Incidence of Rib Fracture following Treatment with Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Purpose: To determine the rib fracture rate in a cohort of patients with breast cancer treated with proton therapy. Patient and Methods: From a prospective database, we identified 225 patients treated with proton therapy between 2012 and 2020 (223 women; 2 men). Clinical and dosimetric data were extracted, the cumulative incidence method assessed rib fracture rate, and Fine-Gray tests assessed prognostic significance of select variables. In-field rib fracture was defined as a fracture that occurred in a rib located within the 10% isodose line. Out-of-field rib fracture was defined as a fracture occurring in a rib location outside of the 10% isodose line. Results: Of the patients, 74% had left-sided breast cancer; 5%, bilateral; and 21%, right-sided. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans showed normality in 20%, osteopenia in 34%, and osteoporosis in 6% (test not performed in 40%). Additionally, 57% received an aromatase inhibitor. Target volumes were breast ± internal mammary nodes (IMNs) (16%), breast and comprehensive regional lymphatics (32%), chest wall ± IMNs (1%), and chest wall/comprehensive regional lymphatics (51%). Passive-scattered proton therapy was used for 41% of patients, 58% underwent pencil-beam scanning (PBS), and 1% underwent a combination (passive scattering/PBS), with 85% of patients receiving a boost. Median follow-up was 3.1 years, with 97% having >12-month follow-up. The 3-year cumulative in-field rib fracture incidence was 3.7%. Eight patients developed in-field rib fractures (1 symptomatic, 7 imaging identified) for a 0.4% symptomatic rib fracture rate. Median time from radiation completion to rib fracture identification was 1.8 years (fractures were identified within 2.2 years for 7 of 8 patients). No variables were associated with rib fracture on univariate analysis. Three fractures developed outside the radiation field (0.9% cumulative incidence of out-of-field rib fracture). Conclusion: In this series of patients with breast cancer treated with proton therapy, the 3-year rib fracture rates remain low (in-field 3.7%; symptomatic 0.4%). As in photon therapy, the asymptomatic rate may be underestimated owing to a lack of routine surveillance imaging. However, patients experiencing symptomatic rib fractures after proton therapy for breast cancer are rare.

Modern Therapy for Chest Wall Ewing Sarcoma: An Update of the University of Florida Experience.

PURPOSE: Owing to adjacent critical organs, the aggressive multimodality local therapy necessary for Ewing sarcoma of the chest wall is a challenge. Our previous review of historical outcomes at our institution revealed suboptimal disease control and a high incidence of grade ≥3 toxic effects in patients treated before 2006. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes during the past decade since the introduction of proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-nine consecutive pediatric patients with a chest wall Ewing sarcoma treated between 2006 and 2020 at the University of Florida were identified. The median maximum tumor diameter was 10 cm (range, 4-28 cm). At diagnosis, 19 patients had local disease and the others had a pleural effusion (11), pleural nodules (5), or pulmonary metastases (4). Patients were treated with chemotherapy regimens according to contemporary North American and European protocols: 7 were treated with preoperative, 18 with postoperative, and 14 with definitive radiation. Preceding primary site treatment, 15 patients required hemithorax radiation and 4 patients underwent whole-lung irradiation using photon techniques. The total median radiation dose to the primary tumor was 52.8 GyRBE [relative biological effectiveness] (range, 44.4-55.8 GyRBE). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4 years (range, 0.7-14.7 years), the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 97.2%, 74.4%, and 81.6%, respectively, for the whole cohort. For the 19 patients with nonmetastatic disease, the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 100%, 78.9%, and 78.9%, respectively. No patients developed grade ≥4 toxic effects. Two patients (5%) experienced grade 3 toxic effects related to multimodality treatment; both were patients who required surgery to correct scoliosis. Two patients (5%) developed grade 2 pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with our prior published institutional experience, our data suggest improvements in disease control and multimodality toxic effects since the introduction of proton therapy. This should be confirmed with a larger sample size and longer follow-up.

