An Intervention to Decrease the Occurrence of Invalid Data on Neuropsychological Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: This study tested whether patients who were given a handout based on deterrence theory, immediately prior to evaluation, would provide invalid data less frequently than patients who were simply given an informational handout. METHOD: All outpatients seen for clinical evaluation in a VA Neuropsychology Clinic were randomly given one of the two handouts immediately prior to evaluation. The "Intervention" handout emphasized the importance of trying one's hardest, explicitly listed consequences of valid and invalid responding and asked patients to sign and initial it. The "Control" handout provided general information about neuropsychological evaluation. Examiners were blinded to condition. Patients were excluded from analyses if they were diagnosed with major neurocognitive disorder or could not read the handout. Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) was used to determine performance validity. RESULTS: Groups did not differ on age, education, or litigation status. For the entire sample (N = 251), there was no effect of handout on passing versus failing MSVT. However, among patients who were seeking disability benefits at the time of evaluation (n = 70), the Intervention handout was associated with lower frequency of failing MSVT than the Control handout. CONCLUSIONS: This brief, theory-based, cost-free intervention was associated with lower frequency of invalid data among patients seeking disability benefits at the time of clinical evaluation. We suggest methodological modifications that might produce a more potent intervention that could be effective with additional subsets of patients.

Interdisciplinary Differential Diagnosis and Care of a Patient with Atypical Delusional Parasitosis due to early HIV-related Dementia.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a differential diagnosis and recommendations for care for an individual with suspected delusional parasitosis secondary to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHOD: A 62-year-old male with sexually acquired, chronic, and well-managed HIV infection was referred for neuropsychological evaluation and treatment recommendations following extensive self-manipulation of a sternoclavicular cystic mass and superficial skin lesions over most of his body. The patient reported that he had pulled long calcified tendrils out of the mass over a period of several weeks and that "encapsulated fat" was flowing beneath his skin. RESULTS: Numerous lab panels were negative for any acute medical pathology. Clinical neuroimaging was unremarkable. Neuropsychological evaluation revealed a profile consistent with mild neurocognitive disorder due to HIV. Medical and behavioral recommendations were made for the management of delusional thought processes consistent with atypical delusional parasitosis and other symptoms. The patient was responsive to carefully crafted provider feedback and his delusional and somatic symptoms decreased significantly with risperidone. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates the utility of neuropsychological assessment and provider feedback in the diagnosis and care of HIV-related neurocognitive disorder, the context of a delusional disorder.

[Formula: see text]inadequate effort on neuropsychological evaluation is associated with increased healthcare utilization.

Patients who exert inadequate effort on neuropsychological examination might not receive accurate diagnoses and recommendations, and might not cooperate fully with other aspects of healthcare. This study examined whether inadequate effort is associated with increased healthcare utilization. Of 355 patients seen for routine, clinical neuropsychological examination at a VA Medical Center, 283 (79.7%) showed adequate effort and 72 (20.3%) showed inadequate effort, as determined at time of evaluation using the Word Memory Test and/or Test of Memory Malingering. Utilization data included number of Emergency Department (ED) visits and inpatient hospitalizations in the year following evaluation. Patients who had shown inadequate effort on examination had more Emergency Department visits, more inpatient hospitalizations, and more days of inpatient hospitalization in the year after evaluation, compared to patients who had exerted adequate effort. This finding was not attributable to group differences in age or medical/psychiatric comorbidities. Thus, patients who exerted inadequate effort showed greater healthcare utilization in the year following evaluation. Such patients might use more resources since diagnostic evaluations are inconclusive. Inadequate effort on examination might also serve as a "marker" for more general failure to cooperate fully in one's healthcare, possibly resulting in greater utilization.

CE hospital service utilization is reduced following neuropsychological evaluation in a sample of U.S. veterans.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the objective value of neuropsychological evaluation (NPE) through reduction in Emergency Room (ER) visits and hospitalizations. Retrospective analysis examined trends in ER visits and hospitalizations in 440 U.S. veterans who completed NPE between the years of 2003 and 2010. Within-subjects comparisons showed significant decreases in incidence of hospitalization and length of hospitalization in the year after evaluation compared to the year prior. Mean number of hospitalizations declined from 0.31 (SD = 0.64) pre-NPE to 0.22 (SD = 0.59) post-NPE; there were a total of 41 fewer hospitalizations in the year following NPE. Mean length of hospitalization decreased from 1.9 days (SD = 5.6) pre-NPE to 1.06 days (SD = 3.9) post-NPE; there were a total of 368 fewer days of hospitalization post-NPE. This reduction was not attributable to age or time. Incidence of ER visits also decreased from pre-NPE (M = 0.74, SD = 1.3) to post-evaluation (M = 0.69, SD = 1.3), though this was not significant. These findings provide preliminary evidence of the clinical and potential economic value of neuropsychological services within a medical setting. Follow-up studies should examine individual and exam-specific factors that may contribute to reduced utilization.

A pilot trial of neuropsychological evaluations conducted via telemedicine in the Veterans Health Administration.

INTRODUCTION: Many veterans live in rural areas distant from Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) and receive primary medical care from community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs). These veterans often must travel great distances to the nearest VAMC for neuropsychological evaluations, resulting in poor access to care, travel reimbursement costs, fee-basis evaluations of uncontrolled quality, and driving safety concerns. Return trips for feedback compound complications. Accordingly, we initiated a pilot trial of neuropsychological evaluation and feedback via telemedicine (i.e., clinical videoconferencing). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Participants were veterans referred for neuropsychological evaluation from a rural CBOC 115 miles from the regional VAMC. All veterans were given the choice to undergo evaluation at the CBOC via telemedicine or in-person at the VAMC. Telemedicine equipment allowed presentation of digitized material with simultaneous patient observation. Testing materials were organized in numbered folders and given to veterans by CBOC clerks immediately prior to evaluation. Clerks returned completed materials via facsimile. RESULTS: Fifteen veterans from the rural CBOC were seen for neuropsychological evaluation. Eight chose telemedicine evaluation. Groups based on evaluation modality appeared similar on demographics, referral basis, resulting neuropsychiatric diagnoses, and follow-through on recommendations. No significant technical or clinical difficulties were encountered, and veterans reported satisfaction with telemedicine. All veterans requested feedback via telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological evaluation via telemedicine is feasible and appears comparable to in-person evaluation. Experiences are encouraging and consistent with the broader literature on the acceptance of and satisfaction with clinical videoconferencing. Future studies will assess possible psychometric issues in clinical populations.