Toward Shared Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Health care decisions are a critical determinant in the evolution of chronic illness. In shared decision-making (SDM), patients and clinicians work collaboratively to reach evidence-based health decisions that align with individual circumstances, values, and preferences. This personalized approach to clinical care likely has substantial benefits in the oversight of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), a type of nontraumatic spinal cord injury. Its chronicity, heterogeneous clinical presentation, complex management, and variable disease course engenders an imperative for a patient-centric approach that accounts for each patient's unique needs and priorities. Inadequate patient knowledge about the condition and an incomplete understanding of the critical decision points that arise during the course of care currently hinder the fruitful participation of health care providers and patients in SDM. This study protocol presents the rationale for deploying SDM for DCM and delineates the groundwork required to achieve this. OBJECTIVE: The study's primary outcome is the development of a comprehensive checklist to be implemented upon diagnosis that provides patients with essential information necessary to support their informed decision-making. This is known as a core information set (CIS). The secondary outcome is the creation of a detailed process map that provides a diagrammatic representation of the global care workflows and cognitive processes involved in DCM care. Characterizing the critical decision points along a patient's journey will allow for an effective exploration of SDM tools for routine clinical practice to enhance patient-centered care and improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Both CISs and process maps are coproduced iteratively through a collaborative process involving the input and consensus of key stakeholders. This will be facilitated by Myelopathy.org, a global DCM charity, through its Research Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy community. To develop the CIS, a 3-round, web-based Delphi process will be used, starting with a baseline list of information items derived from a recent scoping review of educational materials in DCM, patient interviews, and a qualitative survey of professionals. A priori criteria for achieving consensus are specified. The process map will be developed iteratively using semistructured interviews with patients and professionals and validated by key stakeholders. RESULTS: Recruitment for the Delphi consensus study began in April 2023. The pilot-testing of process map interview participants started simultaneously, with the formulation of an initial baseline map underway. CONCLUSIONS: This protocol marks the first attempt to provide a starting point for investigating SDM in DCM. The primary work centers on developing an educational tool for use in diagnosis to enable enhanced onward decision-making. The wider objective is to aid stakeholders in developing SDM tools by identifying critical decision junctures in DCM care. Through these approaches, we aim to provide an exhaustive launchpad for formulating SDM tools in the wider DCM community. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46809.

Anesthetic block of the intertransverse septum, a prospective observational study / Bloqueio anestésico do septo intertransverso, estudo prospectivo observacional / Bloqueo anestésico del septo intertransverso, estudio prospectivo observacional

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the influence of intertransverse septal anesthetic block (BASIT) on postoperative pain in lumbar spine surgery. Methods: The study was carried out prospectively and observationally. Were included 105 patients who underwent posterior lumbar spine surgery, divided into two groups: 35 patients in the experimental group, who received BASIT at the end of the procedure, and 70 patients in the control group, without BASIT. Patients were assessed for low back pain (visual pain scale), opioid consumption on the 1st postoperative day, complications related to the procedure, and length of stay after surgery. Results: The sample consisted of 46 men and 59 women, with a mean age of 57.7 years (21 to 90 years). Mean postoperative pain in the experimental group was 1.88, and in the control group 2.11 (p<0.05). There was a trend towards less morphine use in the experimental group with p = 0.053. There was a statistical difference in morphine consumption between patients who did not previously use opioids and those who already used them (p 0.04). There was no difference between the groups regarding length of stay. Conclusion: Anesthetic blockade of the intertransverse septum reduced the consumption of opioids and the levels of low back pain after surgery (p<0.05), with no statistical difference in length of hospital stay or complications related to the technique. Level of Evidence II; Clinical Prospective Study.

RESUMO: Objetivo: Avaliar a influência do bloqueio anestésico do septo intertransverso (BASIT) sobre a dor pós-operatória em cirurgia de coluna lombar. Metodologia: O estudo foi realizado de modo prospectivo e observacional. Foram incluídos no estudo 105 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia da coluna lombar por via posterior e divididos em dois grupos: 35 pacientes no grupo experimental, que recebeu o BASIT ao final do procedimento e 70 pacientes no grupo controle, sem o BASIT. Os pacientes foram avaliados quanto à dor lombar (escala visual de dor), consumo de opioide no 1º dia pós-operatório, complicações referentes ao procedimento e tempo de internamento após a cirurgia. Resultados: A amostra consistiu em 46 homens e 59 mulheres, com média de idade de 57,7 anos (21 a 90 anos). A média de dor pós-operatória do grupo experimento foi 1,88 e no grupo controle 2,11 (p<0,05). Houve uma tendência a menor uso de morfina no grupo experimento com p = 0,053. Houve diferença estatística no consumo de morfina entre os pacientes que não utilizavam opioides previamente quanto comparados aos que já faziam uso (p 0,04). Não houve diferença entre os grupos quanto ao tempo de internamento nem eventos adversos relacionados à técnica. Conclusão: O bloqueio anestésico do septo intertransverso reduziu o consumo de opioides e os níveis de dor lombar após cirurgia (p<0,05), não havendo diferença estatística no tempo de internamento, nem intercorrências relacionadas a técnica. Nível de Evidência II; Estudo Prospectivo Clínico.

RESUMEN: Objetivo: Evaluar la influencia del bloqueo anestésico del septo intertransverso (BASIT) sobre el dolor posoperatorio en cirugía de columna lumbar. Método: El estudio se realizó de forma prospectiva observacional. Fueron incluidos en el estudio 105 pacientes sometidos a cirugía de columna lumbar posterior y se dividieron en dos grupos: 35 pacientes en el grupo experimental, recibieron BASIT al final del procedimiento, y 70 pacientes en el grupo control, sin BASIT. Los pacientes fueron evaluados por dolor lumbar (escala visual de dolor), consumo de opioides en el primer día postoperatorio, complicaciones relacionadas con el procedimiento y tiempo de estancia hospitalaria después de la cirugía. Resultado: La muestra consistió en 46 hombres y 59 mujeres, con una edad media de 57,7 años (21 a 90 años). El dolor postoperatorio medio en el grupo experimental fue de 1,88 y en el grupo control de 2,11 (p<0,05). Hubo una tendencia hacia un menor uso de morfina en el grupo experimental con p = 0,053. Hubo una diferencia estadística en el consumo de morfina entre los pacientes que no usaban previamente opioides en comparación con los que ya los usaban (p 0,04). No hubo diferencia entre los grupos con respecto a la duración de la estancia. Conclusión: El bloqueo anestésico del septo intertransverso redujo el consumo de opioides y los niveles de dolor lumbar posoperatorio (p<0,05), sin diferencia estadística en la estancia hospitalaria ni en las complicaciones relacionadas con la técnica. Nivel de Evidencia II; Estudio Clínico Prospectivo.

Factors Affecting the Decision to Initiate Anticoagulation After Spine Surgery: Findings From the AOSpine Anticoagulation Global Initiative.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, international survey. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors influencing pharmacologic anticoagulation initiation after spine surgery based on the AOSpine Anticoagulation Global Survey. METHODS: This survey was distributed to the international membership of AOSpine (n = 3805). A Likert-type scale described grade practice-specific factors on a scale from low (1) to high (5) importance, and patient-specific factors a scale from low (0) to high (3) importance. Analysis was performed to determine which factors were significant in the decision making surrounding the initiation of pharmacologic anticoagulation. RESULTS: A total of 316 spine surgeons from 64 countries completed the survey. In terms of practice-specific factors considered to initiate treatment, expert opinion was graded the highest (mean grade ± SD = 3.2 ± 1.3), followed by fellowship training (3.2 ± 1.3). Conversely, previous studies (2.7 ± 1.2) and unspecified guidelines were considered least important (2.6 ± 1.6). Patient body mass index (2.0 ± 1.0) and postoperative mobilization (2.3 ± 1.0) were deemed most important and graded highly overall. Those who rated estimated blood loss with greater importance in anticoagulation initiation decision making were more likely to administer thromboprophylaxis at later times (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68-0.71), while those who rated drain output with greater importance were likely to administer thromboprophylaxis at earlier times (HR = 1.32-1.43). CONCLUSION: Among our global cohort of spine surgeons, certain patient factors (ie, patient mobilization and body mass index) and practice-specific factors (ie, expert opinion and fellowship training) were considered to be most important when considering anticoagulation start times.

The use of chemoprophylaxis or not for dvt in spine surgery: a systematic review / O uso da quimioprofilaxia ou não para tvp em cirurgia de coluna: revisão sistemática / El uso de quimioprofilaxis o no para la tvp en la cirugía de columna vertebral: revisión sistemática

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare pharmacological and non-pharmacological prophylaxis in elective spine surgery to determine the risks of DVT, PTE, and epidural hematoma (EH) in both groups, as well as their respective treatment effectiveness. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis based on systematically searched articles, using combinations of MeSH terms related to chemoprophylaxis and non-chemoprophylaxis for prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in elective spine surgery. Adult patients were eligible for inclusion in the study, except for those with trauma, spinal cord injury, neoplasms, or those using vena cava filters. Results: Five studies were selected for this systematic review and meta-analysis: 3 retrospective studies, 1 prospective study, and 1 case series. Data analysis showed that 4.64% of patients treated with chemoprophylaxis had an unfavorable outcome regarding DVT, while this outcome occurred in 1.14% of patients not treated with chemoprophylaxis (p=0.001). Among patients using chemoprophylaxis, only 0.1% developed epidural hematoma and 0.38% developed PTE. Among those on non-pharmaceutical prophylaxis, 0.04% had EH (p=0.11) and 0.42% had PTE (p=0.45). Conclusions: No benefits were found for chemoprophylaxis as compared to non-chemoprophylaxis in preventing DVT in elective spine surgery, nor was there an increased risk of epidural hematoma or fatal thromboembolic events. Level of evidence III; Therapeutic studies; Investigation of treatment results.

