Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Orthop ; 48(5): 1295-1302, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502337

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus involving the capitellum and trochlea are rare injuries. Internal fixation with headless compression screws provides a stable construct facilitating early mobilisation. Our study aimed to identify the key determinants of both radiological and functional outcomes of patients with distal humerus coronal shear fractures treated with internal fixation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 61 patients with distal humerus coronal shear fractures who were treated surgically was done. Demographics, fracture morphology, time to surgery, operative details such as surgical approach and implant used, quality of reduction, time to union, and associated complications from hospital records. Radiological outcomes were assessed using plain radiographs, and the functional outcomes were by Oxford Elbow Score (OES) and Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). RESULTS: Patients with anatomical reduction of the fracture had better functional outcomes and range of motion. The presence of posterior comminution of capitellum resulted in poorer outcomes (p = 0.03). Delayed presentation did not alter the outcome when the anatomical reduction was achieved. Myositis ossificans was noted in nine patients and non-union in five patients. Two patients developed avascular necrosis of the capitellum and arthritis of the elbow joint. CONCLUSION: Anatomical reduction and posterior comminution are the two key determinants of the functional outcome in these coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus. Early mobilisation following a stable fixation is crucial in achieving a good outcome.


Asunto(s)
Articulación del Codo , Fracturas Conminutas , Fracturas del Húmero , Humanos , Articulación del Codo/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas del Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Húmero , Radiografía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Indian J Orthop ; 57(4): 552-564, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37006739

RESUMEN

Introduction: Humerus shaft nonunions are very disabling and challenging to treat. The current study aims to analyse the rate of union and the incidence of complications following a consistent protocol in treating humerus shaft nonunion. Methodology: We did a retrospective analysis of 100 patients with humerus shaft nonunion treated over an eight-year period from 2014 to 2021. The mean age was 42 years (range 18-75 years). There were 53 male and 47 female patients. The average time interval from injury to nonunion surgery was 23 months (range 3 months to 23 years). The series included 12 recalcitrant nonunions and 12 patients with septic nonunion. All patients underwent freshening of fracture edges to increase the contact surface area, stable fixation with a locking plate and intramedullary iliac crest bone grafting. Infective nonunions were treated in a staged manner, following a similar treatment protocol after the elimination of infection in the first stage. Results: Complete union was achieved in 97% of the patients with a single procedure. One patient achieved union after an additional procedure, while two patients were lost to further follow-up. The mean time to union was 5.7 months (range 3-10 months). Three patients (3%) had postoperative radial nerve palsy, which recovered completely within 6 months. Three patients (3%) had a superficial surgical site infection, while one patient (1%) developed a deep infection. Conclusion: Intramedullary cancellous autologous grafts combined with stable fixation by compression plating achieve a high union rate with minimal complications. Level of Evidence: III. Level of Clinical Care: Level I Tertiary trauma centre.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA