Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 44(9): 620-627, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33249114

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are successfully used in the management of portal hypertension (PH)-related complications. Debate surrounds the diameter of the dilation. The aim was to analyse the outcomes of and complications deriving from TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and identify predictors of survival. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study, which included patients with cirrhosis who had a TIPS procedure for PH from 2009 to October 2018. Demographic, clinical and radiological data were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to measure survival and predictors of survival were identified with the Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included (78.6% male), mean age was 58.5 (SD±/-9.9) and the median MELD was 13.3 (IQR 9.5-16). The indications were refractory ascites (RA), variceal bleeding (VB) and hepatic hydrothorax (HH). Median survival was 72 months (RA 46.4, VB 68.5 and HH 64.7) and transplant-free survival was 26 months. Clinical and technical success rates were 70.5% and 92.9% respectively. Age (HR 1.05), clinical success (HR 0.33), sodium (HR 0.92), renal failure (HR 2.46) and albumin (HR 0.35) were predictors of survival. Hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 28.6% of patients and TIPS dysfunction occurred in 16.3%. CONCLUSIONS: TIPS with 10-mm PTFE-covered stent is an effective and safe treatment for PH-related complications in patients with cirrhosis. Age, renal failure, sodium, albumin and clinical success are independent predictors of long-term survival.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Portal/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/métodos , Stents , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ascitis/mortalidad , Ascitis/cirugía , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/mortalidad , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/cirugía , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Encefalopatía Hepática/epidemiología , Encefalopatía Hepática/mortalidad , Encefalopatía Hepática/prevención & control , Venas Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Hepáticas/cirugía , Humanos , Hidrotórax/mortalidad , Hidrotórax/cirugía , Hipertensión Portal/mortalidad , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Cirrosis Hepática/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Politetrafluoroetileno , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/efectos adversos , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diseño de Prótesis , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Albúmina Sérica , Sodio/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 28(4): 412-20, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26760587

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and contrast-enhanced MRI in cirrhotic patients who were candidates for liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 273 consecutive patients with 218 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules, who underwent imaging and subsequent transplantation, were examined. Diagnosis of HCC was based on explant correlation of the whole liver. Three different imaging data sets were evaluated: US, MDCT and MRI unenhanced and dynamic phases. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, were determined. Statistical analysis was performed for all lesions and for two lesion subgroups (≤2 and >2 cm). Preoperative tumour staging was analysed. RESULTS: Patient sensitivity to US, MDCT and MRI was 80.4, 81.1 and 90.5%, respectively. Specificity was 96.3, 96.2 and 82.1%. Combined US and MDCT improved sensitivity (88%) without significant loss in specificity (95.7%). Imaging tests resulted in accurate tumour staging in 83.4% of the patients. In per-nodule analysis, technique sensitivity was 55.6, 52.4 and 65.9%, respectively. Sensitivity figures improved when the nodule was larger than 2 cm. CONCLUSION: Combining imaging techniques is a good strategy for pretransplant HCC diagnosis and provides more accurate cancer staging in patients, which is necessary to decide the correct therapeutic approach.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Trasplante de Hígado , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Ultrasonografía , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...