Use of a Multiplex PCR Assay To Assess the Presence of Treponema pallidum in Mucocutaneous Ulcerations in Patients with Suspected Syphilis.

We evaluated the utility of the commercial Allplex genital ulcer real-time PCR multiplex assay for detecting Treponema pallidum, herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2), and Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L (lymphogranuloma venereum [LGV]) DNA in mucosal and genital ulcers in the context of suspected syphilis. In total, 374 documented genital and mucosal ulcers from patients with and without syphilis presenting at several sexually transmitted infection (STI) centers in France from October 2010 to December 2016 were analyzed at the National Reference Center (CNR) for Bacterial STIs at Cochin Hospital in Paris. T. pallidum subsp. pallidum detection results were compared with the final diagnosis based on a combination of clinical examination, serological results, and in-house nested PCR (nPCR). Detections of HSV and LGV were validated against reference methods. We found that 44.6% of the 374 samples tested were positive for T. pallidum subsp. pallidum, 21% for HSV, and 0.8% for LGV. No positive results were obtained for 30.7% of samples, and 4.8% presented coinfections. For T. pallidum subsp. pallidum detection, the overall sensitivity was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.1 to 84.1%), specificity was 98.8% (95% CI, 97.7 to 99.9%), positive predictive value was 98.8% (95% CI, 97.7 to 99.9%) and negative predictive value was 80.2% (95% CI, 76.2 to 84.2%), with a rate of concordance with the reference method of 92.5% (k = 0.85). This PCR multiplex assay is suitable for T. pallidum subsp. pallidum detection in routine use and facilitates the simultaneous rapid detection of a broad panel of pathogens relevant in a context of suspected syphilis lesions.

Dermatite atopique : trois cas cliniques Il était une fois...: Atopic dermatitis: three case reports.

Atopic dermatitis is a common condition and the clinical presentation is often classic. Yet management of the disease varies widely, not always taking into account the severity of the disease and its repercussions on the patient and his environment - personal or social. With on one side the resilience of the patient and on the other side a shortage of general practitioners or dermatologists, a lack of understanding in the professional or family environment, and clinical inertia, disease management is clearly insufficient. Like in all inflammatory dermatoses, the patient's and the physician's assessment and perception of the clinical severity or the deterioration of the quality of life often differ. These three clinical cases are real-life situations where the emphasis is on their history and not on therapeutic choices. © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Meningoradiculitis due to varicella zoster virus reactivation in a patient treated with ixekizumab.

INTRODUCTION: Ixekizumab is a recently developed biopharmaceutical used since 2016 in the US and Europe for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Few adverse effects have been reported in the literature and ixekizumab is not known to increase the risk of viral reactivation. Herein we report the case of an immunocompetent female patient treated with ixekizumab who presented meningoradiculitis due to varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 51-year-old woman, treated with ixekizumab for psoriasis, consulted in March 2018 for left hemicrania headache associated with left facial paralysis, but without fever. Brain MRI scans revealed cerebral venous thrombosis of the superior sagittal sinus. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) revealed lymphocytic meningitis and positive VZV-PCR. PCR blood assay for VZV was negative. Blood concentrations of anti-VZV IgG antibody increased while Anti-VZV IgM antibodies remained negative. The final diagnosis was VZV meningoradiculitis complicated by cerebral thrombophlebitis. The absence of skin rash, the rapid increase in anti-VZV IgG antibodies, the absence of anti-VZV IgM antibodies, and the negative blood PCR assay suggested viral reactivation rather than primary infection. The patient received acyclovir and coumadin and her condition improved rapidly. After multidisciplinary discussion, ixekizumab was reintroduced together with valacyclovir prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: This case raises the question of the risk of viral reactivation during treatment with an IL-17 inhibitor and with biologics in general. Neurological and vascular complications of VZV may occur without skin lesions and their occurrence during ixekizumab therapy must be investigated by PCR testing of CSF for VZV DNA.

Tattoo complications in treated and non-treated psoriatic patients.

BACKGROUND: Tattooing is a widespread phenomenon, with an estimated prevalence of 10-30% in Western populations. For psoriasis patients, current recommendations are to avoid having a tattoo if the disease is active and they are receiving immunosuppressive treatments. Although scientific data supporting these recommendations are lacking, dermatologists are often reluctant to advocate tattooing in psoriasis patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the frequency of tattoo complications in patients with psoriasis and determine whether the occurrence of complications was associated with psoriasis status and treatments received at the time of tattooing. METHODS: We performed a multicentre cross-sectional study. Adults with psoriasis were consecutively included and classified as tattooed or non-tattooed. Prevalence of complications associated with tattoos was then evaluated according to psoriasis onset and treatments. The study was divided into three parts, in which data were collected through a series of questionnaires filled in by the dermatologist. Complications included pruritus, oedema, allergic reaction/eczema, infection/superinfection, granuloma, lichenification, photosensitivity, Koebner phenomenon and psoriasis flare after tattooing. Diagnosis of complications was made retrospectively. RESULTS: We included 2053 psoriatic patients, 20.2% had 894 tattoos. Amongst non-tattooed patients, 15.4% had wished to be tattooed, with psoriasis being stated as a reason for not having a tattoo by 44.0% and 5.7% indicating that they planned to have a tattoo in the future. Local complications, such as oedema, pruritus, allergy and Koebner phenomenon, were reported in tattoos in 6.6%, most frequently in patients with psoriasis requiring treatment at the time of tattooing (P < 0.0001). No severe complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of tattoo complications in psoriasis patients was low. Although the risk of complications was highest amongst patients with psoriasis requiring treatment at the time of tattooing, all the complications observed were benign. These results can be helpful for practitioners to give objective information to patients.