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar profilaxia farmacológica e não farmacológica em cirurgia eletiva da coluna vertebral, a fim de determinar os riscos de TVP, TEP e hematoma epidural (HE) em ambos os grupos, bem como a respectiva eficácia do tratamento. Métodos: Revisão sistemática e metanálise com base em artigos sistematicamente pesquisados, usando combinações de termos MESH relacionados à quimioprofilaxia e à não quimioprofilaxia para prevenção de trombose venosa profunda e embolia pulmonar em cirurgia eletiva da coluna vertebral. Pacientes adultos foram elegíveis para inclusão no estudo, exceto aqueles com trauma, lesão medular, neoplasias e aqueles que usavam filtros de veia cava. Resultados: Cinco estudos foram incluídos para fazer parte desta revisão sistemática e metanálise: três estudos retrospectivos, um prospectivo e um série de casos. A análise dos dados mostrou que 4,64% dos pacientes tratados com quimioprofilaxia tiveram um resultado desfavorável em relação à TVP, enquanto esse resultado ocorreu em 1,14% dos pacientes não tratados com quimioprofilaxia (p = 0,001). Entre os pacientes em uso de quimioprofilaxia, apenas 0,1% desenvolveram hematoma epidural (HE) e 0,38% desenvolveram TEP. Entre aqueles em profilaxia não medicamentosa, 0,04% apresentaram HE (p = 0,11) e 0,42% tiveram TEP (p = 0,45). Conclusões: Não foram encontrados benefícios para a quimioprofilaxia quando comparada à não quimioprofilaxia na prevenção da TVP em cirurgia eletiva da coluna vertebral, assim como não foi verificado aumento do risco de hematoma epidural ou eventos tromboembólicos fatais. Nível de evidência III; Estudos terapêuticos - Investigação dos resultados do tratamento.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Comparar la profilaxis farmacológica y no farmacológica en la cirugía de columna electiva para determinar los riesgos de TVP, TEP y hematoma epidural (HE) en ambos grupos, así como la respectiva eficacia del tratamiento. Métodos: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis basados en artículos buscados sistemáticamente, utilizando combinaciones de términos MESH relacionados con quimioprofilaxis y no quimioprofilaxis para la prevención de trombosis venosa profunda y embolia pulmonar en cirugía electiva de columna. Se eligieron pacientes adultos para su inclusión en el estudio, excepto aquellos con traumatismos, lesión medular, neoplasias y aquellos que usan filtros de vena cava. Resultados: Se incluyeron cinco estudios para formar parte de esta revisión sistemática y metanálisis: 3 estudios retrospectivos, 1 prospectivo y 1 serie de casos. El análisis de los datos reveló que el 4,64% de los pacientes tratados con quimioprofilaxis tuvieron un resultado desfavorable con respecto a la TVP, mientras que este resultado se produjo en el 1,14% de los pacientes no tratados con quimioprofilaxis (p = 0,001). Entre los pacientes que recibieron quimioprofilaxis, sólo el 0,1% desarrolló hematoma epidural (HE) y el 0,38% desarrolló TEP. Entre los que recibieron profilaxis no farmacológica, el 0,04% desarrolló HE (p = 0,11) y el 0,42% desarrolló TEP (p = 0,45). Conclusiones: No se encontraron beneficios para la quimioprofilaxis en comparación con la no quimioprofilaxis para prevenir la TVP en la cirugía de columna electiva, así como tampoco un mayor riesgo de hematoma epidural o eventos tromboembólicos fatales. Nivel de evidencia - III; Estudios terapéuticos - Investigación de los resultados del tratamiento.

Validation of the AO Spine Sacral Classification System: Reliability Among Surgeons Worldwide.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) demonstrate that the AO Spine Sacral Classification System can be reliably applied by general orthopaedic surgeons and subspecialists universally around the world and (2) delineate those injury subtypes that are most difficult to classify reliably to refine the classification before evaluating clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Agreement study. SETTING: All-level trauma centers, worldwide. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-two members of the AO Trauma and AO Spine community. INTERVENTION: The AO Sacral Classification System was applied by each surgeon to 26 cases in 2 independent assessments performed 3 weeks apart. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. RESULTS: A total of 8097 case assessments were performed. The kappa coefficient for interobserver agreement for all cases was 0.72/0.75 (assessment 1/assessment 2), representing substantial reliability. When comparing classification grading (A/B/C) regardless of subtype, the kappa coefficient was 0.84/0.85, corresponding to excellent reliability. The kappa coefficients for interobserver reliability were 0.95/0.93 for type A fractures, 0.78/0.79 for type B fractures, and 0.80/0.83 for type C fractures. The overall kappa statistic for intraobserver reliability was 0.82 (range 0.18-1.00), representing excellent reproducibility. When only evaluating morphology type (A/B/C), the average kappa value was 0.87 (range 0.18-1.00), representing excellent reproducibility. CONCLUSION: The AO Spine Sacral Classification System is universally reliable among general orthopaedic surgeons and subspecialists worldwide, with substantial interobserver and excellent intraobserver reliability.

Description and Reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System.

