Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 2023 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37821242

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences are lacking, and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial is to compare metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) with or without elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM) is an international, phase 2, open-label, randomized, superiority trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569241). Patients diagnosed with positron emission tomography-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (five or fewer nodes) following radical local treatment for prostate cancer were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between arm A (MDT and 6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) and arm B (ENRT [25 × 1.8 Gy] with MDT and 6 mo of ADT). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We report the secondary endpoint acute toxicity, defined as worst grade ≥2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity within 3 mo of treatment. The chi-square test was used to compare toxicity between treatment arms. We also compare the quality of life (QoL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 and PR25 questionnaires. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Between June 2018 and April 2021, 196 patients were assigned randomly to MDT or ENRT. Ninety-seven of 99 patients allocated to MDT and 93 of 97 allocated to ENRT received per-protocol treatment. Worst acute GI toxicity proportions were as follows: grade ≥2 events in three (3%) in the MDT group versus four (4%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.11). Worst acute GU toxicity proportions were as follows: grade ≥2 events in eight (8%) in the MDT group versus 12 (13%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.95). We observed no significant difference between the study groups in the proportion of patients with a clinically significant QoL reduction from baseline for any subdomain score area. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically meaningful differences were observed in worst grade ≥2 acute GI or GU toxicity or in QoL subdomains between MDT and ENRT. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found no evidence of differential acute bowel or urinary side effects using metastasis-directed therapy and elective nodal radiotherapy for the treatment of patients with a pelvic lymph node recurrence.

2.
Radiother Oncol ; 172: 1-9, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35476942

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Aim of this study is to report the results of the radiotherapy quality assurance program of the PEACE V-STORM randomized phase II trial for pelvic nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A benchmark case (BC) consisting of a postoperative case with 2 nodal recurrences was used for both stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT, 30 Gy/3 fx) and whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT, 45 Gy/25 fx + SIB boost to 65 Gy). RESULTS: BC of 24 centers were analyzed. The overall grading for delineation variation of the 1st BC was rated as 'UV' (Unacceptable Variation) or 'AV' (Acceptable Variation) for 1 and 7 centers for SBRT (33%), and 3 and 8 centers for WPRT (46%), respectively. An inadequate upper limit of the WPRT CTV (n = 2), a missing delineation of the prostate bed (n = 1), and a missing nodal target volume (n = 1 for SBRT and WPRT) constituted the observed 'UV'. With the 2nd BC (n = 11), the overall delineation review showed 2 and 8 'AV' for SBRT and WPRT, respectively, with no 'UV'. For the plan review of the 2nd BC, all treatment plans were per protocol for WPRT. SBRT plans showed variability in dose normalization (Median D90% = 30.1 Gy, range 22.9-33.2 Gy and 30.6 Gy, range 26.8-34.2 Gy for nodes 1 and 2 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Up to 46% of protocol deviations were observed in delineation of WPRT for nodal oligorecurrent PCa, while dosimetric results of SBRT showed the greatest disparities between centers. Repeated BC resulted in an improved adherence to the protocol, translating in an overall acceptable contouring and planning compliance rate among participating centers.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos
4.
Case Rep Oncol ; 13(2): 1031-1036, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33082744

RESUMEN

Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have an increased lifetime risk for the development of nervous system tumors, including high-grade gliomas (glioblastoma). NF1 is associated with the loss of expression of neurofibromin 1 (NF1 gene product). This hyperactivates the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, leading to cellular proliferation and survival. MEK-inhibitor monotherapy is a promising treatment strategy in this setting, but is associated with distinct adverse events, most prominently cutaneous toxicity. We report the case of a young NF1 patient with a recurrent, heavily pretreated mesencephalic glioblastoma who was treated with the MEK-inhibitor trametinib (2 mg once daily). A partial response was documented, but unfortunately, he developed dose-limiting cutaneous toxicity (rash, paronychia). Based on interim results of a phase 2 trial in advanced BRAF V600 wild-type melanoma indicating that a low dose of the BRAF-inhibitor dabrafenib is able to counter trametinib-related cutaneous toxicity, dabrafenib 50 mg twice daily was added. The cutaneous adverse events gradually recovered after addition of dabrafenib to trametinib. The patient eventually achieved a durable complete response, has excellent tolerance of his treatment and remains fully active.

5.
Radiother Oncol ; 125(1): 147-153, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28797700

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quantitative tissue characteristics derived from medical images, also called radiomics, contain valuable prognostic information in several tumour-sites. The large number of features available increases the risk of overfitting. Typically test-retest CT-scans are used to reduce dimensionality and select robust features. However, these scans are not always available. We propose to use different phases of respiratory-correlated 4D CT-scans (4DCT) as alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In test-retest CT-scans of 26 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and 4DCT-scans (8 breathing phases) of 20 NSCLC and 20 oesophageal cancer patients, 1045 radiomics features of the primary tumours were calculated. A concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) >0.85 was used to identify robust features. Correlation with prognostic value was tested using univariate cox regression in 120 oesophageal cancer patients. RESULTS: Features based on unfiltered images demonstrated greater robustness than wavelet-filtered features. In total 63/74 (85%) unfiltered features and 268/299 (90%) wavelet features stable in the 4D-lung dataset were also stable in the test-retest dataset. In oesophageal cancer 397/1045 (38%) features were robust, of which 108 features were significantly associated with overall-survival. CONCLUSION: 4DCT-scans can be used as alternative to eliminate unstable radiomics features as first step in a feature selection procedure. Feature robustness is tumour-site specific and independent of prognostic value.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Tomografía Computarizada Cuatridimensional/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Mecánica Respiratoria , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Methods ; 130: 51-62, 2017 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28705470

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In this systematic review, the existing evidence of available hypoxia-associated molecular response biomarkers in esophageal cancer (EC) patients is summarized and set into the context of the role of hypoxia in the prediction of esophageal cancer, treatment response and treatment outcome. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases using the keywords: hypoxia, esophagus, cancer, treatment outcome and treatment response. Eligible publications were independently evaluated by two reviewers. In total, 22 out of 419 records were included for systematic review. The described search strategy was applied weekly, with the last update being performed on April 3rd, 2017. RESULTS: In esophageal cancer, several (non-)invasive biomarkers for hypoxia could be identified. Independent prognostic factors for treatment response include HIF-1α, CA IX, GLUT-1 overexpression and elevated uptake of the PET-tracer 18F-fluoroerythronitroimidazole (18F-FETNIM). Hypoxia-associated molecular responses represents a clinically relevant phenomenon in esophageal cancer and detection of elevated levels of hypoxia-associated biomarkers and tends to be associated with poor treatment outcome (i.e., overall survival, disease-free survival, complete response and local control). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of tumor micro-environmental conditions, such as intratumoral hypoxia, is important to predict treatment outcome and efficacy. Promising non-invasive imaging-techniques have been suggested to assess tumor hypoxia and hypoxia-associated molecular responses. However, extensive validation in EC is lacking. Hypoxia-associated markers that are independent prognostic factors could potentially provide targets for novel treatment strategies to improve treatment outcome. For personalized hypoxia-guided treatment, safe and reliable makers for tumor hypoxia are needed to select suitable patients.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/biosíntesis , Anhidrasa Carbónica IX/biosíntesis , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/biosíntesis , Hipoxia/diagnóstico por imagen , Animales , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipoxia/metabolismo
7.
Radiother Oncol ; 121(1): 118-123, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27647458

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies confirmed that implantable rectum spacers (IRS) decreased acute gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity in a significant percentage of prostate cancer patients undergoing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). We developed decision rules based on clinical risk factors (CRFs) to select those patients who are expected to benefit most from IRS implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 26 patients dose distributions with (IMRT+IRS) and without (IMRT-IRS) IRS were calculated. Validated nomograms based on CRFs and dosimetric criteria (anorectal V40Gy and V75Gy) were used to predict probabilities for grade 2-3 (G2-3) acute GI toxicity, G2-3 late rectal bleeding (LRB), G3 LRB, and G2-3 faecal incontinence (FI) for IMRT+IRS and IMRT-IRS. All permutations of CRFs were generated to identify most benefit scenarios (MBS) in which a predicted toxicity reduction of ⩾5% points in ⩾25% of the cohort was present due to IRS implantation. RESULTS: IMRT+IRS revealed a significant reduction in V40Gy (p=0.0357) and V75Gy (p<0.0001) relative to IMRT-IRS. For G2-3 acute GI toxicity and G2-3 LRB, the predicted toxicity rates decreased in 17/26 (65%) and 20/26 (77%) patients, and decision rules were derived for 22/32 (69%) and 12/64 (19%) MBS, respectively. From the decision rules, it follows that diabetes status has no impact on G2-3 acute toxicity, and in absence of pre-RT abdominal surgery, the implantation of an IRS is predicted to show no clinically relevant benefit for G2-3 LRB. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer patients who are expected to benefit most from IRS implantation can be identified prior to IMRT based on their CRFs profile.


