Prostate Cancer-related Events in Patients with Synchronous Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy with and Without Concurrent Radiation Therapy to the Prostate; Data from the HORRAD Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A survival benefit was demonstrated for patients with low-volume synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPCa) when local radiotherapy to the prostate was added to androgen deprivation therapy. This study aims to determine the incidence of prostate cancer-related events and treatments in those who received and those who did not receive external beam radiotherapy for mHSPCa. METHODS: The HORRAD trial is a multicentre randomised controlled trial recruiting originally 432 patients with mHSPCa diagnosed between 2004 and 2014. In a second updated analysis, 328 patients were studied retrospectively for local and nonlocal prostate cancer-related events and treatments. Outcome measurements included the incidence and treatment of local (bladder outlet or ureter obstruction, catheterisation, surgical intervention, ureteric stents, and nephrostomy tubes) and nonlocal (blood transfusions, hospitalisations, and treatment for painful bone metastases) events. Differences between groups were compared using crude and adjusted logistic regression, while time to occurrence of local events was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A significant difference in the incidence of local events was observed: 30 events in the radiotherapy group versus 50 in the nonradiotherapy group (p = 0.04). Time to occurrence of local interventions was significantly longer in the radiotherapy group (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.99, p = 0.04). The study's limitations include its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Local radiotherapy to the prostate prolongs local event-free survival significantly and reduces local prostate cancer-related interventions in patients with mHSPCa.

Biomarker-Oriented Therapy in Bladder and Renal Cancer.

Treatment of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder or renal cancer has changed significantly during recent years and efforts towards biomarker-directed therapy are being investigated. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) or fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) directed therapy are being evaluated for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients, as well as muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. Meanwhile, efforts to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are still ongoing, and genomic biomarkers are being evaluated in prospective clinical trials. Currently, patients with metastatic UC (mUC) are usually treated with second-line ICI, while cisplatin-ineligible patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive tumors can benefit from first-line ICI. Platinum-relapsed UC patients harboring FGFR2/3 mutations can be treated with erdafitinib, while enfortumab vedotin has emerged as a novel third-line treatment option for mUC. In metastatic (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), ICI was first introduced as second-line treatment after vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibition (VEGFR-TKI). Currently, ICIs have also been introduced as first-line treatment in metastatic RCC. Although there is no evidence up to now for beneficial adjuvant treatment after surgery with VEGFR-TKIs in high-risk non-metastatic RCC, several trials are underway investigating the potential beneficial effect of ICIs in this setting.

Patient-reported Quality of Life in Patients with Primary Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy with and Without Concurrent Radiation Therapy to the Prostate in a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial; Data from the HORRAD Trial.

BACKGROUND: A survival benefit was demonstrated for patients with low-volume metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) when local radiotherapy was added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of ADT combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the prostate on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with primary bone mPCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The HORRAD trial is a multicentre randomised controlled trial recruiting 432patients with primary bone mPCa between 2004 and 2014. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to ADT with EBRT or to ADT alone. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patients completed two validated HRQoL questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module (QLQ-C30) and EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Prostate Module [QLQ-PR25]) at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and24 mo after the initiation of treatment. The effect of both treatments was evaluated based on mixed-effect models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patient characteristics and HRQoL scores at baseline were similar in both arms. At baseline, 98% of patients completed the questionnaires, compared with 58% at 24 mo. Patients reported significantly more diarrhoea (difference between the groups 10.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.3-14.2), bowel symptoms (4.5; 95% CI 2.1-6.8), and urinary symptoms (11.9; 95% CI 8.9-14.8) after EBRT and ADT compared with ADT alone (all between-arm difference p < 0.001). Urinary complaints levelled at 6 mo. At 2 yr, only bowel symptom scores were significantly different (8.0; 95% CI 4.8-11.1, p ≤ 0.001), but 68% of patients in the radiotherapy group did not report clinically relevant worsening of their bowel symptom scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with bone mPCa reported temporary modest urinary and bowel symptoms after combined treatment with EBRT of the prostate and ADT compared with ADT alone. For some patients (22%), deterioration of bowel functions remains at 2 yr, whereas general HRQoL does not deteriorate.. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study investigated the effect of radiotherapy to the prostate added to hormonal therapy on patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with primary bone metastatic prostate cancer. Most patients reported only temporary urinary and bowel symptoms. In 22% of patients, bowel symptoms remained at 2 yr, whereas general HRQoL did not deteriorate.

Cystic renal-epithelial derived induced pluripotent stem cells from polycystic kidney disease patients.

Autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited kidney disease, leading to kidney failure in most patients. In approximately 85% of cases, the disease is caused by mutations in PKD1. How dysregulation of PKD1 leads to cyst formation on a molecular level is unknown. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are a powerful tool for in vitro modeling of genetic disorders. Here, we established ADPKD patient-specific iPSCs to study the function of PKD1 in kidney development and cyst formation in vitro. Somatic mutations are proposed to be the initiating event of cyst formation, and therefore, iPSCs were derived from cystic renal epithelial cells rather than fibroblasts. Mutation analysis of the ADPKD iPSCs revealed germline mutations in PKD1 but no additional somatic mutations in PKD1/PKD2. Although several somatic mutations in other genes implicated in ADPKD were identified in cystic renal epithelial cells, only few of these mutations were present in iPSCs, indicating a heterogeneous mutational landscape, and possibly in vitro cell selection before and during the reprogramming process. Whole-genome DNA methylation analysis indicated that iPSCs derived from renal epithelial cells maintain a kidney-specific DNA methylation memory. In addition, comparison of PKD1+/- and control iPSCs revealed differences in DNA methylation associated with the disease history. In conclusion, we generated and characterized iPSCs derived from cystic and healthy control renal epithelial cells, which can be used for in vitro modeling of kidney development in general and cystogenesis in particular.

Identifying cystogenic paracrine signaling molecules in cyst fluid of patients with polycystic kidney disease.

In autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) paracrine signaling molecules in cyst fluid can induce proliferation and cystogenesis of neighboring renal epithelial cells. However, the identity of this cyst-inducing factor is still unknown. The aim of this study was to identify paracrine signaling proteins in cyst fluid using a 3D in vitro cystogenesis assay. We collected cyst fluid from 15 ADPKD patients who underwent kidney or liver resection (55 cysts from 13 nephrectomies, 5 cysts from 2 liver resections). For each sample, the ability to induce proliferation and cyst formation was tested using the cystogenesis assay (RPTEC/TERT1 cells in Matrigel with cyst fluid added for 14 days). Kidney cyst fluid induced proliferation and cyst growth of renal epithelial cells in a dose-dependent fashion. Liver cyst fluid also induced cystogenesis. Using size exclusion chromatography, 56 cyst fluid fractions were obtained of which only the fractions between 30 and 100 kDa showed cystogenic potential. Mass spectrometry analysis of samples that tested positive or negative in the assay identified 43 candidate cystogenic proteins. Gene ontology analysis showed an enrichment for proteins classified as enzymes, immunity proteins, receptors, and signaling proteins. A number of these proteins have previously been implicated in ADPKD, including secreted frizzled-related protein 4, S100A8, osteopontin, and cysteine rich with EGF-like domains 1. In conclusion, both kidney and liver cyst fluids contain paracrine signaling molecules that drive cyst formation. Using size exclusion chromatography and mass spectrometry, we procured a candidate list for future studies. Ultimately, cystogenic paracrine signaling molecules may be targeted to abrogate cystogenesis in ADPKD.

Effect on Survival of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Alone Compared to Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Concurrent Radiation Therapy to the Prostate in Patients with Primary Bone Metastatic Prostate Cancer in a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial: Data from the HORRAD Trial.

BACKGROUND: The cornerstone of standard treatment for patients with primary bone metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Retrospective studies suggest a survival benefit for treatment of the primary prostatic tumour in mPCa, but to date, no randomised-controlled-trials (RCTs) have been published addressing this issue. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether overall survival is prolonged by adding local treatment of the primary prostatic tumour with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to ADT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The HORRAD trial is a multicentre RCT recruiting 432 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20ng/ml and primary bone mPCa on bone scan between 2004 and 2014. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to either ADT with EBRT (radiotherapy group) or ADT alone (control group). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoint was time to PSA progression. Crude and adjusted analyses were applied to evaluate treatment effect. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median PSA level was 142ng/ml and 67% of patients had more than five osseous metastases. Median follow up was 47 mo. Median overall survival was 45 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.4-49.6) in the radiotherapy group and 43 mo (95% CI: 32.6-53.4) in the control group (p=0.4). No significant difference was found in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.70-1.14; p=0.4). Median time to PSA progression in the radiotherapy group was 15 mo (95% CI: 11.8-18.2), compared with 12 mo (95% CI: 10.6-13.4) in the control group. The crude HR (0.78; 95% CI: 0.63-0.97) was statistically significant (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The current RCT comparing ADT to ADT with EBRT to the prostate in patients with primary bone mPCa did not show a significant difference in overall survival, although the CI cannot exclude a substantial survival benefit. Further research is needed to confirm our findings. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study investigated the effect of adding radiation therapy to the prostate to hormonal therapy in prostate cancer patients with metastasis to the bone at diagnosis. In our patient group, additional radiotherapy did not improve overall survival. Further research is needed to confirm our findings. TWITTER SUMMARY: Adding radiotherapy to the prostate in patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer does not improve overall survival.