Modern Therapy for Spinal and Paraspinal Ewing Sarcoma: An Update of the University of Florida Experience.

PURPOSE: In 2010, we published a comprehensive review of our institutional outcomes about treating children with spinal and paraspinal Ewing sarcoma using photon therapy. Multimodality therapy was associated with fair disease control but also with serious toxicity, including a 37% rate of grade 3 or greater toxicity. We therefore sought to assess our more recent experience about treating children with more modern technology and treatment regimens. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2010 and 2021, 32 pediatric patients with nonmetastatic spinal and paraspinal Ewing sarcoma were treated at University of Florida and enrolled in a retrospective outcome study. Median age at diagnosis was 9.8 years (range, 2.1-21.8 years). Within the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine regions, 3, 22, and 7 tumors arose, respectively. Median maximum tumor diameter was 5 cm (range, 3-19 cm). At diagnosis, 28 of 32 patients had motor, bowel, or bladder deficits. Chemotherapy was delivered according to contemporary North American and European interval-compressed regimens. Before radiation therapy, 14 patients underwent gross total resection, whereas 18 underwent a biopsy or subtotal resection with cord decompression. All patients were treated with proton therapy; 6 with hardware stabilization also received a component of intensity modulated photon therapy. Median prescription dose was 50.4 gray relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE; range, 45-55.8 GyRBE). Median maximum dose to the spinal cord was 50.2 GyRBE (range, 0-54.9 GyRBE). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4.1 years (range, 0.7-9.4 years), the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 92%, 79%, and 85%, respectively. Ten of 30 living patients have residual motor, bowel, or bladder deficits. Overall, 22% of patients experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 late toxicity related to multimodality treatment: kyphosis (n = 4), esophagitis (n = 2), and chronic kidney disease (n = 1). No patients developed grade 4 or greater toxicity, new neurologic deficits, or second malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Modern treatment advances may offer an improved therapeutic ratio for pediatric patients with spinal and paraspinal Ewing sarcoma. With appropriate management, most patients can be cured with recovery of long-term neurologic function and modest side effects.

Bicentric Treatment Outcomes After Proton Therapy for Nonmyxopapillary High-Grade Spinal Cord Ependymoma in Children.

PURPOSE: Few studies report outcomes in children treated with radiation for nonmyxopapillary ependymoma of the spinal cord, and little evidence exists to inform decisions regarding target volume and prescription dose. Moreover, virtually no mature outcome data exist on proton therapy for this tumor. We describe our combined institutional experience treating pediatric classical/anaplastic ependymoma of the spinal cord with proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2008 and 2019, 14 pediatric patients with nonmetastatic nonmyxopapillary grade II (n = 6) and grade III (n = 8) spinal ependymoma received proton therapy. The median age at radiation was 14 years (range, 1.5-18 years). Five tumors arose within the cervical cord, 3 within the thoracic cord, and 6 within the lumbosacral cord. Before radiation therapy, 3 patients underwent subtotal resection, and 11 underwent gross-total or near total resection. Two patients received chemotherapy. For radiation, the clinical target volume received 50.4 Gy (n = 8), 52.2 (n = 1), or 54 Gy (n = 5), with the latter receiving a boost to the gross tumor volume after the initial 50.4 Gy, modified to respect spinal cord tolerance. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 6.3 years (range, 1.5-14.8 years), no tumors progressed. Although most patients experienced neurologic sequela after surgery, only 1 developed additional neurologic deficits after radiation: An 18-year-old male who received 54 Gy after gross total resection of a lumbosacral tumor developed grade 2 erectile dysfunction. There were 2 cases of musculoskeletal toxicity attributable to surgery and radiation. At analysis, no patient had developed cardiac, pulmonary, or other visceral organ complications or a second malignancy. CONCLUSION: Radiation to a total dose of 50 to 54 Gy can be safely delivered and plays a beneficial role in the multidisciplinary management of children with nonmyxopapillary spinal cord ependymoma. Proton therapy may reduce late radiation effects and is not associated with unexpected spinal cord toxicity.