Asunto(s)
Hidrogel de Polietilenoglicol-Dimetacrilato/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Incontinencia Fecal/prevención & control , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Nomogramas , Selección de Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/instrumentación , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/instrumentación , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Recto/anatomía & histología , Recto/diagnóstico por imagen
8.
BMC Cancer ; 16: 644, 2016 08 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27535748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the standard treatment with curative intent for oesophageal cancer patients, with 5-year overall survival rates up to 50 %. However, patients' quality of life is severely compromised by oesophagectomy, and eventually many patients die due to metastatic disease. Most solid tumours, including oesophageal cancer, contain hypoxic regions that are more resistant to chemoradiotherapy. The hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide works as a DNA-alkylating agent under these hypoxic conditions, which directly kills hypoxic cancer cells and potentially minimizes resistance to conventional therapy. This drug has shown promising results in several clinical studies when combined with chemotherapy. Therefore, in this phase I study we investigate the safety of evofosfamide added to the chemoradiotherapy treatment of oesophageal cancer. METHODS/DESIGN: A phase I, non-randomized, single-centre, open-label, 3 + 3 trial with repeated hypoxia PET imaging, will test the safety of evofosfamide in combination with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in potentially resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Investigated dose levels range from 120 mg/m2 to 340 mg/m2. Evofosfamide will be administered one week before the start of chemoradiotherapy (CROSS-regimen) and repeated weekly up to a total of six doses. PET/CT acquisitions with hypoxia tracer (18)F-HX4 will be made before and after the first administration of evofosfamide, allowing early assessment of changes in hypoxia, accompanied with blood sampling to measure hypoxia blood biomarkers. Oesophagectomy will be performed according to standard clinical practice. Higher grade and uncommon non-haematological, haematological, and post-operative toxicities are the primary endpoints according to the CTCAEv4.0 and Clavien-Dindo classifications. Secondary endpoints are reduction in hypoxic fraction based on (18)F-HX4 imaging, pathological complete response, histopathological negative circumferential resection margin (R0) rate, local and distant recurrence rate, and progression free and overall survival. DISCUSSION: This is the first clinical trial testing evofosfamide in combination with chemoradiotherapy. The primary objective is to determine the dose limiting toxicity of this combined treatment and herewith to define the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose for future clinical studies. The addition of non-invasive repeated hypoxia imaging ('window-of-opportunity') enables us to identify the biologically effective dose. We believe this approach could also be used for other hypoxia targeted drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02598687 .


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Nitroimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Mostazas de Fosforamida/administración & dosificación , Hipoxia de la Célula/efectos de los fármacos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esofagectomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Nitroimidazoles/farmacología , Mostazas de Fosforamida/farmacología , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Acta Oncol ; 54(9): 1289-300, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26395528

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trials are vital in informing routine clinical care; however, current designs have major deficiencies. An overview of the various challenges that face modern clinical research and the methods that can be exploited to solve these challenges, in the context of personalised cancer treatment in the 21st century is provided. AIM: The purpose of this manuscript, without intending to be comprehensive, is to spark thought whilst presenting and discussing two important and complementary alternatives to traditional evidence-based medicine, specifically rapid learning health care and cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design. Rapid learning health care is an approach that proposes to extract and apply knowledge from routine clinical care data rather than exclusively depending on clinical trial evidence, (please watch the animation: http://youtu.be/ZDJFOxpwqEA). The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design is a pragmatic method which has been proposed to help overcome the weaknesses of conventional randomised trials, taking advantage of the standardised follow-up approaches more and more used in routine patient care. This approach is particularly useful when the new intervention is a priori attractive for the patient (i.e. proton therapy, patient decision aids or expensive medications), when the outcomes are easily collected, and when there is no need of a placebo arm. DISCUSSION: Truly personalised cancer treatment is the goal in modern radiotherapy. However, personalised cancer treatment is also an immense challenge. The vast variety of both cancer patients and treatment options makes it extremely difficult to determine which decisions are optimal for the individual patient. Nevertheless, rapid learning health care and cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design are two approaches (among others) that can help meet this challenge.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos
10.
Radiother Oncol ; 117(3): 442-7, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26364885

