morphology (HM) classification was applied, envisaging 3 different subtypes: HM1 (normal), HM2 (intrathoracic fundoplication), and HM3 (slipped fundoplication). RESULTS: Among the 132 patients recruited during the study period, 46 were in the LNpH- group, 51 in the LTpH- group, 15 in the LNpH + group, 7 in the LTpH + group, and 5 in the Dysphagia group. In multivariate analysis, postoperative abdominal lower esophageal sphincter length (p = 0.001) and HM2 (p < 0.001) were both independently associated with surgical failure. Integrated relaxation pressure was significantly higher in the Dysphagia group than in the LNpH- group. CONCLUSION: This study generated reference HRM values for an effective LF, and confirms that using HRM to assess the neo-sphincter and HM improves the clinical assessment in cases of symptom recurrence.

Surgical oncological emergencies in octogenarian patients.

Background: Surgical oncological emergencies represent a frequent challenge in acute settings, with postoperative courses characterized by high morbidity and mortality. An accurate selection of patients who could benefit from surgery is essential to avoid unnecessary invasive treatment. In this study, we tried to determine if advanced age (>80 years) represents a risk factor for negative short-term outcome in patients undergoing emergency surgery for acute abdominal oncological illness. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent emergency oncological surgery at the Department of Acute Care Surgery of Padua General Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. One hundred two cancer patients were included in the study. Among them, 42 were aged ≥80 years (41%). Multiple preoperative and postoperative parameters were recorded, and the follow-up period was at least 90 days. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with short-term postoperative outcomes. Results: In the octogenarian group, 30-day mortality was 11% vs. 9.5% in the younger group [p = not significant (ns)] and 90-day mortality was 17.6% in the octogenarian group vs. 20.5% in the younger group (p = ns). Postoperative morbidity and hospital length of stay were not significantly different in the two groups. Low albumin levels [odds ratio (OR) 30.6, 9.51-87.07] and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (OR 26.4, 9.18-75.83) were predictive for short-term mortality in surgical oncological emergencies. Conclusion: Advanced age is not a risk factor for negative outcomes in surgical oncological emergencies. Therefore, surgical options should be considered in octogenarians with oncological emergencies and acceptable clinical conditions. Serum albumin levels and LDH can help predict the postoperative outcome after surgery for oncological emergencies.

Patient Position in Operative Endoscopy.

It is well known by surgeons that patient positioning is fundamental to exposing the organs when performing an operation via laparoscopy, as gravity can help move the organs and facilitate the exposure of the surgical site. But is it also important for endoscopic procedures? This paper examines various types of endoscopic operations and addresses the issue of the patient's position. The patient's position can be changed not only by rotating the patient along the head-toe axis but also by tilting the surgical bed, as is undertaken during laparoscopic surgical procedures. In particular, it is useful to take into account the effect of gravity on lesion exposure, tumour traction during dissection, crushing by body weight, risk of sample drop, risk of damage to adjacent organs, and anatomical exposure for procedures with radiological support. The endoscopist should always keep in mind the patient's anatomy and the position of the endoscope during operative procedures, not limited to considering only intraluminal vision.

Paraneoplastic myopathy-related rhabdomyolysis and pancreatic cancer: A case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyolysis is a life-threatening condition, often leading to progressive renal failure and death. It is caused by destruction of skeletal muscle and the release of myoglobin and other intracellular contents into the circulation. The most frequent cause of this condition is "crush syndrome", although several others have been described and paraneoplastic inflammatory myopathies associated with various types of cancer are repeatedly reported. CASE SUMMARY: We describe a rare case of a patient with pancreatic cancer who developed rhabdomyolysis early on, possibly due to paraneoplastic myositis leading to acute renal failure and eventually to rapid death. A 78-year-old Caucasian woman was referred to our hospital for obstructive jaundice and weight loss due to a lesion in the pancreatic head. She presented increasingly severe renal insufficiency with anuria, a dramatic increase in creatine phosphokinase (36000 U/L, n.v. 20-180 U/L) and myoglobin (> 120000 µg/L, n.v. 12-70 µg/L). On clinical examination, the patient showed increasing pain in the lower limbs associated with muscle weakness which was severe enough to immobilize her. Paraneoplastic myopathy linked to the malignant lesion of the pancreatic head was suspected. The patient was treated with hemodialysis and intravenous methylprednisolone. Despite all the efforts to prepare the patient for surgery, her general condition rapidly deteriorated and she eventually died 30 d after hospital admission. CONCLUSION: The possible causes of rhabdomyolysis in this patient with pancreatic cancer are discussed, the development of paraneoplastic myopathy being the most likely. Clinicians should bear in mind that these syndromes may become clinically manifest at any stage of the cancer course and their early diagnosis and treatment could improve the patient's prognosis.

Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The optimal neoadjuvant treatment for resectable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (TE) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains a matter of debate. We performed an individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to study the effect of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, with a focus on tumor location and histology subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All, published or unpublished, RCTs closed to accrual before December 31, 2015 and having compared at least two of the following strategies were eligible: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). All analyses were conducted on IPD obtained from investigators. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The IPD-NMA was analyzed by a one-step mixed-effect Cox model adjusted for age, sex, tumor location, and histology. The NMA was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018107158). RESULTS: IPD were obtained for 26 of 35 RCTs (4,985 of 5,807 patients) corresponding to 12 comparisons for CS-S, 12 for CRS-S, and four for CRS-CS. CS and CRS led to increased OS when compared with S with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86 (0.75 to 0.99), P = .03 and HR = 0.77 (0.68 to 0.87), P < .001 respectively. The NMA comparison of CRS versus CS for OS gave a HR of 0.90 (0.74 to 1.09), P = .27 (consistency P = .26, heterogeneity P = .0038). For CS versus S, a larger effect on OS was observed for GEJ versus TE tumors (P = .036). For the CRS versus S and CRS versus CS, a larger effect on OS was observed for women (P = .003, .012, respectively). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were consistently better than S alone across histology, but with some variation in the magnitude of treatment effect by sex for CRS and tumor location for CS. A strong OS difference between CS and CRS was not identified.

Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in the elderly patient: a multicenter retrospective matched-cohort study.

Introduction: Several studies reported the advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomy over the conventional open approach, particularly in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The literature regarding the elderly population is however scarce and it is still not clear whether elderly patients may benefit from a minimally invasive approach as the general population. We sought to evaluate whether thoracoscopic/ laparoscopic (MIE) or fully robotic (RAMIE) Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy significantly reduces postoperative morbidity in the elderly population. Methods: We analyzed data of patients who underwent open esophagectomy or MIE/RAMIE at Mainz University Hospital and at Padova University Hospital between 2016 and 2021. Elderly patients were defined as those ≥ 75 years old. Clinical characteristics and the postoperative outcomes were compared between elderly patients who underwent open esophagectomy or MIE/RAMIE. A 1-to-1 matched comparison was also performed. Patients < 75 years old were evaluated as a control group. Results: Among elderly patients MIE/RAMIE were associated with a lower overall morbidity (39.7% vs. 62.7%, p=0.005), less pulmonary complications (32.8 vs. 56.9%, p=0.003) and a shorter hospital stay (13 vs. 18 days, p=0.03). Comparable findings were obtained after matching. Similarly, among < 75 years-old patients, a reduced morbidity (31.2% vs. 43.5%, p=0.01) and less pulmonary complications (22% vs. 36%, p=0.001) were detected in the minimally invasive group. Discussion: Minimally invasive esophagectomy improves the postoperative course of elderly patients reducing the overall incidence of postoperative complications, particularly of pulmonary complications.

Safety and Efficacy of Surgery for Metastatic Tumor to the Pancreas: A Single-Center Experience.

Pancreatic metastases from other neoplasms are rare. The role of surgery for this clinical entity is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of resection in patients with pancreatic secondary lesions. We observed 44 patients with pancreatic metastases from other tumors. Renal cell carcinoma was the most common primary tumor (n = 19, 43.2%). Thirty-seven patients underwent surgery, and pancreatic resection with curative intent was feasible in 35 cases. Fifteen patients (43.2%) experienced major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > 2), and postoperative mortality rate was 5.4%. The median overall survival and disease-free survival were 38 (range 0-186) and 11 (range 0-186) months, respectively. Overall survival and disease-free survival were significantly longer for pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma when compared to other primary tumors. Multivariate analysis confirmed a pathological diagnosis of metastasis from RCC as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OR 2.48; 95% CI, 1.00-6.14; p = 0.05). In conclusion, radical resection of metastases to the pancreas is feasible and safe, and may confer a survival benefit for selected patients. There is a clear benefit of metastasectomy in terms of patient survival for metastases from renal cell carcinoma, while for those with other primary tumors, surgery seems to be mainly palliative.

