RESUMEN
Most Canadians with dementia die in long-term care (LTC) facilities. No data are routinely collected in Canada on the quality of end-of-life care provided to this vulnerable population, leading to significant knowledge gaps. The Quebec Observatory on End-of-Life Care for People with Dementia was created to address these gaps. The Observatory is a research infrastructure designed to support the collection of data needed to better understand, and subsequently enhance, care quality for residents dying with dementia. This article reports on the main steps involved in setting up the Observatory, as well as a pilot study that involved 172 residents with dementia who died between 2016 and 2018 in one of 13 participating facilities. It describes the data gathered, methodological changes that were made along the way, feedback from participating facilities, and future developments of the Observatory.
Asunto(s)
Demencia , Cuidado Terminal , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Canadá , Quebec , Demencia/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of cancer is emotionally threatening not only for patients but also for their family caregivers (FC) who witness and share much of the illness experience. This study compares distress experienced by lung cancer patients and their FC during the year following the diagnosis. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 206 patients recently diagnosed with inoperable lung cancer (participation rate 79.5%) and 131 FC (participation rate 63.6%) was conducted in an ambulatory oncology clinic in Quebec City (Canada). They completed validated questionnaires regarding their personal and psychological characteristics (Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale-HADS), in the first months after the diagnosis of lung cancer and after 6 and 12 months. Univariate, bivariate, and linear mixed models were conducted to compare patient and FC distress. RESULTS: At baseline, 7.8% of patients reported distress (HADS total score >15) and their mean distress score was 7.0 ± 4.9 (range 0-42). In contrast, 33.6% of FC presented significant distress and their mean distress score was 12.0 ± 7.2 (P < 0.0001). Proportions of patients and FC with distress remained relatively stable at 6 and 12 months, and at every time point, FC reported higher levels of distress compared to their relative with cancer (P < 0.0001). Comparable trends were found when looking at the mean scores of distress, anxiety, and depression throughout the study. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Being diagnosed with lung cancer and going through its different phases seems to affect more FC than patients. The psychological impact of such diagnosis appears early after the diagnosis and does not significantly change over time. These findings reinforce the importance for oncology teams, to include FC in their systematic distress screening program, in order to help them cope with their own feelings and be able to play their role in patient support and care throughout the cancer journey.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Cuidadores/psicología , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/psicología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Collaboration between family physicians (FPs) and oncologists can be challenging. We present the results of a randomized clinical trial of an intervention designed to improve continuity of care and interprofessional collaboration, as perceived by patients with lung cancer and their FPs. METHODS: The intervention included (1) supplying FPs with standardized summaries related to each patient, (2) recommending that patients see their FP after receiving the cancer diagnosis, (3) supplying the oncology team with patient information resulting from FP visits, and (4) providing patients with priority access to FPs as needed. A total of 206 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 104) or control group (n = 102), and 86.4% of involved FPs participated. Perceptions of continuity of care and interprofessional collaboration were assessed every 3 months for patients and at baseline and at the end of the study for FPs. Patient distress and health service utilization were also assessed. RESULTS: Patients and FPs in the intervention group perceived better interprofessional collaboration (patients: P <.0001; FPs: P = .0006) than those in the control group. Patients reported better informational continuity (P = .001) and management continuity (P = .05) compared to the control group, but no differences were found for FPs (information: P = .22; management: P = .13). No effect was found with regard to patient distress or health service utilization. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention improved patient and FP perception of interprofessional collaboration, but its effectiveness on continuity of care was less clear for FPs than for patients. Additional strategies should be considered to sustainably improve continuity of care and interprofessional collaboration.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/organización & administración , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Neoplasias/terapia , Oncólogos/psicología , Médicos de Familia/psicología , Anciano , Humanos , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Family caregivers (FCs) of cancer patients often experience high distress. This randomized clinical trial assessed the feasibility and preliminary effects of an intervention to improve FC supportive care. METHOD: A pragmatic and minimal intervention to improve FC supportive care was developed and pretested with FCs, oncology team, and family physicians to assess its relevance and acceptability. Then, FCs of lung cancer patients were randomized to the intervention or the control group. The intervention included (1) systematic FC distress screening and problem assessment in the first months after their relative cancer diagnosis, and every 2 months after; (2) privileged contact with an oncology nurse to address FC problems, provide emotional support and skills to play their caregiving role; (3) liaison with the family physician of FCs reporting high distress (distress thermometer score ≥4/10) to involve them in the provision of supportive care. Distress, the primary outcome, was measured every 3 months, for 9 months. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, caregiving preparedness, and perceived burden. At the end of their participation, a purposive sample of FC from the experimental group was individually interviewed to assess the intervention usefulness. Content analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 109 FCs participated in the trial. FC distress decreased over time, but this reduction was observed in both groups. Similar results were found for secondary outcomes. However, FCs who received the intervention felt better prepared in caregiving than controls (p = 0.05). All 10 interviewed FCs valued the intervention, even though they clearly underused it. Knowing they could contact the oncology nurse served as a security net. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Although the intervention was not found effective, some of its aspects were positively perceived by FCs. As many of them experience high distress, an improved intervention should be developed to better support them.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Cuidados Paliativos , Emociones , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Enfermería Oncológica , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little attention has been paid to neurotoxicants on the risk of dementia. Exposure to known neurotoxicants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine (OC) pesticides is suspected to have adverse cognitive effects in older populations. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether plasma concentrations of PCBs and OC pesticides are associated with the risk of cognitive decline, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and of all-cause dementia in the Canadian older population. METHODS: Analyses were based on data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging, a 3-phase, 10-year population-based study of individuals aged 65+ years. Analyses included 669 clinically assessed subjects, of which 156 developed dementia including 108 incident cases of AD. Subjects were screened at each phase with the 100-point Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS), a measurement of global cognitive function. Statistical analyses included Cox proportional hazards model when the outcome was dementia or AD, and a repeated-measure mixed model when the outcome was the 3MS score. RESULTS: No association of PCB and OC pesticides with the risk of dementia and AD was observed. Elevated concentrations of PCB congeners nos 118, 153, 156, 163, and OC pesticides 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane (p,p'-DDT) and its metabolite 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (p,p'-DDE) were significantly associated with cognitive decline as assessed with the 3MS. A posteriori analyses suggested that only p,p'-DDE was significantly related to a higher cognitive decline in time based on the 3MS among incident cases of dementia compared to subjects remaining nondemented. CONCLUSION: PCB and OC pesticide plasma concentrations were not related to the incident diagnosis of neither dementia, nor AD. Using the 3MS scores as the outcome, higher concentrations of four PCB congeners and two OC pesticides were associated with lower cognitive performances in subjects. The association of p,p'-DDE with cognitive decline in time in incident cases of dementia merits further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Demencia/epidemiología , Hidrocarburos Clorados/efectos adversos , Plaguicidas/efectos adversos , Bifenilos Policlorados/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/inducido químicamente , Canadá/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/inducido químicamente , Demencia/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medication regimens in nursing home (NH) residents with severe dementia should be frequently reviewed to avoid inappropriate medication, overtreatment and adverse drug events, within a comfort care approach. This study aimed at testing the feasibility of an interdisciplinary knowledge exchange (KE) intervention using a medication review guidance tool categorizing medications as either "generally", "sometimes" or "exceptionally" appropriate for NH residents with severe dementia. METHODS: A quasi-experimental feasibility pilot study with 44 participating residents aged 65 years or over with severe dementia was carried out in three NH in Quebec City, Canada. The intervention comprised an information leaflet for residents' families, a 90-min KE session for NH general practitioners (GP), pharmacists and nurses focusing on the medication review guidance tool, a medication review by the pharmacists for participating residents with ensuing team discussion on medication changes, and a post-intervention KE session to obtain feedback from team staff. Medication regimens and levels of pain and of agitation of the participants were evaluated at baseline and at 4 months post-intervention. A questionnaire for team staff explored perceived barriers and facilitators. Statistical differences in measures comparing pre and post-intervention were assessed using paired t-tests and Cochran's-Q tests. RESULTS: The KE sessions reached 34 NH team staff (5 GP, 4 pharmacists, 6 heads of care unit and 19 staff nurses). Forty-four residents participated in the study and were followed for a mean of 104 days. The total number of regular medications was 372 pre and 327 post-intervention. The mean number of regular medications per resident was 7.86 pre and 6.81 post-intervention. The odds ratios estimating the risks of using any regular medication or a "sometimes appropriate" medication post-intervention were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.92) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.94), respectively. CONCLUSION: A simple KE intervention using a medication review guidance tool categorizing medications as being either "generally", "sometimes" or "exceptionally" appropriate in severe dementia was well received and accompanied by an overall reduction in medication use by NH residents with severe dementia. Levels of agitation were unaffected and there was no clinically significant changes in levels of pain. Staff feedback provided opportunities to improve the intervention.