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether adaptive radiotherapy for unaccounted stomach changes in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) is necessary and whether dose differences could be prevented by giving patients food and fluid instructions before treatment simulation and radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients were randomly assigned into two groups: patients with and without instructions about restricting food and fluid intake prior to radiotherapy simulation and treatment. Redelineation and offline recalculation of dose distributions based on cone-beam computed tomography (n=100) were performed. Dose-volume parameters were analysed for the clinical target volume extending into the stomach. RESULTS: Four patients who did not receive instructions had a geometric miss (0.7-12 cm(3)) in only one fraction. With instructions, 3 out of 10 patients had a geometric miss (0.1-1.9 cm(3)) in one (n=2) or two (n=1) fractions. The V95% was reduced by more than 5% for one patient, but this underdosage was in an in-air region without further clinical importance. CONCLUSIONS: Giving patients food and fluid instructions for the treatment of GEJ cancer offers no clinical benefit. Using a planning target volume margin of 1cm implies that there is no need for adaptive radiotherapy for GEJ tumours.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Unión Esofagogástrica , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/fisiopatología , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Vaciamiento Gástrico/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos
11.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 30(10): 1293-303, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26198994

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to give an overview of the measures used to prevent chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) and to provide an algorithm for the treatment of CRP. METHODS: Medical literature databases including PubMed and Medline were screened and critically analyzed for relevance in the scope of our purpose. RESULTS: CRP is a relatively frequent late side effect (5-20%) and mainly dependent on the dose and volume of irradiated rectum. Radiation treatment (RT) techniques to prevent CRP are constantly improving thanks to image-guided RT and intensity-modulated RT. Also, newer techniques like protons and new devices such as rectum spacers and balloons have been developed to spare rectal structures. Biopsies do not contribute to diagnosing CRP and should be avoided because of the risk of severe rectal wall damage, such as necrosis and fistulas. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of CRP. A variety of possibilities is available and includes topical and oral agents, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and endoscopic interventions. CONCLUSIONS: CRP has a natural history of improving over time, even without treatment. This is important to take into account when considering these treatments: first be conservative (topical and oral agents) and be aware that invasive treatments can be very toxic.


Asunto(s)
Proctitis/terapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/terapia , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Proctitis/diagnóstico , Proctitis/prevención & control , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Dosificación Radioterapéutica
12.
Radiother Oncol ; 114(2): 276-81, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25616537

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of treating prostate cancer patients with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and a spacer (IMRT+S) versus IMRT-only without a spacer (IMRT-O). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was constructed to examine the effect of late rectal toxicity and compare the costs and quality-adjusted Life Years (QALYs) of IMRT-O and IMRT+S. The main assumption of this modeling study was that disease progression, genito-urinary toxicity and survival were equal for both comparators. RESULTS: For all patients, IMRT+S revealed a lower toxicity than IMRT-O. Treatment follow-up and toxicity costs for IMRT-O and IMRT+S amounted to €1604 and €1444, respectively, thus saving €160 on the complication costs at an extra charge of €1700 for the spacer in IMRT+S. The QALYs yielded for IMRT-O and IMRT+S were 3.542 and 3.570, respectively. This results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €55,880 per QALY gained. For a ceiling ratio of €80,000, IMRT+S had a 77% probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSION: IMRT+S is cost-effective compared to IMRT-O based on its potential to reduce radiotherapy-related toxicity.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/economía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/economía , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/economía , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos
13.
Radiother Oncol ; 113(2): 166-74, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25465727

