An Intraoperative Method to Minimize Leg Length Discrepancy in Anterior Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Prospective Study.

While several intraoperative devices have been described in the literature for assessing leg length discrepancy (LLD), none have been utilized during total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed via the Anterior Minimally Invasive Surgery (AMIS) approach. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and accuracy of a compass device in assessing leg length during THA performed using the AMIS technique. A prospective study was conducted involving 35 patients who consecutively underwent unilateral primary THA using the AMIS technique at our department from September 2017 to December 2018. LLD was measured by comparing preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis, independently assessed by two observers. The mean preoperative LLD was 3.6 (SD 3.9, range, 0.2-19.3) mm. The mean postoperative LLD was 2.5 (SD 3.0, range, 0-12.2) mm. A postoperative LLD of less than 5 mm was observed in 88.2% of cases, with 94.1% having values less than 10 mm. In conclusion, the compass device emerged as a valuable tool for ensuring precise limb length control in THA with the AMIS approach, offering both efficiency and cost-effectiveness in clinical practice.

Adipose-derived Stromal Vascular Fraction Injection in a Competitive High-level Athlete Affected by Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy.

Achilles tendinopathy is one of the most common ankle and foot overuse injuries, especially among athletes. Despite this, the management of this injury lacks an evidence-based support, and patients are at risk of long-term morbidity with unpredictable clinical outcome. Recently, injective approach has gained more and more attention, and in particular the intratendinous injection with adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction. We report a case of an insertional Achilles tendinopathy in a high-level professional athlete, who was treated avoiding surgical treatment in favor of this innovative biological approach. Patient's satisfaction and return to play was prospectively evaluated for a period of 6 months of follow-up. An improvement of all functional scores was yet appreciated after 1 month from the treatment, with a crescent trend until the last 6-month follow-up. The patient was able to return to train after 34 days, and returned to match after 68 days, playing 20 minutes. She returned to the complete full game 72 days after treatment. However subsequent ultrasound and MRI evaluations failed to show any substantial changes in the characteristics of the lesion from the preoperative images. This case report opens a new window for the treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy in competitive athletes. The current outcome deserves further investigation with higher quality studies in order to confirm the validity of this fascinating therapeutic option.

Bearing thickness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a reliable predictor of tibial bone loss during revision to total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Bone defects during revision procedures for failed UKA represent a challenge even for the most experienced surgeons; therefore, an accurate preoperative planning remains essential to prevent dramatic scenarios in the surgical theatre. HYPOTHESIS: Our hypothesis is that bearing thickness used in original UKA represents a reliable predictor of severe tibial bone loss, requiring a metallic augment or constrained implant, during revision to TKA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty from failed UKA were identified from our institutional database and evaluated clinically using the Knee Society Score (KSS). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using the presence of tibial augments or the need of varus-valgus constrained (VVC) prosthesis as depend variables, and patients' gender, age at revision procedure, side (medial or lateral), UKA tibial tray (all-polyethylene or metal back), bearing thickness (composite thicknesses of the metal-backed tray and insert or all-polyethylene tibial component ≤8mm or more than 8mm) and cause of failed UKA as independent variables. RESULTS: A posterior-stabilized prosthesis was used in 27 cases (64.3%). An augment was necessary in 12 patients (28.6%). Initial bearing thickness greater than 8mm was associated with greater likelihood of a VVC implant (OR=11.78, 95% CI, 1.6583 to 83.6484, p=0.0137) and a tibial augment (OR=9.59, 95% CI, 1.327 to 69.395, p=0.0251). Tibial tray design, patients' gender or age during revision surgery, side or cause of failure were not associated to increased risk of augmentation or constrained implants. DISCUSSION: Surgeons should be aware of the particular challenges that the conversion of a UKA to a TKA presents and be prepared to address them intraoperatively, with particular care to proper bone loss manage. Satisfying results can be achieved at mid-to-long term follow-up, if these procedures are planned accurately, and a precise analysis of failed UKA components, in particular bearing thickness, represents a helpful support in this context. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Difficult primary total knee arthroplasty requiring a varus-valgus constrained implant is at higher risk of periprosthetic infection.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the risk of periprosthetic infection of a consecutive cohort of primary varus-valgus constrained (VVC) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), with a matched 1:1 cohort of primary posterior-stabilized (PS) TKAs. METHODS: 74 primary VVC TKAs performed in 66 patients were identified and matched 1:1 with a cohort of 74 primary PS TKAs performed in 73 patients. At last follow up, patients were clinically evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to analyze survivorship using as endpoints revision for any reason, revision for periprosthetic infection and revision for mechanical failure after excluding periprosthetic infection. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was constructed to determine whether revision surgery for periprosthetic infection was influenced by patients' gender, age, surgical time and reasons for TKA (primary vs secondary osteoarthritis). RESULTS: Demographic data were not significantly different between the two groups as regard patients' age, gender, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, reasons for replacement, and length of follow-up. Surgical time was greater in the VVC group (95.7 ± 22.5 min vs 88.6 ± 17.1 min, respectively, p = 0.032). Postoperative KSS, range of motion and radiographic data did not differ significantly between the two groups. Overall revision rate and revision rate for mechanical failure after 5 years of follow-up was not statistically different between the two groups. Considering only the revision rate due to periprosthetic infection, the risk was higher in patients with primary VVC implants (p = 0.013). The surgical time was the only factor that significantly affected the risk of revision for periprosthetic infection (OR 1.0636, CI 95% 1.0209-1.1081, p = 0.0032), whereas patients' gender, age and reason for TKA had no influence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and surgeons should be aware of the higher risk of periprosthetic knee infection using a VVC prosthesis. However, the present study supports the use of VVC implants in cases of difficult knee replacements, since comparable clinical outcomes and overall revision rate was found after at least 5 years of follow up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.