Baseline single institutional retrospective review of body mass index (BMI) as a prognostic indicator in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain cancer in adults with a very poor prognosis. Metabolic drivers of tumorigenesis are highly relevant within the central nervous system, where glucose is the critical source of energy. The impact of obesity on survival outcomes in patients with GBM is not well established. This study investigates the prognostic value of body mass index (BMI) in patients diagnosed with GBM. METHODS: Adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2022, were included in the study. BMI was calculated using the formula BMI = kg/m2. Patients BMI groups were underweight (BMI < 19.00), normal weight (BMI 19.00-24.99), overweight (BMI 25-29.99), and obese (BMI > 30.00). All patients received 60 Gy of radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide following maximal safe resection. A difference in clinical outcomes of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated between the groups using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. RESULTS: A total of 392 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 60.3 (range 18.9-86.7), with 144 females and 248 males. Median BMI was 27.0 (Range; 17.7-52.9). Non-overweight GBM patients (BMI < 25.00, OS 2.1 years, CI 1.7-2.4 years) had increased overall survival compared to overweight patients (BMI ≥ 25.00, OS 1.5 years, CI 1.4-1.6 years) (p < 0.001). Patients with MGMT-methylated GBM also had significantly greater OS and PFS compared to MGMT-unmethylated patients (p < 0.001). Non-overweight GBM patients (BMI < 25.00, median PFS 1.5 years, CI 1.3-2.0 years) also had increased progression-free survival compared to overweight patients (BMI ≥ 25.00, median PFS 1.1 years, CI 0.9-1.2 years) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates normal BMI (19.00-24.99) at the time of GBM diagnosis is a favorable prognostic indicator for overall and progression-free survival. Additional studies are warranted for further analysis of BMI and survival outcomes in GBM patients.

Novel frameless LINAC radiosurgery solution for uveal melanoma.

Introduction: Radiation treatment has replaced enucleation as an organ-preservation treatment for patients with uveal melanoma (UM). We developed a novel non-invasive, frameless LINAC based solution for fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) treatment. Methods: We designed and constructed the a stereotactic ocular localization box that can be attached and indexed to a stereotactic LINAC tabletop. It contains adjustable LED lights as a gaze focus point and CCD camera for monitoring of the patient's eye position. The device also has 6 infrared spheres compatible with the ExacTRAC IGRT system. Treatment plans were developed using iPLAN Dose version 4.5, with conformal dynamic arcs and 6MV photon beam in flattening filter free mode, dosed to 50Gy in 5 fractions. During treatment, patients were instructed to stare at the light when a radiation beam is prepared and ready for delivery. Eye movement was tracked throughout treatment. Residual setup errors were recorded for evaluation. Results: The stereotactic ocular localization box was 3D-printed with polylactic acid material and attached to the stereotactic LINAC tabletop. 10 patients were treated to evaluate the feasibility, tolerability and setup accuracy. Median treatment time for each arc is 17.3 ± 2.4 seconds (range: 13.8-23.4). After ExacTRAC setup, the residual setup errors are -0.1 ± 0.3 mm laterally, -0.1 ± 0.3 mm longitudinally, and 0 ± 0.2 mm vertically. The residue rotational errors are -0.1 ± 0.3 degree pitch, 0.1 ± 0.2 degree roll, and 0 ± 0.2 degree couch rotation. All patients received treatment successfully. Conclusion: We successfully developed a novel non-invasive frameless mask-based LINAC solution for SRS for uveal melanoma, or other ocular tumors. It is well tolerated with high set up accuracy. Future directions for this localization box would include a multi-center trial to assess the efficacy and reproducibility in the fabrication and execution of such a solution for UM therapy.

Conversion to faricimab after prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for persistent diabetic macular oedema.

BACKGROUND: To assess the anatomical and functional outcomes in eyes with persistent diabetic macular oedema (pDME) on chronic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy switched to intravitreal faricimab. METHODS: Patients with pDME on chronic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy that were switched to faricimab and received at least three injections at our institution between April 2022 and May 2023 were included in this study. Patients were excluded if they had complete response to previous treatment but were switched to extend treatment intervals if they had steroid or laser treatment for DME within 6 months prior to switch. Clinical and imaging data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Central foveal thickness (CFT) and Snellen visual acuity (VA) were obtained before and after three intravitreal faricimab injections. Generalised estimating equations were used to analyse the change in CFT and VA. RESULT: During the study period, 69 eyes of 53 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 68.6±9.0 years. The mean number of injections prior to switch was 18.1±16.0. Pre-switch mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution VA was 0.40±0.30 (Snellen equivalent 20/50) and 0.38±0.27 (Snellen equivalent 20/48) after three faricimab injections (p=0.397). Mean CFT improved from 380±155 microns to 323±147 microns (p<0.001). No ophthalmic or systemic adverse events occurred during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal faricimab can improve anatomic outcomes while maintaining visual acuity in eyes with pDME previously treated with anti-VEGF therapy.

Clinical Outcomes of Faricimab in Patients with Previously Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To assess the anatomic and functional outcomes in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with anti-VEGF therapy in response to intravitreal faricimab. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series. SUBJECTS: Patients with previously treated nAMD who received ≥ 4 consecutive injections of faricimab were included. The study period was from March through November 2022. METHODS: Clinical and imaging data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Central foveal thickness (CFT), maximum fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (fvPED) height, and Snellen visual acuity (VA) were obtained. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the change in CFT, maximum fvPED height, and logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in CFT, maximum fvPED height, and Snellen VA before faricimab and after ≥ 4 faricimab intravitreal injections. RESULTS: During the study period, 218 eyes of 191 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 79.9 (range, 70.6-89.2) years. The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections received before faricimab was 34.2 (range, 6.4-62). The following results were found after ≥ 4 faricimab injections. Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA before switching to faricimab was 0.58 (Snellen VA ∼20/76; range, 20/22-20/264) and was 0.55 (Snellen VA ∼20/71; range, 20/21-20/235; P = 0.20) after switching. Mean maximum fvPED height was 195.0 (range, 50.2-339.8) µm before switching to faricimab and improved to 165.0 (range, 33.6-296.4; P < 0.001) µm after switching. Mean CFT was 354.8 (range, 184.7-524.9) µm before switching to faricimab and improved to 306.6 (range, 144.4-468.8; P < 0.001) after switching. The proportion of eyes with intraretinal fluid was 36.7% (80/218 eyes) before switching, and decreased to 24.8% (54/218 eyes, P < 0.001) after switching. The proportion of eyes with subretinal fluid was 53.2% (116/218 eyes) before switching and decreased to 26.6% (58/218 eyes, P < 0.001) after switching. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal faricimab may improve anatomic outcomes in patients with previously treated nAMD, while maintaining VA in the short-term. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.