BACKGROUND: Several classification systems exist for sacral fractures; however, these systems are primarily descriptive, are not uniformly used, have not been validated, and have not been associated with a treatment algorithm or prognosis. The goal of the present study was to demonstrate the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a group of international spine and trauma surgeons. METHODS: A total of 38 sacral fractures were reviewed independently by 18 surgeons selected from an expert panel of AOSpine and AOTrauma members. Each case was graded by each surgeon on 2 separate occasions, 4 weeks apart. Intrarater reproducibility and interrater agreement were analyzed with use of the kappa statistic (κ) for fracture severity (i.e., A, B, and C) and fracture subtype (e.g., A1, A2, and A3). RESULTS: Seventeen reviewers were included in the final analysis, and a total of 1,292 assessments were performed (646 assessments performed twice). Overall intrarater reproducibility was excellent (κ = 0.83) for fracture severity and substantial (κ = 0.71) for all fracture subtypes. When comparing fracture severity, overall interrater agreement was substantial (κ = 0.75), with the highest agreement for type-A fractures (κ = 0.95) and the lowest for type-C fractures (κ = 0.70). Overall interrater agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) when comparing fracture subtype, with the highest agreement seen for A2 subtypes (κ = 0.81) and the lowest for A1 subtypes (κ = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the reliability of the AOSpine Sacral Classification System among a worldwide group of expert spine and trauma surgeons, with substantial to excellent intrarater reproducibility and moderate to substantial interrater agreement for the majority of fracture subtypes. These results suggest that this classification system can be reliably applied to sacral injuries, providing an important step toward standardization of treatment.

Perioperative Anticoagulation Management in Spine Surgery: Initial Findings From the AO Spine Anticoagulation Global Survey.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, international survey. OBJECTIVES: This study addressed the global perspectives concerning perioperative use of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis during spine surgery along with its risks and benefits. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed and implemented by expert members in the AO Spine community. The survey was distributed to AO Spine's spine surgeon members (N = 3805). Data included surgeon demographic information, type and region of practice, anticoagulation principles, different patient scenarios, and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 316 (8.3% response rate) spine surgeons completed the survey, representing 64 different countries. Completed surveys were primarily from Europe (31.7%), South/Latin America (19.9%), and Asia (18.4%). Surgeons tended to be 35 to 44 years old (42.1%), fellowship-trained (74.7%), and orthopedic surgeons (65.5%) from academic institutions (39.6%). Most surgeons (70.3%) used routine anticoagulation risk stratification, irrespective of geographic location. However, significant differences were seen between continents with anticoagulation initiation and cessation methodology. Specifically, the length of a procedure (P = .036) and patient body mass index (P = .008) were perceived differently when deciding to begin anticoagulation, while the importance of medical clearance (P < .001) and reference to literature (P = .035) differed during cessation. For specific techniques, most providers noted use of mobilization, low-molecular-weight heparin, and mechanical prophylaxis beginning on postoperative 0 to 1 days. Conversely, bridging regimens were bimodal in distribution, with providers electing anticoagulant initiation on postoperative 0 to 1 days or days 5-6. CONCLUSION: This survey highlights the heterogeneity of spine care and accentuates geographical variations. Furthermore, it identifies the difficulty in providing consistent perioperative anticoagulation recommendations to patients, as there remains no widely accepted, definitive literature of evidence or guidelines.

Influence of the misdef algorithm on the therapeutic decision for vertebral deformity in the adult / Influência do algoritmo misdef na decisão terapêutica de deformidade vertebral em adultos / Influencia del algoritmo misdef en la decisión terapéutica de deformidad vertebral en adultos

ABSTRACT Objective The therapeutic decision in cases of adult spinal deformity takes numerous factors into account with a consequent variability in treatment options. The objective is to compare the impact of the MISDEF (minimally invasive spine deformity) algorithm on therapeutic decisions in cases of adult spinal deformity. Methods Prospective radiographic analysis of 40 cases of adult deformity. The cases were sent, in two steps, to 20 Latin American surgeons who had to choose among six treatment options with and without the use of the MISDEF. Results For the conducts of decompression, decompression and short fusion, decompression and fusion with interbody device, and osteotomy with extension of fusion to the thoracic spine, no significant differences were found when comparing decisions made with and without MISDEF. For osteotomy, we observed a tendency for the number of surgeons choosing this conduct to increase when the decision is made with MISDEF. We observed that the number of surgeons who decided on conservative treatment decreased with the use of MISDEF (p <0.001). In cases with sagittal vertical axis <6 cm or pelvic tilt <25 ° or PI-LL (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis) <10 ° or coronal curve <20 °, there was a decrease in the conservative treatment option and an increase in osteotomy with proximal extension of the fusion with the use of MISDEF. Conclusions There is a tendency to increase indications of osteotomy and decrease the conservative treatment option when making a decision with MISDEF. The use of the algorithm showed no significant impact on the therapeutic decision in severe cases of adult deformity. Level of Evidence II; Prospective comparative radiographic analysis.