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Oesophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide and radiotherapy plays a prominent role in its treatment. The presence of lymph node (LN) metastasis has been demonstrated to be one of the most significant prognostic factors related to oesophageal cancer. The use of elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) is still a topic of persistent controversy. The conservative school is to irradiate positive lymph nodes only; the other school is to prophylactically irradiate the regional lymph node area according to different tumour sites. This review investigated the justification for including ENI in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search to find surgical data about lymph node distribution depending on different tumour subgroups: early, cervical, thoracic and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Furthermore, we performed a qualitative assessment of recurrence patterns in patients treated with or without ENI to derive estimates of the potential area at risk for lymph node harvest. RESULTS: We identified and reviewed 49 studies: 10 in early, 8 in cervical, 10 in thoracic and the remaining 21 in gastroesophageal junction cancer. In general, these studies were conclusive in incidence and location of pathologic lymph nodes for different subgroups. Data for lymph node recurrence patterns are scarce and contributed little to our review. CONCLUSIONS: This review resulted in five recommendations for radiation oncologists in daily practice. We used the available evidence about metastatic lymph node distribution to develop a careful reasonable radiation protocol for the corresponding tumour subgroups.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Ganglios Linfáticos/efectos de la radiación , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia
14.
Case Rep Hematol ; 2014: 684689, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24891961

RESUMEN

Chylothorax is caused by disruption or obstruction of the thoracic duct or its tributaries that results in the leakage of chyle into the pleural space. A number of interventions have been used to treat chylothorax including the treatment of the underlying disease. Lymphoma is found in 70% of cases with nontraumatic malignant aetiology. Although patients usually have advanced lymphoma, supradiaphragmatic disease is not always present. We discuss the case of a 63-year-old woman presenting with progressive respiratory symptoms due to chylothorax. She was diagnosed with a stage IIE retroperitoneal grade 1 follicular lymphoma extending from the coeliac trunk towards the pelvic inlet. Despite thoracocentesis and medium-chain triglycerides (MCT), diet chylothorax reoccurred. After low dose radiotherapy (2 × 2 Gy) to the abdominal lymphoma there was a marked decrease in lymphadenopathy at the coeliac trunk and a complete regression of the pleural fluid. In this case, radiotherapy was shown to be an effective nontoxic treatment option for lymphoma-associated chylothorax with long-term remission of pleural effusion.

15.
Oncologist ; 18(6): 697-706, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23723331

RESUMEN

A decade after its first introduction into the clinic, little is known about the clinical impact of helical tomotherapy (HT) on head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. Therefore, we analyzed the basics of this technique and reviewed the literature regarding HT's potential benefit in HNC. The past two decades have been characterized by a huge technological evolution in photon beam radiotherapy (RT). In HNC, static beam intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has shown superiority over three-dimensional conformal RT in terms of xerostomia and is considered the standard of care. However, the next-generation IMRT, the rotational IMRT, has been introduced into the clinic without any evidence of superiority over static beam IMRT other than being substantially faster. Of these rotational techniques, HT is the first system especially developed for IMRT in combination with image-guided RT. HT is particularly promising for the treatment of HNC because its sharp dose gradients maximally spare the many radiosensitive organs at risk nearby. In addition, HT's integrated computed tomography scan assures a very precise dose administration and allows for some adaptive RT. Because HT is specifically developed for IMRT in combination with (integrated) image-guidance, it allows for precise dose distribution ("dose painting"), patient setup, and dose delivery. As such, it is an excellent tool for difficult HNC irradiation. The literature on the clinical results of HT in HNC all show excellent short-term (≤2 years) results with acceptable toxicity profiles. However, properly designed trials are still warranted to further substantiate these results.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
16.
Mutat Res ; 751(2): 304-325, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22698615

RESUMEN

Alterations of genetic and epigenetic features can provide important insights into the natural history of breast cancer. Although DNA methylation analysis is a rapidly developing field, a reproducible epigenetic blood-based assay for diagnosis and follow-up of breast cancer has yet to be successfully developed into a routine clinical test. The aim of this study was to review multiple serum DNA methylation assays and to highlight the value of those novel biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of therapeutic outcome. Serum is readily accessible for molecular diagnosis in all individuals from a peripheral blood sample. The list of hypermethylated genes in breast cancer is heterogeneous and no single gene is methylated in all breast cancer types. There is increasing evidence that a panel of epigenetic markers is essential to achieve a higher sensitivity and specificity in breast cancer detection. However, the reported percentages of methylation are highly variable, which can be partly explained by the different sensitivities and the different intra-/inter-assay coefficients of variability of the analysis methods. Moreover, there is a striking lack of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the proposed biomarkers. Another point of criticism is the fact that 'normal' patterns of DNA methylation of some tumor suppressor and other cancer-related genes are influenced by several factors and are often poorly characterized. A relatively frequent methylation of those genes has been observed in high-risk asymptomatic women. Finally, there is a call for larger prospective cohort studies to determine methylation patterns during treatment and follow-up. Identification of patterns specific for a differential response to therapeutic interventions should be useful. Only in this way, it will be possible to evaluate the predictive and prognostic characteristics of those novel promising biomarkers.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/sangre , Metilación de ADN , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Appl Spectrosc ; 65(11): 1281-90, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22054088

