Evolocumab-Based LDL-C Management in High and Very High Cardiovascular Risk Patients in German Clinical Practice: The HEYMANS Study.

INTRODUCTION: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is among the most important modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In very high-risk patients, the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines recommend attaining LDL-C < 55 mg/dL. In the German cohort of the observational HEYMANS study, we aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and LDL-C control among patients initiating evolocumab. METHODS: Data was collected between 09/2016 and 05/2021 for ≤ 6 months before (retrospectively) and ≤ 30 months after evolocumab initiation (prospectively). Patient characteristics, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), lipid values, evolocumab use, and safety were collected. RESULTS: Of 380 enrolled patients, 93% received evolocumab in secondary prevention and 69% had a history of statin intolerance. At study baseline, 49% did not receive any statins and LDL-C was very high (145 mg/dL). Use of evolocumab decreased LDL-C by a median of 53% within 3 months and remained stable thereafter, despite mainly unchanged background LLT. Overall, 59% attained an LDL-C level < 55 mg/dL (69% with, 49% without LLT). Persistence to evolocumab was 90.6% in months 1-12 and 93.5% in months 13-30. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 8% of patients. CONCLUSION: Data from the German HEYMANS cohort corroborate previous reports on evolocumab effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. Evolocumab initiation was associated with a rapid and sustained LDL-C reduction. Persistence with evolocumab was high. Our finding that patients receiving an evolocumab/LLT combination are more likely to attain the LDL-C goal than those receiving evolocumab alone corroborates previous data showing the importance of using highly intensive therapy. Graphical abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02770131 (registration date 27 April 2016).

The German CaRe high registry for familial hypercholesterolemia - Sex differences, treatment strategies, and target value attainment.

Background and aims: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is among the most common genetic disorders in primary care. However, only 15% or less of patients are diagnosed, and few achieve the goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In this analysis of the German Cascade Screening and Registry for High Cholesterol (CaRe High), we examined the status of lipid management, treatment strategies, and LDL-C goal attainment according to the ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines. Methods: We evaluated consolidated datasets from 1501 FH patients diagnosed clinically and seen either by lipid specialists or general practitioners and internists. We conducted a questionnaire survey of both the recruiting physicians and patients. Results: Among the 1501 patients, 86% regularly received lipid-lowering drugs. LDL-C goals were achieved by 26% and 10% of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) according to the 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines, respectively. High intensity lipid-lowering was administered more often in men than in women, in patients with ASCVD, at higher LDL-C and in patients with a genetic diagnosis of FH. Conclusions: FH is under-treated in Germany compared to guideline recommendations. Male gender, genetic proof of FH, treatment by a specialist, and presence of ASCVD appear to be associated with increased treatment intensity. Achieving the LDL-C goals of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines remains challenging if pre-treatment LDL-C is very high.

[Statin intolerance-Statin tolerance]. / Statinunverträglichkeit ­ Statinverträglichkeit.

BACKGROUND: Statins are the first-line treatment for reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, because the evidence regarding safety, tolerability, and reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is very good. For combination treatment several options are available. Nevertheless, LDL cholesterol values are often not sufficiently lowered. One reason is intolerance of the lipid-lowering medications. OBJECTIVE: In addition to the study situation regarding statin tolerability, possible approaches to overcome intolerability are also shown. RESULTS: In randomized trials adverse effects due to statin treatment are as rare as in the placebo groups. In clinical practice patients more frequently report complaints, particularly muscular symptoms. One important reason for intolerability is the nocebo effect. Complaints during treatment can lead to the fact that statins are not taken or are taken in insufficient doses. As a result, the LDL cholesterol level is insufficiently lowered with unfavorable effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events. Therefore, it is important to establish a tolerable treatment together with the patient on an individual basis. Information about the facts is one important aspect. In addition, a positively guided communication with the patient helps to reduce the nocebo effect. CONCLUSION: Most adverse effects that patients attribute to statins are not caused by statins. This shows that other reasons are frequent and should be the focus of medical care. In this article international recommendations and personal experiences of a specialized lipid outpatient clinic are described.