RESUMO Objetivo A decisão terapêutica em casos de deformidade vertebral em adultos considera inúmeros fatores com consequente variabilidade na opção de tratamento. O objetivo consiste em comparar o impacto do algoritmo MISDEF (minimally invasive spine deformity) na decisão terapêutica em casos de deformidade vertebral em adultos. Métodos Análise radiográfica prospectiva de 40 casos de deformidade em adultos. Os casos foram enviados, em duas etapas, para 20 cirurgiões da América Latina que deveriam escolher entre seis opções de tratamento sem e com a utilização do MISDEF. Resultados Para as condutas descompressão, descompressão e fusão curta, descompressão e fusão com dispositivo intersomático e osteotomia com extensão para coluna torácica não foram encontradas diferenças significativas quando comparadas às decisões sem e com MISDEF. Para osteotomia, observa-se uma tendência de que o número de cirurgiões que escolhe essa conduta aumenta quando a decisão é feita com MISDEF. Observou-se que o número de cirurgiões que decide por tratamento conservador diminui com a utilização do MISDEF (p<0,001). Em casos com eixo vertical sagital <6 cm ou inclinação pélvica <25° ou IP-LL (incidência pélvica menos lordose lombar) <10° ou curva coronal <20°, houve diminuição da opção por tratamento conservador e aumento da indicação de osteotomia com extensão proximal da fusão com o uso do MISDEF. Conclusões Há uma tendência em aumentar as indicações de osteotomia e diminuir a opção por tratamento conservador na tomada de decisão com MISDEF. A utilização do algoritmo não demonstrou impacto expressivo na decisão terapêutica em casos graves de deformidade em adultos. Nível de evidência II; Análise radiográfica prospectiva comparativa.

RESUMEN Objetivo La decisión terapéutica en casos de deformidad en adultos considera innumerables factores, con la consiguiente variabilidad en la opción de tratamiento. El objetivo consiste en comparar el impacto del algoritmo MISDEF (minimally invasive spine deformity) en la decisión terapéutica en casos de deformidad vertebral en adultos. Métodos Análisis radiográfico prospectivo de 40 casos de deformidad del adulto. Los casos fueron enviados, en dos etapas, a 20 cirujanos de América Latina que deberían elegir entre seis opciones de tratamiento sin y con uso del MISDEF. Resultados Para las conductas descompresión, descompresión y fusión corta, descompresión y fusión con dispositivo intersomático y osteotomía con extensión para columna torácica, no se encontraron diferencias significativas al comparar decisiones sin y con MISDEF. Para osteotomía, se observa una tendencia de que el número de cirujanos que elige esta conducta aumenta cuando la decisión es hecha con MISDEF. Se observó que el número de cirujanos que decide por tratamiento conservador disminuye con el uso del MISDEF (p <0,001). En casos con eje vertical sagital <6 cm o inclinación pélvica <25° o IP-LL (incidencia pélvica menos lordosis lumbar) <10° o curva coronal <20°, hubo disminución de la opción por tratamiento conservador y aumento de la indicación de osteotomía con extensión proximal de fusión con el uso del MISDEF. Conclusiones Hay una tendencia en aumentar las indicaciones de osteotomía y disminuir la opción por tratamiento conservador en la toma de decisión con MISDEF. El uso del algoritmo no mostró impacto expresivo en la decisión terapéutica en casos graves de deformidad en adultos . Nivel de evidencia II; Análisis radiográfico prospectivo comparativo.

A Technique for the Reconstruction of the Limbs of Osteomuscular Tissue Donors.

The donation of bone and tendon tissues is an important source of biological material used in several surgical techniques. The removal of such tissues generates an important aesthetic sequel in the donor that requires limb reconstruction before returning the corpse to the relatives. The technique used by the Banco de Ossos do Paraná (Bone Bank from Paraná), Brazil, employs metal rebar, silicone tubes and nylon clamps to rebuild the limbs, it is easy to perform and has satisfactory aesthetic results.

A Technique for the Reconstruction of the Limbs of Osteomuscular Tissue Donors / Técnica para reconstrução de membros de doadores de tecidos osteomusculares

Abstract The donation of bone and tendon tissues is an important source of biological material used in several surgical techniques. The removal of such tissues generates an important aesthetic sequel in the donor that requires limb reconstruction before returning the corpse to the relatives. The technique used by the Banco de Ossos do Paraná (Bone Bank from Paraná), Brazil, employs metal rebar, silicone tubes and nylon clamps to rebuild the limbs, it is easy to perform and has satisfactory aesthetic results.

Resumo A doação de tecidos ósseos e tendíneos é uma importante fonte de material biológico empregado em diversas técnicas cirúrgicas. A remoção destes tecidos gera uma importante sequela estética no doador, sendo necessária a reconstrução dos membros antes da devolução do corpo aos familiares. A técnica utilizada pelo Banco de Ossos do Paraná faz uso de vergalhões metálicos, tubos de silicone e abraçadeiras de náilon para reconstruir os membros, uma técnica de fácil execução e com resultado estético satisfatório.

Influence of total hip arthroplasty on sagittal lumbar-pelvic balance: Evaluation of radiographic parameters.