Current molecular biomarkers evaluation in gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: pathologist does matter.

The comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas has led to the improvement of targeted and more effective treatments. As a result, several biomarkers have been introduced into clinical practice and the implementation of innovative diagnostic tools is under study. Such assessments are mainly based on the evaluation of limited biopsy material in clinical practice. In this setting, the pathologist represents a key player in the selection of patients facilitating precision medicine approaches.

Laparoscopic Heller-Dor is an effective long-term treatment for end-stage achalasia.

BACKGROUND: The end-stage achalasia is a difficult condition to treat, for the esophageal diameter and conformation of the gullet, that may progress to a sigmoid shape. The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of Laparoscopic Heller-Dor in patients with end-stage achalasia, comparing them with patients who had mega-esophagus without a sigmoid shape. METHODS: From 1992 to 2020, patients with a diagnosis of sigmoid esophagus, or radiological stage IV achalasia (the SE group), and patients with a straight esophagus larger than 6 cm in diameter, or radiological stage III achalasia (the NSE group), were all treated with LHD. The two groups were compared in terms of patients' symptoms, based on the Eckardt score, and on barium swallow, endoscopy and manometry performed before and after the treatment. The failure of the treatment was defined as an Eckardt score > 3, or the need for further treatment. RESULTS: The study involved 164 patients: 73 in the SE group and 91 in the NSE group. No intra- or postoperative mortality was recorded. The median follow-up was 51 months (IQR 25-107). The outcome was satisfactory in 71.2% of patients in the SE group, and in 89% of those in the NSE group (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SE is certainly the worst condition of the disease and the final outcome of LHD, in term of symptom control, is inferior compared to NSE. Despite this, almost 3/4 of the SE patients experienced a significant relieve in symptoms after LHD, which may therefore still be the first surgical option to offer to these patients, before considering esophagectomy.

Transoral septotomy with septum traction is an effective treatment for recurrent Zenker diverticulum.

Symptoms of Zenker diverticulum can recur whatever the type of primary treatment administered. A modified transoral stapler-assisted septotomy (TS) was introduced in clinical practice a few years ago to improve the results of this mini-invasive technique. The aim of this prospective, controlled study was to assess the outcome of TS in patients with recurrent Zenker diverticulum (RZD), as compared with patients with treatment-naïve Zenker diverticulum (NZD). Patients diagnosed with NZD or RZD, and treated with TS between 2015 and 2021 were compared. Symptoms were recorded and scored using a detailed questionnaire. Barium swallow and endoscopy were performed before and after the TS procedure. In sum, 89 patients were enrolled during the study period: 68 had NZD and 21 had RZD. The patients' demographic and clinical data were similar in the two groups. Three mucosal lesions were detected intra-operatively, and one came to light at post-operative radiological assessment in the NZD group. No mucosal lesions were detected in the RZD group. The median follow-up was 36 months (interquartile range 23-60). The treatment was successful in 97% NZD patients and 95% of RZD patients (P = 0.56). This is the first comparative study based on prospectively collected data to assess the outcome of TS in patients with RZD. Traction on the septum during the procedure proved effective in the treatment of RZD, achieving a success rate that was excellent, and comparable with the outcome in treating NZD.

ctDNA as promising tool for the assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) and the need of an adjuvant treatment in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is a challenging disease due to its poor prognosis and the presence of few therapeutic options. For these reasons, it is mandatory to identify the subgroup of patients who are at high risk for relapse after curative-intention surgery. In the last years, liquid biopsy has aroused great interest in cancer treatment for its feasibility and the possibility to capture tumor heterogeneity in a real-time way. In postoperative setting, the interest is directed to the identification of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD), defined as isolated or small cluster of cancer cells that residues after curative-intention surgery, and are undetectable by conventional radiological and clinical exams. This review wants to summarize current evidence on the use of liquid biopsy in gastroesophageal cancer, focusing on the detection of ctDNA in the postoperative setting and its potential role as a guide for treatment decision.

Bio-Engineered Scaffolds Derived from Decellularized Human Esophagus for Functional Organ Reconstruction.

