Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 47(1): 45-59, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38097769

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report technical feasibility and clinical efficacy of iliac vein stent placement in adolescent patients with May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-institution retrospective review of the medical record between 2014 and 2021 found 63 symptomatic patients (F = 40/63; mean age 16.1 years, 12-20 years) who underwent left common iliac vein (LCIV) stent placement for treatment of LCIV compression from an overriding right common iliac artery, or equivalent (n = 1, left IVC). 32/63 (50.7%) patients presented with non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL). 31/63 (49.2%) patients presented with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity and required catheter-directed thrombolysis after stent placement (tMTS). Outcomes include technically successful stent placement with resolution of anatomic compression and symptom improvement. Stent patency was monitored with Kaplan-Meier analysis at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet (AC/AP) regimens were reported. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 98.4%. 74 bare-metal self-expanding stents were placed in 63 patients. Primary patency at 12, and 24-months was 93.5%, and 88.9% for the NIVL group and 84.4% and 84.4% for the tMTS group for the same period. Overall patency for the same time intervals was 100%, and 95.4% for the NIVL group and 96.9%, and 96.9% for the tMTS group. Procedural complication rate was 3.2% (2/63) with no thrombolysis-related bleeding complications. Clinical success was achieved in 30/32 (93.8%) and 29/31 (93.5%) patients with tMTS and NIVL groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: CIV stent placement in the setting of tMTS and NIVL is technically feasible and clinically efficacious in young patients with excellent patency rates and a favorable safety profile.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de May-Thurner , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Síndrome de May-Thurner/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de May-Thurner/terapia , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Factibilidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents , Estudios Retrospectivos , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
2.
Clin Imaging ; 103: 109991, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37801739

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: De novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes are advantageous in children that require prolonged supplemental nutrition. However, few institutions place these devices at the time of initial feeding tube placement. We aim to build upon our previously published initial experience with this procedure to study mid-to-long-term outcomes of pediatric patients who have had de novo, image-guided, percutaneous low-profile GJ tube placement. METHODS: All de novo, image-guided, percutaneous, low-profile GJ tube placements at a single children's hospital were retrospectively reviewed between May 2014 and March 2021. Technical parameters, including fluoroscopy time, tube size, technical success, and complications were recorded. Clinical data, including age, indication, weight gain and transition to gastric/oral feeds were analyzed. RESULTS: 64 de novo low-profile GJ tubes were successfully placed in 65 patients (mean age: 4.6 years, median: 1, range: 0.2-19; mean pre-procedural weight: 16.8 kg, median: 8.2, range: 4.4-66.7). Average clinical follow-up 23.4 months (range: 0.1-75, median 10.4). Average weight gain was 6.1 kg. Average increase in weight percentile was 7.3%. 19 (19/64; 29.7%) patients had conversion from GJ to G tube. 11 (11/64; 17.2%) patients had their enteric tube removed completely. There were 7 minor complications (7/65; 10.7%), most common being excessive skin irritation (6/7) and 9 major complications (9/65; 13.8%), most common being tube dislodgment within the first 30 days (6/9). CONCLUSIONS: These results further support that de novo, image-guided, percutaneous, low-profile GJ tube placement is technically feasible and efficacious in children requiring post-pyloric nutritional supplementation with a favorable safety profile.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Intubación Gastrointestinal/métodos , Nutrición Enteral , Aumento de Peso
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 56(4): 816-820, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33422328

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the use of the internal mammary vein as an alternative access for central venous catheters. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent placement of central venous catheters via the internal mammary vein. Patient demographics, indication for venous access, technical success, catheter type, dwell time and indication for exchange or removal were recorded. RESULTS: Placement of central venous catheters via the internal mammary vein was attempted in 11 patients including 8 children (4 males, mean age 5.7 years) and 3 adults. The most common indication was parenteral nutrition in patients with intestinal failure (7/11). Initial needle access of the vein was successful in all patients. Catheter placement was successful in 9 and unsuccessful in 2 patients due to occlusion of the superior vena cava. There were no immediate complications. A total of 20 catheters of various sizes (3-14.5 French) and lengths (8-23 cm) were either placed (n = 12) or exchanged (n = 8). The most common indications for catheter exchange were poor function and malposition (7/8). Four catheters were removed for infection and 4 were accidentally removed. The mean dwell time was 141 days (range 0-963 days) per catheter for a total of 2829 catheter days. The total mean dwell time per patient, including primarily placed and exchanged catheters, was 314 days (range 5-963 days). CONCLUSIONS: The internal mammary vein may provide a safe alternative route for patients who have lost their traditional access veins.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Enfermedades Vasculares , Adulto , Catéteres de Permanencia , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vena Cava Superior
4.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(1 Pt A): 22-30, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31376398

