[Respiratory physiotherapy in acute viral bronchiolitis in the newborn. Pro/con arguments]. / La kinésithérapie respiratoire dans la bronchiolite virale aiguë du nourrisson. Arguments pour/contre.

This article reports an exchange of unbiased arguments between Mr Guy Postiaux speaking in favour of respiratory physiotherapy in acute viral bronchiolitis in the newborn and Prof. Jean-Christoph Dubus arguing against. A review of the literature suggests that traditional methods of physiotherapy should be abandoned because they are not validated and because they have harmful side effects. The latest Cochrane revue (2016) suggests the use of slow expiration techniques that have some validated elements and cause no harmful side effects. Large multicentre studies should be undertaken to confirm or refute the results of the five studies in the Cochrane review. Their analysis would allow extraction of objective evidence for the efficacy of slow expiration techniques on the relief of bronchopulmonary obstruction and the reduction of the degree of severity in the short and medium term. Studies of the effect of ambulatory respiratory physiotherapy for bronchiolitis of a moderate degree not requiring hospitalisation are not available. An evaluation is needed which is based on the pathophysiology of multifactorial bronchial obstruction and on the physical signs, of which auscultation is the cornerstone.

Respiratory muscle endurance training in obese patients.

OBJECTIVE: Increased respiratory muscle work is associated with dyspnea and poor exercise tolerance in obese patients. We evaluated the effect of respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET) on respiratory muscle capacities, symptoms and exercise capacity in obese patients. DESIGN: A total of 20 obese patients hospitalized for 26 ± 6 days to follow a low-calorie diet and a physical activity program were included in this case-control study. Of them, 10 patients performed RMET (30-min isocapnic hyperpnea at 60-80% maximum voluntary ventilation, 3-4 times per week during the whole hospitalization period: RMET group), while the other 10 patients performed no respiratory training (control (CON) group). RMET and CON groups were matched for body mass index (BMI) (45 ± 7 kg m(-2)) and age (42 ± 12 years). Lung function, respiratory muscle strength and endurance, 6-min walking distance, dyspnea (Medical Research Council scale) and quality of life (short-form health survey 36 questionnaire) were assessed before and after intervention. RESULTS: Similar BMI reduction was observed after hospitalization in the RMET and CON groups (-2 ± 1 kg m(-2), P < 0.001). No significant change in lung function and respiratory muscle strength was observed except for vital capacity, which increased in the RMET group (+0.20 ± 0.26 l, P = 0.039). Respiratory muscle endurance increased in the RMET group only (+52 ± 27%, P < 0.001). Compared with the CON group, the RMET group had greater improvement in 6MWT (+54 ± 35 versus +1 ± 7 m, P = 0.007), dyspnea score (-2 ± 1 versus -1 ± 1 points, P = 0.047) and quality of life (total score: +251 ± 132 versus +84 ± 152 points, P = 0.018) after hospitalization. A significant correlation between the increase in respiratory muscle endurance and improvement in 6MWT distance was observed (r (2) = 0.36, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that RMET is feasible in obese patients and can induce significant improvement in dyspnea and exercise capacity. RMET may be a promising tool to improve functional capacity and adherence to physical activities in this population, but further studies are needed to confirm these results.