Objective To prospectively analyze the radiographic variables of lumbosacral sagittal balance in the pre- and postoperative period of patients submitted to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods A prospective, observational, comparative study that evaluated pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters of 71 patients, submitted to 72 total hip arthroplasties in a 3-year period (2014-2017) for primary coxarthrosis, of whom 28 performed late postoperative control (6 months) through the Surgimap Spine software (Surgimap, New York, NY, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t-test, the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results A total of 72 cases, presenting a mean age of 57.9 years old, predominantly females (60.6%) and patients > 50 years old (71.8%). There was an overall decrease in lumbar lordosis values in the immediate postoperative period, without major global changes in late evolution. It was found that patients with a pelvic incidence ≥ 60° tended to have their other sagittal balance parameters elevated. Conclusion There was no significant difference between the radiographic variables of sagittal lumbopelvic balance in the evaluated periods. Lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence were the main modifying factors. Improvement of low back pain after THA, without changes in parameters, suggests different pathology mechanisms still to be clarified.

Influence of total hip arthroplasty on sagittal lumbar-pelvic balance: Evaluation of radiographic parameters / Influência da artroplastia total de quadril sobre o equilíbrio sagital lombopélvico: Avaliação dos parâmetros radiográficos

Abstract Objective To prospectively analyze the radiographic variables of lumbosacral sagittal balance in the pre- and postoperative period of patients submitted to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods A prospective, observational, comparative study that evaluated pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters of 71 patients, submitted to 72 total hip arthroplasties in a 3-year period (2014-2017) for primary coxarthrosis, of whom 28 performed late postoperative control (6 months) through the Surgimap Spine software (Surgimap, New York, NY, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t-test, the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results A total of 72 cases, presenting a mean age of 57.9 years old, predominantly females (60.6%) and patients > 50 years old (71.8%). There was an overall decrease in lumbar lordosis values in the immediate postoperative period, without major global changes in late evolution. It was found that patients with a pelvic incidence ≥ 60° tended to have their other sagittal balance parameters elevated. Conclusion There was no significant difference between the radiographic variables of sagittal lumbopelvic balance in the evaluated periods. Lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence were the main modifying factors. Improvement of low back pain after THA, without changes in parameters, suggests different pathology mechanisms still to be clarified.

Resumo Objetivo Analisar prospectivamente as variáveis radiográficas do equilíbrio sagital da coluna lombossacral no pré e pós-operatório dos pacientes submetidos a artroplastia total de quadril (ATQ). Métodos Estudo prospectivo, observacional e comparativo que avaliou parâmetros radiográficos pré e pós-operatórios imediatos de 71 pacientes submetidos a 72 ATQs em três anos (2014-2017) por coxartrose primária, dos quais 28 fizeram controle pós-operatório tardio (6 meses), através do programa Surgimap Spine (Surgimap, Nova York, NY, EUA). A análise estatística foi feita com o teste t de Student, o modelo de análise de covariância (ANCOVA, na sigla em inglês) e o teste de Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Os dados foram analisados com o programa IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Versão 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, EUA). Valores de p < 0,05 indicaram significância estatística. Resultados Os 72 casos avaliados apresentaram uma idade média de 57,9 anos, com predominância do sexo feminino (60,6%) e de pacientes > 50 anos (71,8%). Houve uma diminuição global nos valores da lordose lombar no pós-operatório imediato, sem grandes alterações globais na evolução tardia. Aferiu-se que pacientes com uma incidência pélvica ≥ 60° tendem a ter os demais parâmetros do equilíbrio sagital elevados. Conclusão Não houve diferença significativa entre as variáveis radiográficas do equilíbrio sagital lombopélvico nos períodos avaliados. A lordose lombar e a incidência pélvica foram os principais fatores modificantes. A melhoria da lombalgia pós-ATQ sem alterações desses parâmetros sugere diferentes mecanismos da patologia ainda a serem esclarecidos.

Image correlation between facet effusion and lumbar instability / Correlação por imagem entre líquido facetário e instabilidade lombar / Correlación por imagen entre derrame facetario y inestabilidad lumbar

ABSTRACT Objective To assess the incidence of facet effusion in lumbosacral spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the relationship with radiographic segmental instability in patients submitted to spinal surgery. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients submitted to lumbosacral spine surgery over a period of three years, through the evaluation of dynamic radiographs (X-ray) motion and facet effusion in axial section of MRI. Instability was defined as vertebral translation > 3 mm or intervertebral angle > 10º, and facet effusion as fluid in the facet joints > 1.5 mm. Results The total number of patients that fulfilled the criteria for analysis was 244, of which 47 presented movement (≤ 3 mm) and 31 presented excessive movement (> 3 mm), 115 had facet effusion (≤ 1.5 mm) and 46 presented excessive fluid (> 1.5 mm). Statistical analysis did not demonstrate a significant association between increased segmental movement and facet effusion (p = 0.150). Conclusions The total incidence of facet effusion was 47.1% and the excessive fluid was 18.9%.There was no association between facet effusion in MRI and instability in dynamic X-ray. MRI does not replace dynamic X-ray in flexion and extension in the evaluations of lumbar instability. Level of evidence III; Retrospective Cohort.