Asunto(s)
Demencia/terapia , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Casas de Salud , Personal de Enfermería/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Demencia/diagnóstico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Quebec , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Improvement in the quality of end-of-life care for advanced dementia is increasingly recognized as a priority in palliative care. AIM: To evaluate the impact of a multidimensional intervention to improve quality of care and quality of dying in advanced dementia in long-term care facilities. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study with the intervention taking place in two long-term care facilities versus usual care in two others over a 1-year period. The intervention had five components: (1) training program to physicians and nursing staff, (2) clinical monitoring of pain using an observational pain scale, (3) implementation of a regular mouth care routine, (4) early and systematic communication with families about end-of-life care issues with provision of an information booklet, and (5) involvement of a nurse facilitator to implement and monitor the intervention. Quality of care was assessed with the Family Perception of Care Scale. The Symptom Management for End-of-Life Care in Dementia and the Comfort Assessment in Dying scales were used to assess the quality of dying. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 193 residents with advanced dementia and their close family members were included (97 in the intervention group and 96 in the usual care group). RESULTS: The Family Perception of Care score was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group (157.3 vs 149.1; p = 0.04). The Comfort Assessment and Symptom Management scores were also significantly higher in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Our multidimensional intervention in long-term care facilities for patients with terminal dementia resulted in improved quality of care and quality of dying when compared to usual care.
Asunto(s)
Demencia/enfermería , Familia/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/psicología , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/psicología , Personal de Enfermería/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Casas de Salud , Derecho a MorirRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Mini-Mental State Examination continues to be used frequently to screen for cognitive impairment in older adults, but it remains unclear how to interpret changes in its score over time to distinguish age-associated cognitive decline from an early degenerative process. We aimed to generate cognitive charts for use in clinical practice for longitudinal evaluation of age-associated cognitive decline. METHODS: We used data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging from 7569 participants aged 65 years or older who completed a Mini-Mental State Examination at baseline, and at 5 and 10 years later to develop a linear regression model for the Mini-Mental State Examination score as a function of age and education. Based on this model, we generated cognitive charts designed to optimize accuracy for distinguishing participants with dementia from healthy controls. We validated our model using a separate data set of 6501 participants from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's Uniform Data Set. RESULTS: For baseline measurement, the cognitive charts had a sensitivity of 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75% to 84%) and a specificity of 89% (95% CI 88% to 90%) for distinguishing healthy controls from participants with dementia. Similar sensitivities and specificities were observed for a decline over time greater than 1 percentile zone from the first measurement. Results in the validation sample were comparable, albeit with lower sensitivities. Negative predictive value was 99%. INTERPRETATION: Our innovative model, which factors in age and education, showed validity and diagnostic accuracy for determining whether older patients show abnormal performance on serial Mini-Mental State Examination measurements. Similar to growth curves used in pediatrics, cognitive charts allow longitudinal cognitive evaluation and enable prompt initiation of investigation and treatment when appropriate.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Demencia/diagnóstico , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Escala del Estado Mental/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Cognición , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Memoria a Corto Plazo , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Family caregivers (FC) often experience higher distress levels than their relative with cancer. Many cancer centers have implemented distress screening programs, but most of them concentrate their efforts on patients, with little attention to their FC. To fill this gap, a pragmatic intervention has been designed to improve supportive care for FC of patients with lung cancer. This article describes the study protocol of a single-center randomized controlled trial to assess its effectiveness. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 120 lung cancer patients and their FC are randomly assigned to the experimental group (exposed to intervention, N = 60) or to the control group (usual care, N = 60). The intervention includes: (1) systematic FC distress screening and problem assessment near their relative's cancer diagnosis, and every 2 months, (2) privileged contact with an oncology nurse (ON) away from the patient to address FC problems and (3) liaison by the ON with the family physician of FC reporting high distress (thermometer score ≥5/10), or problems relying on FP expertise. In both groups, FC, patient and process-of-care outcomes are measured at baseline and every 3 months, up to 9 months. The primary endpoint is FC distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Psychological Distress Index used in the Quebec Health Survey (PDQHS). Individual interviews with 10 FC and a focus group with the oncology team will be conducted at the study end to further document the effectiveness of the intervention and its impact on quality of life (for FC) and practice organization (for the oncology team). DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the effectiveness of an innovative intervention based on interprofessional collaboration between primary care and oncology care. It targets a population in great need, yet often neglected, and has the potential to clearly improve patient and caregiver experience of cancer care, and reduce the burden of disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02531464 . Registered on 15 July 2015.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Cuidadores/psicología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Oncología Médica , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos , Costo de Enfermedad , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicología , Enfermería Oncológica , Médicos de Familia , Calidad de Vida , Quebec , Proyectos de Investigación , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The consequences of minor trauma involving a head injury (MT-HI) in independent older adults are largely unknown. This study assessed the impact of a head injury on the functional outcomes six months post-injury in older adults who sustained a minor trauma. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study in eight sites included patients who were aged 65 years or older, previously independent, presenting to the emergency department (ED) for a minor trauma, and discharged within 48 hours. To assess the functional decline, we used a validated test: the Older Americans' Resources and Services Scale. The cognitive function of study patients was also evaluated. Finally, we explored the influence of a concomitant injury on the functional decline in the MT-HI group. RESULTS: All 926 eligible patients were included in the analyses: 344 MT-HI patients and 582 minor trauma without head injury. After six months, the functional decline was similar in both groups: 10.8% and 11.9%, respectively (RR=0.79 [95% CI: 0.55-1.14]). The proportion of patients with mild cognitive disabilities was also similar: 21.7% and 22.8%, respectively (RR=0.91 [95% CI: 0.71-1.18]). Furthermore, for the group of patients with a MT-HI, the functional outcome was not statistically different with or without the presence of a co-injury (RR=1.35 [95% CI: 0.71-2.59]). CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate that the occurrence of a MT-HI is associated with a worse functional or cognitive prognosis than other minor injuries without a head injury in an elderly population, six months after injury.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Lesiones Encefálicas/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Lesiones Encefálicas/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Intervalos de Confianza , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Traumatismo Múltiple/diagnóstico , Traumatismo Múltiple/epidemiología , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Seniors with severe dementia residing in nursing homes (NHs) frequently receive large numbers of medications. With disease progression, the medications' harm-benefit ratio changes and they need to be reviewed, adjusted, or discontinued. Evidence on successful interventions to optimize medication use among these residents is lacking. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to identify categories of appropriateness for medications as well as successful interventions or elements thereof to improve medication use in NH residents with severe dementia, suitable for use in Canada. METHODS: A scoping literature review was performed to identify criteria and categories of appropriateness of medications for these residents as well as elements of successful interventions to optimize medication use. A 15-member multidisciplinary Delphi panel was convened to evaluate the applicability of these findings for NHs in a Canadian province. RESULTS: The scoping review identified 1 study presenting categories of appropriateness specific to residents with severe dementia and 35 interventions aimed at reducing drug-drug interactions, inappropriate use of specific drug classes, inappropriate drug use overall, or polypharmacy. Regarding appropriateness, the Delphi panel agreed on the categorization of 63 medications or medication classes as "generally," "sometimes," or "rarely appropriate." The main elements of interventions successful in improving appropriate medication use in NH residents with dementia also were approved by the Delphi panel (ie, medication reviews using criteria of appropriateness, educational and training sessions, and interdisciplinary case conferences). CONCLUSIONS: These results may be used to develop an intervention to optimize medication use in NH residents with severe dementia.