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification of pulmonary embolism (PE) can reduce unnecessary imaging. We investigated the extent to which the American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline for evaluation of patients with suspected PE could be applied to cancer patients in the emergency department of a comprehensive cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from cancer patients who underwent CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) between August 1, 2015, and October 31, 2015, were collected. We assessed each patient's diagnostic workup for its adherence to the ACP guideline in terms of clinical risk stratification and age-adjusted d-dimer level and the degree to which these factors were associated with PE. RESULTS: Of the 380 patients identified, 213 (56%) underwent CTPA indicated per the ACP guideline, and 78 (21%) underwent CTPA not indicated per the guideline. Only one of the patients who underwent nonindicated CTPA had a PE. Fifty-seven patients underwent unnecessary d-dimer evaluation, and 71 patients with negative d-dimer test results underwent nonindicated CTPA. PEs were found in 6 of 108 (6%) low-risk patients, 22 of 219 (10%) intermediate-risk patients, and 13 of 53 (25%) high-risk patients. The ACP guideline had negative predictive value of 99% (95% confidence interval: 93%-100%) and sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval: 86%-100%) in predicting PE. CONCLUSION: The ACP guideline has good sensitivity for detecting PE in cancer patients and thus can be applied in this population. Compliance with the ACP guideline when evaluating cancer patients with suspected PE could reduce the use of unnecessary imaging and laboratory studies.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Femenino , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Innecesarios
5.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 15(1 Pt A): 116-122, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28969974

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of educational sessions on reducing lumbar spine MRI inappropriateness for uncomplicated low back pain and to present our institutional experience on the use of ACR's Radiology Support, Communication and Alignment Network (R-SCAN) program toward achieving appropriateness. METHODS: The R-SCAN web portal was accessed to register a project. Using order entry data, the number of lumbar spine MRI orders placed per month at three family medicine clinics was assessed over a 10-month period. After educational presentations were given at those three clinics highlighting the American College of Physicians and Choosing Wisely campaign imaging guidelines, the number of MRI orders placed was reassessed over an additional 10 months. For a subset of these exams, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria rating of the lumbar spine MRIs were compared between the pre- and posteducation periods. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The average number of monthly MRIs ordered from all three clinics combined was 6.3 during the posteducation period, which was significantly less than during the pre-education period of 10.0 (P = .009). The combined average ACR Appropriateness Criteria rating made at all three clinics was 5.8 after educational sessions, which was significantly higher than the rating of 4.7 before educational sessions (P = .014). CONCLUSION: Clinician education, facilitated by R-SCAN, resulted in a reduced number of MRI lumbar spine studies performed for uncomplicated low back pain and improved appropriateness of those studies as measured by the ACR Appropriateness Criteria rating.


Asunto(s)
Capacitación en Servicio , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología/educación , Procedimientos Innecesarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Sistemas de Información Radiológica
6.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 40(10): 1552-1558, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28488105

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A single-incision technique for tunneled central venous access has been described. This study evaluates whether single-incision technique in children is comparable to the conventional method, with regard to procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and complication rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 303 internal jugular vein tunneled central catheter placements whose age ranged from newborn to 17 years (median 1.7 years) by pediatric interventional radiologists from January 2014 through December 2015. 223 catheters were placed (181 patients) using the single-incision technique, and 80 catheters were placed (72 patients) using the conventional two-incision technique. Data were obtained from electronic medical records and PACS including procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and complication rates which were compared for both single-incision and conventional techniques. RESULTS: Technical success for the single-incision and conventional technique groups was 99.1 and 98.8%, respectively. Early complication rate was 12.1% for the single-incision technique and 17.5% for the conventional technique (p = 0.254). Overall complication rate was 26% (3.8/1000 line days) for the single-incision technique and 37.5% (4/1000 line days) for the conventional technique (p = 0.085). Median procedure time was 25 min for the single-incision technique and 26 min for the conventional technique (p = 0.427). Median fluoroscopy time was 1.7 min in the single-incision group and 1.3 min in the conventional group (p = 0.085). CONCLUSION: The single-incision technique for central venous access has comparable procedure time and fluoroscopy time with no difference in complication rates between the two techniques in a pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...