[Psoriasis and HIV infection, what do French dermatologists do?] / Détection et impact d'une séropositivité VIH chez les patients atteints de psoriasis. Une enquête de pratiques.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of psoriasis among patients presenting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)infection is the same as in the general population, but the disease is more severe and refractory, and management is more complex. The aim of this survey was to assess the practices of French dermatologists concerning both screening for HIV in psoriasis patients and therapeutic management and follow-up of psoriasis patients with HIV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An anonymous national survey of practices was conducted by means of a questionnaire emailed to dermatologists in hospital in private practice in France between March and June 2017. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 262 dermatologists. They indicated that they carried out screening for HIV in psoriasis patients presenting risk factors (79.4%), prior to biotherapy (63.4%) or different systemic treatments other than retinoids (53.1%), if the psoriasis was severe (45.8%), or in the event of worsening (37.8%). 28.7% of practitioners surveyed were in fact treating patients with psoriasis and HIV, with a mean 3.1 patients being followed up. All practitioners prescribe systemic treatment, other than cyclosporine, but they frequently consult an infectious disease specialist before prescribing these therapies. The most widely used biotherapy was etanercept (65.5% of practitioners). More intensive laboratory follow-up was conducted for these patients in 72.1% of cases. CONCLUSION: French dermatologists do not perform routine screening for HIV in psoriasis patients. However, where infection has been identified, their practices are modified accordingly. Therapeutic choices are consistent with the French recommendations. Nevertheless, recommendations appear necessary concerning HIV screening in this population.

[Psoriatic patients: Analysis of patients dissatisfied with their management]. / Patients atteints de psoriasis : analyse de la population insatisfaite de sa prise en charge.

BACKGROUND: The French are frequently regarded as grouchy. In a recent study, we observed a high proportion of patients initially consulting for psoriasis because they were dissatisfied with their previous therapy. We analyzed the characteristics of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional multicenter study in 40 centers belonging to the ResoPso (psoriasis treatment network) multicenter study group, with consecutive inclusions over a period of 11months in 2014. All adults (age>18 years) consulting for the first time for psoriasis at a center were included in the study. RESULTS: Among patients, 1205 were included, of whom 249 (20.3%) were consulting because of their dissatisfaction with treatment. In the univariate analysis, these patients were younger (P=0.02) and presented psoriasis that had begun earlier in life (P<0.0001). It consisted mostly of generalized plaque psoriasis (P=0.047) and more severe forms of psoriasis (PASI and/or DLQI score>10, P<0.02). There were fewer cases of psoriatic arthritis (P=0.01). The "dissatisfied" patients reported significantly more frequent use of topical treatments (P<0.0001) and alternative medicines (P=0.02), and more infrequent use of biologics (P=0.006) as well as longer treatment periods (P=0.0005). They consulted at hospitals (P=0.01) and had previously seen more GPs and dermatologists (P≤0.0008). There was no impact of gender on the dissatisfaction profile by either comorbidities (metabolic, blood pressure, alcohol and tobacco consumption, and depression), or socio-economic data. In the multivariate analysis, DLQI>10 (P=0.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07) and longer duration of care (P=0.004; 95% CI: 1.23-2.99) were associated with dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: Twenty percent of our psoriatic patients seem dissatisfied with their treatment. It is difficult to draw a specific demographic and socioeconomic profile of dissatisfied patients. Only disease severity and possibly inadequate treatment at the initial consultation are associated with patient dissatisfaction. Explanations related to the individual patients and doctors may be proposed. Finally, while the French may be considered grouchy, the frequency of patient dissatisfaction seen in our study does not appear to be any greater than that observed in other countries.

Psoriasis in the elderly: epidemiological and clinical aspects, and evaluation of patients with very late onset psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Age of the patients and age of onset of psoriasis may have an impact on the disease. There is little information about psoriasis in elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated epidemiological, clinical aspects, comorbidities and treatments of psoriasis in the elderly (>70 years) patients, and in patients with very late onset psoriasis (onset ≥ 70 years). METHODS: This observational multicentre non-interventional study of adults with psoriasis was conducted in 29 departments of dermatology in France. A total of 2210 adults with psoriasis were included. RESULTS: A total of 212 (9.5%) patients were elderly. This group had a higher frequency of females (P = 0.005), a later onset of the disease (P < 0.0001), a lower frequency of familial (P < 0.0001) and plaque psoriasis (P < 0.0001), but higher frequency of guttate and inverse psoriasis (P ≤ 0.005). Hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and major cardiovascular events (MACE) were more frequent in this group (P < 0.0001), but not tobacco (P < 0.0001). Systemic and biological therapies were used less frequently in the elderly group (P < 0.0001). Fifty-eight (2.7%) patients had late onset psoriasis. Patients with very late onset psoriasis were more frequently women (P = 0.02) and older (P < 0.0001), among elderly group. They had significantly less frequently familial (P < 0.0001) and plaque psoriasis (P < 0.0001), and were less often on systemic treatment including biological. Frequencies of comorbidities were not statically different but patients with 'early' onset psoriasis have a tendency (P < 0.5) to have higher frequencies of obesity, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and MACE. CONCLUSION: This study highlights phenotypic features of psoriasis in elderly and in very late onset psoriasis. The management of these fragile patients remains poorly codified and needs further investigation.