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a incidência de líquido facetário na ressonância magnética (RNM) de coluna lombossacra e a relação com instabilidade segmentar radiográfica em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia da coluna vertebral. Métodos Coorte retrospectivo de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia da coluna lombossacra, em um período de três anos, através da avaliação do movimento na radiografia (RX) dinâmica e presença de líquido facetário no corte axial da RNM. Considerou-se movimento excessivo a translação vertebral > 3 mm ou angulação intervertebral > 10º. Quanto ao líquido excessivo, a presença de líquido facetário >1,5 mm. Resultados 244 pacientes preencheram critérios para análise. 47 apresentaram movimento (≤3 mm) e 31 apresentaram movimento excessivo (>3 mm). 115 apresentaram líquido facetário (≤1,5 mm) e 46 apresentaram líquido excessivo (>1,5 mm). A análise estatística não demonstrou associação significativa entre o movimento segmentar aumentado e a presença de líquido facetário (p = 0,150). Conclusão A incidência total de líquido facetário foi de 47,1% e de líquido excessivo 18,9%. Não houve associação entre líquido facetário na RNM e instabilidade no RX dinâmico. A RNM não substitui o RX em flexão e extensão na avaliação de instabilidade lombar. Nível de evidência III; Coorte Retrospectiva.

RESUMEN Objetivo Evaluar la incidencia de derrame facetario en la resonancia magnética (RM) de la columna lumbosacra y la relación con la inestabilidad segmentaria radiográfica en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de columna vertebral. Métodos Estudio retrospectivo de cohorte de pacientes sometidos a cirugía de columna lumbosacra en un período de tres años, mediante la evaluación del movimiento en las radiografías (RX) dinámicas y derrame facetario en el corte axial de la RM. La inestabilidad se definió como traslación vertebral > 3 mm o ángulo intervertebral > 10º, y derrame facetario como líquido en las articulaciones facetarias > 1,5 mm. Resultados El número total de pacientes que cumplieron con los criterios para análisis fue 244, de los cuales 47 presentaron movimientos (≤ 3 mm) y 31 presentaron movimientos excesivos (> 3 mm), 115 tuvieron derrame facetario (≤ 1,5 mm) y 46 presentaron exceso de líquido (> 1,5 mm). El análisis estadístico no demostró asociación significativa entre el aumento del movimiento segmentario y el derrame facetario (p = 0,150). Conclusiones La incidencia total de derrame facetario fue del 47,1% y el líquido excesivo 18,9%. No hubo asociación entre el derrame facetario en la RM y la inestabilidad en los rayos X dinámicos. La RM no reemplaza la radiografía dinámica en flexión y extensión en las evaluaciones de la inestabilidad lumbar. Nivel de evidencia III; Cohorte Retrospectivo.

Comparative study of lumbar plexus path on the left and right sides through the psoas muscle / Estudo comparativo do trajeto do plexo lombar nos lados direito e esquerdo através do músculo psoas / Estudio comparativo del trayecto del plexo lumbar en los lados derecho e izquierdo a través del músculo psoas

ABSTRACT Objective: Spine surgery with a minimally invasive lateral approach and validate possible anatomical differences between the right and left sides. Methods: Four measurements (cm) were taken on 38 cadavers: the distance between the lumbar plexus and the transverse process (L4-L5) and the distance between the lumbar plexus and the midline of the lumbar spine, both on the right and left sides. Results: The mean distance between the lumbar plexus and the transverse process of L4-L5 was 1.03 cm and the distance to the midline was 3.99 cm for the right side. The averages of the left side were 1.13 cm and 3.38 cm, respectively. There is statistical difference between the sides (p<0.05) using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test. Conclusions: The authors suggest that the transverse process might be used as an anatomical landmark to define the surgical approach through the psoas muscle. Level of Evidence IV; Cadaveric study.

RESUMO Objetivo: Encontrar um referencial anatômico prático e seguro durante a cirurgia com a técnica de acesso à coluna ALMI (acesso lateral minimamente invasivo) e validar possíveis diferenças anatômicas entre os lados direito e esquerdo. Método: Foram feitas 4 medidas (cm) em 38 cadáveres: entre o plexo lombar e o processo transverso de L4L5, e entre o plexo lombar e a linha média da coluna lombar dos lados direito e esquerdo. Resultados: A distância média encontrada entre o plexo lombar e o processo transverso de L4L5 foi de 1,03cm e a distância até a linha média foi de 3,99 cm do lado direito. Já do lado esquerdo, as médias são 1,13cm e 3,88cm, respectivamente. Houve diferença estatística entre os lados (p<0,05) pelo teste não-paramétrico de Wilcoxon. Conclusão: Sugere-se como referencial anatômico o processo transverso para definir o ponto de entrada do portal de trabalho no músculo psoas. Nível de Evidência IV; Estudo Cadavérico.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Encontrar una referencia anatómica práctica y segura durante la cirugía de la columna con técnica de abordaje lateral mínimamente invasivo y validar posibles diferencias anatómicas entre los lados derecho e izquierdo. Métodos: Se realizaron 4 medidas (cm) en 38 cadáveres: distancia entre el plexo lumbar y la apófisis transversa (L4-L5) y distancia entre el plexo lumbar y la línea media de la columna lumbar, en los lados derecho e izquierdo. Resultados: La distancia promedio entre el plexo lumbar y la apófisis transversa de L4-L5 fue 1,03 cm y la distancia a la línea media fue de 3,99 cm a la derecha. Los promedios de la izquierda fueron 1,13 cm y 3,88 cm respectivamente. Hay diferencia estadística entre los lados (p <0,05) mediante la prueba no paramétrica de Wilcoxon. Conclusiones: Se sugiere como referencia anatómica la apófisis transversa para definir el portal de trabajo a través del músculo psoas. Nivel de Evidencia IV; Estudio cadavérico.