Esophageal reconstruction through bio-engineered allografts that highly resemble the peculiar properties of the tissue extracellular matrix (ECM) is a prospective strategy to overcome the limitations of current surgical approaches. In this work, human esophagus was decellularized for the first time in the literature by comparing three detergent-enzymatic protocols. After decellularization, residual DNA quantification and histological analyses showed that all protocols efficiently removed cells, DNA (<50 ng/mg of tissue) and muscle fibers, preserving collagen/elastin components. The glycosaminoglycan fraction was maintained (70-98%) in the decellularized versus native tissues, while immunohistochemistry showed unchanged expression of specific ECM markers (collagen IV, laminin). The proteomic signature of acellular esophagi corroborated the retention of structural collagens, basement membrane and matrix-cell interaction proteins. Conversely, decellularization led to the loss of HLA-DR expression, producing non-immunogenic allografts. According to hydroxyproline quantification, matrix collagen was preserved (2-6 µg/mg of tissue) after decellularization, while Second-Harmonic Generation imaging highlighted a decrease in collagen intensity. Based on uniaxial tensile tests, decellularization affected tissue stiffness, but sample integrity/manipulability was still maintained. Finally, the cytotoxicity test revealed that no harmful remnants/contaminants were present on acellular esophageal matrices, suggesting allograft biosafety. Despite the different outcomes showed by the three decellularization methods (regarding, for example, tissue manipulability, DNA removal, and glycosaminoglycans/hydroxyproline contents) the ultimate validation should be provided by future repopulation tests and in vivo orthotopic implant of esophageal scaffolds.

Multimodal treatment of radiation-induced esophageal cancer: Results of a case-matched comparative study from a single center.

PURPOSE: Radiation-induced esophageal cancer (RIEC) is a rare but severe late consequence of radiotherapy. The literature regarding this topic is predominately limited in describing the risk of this disease. Tumor behavior, treatment strategies, and prognosis of this cancer remain poorly defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data of patients who were referred to our unit between 2000 and 2020 for RIEC. After tumor board discussion, upfront surgery or neoadjuvant therapy and surgery were indicated as the main treatment. Preoperative characteristics, long-term and short-term postoperative outcomes of RIEC patients were compared with a 1:1 clustering-matched cohort of patients affected by primary esophageal cancer (PEC). RESULTS: At pre-matching, 54 RIEC and 936 PEC patients were enrolled. The median time between primary irradiation and diagnosis of RIEC was 13.5 years, and the median primary radiation dose was 60 Gy. Compared to the unmatched cohort of PECs, RIEC patients were more frequently female (p = 0.0007), had earlier detection of disease (p = 0.03) and presented more frequently with upper esophageal cancers (p < 0.0001). Neoadjuvant treatment was used less frequently in RIEC patients (p < 0.0001). After matching, the 51 RIEC and 50 PEC patients showed comparable results in terms of exposure to neoadjuvant treatment, surgical radicality and survival outcomes. RIEC patients had more severe postoperative complications (p = 0.04) and a higher proportion of pulmonary complications (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Curative treatments are feasible for RIEC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation can be used in this subgroup, treatment response and long-term outcomes are comparable to those of PEC. The risk of postoperative complications is probably related to the detrimental effect of primary irradiation on lung function.

Pharyngo-Esophageal Perforation Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Single Center Experience and a Systematic Review of the Literature.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series and systematic review of the Literature. OBJECTIVES: Pharyngo-esophageal perforation (PEP) is a rare, life-threatening complication of anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). Best management of these patients remains poorly defined. The aim of this study is to present our experience with this entity and to perform a systematic Literature review to better clarify the appropriate treatment of these patients. METHODS: Patients referred to our center for PEP following ACSS (January 2002-December 2018) were identified from our database. Moreover, an extensive review of the English Literature was conducted according to the 2009 PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Twelve patients were referred to our Institution for PEP following ACSS. Indications for ACSS were trauma (n = 10), vertebral metastases (n = 1) and disc herniation (n = 1). All patients underwent hardware placement at the time of ACSS. There were 6 early and 6 delayed PEP. Surgical treatment was performed in 11 patients with total or partial removal of spine fixation devices, autologous bone graft insertion or plate/cage replacement, anatomical suture of the fistula and suture line reinforcement with myoplasty. Complete resolution of PEP was observed in 6 patients. Five patients experienced PEP persistence, requiring further surgical management in 2 cases. At a median follow-up of 18.8 months, all patients exhibited permanent resolution of the perforation. CONCLUSIONS: PEP following ACSS is a rare but dreadful complication. Partial or total removal of the fixation devices, direct suture of the esophageal defect and coverage with tissue flaps seems to be an effective surgical approach in these patients.

