Side lying during nebulisation can significantly improve apical deposition in healthy adults and adults with mild cystic fibrosis lung disease: a randomised crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: In people with and without Cystic Fibrosis (CF), does side lying during nebulisation change: the proportion of the dose loaded in the nebuliser that is deposited in the lungs; the uniformity of deposition throughout the lungs; or the apical drug density as a percentage of the drug density in the remaining lung? Do these effects differ depending on the degree of lung disease present? METHODS: A randomised crossover trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinded assessors, involving 39 adults: 13 healthy, 13 with mild CF lung disease (FEV1 > 80%pred), and 13 with more advanced CF lung disease (FEV1 < 80%pred). In random order, 4 mL of nebulised radioaerosol was inhaled in upright sitting and in alternate right and left side lying at 2-min intervals, for 20 min. RESULTS: Compared to sitting upright, lung deposition and the uniformity of deposition were not significantly altered by side lying in any of the three groups. In sitting, the density of the deposition was significantly less in the apical regions than in the rest of the lung in all participants. Side lying significantly improved apical deposition in healthy adults (MD, 13%; 95% CI, 7 to 19), and in minimal CF lung disease (MD, 4%; 95% CI, 1 to 7) but not in advanced disease (MD, 4%; 95% CI, - 2 to 9). CONCLUSION: Alternating between right and left side lying during nebulisation significantly improves apical deposition in healthy adults and in adults with mild CF lung disease, without substantial detriment to overall deposition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12611000674932 (Healthy), ACTRN12611000672954 (CF) Retrospectively registered 4/7/2011.

Effects of exercise and airway clearance (positive expiratory pressure) on mucus clearance in cystic fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial.

Exercise improves mucus clearance in people without lung disease and those with chronic bronchitis. No study has investigated exercise alone for mucus clearance in cystic fibrosis (CF). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of treadmill exercise to resting breathing and airway clearance with positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy on mucus clearance in adults with CF.This 3-day randomised, controlled, crossover trial included 14 adults with mild to severe CF lung disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted 31-113%). Interventions were 20 min of resting breathing (control), treadmill exercise at 60% of the participant's peak oxygen consumption or PEP therapy (including huffing and coughing). Mucus clearance was measured using the radioaerosol technique and gamma camera imaging.Treadmill exercise improved whole lung mucus clearance compared to resting breathing (mean difference 3%, 95% CI 2-4); however, exercise alone was less effective than PEP therapy (mean difference -7%, 95% CI -6- -8). When comparing treadmill exercise to PEP therapy, there were no significant differences in mucus clearance from the intermediate and peripheral lung regions, but significantly less clearance from the central lung region (likely reflecting the huffing and coughing that was only in PEP therapy).It is recommended that huffing and coughing are included to maximise mucus clearance with exercise.

The effect of device resistance and inhalation flow rate on the lung deposition of orally inhaled mannitol dry powder.

The present study investigates the effect of DPI resistance and inhalation flow rates on the lung deposition of orally inhaled mannitol dry powder. Mannitol powder radiolabeled with 99mTc-DTPA was inhaled from an Osmohaler™ by healthy human volunteers at 50-70L/min peak inhalation flow rate (PIFR) using both a low and high resistance Osmohaler™, and 110-130L/min PIFR using the low resistance Osmohaler™ (n=9). At 50-70L/min PIFR, the resistance of the Osmohaler™ did not significantly affect the total and peripheral lung deposition of inhaled mannitol [for low resistance Osmohaler™, 20% total lung deposition (TLD), 0.3 penetration index (PI); for high resistance Osmohaler™, 17% TLD, 0.23 PI]. Increasing the PIFR 50-70L/min to 110-130L/min (low resistance Osmohaler™) significantly reduced the total lung deposition (10% TLD) and the peripheral lung deposition (PI 0.21). The total lung deposition showed dependency on the in vitro FPF (R2=1.0). On the other hand, the PI had a stronger association with the MMAD (R2=1.0) than the FPF (R2=0.7). In conclusion the resistance of Osmohaler™ did not significantly affect the total and regional lung deposition at 50-70L/min PIFR. Instead, the total and regional lung depositions are dependent on the particle size of the aerosol and inhalation flow rate, the latter itself affecting the particle size distribution.

