EUFOREA/EPOS2020 statement on the clinical considerations for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps care.

Following the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), patients suffering from severe uncontrolled CRSwNP are recommended to receive oral corticosteroids, (revision) sinus surgery, systemic biologicals and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD). Given the major differences in indications, outcomes, practical considerations, risks and costs of these key pillars of treatment, there is a growing need to define criteria for each treatment option and list the clinically relevant and major considerations for them. This EUFOREA document therefore provides an expert panel overview of the expected outcomes, specific considerations and (contra)indications of the five major treatment arms of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: oral corticosteroids, primary and revision sinus surgery, biological treatment and ATAD. This overview of treatment considerations is needed to allow physicians and patients to consider the different options in the context of providing optimal and personalized care for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. In conclusion, the five major treatment options for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP have intrinsic advantages, specific indications and considerations that are of importance to the patient, the physician and the society. This EUFOREA statement supports the unmet need to define criteria for the indication of every treatment pillar of CRSwNP.

Multiple reasons underlaying uncontrolled disease in the majority of chronic rhinosinusitis patients.

Background: Up to 40% of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remain uncontrolled despite guidelines of care being available, with an enormous socio-economic impact. The reasons for uncontrolled disease can be arbitrarily divided into disease-related, diagnosis-related, treatment-related, and patient-related factors. The relative contribution of each factor in uncontrolled CRS remains speculative. This explorative study aimed at determining the factors responsible for uncontrolled CRS in a tertiary care center, thereby identifying the most commons reasons for uncontrolled disease in CRS. Methods: Patients with uncontrolled CRS (n = 187) were asked to fill out a questionnaire and underwent a clinical examination at the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital of Leuven, Belgium. Two independent physicians evaluated the (multiple) reason(s) for uncontrolled disease. Results: In uncontrolled CRS, 66% of patients showed two or more reasons for uncontrolled disease according to the physicians' evaluation. Disease-related factors (70%) were most often considered the reason for uncontrolled disease, followed by treatment- (45%), patient- (42%), and diagnosis- (32%) related factors. Conclusion: In case of uncontrolled CRS, the different contributing factors to the uncontrolled nature need to be carefully addressed during diagnostic and therapeutic actions in order to define strategies to improve CRS care. Most uncontrolled CRS patients have multiple reasons contributing to their disease status, with disease-related factors being the most common factor.