RESUMEN

Raman spectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy are often used as complementary techniques that are well suited for the analysis of art objects because both techniques are fast, sensitive, and noninvasive and measurements can take place in situ. In most of these studies, both techniques are used separately, in the sense that the spectra are evaluated independently and single conclusions are obtained, considering both results. This paper presents a data fusion procedure for Raman and XRF data for the characterization of pigments used in porcelain cards. For the classification of the analyzed points of the porcelain cards principal component analysis (PCA) was used. A first attempt was made to develop a new procedure for the identification of the pigments using a database containing the fused Raman-XRF data of 24 reference pigments. The results show that the classification based on the fused Raman-XRF data is significantly better than the classifications based on the Raman data or the XRF data separately.

18.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci ; 48(2): 87-96, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21871001

RESUMEN

Urinary albumin measurements are currently not standardized due to a lack of a reference method and reference (primary and secondary [matrix]) material. Multiple molecular forms of albumin in urine are identified. Modification of albumin by proteolysis during passage through the urinary tract and chemical modification during specimen storage leads to the formation of albumin fragments. Multiple methods have been developed to quantify albuminuria and significant different results are reported dependent on the available assay. The current point of view of the National Kidney Disease Education Program - IFCC Working Group on Standardization of Albumin considers the immunoassay with polyclonal sera as the primary method of quantifying urine albumin. This article reviews the process of albumin fragmentation and focuses on the controversial topic of immuno-unreactive, nonimmunoreactive, or immunochemically nonreactive albumin fractions and its consequences for albumin analysis. We conclude that at present there are no hard arguments for measuring immunochemically unreactive albumin in urine. Immunoassays using polyclonal antisera for the detection of urinary albumin remain the gold standard. The development of a reference measurement procedure remains one of the challenges for the future.


Asunto(s)
Albúminas/metabolismo , Albuminuria/orina , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Urinálisis/métodos , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/normas , Urinálisis/normas
19.
Cancer ; 117(19): 4355-64, 2011 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21446048

RESUMEN

The authors undertook a systematic review to designate the role that radiotherapy (RT) might play in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas. Correlating with recent literature, the objective of this review was to evaluate whether there was enough evidence for the authors to develop an institutional treatment protocol concerning the use of RT in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Furthermore, this was a call for surgeons to talk to radiation oncologists before performing surgery. The 2 objectives of this review were: 1) to determine the benefit of RT in terms of local control and/or survival in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas and 2) to discover the optimal timing of RT in the treatment sequence. A computerized literature search was performed in the PubMed database, the Cochrane Library database, and reference lists; and journals also were searched by hand to identify all retrospective and prospective reports published since 1998 relating to RT treatment of adult retroperitoneal sarcoma. Mainly, analyses were sought that were based on a 5-year local control rate (LCR), 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year overall survival (OS). If only 2 years follow-up were available, then the authors also noted this outcome. Toxicity data were collected and analyzed separately. The synthesis of the literature was based on 9 prospectively nonrandomized studies and 10 retrospective studies that, together, reviewed a total of 1426 patients. The 5-year LCR varied from 27% to 62%, and the results from other reports fell in between those values. The 5-year OS rate ranged from 12% to 90%, and complete resection and tumor grade were the most important prognostic factors in most studies. This review resulted in 7 recommendations concerning the use of RT in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma. The authors concluded that there is good evidence from multiple single-institutions studies that RT improves the LCR in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Until now, there has not been a translation of this approach into survival benefit. The current results indicated that preoperative external-beam RT followed by radical surgery seems to be the preferred sequence, and adding intraoperative RT is a safe procedure for dose escalation in the upper abdomen.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/radioterapia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Sarcoma/cirugía , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA