Elastic Lumbar Support Versus Rigid Thoracolumbar Orthosis for Acute Pediatric Spondylolysis: A Prospective Controlled Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study on clinical, radiographic, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in children with acute spondylolysis treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis or with an elastic lumbar support. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of pediatric spondylosysis treated with a hard brace or an elastic lumbar support. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The benefits of the use of a rigid orthosis in treatment of spondylolysis are not clear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive children with acute spondylolysis (mean age: 14.1 yr, range: 9-17 yr) were prospectively enrolled. Patients were treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis (Boston brace) or with a low-profile, elastic lumbar support. First 14 patients were randomized the remaining 43 chose brace type themselves. Treatment period was four months. Treatment outcomes included bony union of the spondylolysis assessed with a computed tomography at four months and HRQoL using the Scoliosis Research Society-24 outcome questionnaire filled out before and after the treatment. RESULTS: Of the 57 patients, 54 completed the treatment protocol. Twenty-nine patients were treated using the Boston brace and 25 patients the elastic lumbar support. Bony union was obtained in 69.0% (20/29) of the Boston brace and in 60.0% (15/25) of the elastic lumbar support group patients. Difference in union rates was not significant (relative risk=1.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.44-2.98, P =0.785). There was no difference in the Scoliosis Research Society-24 total or domain scores at the end of follow-up between the treatment groups ( P >0.159 for all comparisons). In the whole cohort, the bony union did not predict better HRQoL in the end of the treatment ( P =0.869), although the pain domain improved significantly in the whole cohort ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A rigid thoracolumbar orthosis did not provide any benefits over an elastic lumbar support in terms of bony union or HRQoL outcomes in children with acute spondylolysis. LEVEL OF EVIDEN: 2.

Treatment of congenital bipartite patella in pediatric population - a systematic review of the published studies.

Bipartite patella is an abnormality where patella is incorrectly ossified resulting in fibrocartilaginous synchondrosis. In most cases bipartite patella is asymptomatic and incidental finding but can also be painful especially in adolescents. The aim of our analysis was to determine the preferable treatment for pediatric bipartite patella. We conducted a systematic review based on PubMed and Embase searches. All original articles with reference to treatment in the population of ≤ 20 years of age, were included. Case reports, and articles without individualized data were excluded. In total, the individual data of 126 knees in 116 patients was analyzed. In 77.8% (98/126) of the analyzed knees the result was excellent, and the majority of the knees, 89.7% (105/126) received surgical intervention, and seven different techniques were used. None of operative methods were superior to others. Excellent treatment outcomes were achieved more often in younger patients (p=0.004), and the median duration of symptoms in operatively treated patients was shorter (p=0.018). If operative treatment is used after unsuccessful conservative treatment, it should be considered early in adolescence and also within a relatively short period after the onset of symptoms. The best operative method could not be found. More research and RCTs are needed concerning the conservative methods and different operative techniques.

Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes of Instrumented Circumferential Spinal Fusion for Pediatric Spondylolisthesis: A Comparison With Age and Sex Matched Healthy Controls.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study on the clinical, radiographic, and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in adolescents with spondylolisthesis undergoing instrumented circumferential spinal fusion compared with age and sex matched controls. OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes of pediatric spondylolisthesis patients minimum 2 years after surgery and to compare their HRQOL with age and sex matched controls. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is limited evidence of the HRQOL of adolescent spondylolisthesis patients after surgery and no studies comparing it with healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive adolescents (mean age 14.7 yr, range 10-18 yr) undergoing instrumented reduction with intercorporeal spinal fusion for spondylolisthesis (11 low-grade, 15 high-grade) by a single orthopedic surgeon were included to this study cohort and matched by age and sex with two controls. The HRQOL was measured with Scoliosis Research Society-24 (SRS-24) questionnaire before surgery, 6 months and 2 years after the surgery. RESULTS: The mean (SD) vertebral slip in the low-grade patients was 25% (13%) and 67% (15%) in the high-grade patients and 6% (7%) and 21% (25%) postoperatively, respectively (P ≤ 0.041 for both comparisons). Three (12%) patients developed a non-union during follow-up. None of the patients developed a persistent neurologic deficit, but two (8%) patients presented with chronic postsurgical pain persisting 24 months. Seven (27%) of the patients had reoperations for any reason during the follow-up. Pain and activity domains of the SRS-24 improved significantly from preoperative to 2-year follow-up (P ≤ 0.007 for both). SRS pain, self-image, function domains, and total score were significantly worse as compared with the 52 controls (P ≤ 0.020 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Risk of non-union is relatively low after instrumented spinal reduction in adolescents with spondylolisthesis. HRQOL improves significantly after instrumented reduction and circumferential spinal fusion in adolescents with spondylolisthesis, but remains at statistically lower level than in the controls. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.