Could the Pittsburgh Severity Score guide the treatment of esophageal perforation? Experience of a single referral center.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation (EP) is characterized by high morbidity and mortality. The Pittsburgh Severity Score (PSS) is a scoring system based on clinical factors at the time of EP presentation, intended to guide treatment. The aim of the study is to verify PSS usefulness in stratifying EP severity and in guiding clinical decisions. METHODS: All patients referred to our unit for EP between January 2005 and January 2020 were enrolled. Patients were stratified according to their PSS into three groups (PSS ≤ 2, 3-5, and >5): the postoperative outcomes were compared. The predictive value of the PSS was evaluated by simple linear and logistic regression for the following outcomes: need for surgery, complications, in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, time to refeeding, and need for reintervention. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were referred for EP (male/female, 46/27). Perforations were more frequently iatrogenic (41.1%) or spontaneous (38.3%). The median PSS was 4 (interquartile range, 2-6). Surgery was required in 60.3% of cases. Pittsburgh Severity Score was associated with ICU admission, hospital stay, need for surgery and reintervention, postperforation complications and mortality. After regression analysis, PSS was significantly predictive of postperforation complications (p < 0.01), in-hospital mortality (p = 0.01), ICU admission (p < 0.01), need for surgical treatment (p < 0.01), and need for reintervention (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Pittsburgh Severity Score is useful in stratifying patients in risk groups with different morbidity and mortality. It is also useful in guiding the therapeutic conduct, selecting patients for nonoperative management. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the role of the PSS in the treatment of esophageal perforation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Management, Therapeutic/Care; level IV.

STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Strengthening The Reporting Of Cohort Studies in Surgery (STROCSS) guidelines were developed in 2017 in order to improve the reporting quality of observational studies in surgery and updated in 2019. In order to maintain relevance and continue upholding good reporting quality among observational studies in surgery, we aimed to update STROCSS 2019 guidelines. METHODS: A STROCSS 2021 steering group was formed to come up with proposals to update STROCSS 2019 guidelines. An expert panel of researchers assessed these proposals and judged whether they should become part of STROCSS 2021 guidelines or not, through a Delphi consensus exercise. RESULTS: 42 people (89%) completed the DELPHI survey and hence participated in the development of STROCSS 2021 guidelines. All items received a score between 7 and 9 by greater than 70% of the participants, indicating a high level of agreement among the DELPHI group members with the proposed changes to all the items. CONCLUSION: We present updated STROCSS 2021 guidelines to ensure ongoing good reporting quality among observational studies in surgery.

Individual patient data meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus upfront surgery for carcinoma of the oesophagus or the gastro-oesophageal junction.

INTRODUCTION: Which neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced thoracic oesophagus (TE) or gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma is best remains an open question. Randomised controlled trials variously accrued patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, making strong conclusions hard to obtain. The primary objective of this individual participant data meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible trials should have closed to accrual before 2016 and compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery (CS) to surgery alone. All relevant published and unpublished trials were identified via searches of electronic databases, conference proceedings and clinical trial registers. The main end-point was OS. Investigators were contacted to obtain the individual patient data, which was recorded, harmonised and checked. A random-effects Cox model, stratified by trial, was used for meta-analysis and subgroup analyses were preplanned. RESULTS: 16 trials were identified as eligible. Individual patient data were obtained from 12 trial and 2478 patients. CS was associated with an improved OS versus surgery, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.83 [0.72-0.96], p < 0.0001, translating to an absolute benefit of 5.7% at 5-years from 16.8% to 22.5%. Treatment effects did not vary substantially between adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.73 [0.62-0.87]) and squamous cell carcinoma (HR = 0.91 [0.76-1.08], interaction p = 0.26). A somewhat more pronounced effect was observed in gastro-oesophageal junction (HR = 0.68 [0.50-0.93]) versus TE (HR = 0.87 [0.75-1.00], interaction p = 0.07). CS was also associated with a greater disease-free survival (HR = 0.74 [0.64-0.85], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy conferred a better OS than surgery alone and should be considered in all anatomical location and histological subtypes.