Asunto(s)
Demencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripción Inadecuada , Casas de Salud , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Humanos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study, conducted among retired workers (≥65 years), is to estimate the association between long-term risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) death and (1) duration of occupational noise exposure in career and (2) noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), the latter being used as an indicator of adverse effects for long-term exposure to occupational noise. METHODS: Data from screening activities of occupational NIHL were paired to data from death records and were used for this study. A nested case-control analysis was performed. Each case was matched with three controls for length of follow-up and economic sector. A total of 161 CVD deaths occured during an average follow-up of 6.8 years. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the risk (OR) of CVD death by tertiles of duration of noise exposure and of NIHL. RESULTS: Conditional logistic regression models indicated that prolonged duration of noise exposure (≥36.5 years) (3rd tertile) was associated with an increased risk of CVD death (OR 1.70; 95 % CI 1.10-2.62), as compared with shorter duration (<27 years) (first tertile). Moderate NIHL (2nd tertile) (OR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.04-2.6) and severe NIHL (3rd tertile) (OR 1.66; 95 % CI 1.06-2.60) were also associated with an increase in risk of CVD death. CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with recent findings on the chronic effects of occupational noise exposure persisting after retirement although it is less than during active working life.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Jubilación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Even though polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine (OC) pesticides are recognized as neurotoxicants, few studies have investigated their associations with dementia. Here, we assess associations of plasma PCB and OC pesticide concentrations with all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Analyses are based on data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging, a population-based study of men and women aged 65+ years at baseline. PCB and OC pesticide concentrations were measured in 2023 participants who had complete clinical evaluations and blood samples; 574 had dementia, including 399 cases of AD. Concentrations were log-transformed and used as continuous variables in logistic regression models to assess their individual associations with dementia and AD. RESULTS: After adjustment for blood collection period, total plasma lipids, age, sex, education, apolipoprotein E e4 allele (ApoE4), tobacco and alcohol use, rural/urban residence, and comorbidities, elevated plasma PCB concentrations were not associated with increased prevalence of dementia and AD. Elevated concentrations of some OC pesticides and metabolites such as hexachlorobenzene, cis-nonachlor and 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane were significantly associated with a reduced prevalence of dementia. A significant reduced prevalence of AD was also observed with elevated hexachlorobenzene concentrations. Other OC pesticides and metabolites were not associated with the prevalence of dementia or AD. No effect modification by sex and ApoE4 was observed for either dementia or AD. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma PCB and OC pesticide concentrations were not associated with higher prevalence of all-cause dementia and AD. The possibility of modest reductions in prevalence with specific OC pesticides remains to be further investigated given the cross-sectional design of this study.
Asunto(s)
Demencia/sangre , Demencia/epidemiología , Hidrocarburos Clorados/sangre , Plaguicidas/sangre , Bifenilos Policlorados/sangre , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
This study sought to ascertain whether occupational noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) increased the risk of falls requiring hospitalization among retired workers. The study population consisted of males (age ≥ 65) with an average occupational noise exposure of 30.6 years and whose mean bilateral hearing loss was 42.2 dB HL at 3, 4, and 6 kHz. Seventy-two retired workers admitted to hospitals after a fall were matched with 216 controls from the same industrial sectors. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the risk (odds ratio; [OR]) of falls leading to hospitalization by NIHL categories. Results showed a relationship between severe NIHL (≥ 52.5 dB HL) and the occurrence of a fall (OR: 1.97, CI95%: 1.001-3.876). Reducing falls among seniors fosters the maintenance of their autonomy. There is a definite need to acquire knowledge about harmful effects of occupational noise to support the prevention of NIHL and ensure healthier workplaces.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Tiempo de Internación , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Jubilación , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Industrias , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quebec , Jubilación/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to evaluate four pain assessment tools for use with long-term care (LTC) residents who were both able and not able to verbally report their pain; and (2) to assess whether pain behaviors displayed by LTC residents vary as a function of ability to self-report pain. We examined the differences between these two groups of residents in terms of specific pain behaviors assessed through the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) and Pain Assessment in the Communicatively Impaired (PACI). We also examined the interrater reliability, and concurrent and construct validity of these two behavioral observation tools and the concurrent and construct validity of the two verbal report tools. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 338 residents from six LTC homes. The interrater reliabilities for the two behavioral observation tools were good, and concurrent validity was supported for all four pain assessment tools. Pain behaviors, as assessed by the PACSLAC and PACI, varied as a function of resident ability to verbally report pain. Residents with inability to self-report pain are more nonverbally responsive, although certain behaviors (such as guarding and touching the affected area) are seen more frequently in those capable of self-report. Our data also provide psychometric support for the assessment methods used in this study.