Sacral Fractures and Associated Injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to describe the injuries associated with sacral fractures and to analyze their impact on patient outcome. METHODS: A comprehensive narrative review of the literature was performed to identify the injuries associated with sacral fractures. RESULTS: Sacral fractures are uncommon injuries that result from high-energy trauma, and that, due to their rarity, are frequently underdiagnosed and mistreated. Only 5% of sacral fractures occur in isolation. Injuries most often associated with sacral fractures include neurologic injuries (present in up to 50% of sacral fractures), pelvic ring disruptions, hip and lumbar spine fractures, active pelvic/ abdominal bleeding and the presence of an open fracture or significant soft tissue injury. Diagnosis of pelvic ring fractures and fractures extending to the lumbar spine are key factors for the appropriate management of sacral fractures. Importantly, associated systemic (cranial, thoracic, and abdominopelvic) or musculoskeletal injuries should be promptly assessed and addressed. These associated injuries often dictate the management and eventual outcome of sacral fractures and, therefore, any treatment algorithm should take them into consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral fractures are complex in nature and often associated with other often-missed injuries. This review summarizes the most relevant associated injuries in sacral fractures and discusses on their appropriate management.

Does the Spine Surgeon's Experience Affect Fracture Classification, Assessment of Stability, and Treatment Plan in Thoracolumbar Injuries?

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey-based study. OBJECTIVES: The AO Spine thoracolumbar injury classification has been shown to have good reproducibility among clinicians. However, the influence of spine surgeons' clinical experience on fracture classification, stability assessment, and decision on management based on this classification has not been studied. Furthermore, the usefulness of varying imaging modalities including radiographs, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the decision process was also studied. METHODS: Forty-one spine surgeons from different regions, acquainted with the AOSpine classification system, were provided with 30 thoracolumbar fractures in a 3-step assessment: first radiographs, followed by CT and MRI. Surgeons classified the fracture, evaluated stability, chose management, and identified reasons for any changes. The surgeons were divided into 2 groups based on years of clinical experience as <10 years (n = 12) and >10 years (n = 29). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in correctly classifying A1, B2, and C type fractures. Surgeons with less experience had more correct diagnosis in classifying A3 (47.2% vs 38.5% in step 1, 73.6% vs 60.3% in step 2 and 77.8% vs 65.5% in step 3), A4 (16.7% vs 24.1% in step 1, 72.9% vs 57.8% in step 2 and 70.8% vs 56.0% in step3) and B1 injuries (31.9% vs 20.7% in step 1, 41.7% vs 36.8% in step 2 and 38.9% vs 33.9% in step 3). In the assessment of fracture stability and decision on treatment, the less and more experienced surgeons performed equally. The selection of a particular treatment plan varied in all subtypes except in A1 and C type injuries. CONCLUSION: Surgeons' experience did not significantly affect overall fracture classification, evaluating stability and planning the treatment. Surgeons with less experience had a higher percentage of correct classification in A3 and A4 injuries. Despite variations between them in classification, the assessment of overall stability and management decisions were similar between the 2 groups.

The value of CT and MRI in the classification and surgical decision-making among spine surgeons in thoracolumbar spinal injuries.

PURPOSE: Although imaging has a major role in evaluation and management of thoracolumbar spinal trauma by spine surgeons, the exact role of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in addition to radiographs for fracture classification and surgical decision-making is unclear. METHODS: Spine surgeons (n = 41) from around the world classified 30 thoracolumbar fractures. The cases were presented in a three-step approach: first plain radiographs, followed by CT and MRI images. Surgeons were asked to classify according to the AOSpine classification system and choose management in each of the three steps. RESULTS: Surgeons correctly classified 43.4 % of fractures with plain radiographs alone; after, additionally, evaluating CT and MRI images, this percentage increased by further 18.2 and 2.2 %, respectively. AO type A fractures were identified in 51.7 % of fractures with radiographs, while the number of type B fractures increased after CT and MRI. The number of type C fractures diagnosed was constant across the three steps. Agreement between radiographs and CT was fair for A-type (k = 0.31), poor for B-type (k = 0.19), but it was excellent between CT and MRI (k > 0.87). CT and MRI had similar sensitivity in identifying fracture subtypes except that MRI had a higher sensitivity (56.5 %) for B2 fractures (p < 0.001). The need for surgical fixation was deemed present in 72 % based on radiographs alone and increased to 81.7 % with CT images (p < 0.0001). The assessment for need of surgery did not change after an MRI (p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: For accurate classification, radiographs alone were insufficient except for C-type injuries. CT is mandatory for accurately classifying thoracolumbar fractures. Though MRI did confer a modest gain in sensitivity in B2 injuries, the study does not support the need for routine MRI in patients for classification, assessing instability or need for surgery.