Radiation dosimetry of the translocator protein ligands [18F]PBR111 and [18F]PBR102.

INTRODUCTION: The translocator protein (TSPO) ligands [18F]PBR111 and [18F]PBR102 show promise for imaging neuroinflammation. Our aim was to estimate the radiation dose to humans from primate positron emission tomography (PET) studies using these ligands and compare the results with those obtained from studies in rodents. METHODS: [18F]PBR111 and [18F]PBR102 PET-computed tomography studies were carried out in baboons. The cumulated activity in the selected source organs was obtained from the volume of interest time-activity curves drawn on coronal PET slices and adjusted for organ mass relative to humans. Radiation dose estimates were calculated in OLINDA/EXM Version 1.1 from baboon studies and compared with those calculated from Sprague-Dawley rat tissue concentration studies, also adjusted for relative organ mass. RESULTS: In baboons, both ligands cleared rapidly from brain, lung, kidney and spleen and more slowly from liver and heart. For [18F]PBR111, the renal excretion fraction was 6.5% and 17% for hepatobiliary excretion; for [18F]PBR102, the renal excretion was 3.0% and 15% for hepatobiliary excretion. The estimated effective dose in humans from baboon data was 0.021 mSv/MBq for each ligand, whilst from rat data, the estimates were 0.029 for [18F]PBR111 and 0.041 mSv/MBq for [18F]PBR102. CONCLUSION: Biodistribution in a nonhuman primate model is better suited than the rat model for the calculation of dosimetry parameters when translating these ligands from preclinical to human clinical studies. Effective dose calculated from rat data was overestimated compared to nonhuman primate data. The effective dose coefficient for both these TSPO ligands determined from PET studies in baboons is similar to that for [18F]FDG.

Effect of particle size of dry powder mannitol on the lung deposition in healthy volunteers.

There is a lack of in vivo studies focusing on the effect of particle size of dry powder aerosols on lung deposition and distribution. We investigated the dose and distribution of radiolabelled powder aerosols of mannitol in the lungs using single photon emission tomography (SPECT). Three different sized radiolabelled powders were produced by co-spray drying mannitol with 99mTc-DTPA. The primary particle size distribution of the powders measured by laser diffraction showed a volume median diameter of 2, 3 and 4 microm with span 2.3, 2.0 and 2.1, respectively, which corresponded to an aerodynamic diameter of 2.7, 3.6, 5.4 microm and geometric standard deviation of 2.6, 2.4 and 2.7 when the powders were dispersed using an Aeroliser dry powder inhaler. Three capsules each containing approximately 20mg (i.e. a total of 60 mg containing 60-90 MBq) of each of the radiolabelled powders were inhaled by eight healthy volunteers using the Aeroliser inhaler. Images of aerosol deposition in the lungs were acquired using fast, multi-bed position SPECT. The lung dose markedly decreased with increasing aerosol particle size (mean+/-S.E.M.: 44.8+/-2.4, 38.9+/-0.9, 20.6+/-1.6% for 2.7, 3.6, 5.4 microm, respectively, p<0.0001). The sites of deposition of the 2.7 and 3.6 microm aerosols were similar (penetration index, PI=0.63+/-0.05, 0.60+/-0.03, respectively, p>0.3), but different to the 5.4 microm aerosols (PI=0.52+/-0.04, p<0.02). The lung dose followed the in vitro powder dispersion performance, with the % lung dose being related to fine particle fraction by a slope of 0.8 for a regression with intercepts forced through the origin. The SPECT results provide direct evidence that the lung deposition of dry powder aerosols depends on the particle size. The lung dose of the 2.7 and 3.6 microm aerosols using the Aeroliser was double compared to that of the 5.4 microm aerosols and the deposition of the smaller particles was more peripheral.