Asunto(s)
Conducta , Enfermería Geriátrica/métodos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/enfermería , Dolor/enfermería , Conducta Verbal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Demencia/enfermería , Femenino , Enfermería Geriátrica/normas , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/normas , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Dolor/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría/métodos , Psicometría/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , AutoinformeAsunto(s)
Dolor/diagnóstico , Anciano , Demencia/complicaciones , Humanos , Dolor/enfermería , Dimensión del Dolor/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Care from the family physician is generally interrupted when patients with cancer come under the care of second-line and third-line healthcare professionals who may also manage the patient's comorbid conditions. This situation may lead to fragmented and uncoordinated care, and results in an increased likelihood of not receiving recommended preventive services or recommended care. OBJECTIVES: To classify, describe and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aiming to improve continuity of cancer care on patient, healthcare provider and process outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group (EPOC) Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, using a strategy incorporating an EPOC Methodological filter. Reference lists of the included study reports and relevant reviews were also scanned, and ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar were used to identify relevant reports having cited the studies included in this review. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (including cluster trials), controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series evaluating interventions to improve continuity of cancer care were considered for inclusion. We included studies that involved a majority (> 50%) of adults with cancer or healthcare providers of adults with cancer. Primary outcomes considered for inclusion were the processes of healthcare services, objectively measured healthcare professional, informal carer and patient outcomes, and self-reported measures performed with scales deemed valid and reliable. Healthcare professional satisfaction was included as a secondary outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers described the interventions, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The authors contacted several investigators to obtain missing information. Interventions were regrouped by type of continuity targeted, model of care or interventional strategy and were compared to usual care. Given the expected clinical and methodological diversity, median changes in outcomes (and bootstrap confidence intervals) among groups of studies that shared specific features of interest were chosen to analyse the effectiveness of included interventions. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-one studies were included. They used three different models, namely case management, shared care, and interdisciplinary teams. Six additional interventional strategies were used besides these models: (1) patient-held record, (2) telephone follow-up, (3) communication and case discussion between distant healthcare professionals, (4) change in medical record system, (5) care protocols, directives and guidelines, and (6) coordination of assessments and treatment.Based on the median effect size estimates, no significant difference in patient health-related outcomes was found between patients assigned to interventions and those assigned to usual care. A limited number of studies reported psychological health, satisfaction of providers, or process of care measures. However, they could not be regrouped to calculate median effect size estimates because of a high heterogeneity among studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Results from this Cochrane review do not allow us to conclude on the effectiveness of included interventions to improve continuity of care on patient, healthcare provider or process of care outcomes. Future research should evaluate interventions that target an improvement in continuity as their primary objective and describe these interventions with the categories proposed in this review. Also of importance, continuity measures should be validated with persons with cancer who have been followed in various settings.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Neoplasias/terapia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Adulto , Manejo de Caso , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Grupo de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Some observational studies have established an association between exposure to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and a decreased risk of subsequently developing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Mild cognitive impairment or cognitive impairment, not dementia (CIND) is more likely to convert to AD, and no specific preventive method is currently available. The objective of this study was to determine the association of NSAID use in 5276 cognitively normal subjects of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging, a 10-year population-based cohort study, with the incidence of CIND, AD, and all-cause dementia. METHODS: Hazard ratios were calculated from Cox proportional hazards models with age as the time scale according to three study samples including 824 cases of dementia (563 cases of AD), 630 cases of dementia (435 cases of AD), and 883 cases of CIND, respectively. Adjustments were made for gender, education, lifestyle factors, comorbid diseases, and vascular risk factors. RESULTS: Lower risks for AD and all-cause dementia were significantly associated with the use of any NSAIDs and the salicylates without barbiturates subgroup in the study sample including subjects with CIND at baseline. There was a weak association between any NSAIDs and the risk of CIND (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.00). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that there is an association between NSAID use and a lower incidence of AD and, to a lesser extent, of CIND.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/inducido químicamente , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Trastornos del Conocimiento/inducido químicamente , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the performance measures of MR angiography (MRA) in the diagnosis of aneurysm residual flow after coil occlusion. METHODS: Patients having at least 1 cerebral aneurysm treated with coil occlusion were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Time of flight and contrast-enhanced MRA were performed the same day of the DSA follow-up. The degree of aneurysm occlusion and dimensions of the residual flow were evaluated by independent readers at MRA and digital subtraction angiogram. MRA performance measures were estimated in a cross-sectional analysis and repeated in subgroups of aneurysm sizes and locations. MRA predictive values for recurrence were also estimated using a longitudinal design. RESULTS: We obtained 167 aneurysm evaluations for each imaging modality. Class 3 residual flow was seen on digital subtraction angiogram follow-up in 27%. The sensitivity and specificity of MRA was 88% (95% CI, 80-94) and 79% (95% CI, 67-88), respectively. The positive predictive value for a Class 3 recurrence was 67% (95% CI, 51-80) and the negative predictive value was 93% (95% CI, 86-97). Time-of-flight MRA underestimated the length of the residual flow (P=0.039), whereas contrast-enhanced MRA overestimated its width (P<0.0001). MRA sensitivity for a Class 3 residual flow was lower for aneurysms <6 mm (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MRA has sufficient accuracy for screening of aneurysm residual flow after coil occlusion. Due to its lower negative predictive value, recurrent aneurysms should be confirmed with digital subtraction angiogram before planning a retreatment. Routine use of MRA to follow small aneurysms should wait better estimation of its performance in this particular subgroup.