RESUMEN
Colonoscopy is an important endoscopic examination for the diagnosis and treatment of pathological conditions of the colon, like polyps and colorectal cancer. However, several factors determine the quality of colonoscopy and thus the quality of polyp and colorectal cancer detection. The Flemish Society of Gastroenterology (VVGE) performed a voluntary on-line registry among its members to identify quality of colonoscopy in Flanders, Belgium. 64 gastroenterologists voluntarily registered 4276 consecutive colonoscopies performed during a 3 month study period. Colonoscopy quality indicators were prospectively collected and analysed. Results showed a low voluntary participation rate (17%), acceptable overall adenoma detection rate of 20,5% and colorectal cancer interval rate of 5,4%. Complications were low (perforation 0,1% and major bleeding 1,5%). The current study showed that in Flanders, Belgium on-line registration of colonoscopy quality indicators is feasible and that quality of colonoscopy in daily practice meets the expectations of (inter)national guidelines. However, further improvement of the registry and an open debate on the quality control of colonoscopy in Flanders is warranted (Belgian Registry B30020096548).
Asunto(s)
Adenoma/diagnóstico , Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Colonoscopía/normas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Gastroenterólogos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Bélgica/epidemiología , Femenino , Gastroenterología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer related death in the western countries. It remains an important health problem, often under-diagnosed. The symptoms can appear very late and about 25% of the patients are diagnosed at metastatic stage. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an inherited colorectal cancer syndrome, characterized by the early onset of hundred to thousands of adenomatous polyps in the colon and rectum. Left untreated, there is a nearly 100% cumulative risk of progression to CRC by the age of 35-40 years, as well as an increased risk of various other malignancies. CRC can be prevented by the identification of the high risk population and by the timely implementation of rigid screening programs which will lead to special medico-surgical interventions.
Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/diagnóstico , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/prevención & control , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Incidencia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Colonoscopy can prevent colorectal cancer, but its effectiveness is diminished by operator-dependent factors. Therefore, quality assurance programs should be implemented in all colonoscopy practices. Adherence to quality performance measures varies among different countries, and physicians seem reluctant to adopt them. We provide an overview of the existing guidelines for colonoscopy quality assurance, and a summary of the quality control initiatives in Belgium and the surrounding countries.
Asunto(s)
Pólipos Adenomatosos/diagnóstico , Colonoscopía/normas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/prevención & control , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Pólipos Adenomatosos/cirugía , Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico , Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Europa (Continente) , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Control de CalidadRESUMEN
As population-wide screening for colorectal cancer is adopted by many western countries for all individuals aged 50-75. The success of screening colonoscopy programs is highly dependent on the quality of the procedures. High-quality complete endoscopy with excellent patient preparation and adequate withdrawal time is necessary for effectively reducing colon cancer risk. In Belgium formal quality assurance programs and principles of credentialing do not exist. The current reimbursement system for colonoscopy does not reward a careful performed examination but rapidly performed examinations at unnecessarily short intervals. There is a clear need for evidence-based quality measures to ensure the quality of screening colonoscopy. In this guideline review we present an overview of the literature concerning criteria for best practice and important quality indicators for colonoscopy. A summary of the latest guidelines is given. Our goal of this update is to provide practical guidelines for endoscopists performing screening colonoscopy. We hope to provide a broad consensus and an increasing adherence to these recommendations.