Long-term persistence with evolocumab treatment and sustained reductions in LDL-cholesterol levels over 30 months: Final results from the European observational HEYMANS study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Variability in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level control at a population level is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes. Limited data exist on LDL-C level variability or long-term persistence with the monoclonal antibody evolocumab in routine clinical practice. Using data from the HEYMANS registry, this analysis aimed to assess evolocumab persistence and discontinuation over 30 months of evolocumab treatment and to evaluate at a population level the variability in LDL-C level reductions during the study period. METHODS: HEYMANS was a prospective registry of adults initiating evolocumab in routine clinical practice in 12 European countries. Data were collected for up to and including 6 months before evolocumab initiation and up to 30 months after. Evolocumab discontinuation was analysed for two time periods: 0-12 months and 12-30 months. RESULTS: In total, 1951 patients were included in the study. The median reduction in LDL-C levels was 58% within 3 months after evolocumab initiation; this reduction was maintained over 30 months. More than 90% of patients continued receiving evolocumab at 12 months and 30 months of follow-up. Of patients with an LDL-C level measurement during follow-up, approximately 85% achieved a ≥30% reduction from baseline at each follow-up visit and approximately 60% achieved a ≥50% reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Evolocumab therapy was associated with sustained LDL-C level reductions up to 30 months, and persistence with evolocumab remained high, both at 12 and 30 months. Expanding the use of monoclonal antibodies such as evolocumab could provide improvements in LDL-C level control at a population level in European clinical practice.

The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry-Summary of the ninth annual report.

During 2012-2020, 89 German apheresis centers collected retrospective and prospective observational data of 2028 patients undergoing regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) for the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR). More than 47 500 LA sessions are documented in GLAR. In 2020, all patients treated with LA showed a high immediate median reduction rate of LDL-C (68.2%, n = 1055) and Lp(a) (72.4%, n = 994). Patient data were analyzed for the incidence rate of major coronary events (MACE) 1 and 2 years before the beginning of LA treatment (y-2 and y-1) and prospectively up to 7 years on LA (y + 1 to y + 7). During the first 2 years of LA (y + 1 and y + 2), a MACE reduction of 78% was observed. Current analysis of GLAR data shows very low incidence rates of cardiovascular events in patients with high LDL-C and/or high Lp(a) levels, progressive ASCVD, and maximally tolerated lipid lowering medication regular by LA results.

Efficacy of Long-Term Treatment of Autosomal Recessive Hypercholesterolemia With Lomitapide: A Subanalysis of the Pan-European Lomitapide Study.

Background and aim: Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) metabolism caused by pathogenic variants in the LDLRAP1 gene. Like homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, ARH is resistant to conventional LDL-lowering medications and causes a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs) and aortic valve stenosis. Lomitapide is emerging as an efficacious therapy in classical HoFH, but few data are available for ARH. Results: This is a subanalysis carried out on nine ARH patients included in the Pan-European Lomitapide Study. The age at starting lomitapide was 46 (interquartile range (IQR), 39.0-65.5) years, with a median treatment duration of 31.0 (IQR 14.0-40.5) months. At baseline, four (44.4%) patients had hypertension, one (11.1%) had diabetes mellitus, two (22.2%) were active smokers, and five (55.5%) reported ASCVD. The baseline LDL-C was 257.0 (IQR, 165.3-309.2) mg/dL. All patients were on statins plus ezetimibe, three were receiving Lipoprotein apheresis (LA), and one was also receiving proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i). The addition of lomitapide (mean dose, 10 mg) resulted in the achievement of a median on-treatment LDL-C of 101.7 mg/dL (IQR, 71.3-138.3; 60.4% reduction from baseline), with a best LDL-C value of 68.0 mg/dL (IQR, 43.7-86.7; 73.5% reduction from baseline). During follow-up, one patient stopped both PCSK9i and LA. Recurrence of ASCVD events was reported in one patient. The median on-treatment aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase values were 31.1 (IQR, 22.6-48.3) U/L and 31.1 (IQR, 27.2-53.8) U/L, respectively. Among six ARH patients with available fibroscan examination, liver stiffness values recorded at the last visit were within the normal range (median, 4.7 KPa; IQR, 3.6-5.3 KPa). Conclusion: Lomitapide is effective and safe in ARH therapy as well as in classical HoFH.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels exceed the recommended European threshold for PCSK9i initiation: lessons from the HEYMANS study.

AIMS: To describe the characteristics of patients receiving evolocumab in clinical practice across 12 European countries and simulate the association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction and cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The characteristics of hyperlipidaemic patients at initiation of evolocumab and treatment patterns study-HEYMANS (n = 1952) is a prospective registry of patients ≥18 years old who initiated evolocumab from 1 August 2015 onwards. Mean (standard deviation) age was 60 (10.8), 85% had a prior CV event, 45% were diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), and 60% had statin intolerance. At evolocumab initiation, 43% were receiving any statin, 16% were receiving ezetimibe without statin, and 41% received no background lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), with LDL-C levels reflecting local proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) reimbursement criteria. Median LDL-C decreased from 3.98 to 1.63 mmol/L within 3 months of evolocumab initiation and was maintained over 24 months. Overall, 58% achieved risk-based 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society LDL-C goals but that proportion was higher (68%) in patients receiving background LLT compared with those not receiving background LLT (44%). In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease without FH, the simulated relative CV risk reduction associated with evolocumab treatment was 34% (25-44%). CONCLUSION: Across Europe, LDL-C levels at evolocumab initiation were three times higher than recommended thresholds for PCSK9i initiation, reflecting disparities between implementation and guidelines. More patients attained risk-based LDL-C goals when receiving evolocumab in combination with LLT vs. those not receiving combination therapy. Population health could be improved and LDL-C goals better attained if LDL-C thresholds for PCSK9i reimbursement were lowered, enabling more patients to receive combination therapy when needed.

[Management of dyslipidaemias: The New 2019 ESC/EAS-Guideline]. / Therapieempfehlungen bei Fettstoffwechselstörungen: Die neue Leitlinie von 2019.

The updated guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias 2019 sticks to the concept of individual risk-based intervention strategies, but intensifies LDL-C goals. Next to the established SCORE system non-invasive imaging techniques such as coronary CT or ultrasound of carotid or femoral arteries are now recommended for improved risk stratification. Screening for lipoprotein(a) identifies persons at higher cardiovascular risk. Non-statin trials with ezetimibe and PSCK9-inhibitors demonstrated further relative risk reduction for cardiovascular events. Cardiovascular risk reduction depends on the absolute lowering of LDL-C, duration of therapy and the individual cardiovascular risk. For patients at very high risk the new LDL-C goal is < 1.4 mmol/l (55 mg/dl) and reduction of ≥ 50 % from baseline. The overall aim is to reduce "cholesterol life years".

Lipoprotein(a) - Marker for cardiovascular risk and target for lipoprotein apheresis.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) consists of an LDL particle whose apolipoprotein B (apoB) is covalently bound to apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]). An increased Lp(a) concentration is a causal, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and a predictor of incident or recurrent cardiovascular events. Although Lp(a) was first described as early as 1963, only the more recent results of epidemiological, molecular, and genetic studies have led to this unequivocal conclusion. More than 20% of Western populations have elevated Lp(a) values. Lp(a) concentrations should be always part of the lipid profile when ASCVD risk is assessed. However, presence of other risk factors, laboratory findings, medical history and family history must be considered to conclude on its clinical relevance in an individual patient. Early or progressive ASCVD or a familial predisposition are key findings which can be associated with elevated Lp(a). The cholesterol portion contained in Lp(a) is also included in the various methods of LDL-C measurement. To assess proximity to the cardiovascular risk related target value for LDL-C, appropriate correction should be applied when high Lp(a) values are obtained to estimate the LDL-C that can actually be treated by lipid lowering drugs. Initial study data show that antisense oligonucleotides, which selectively decrease apolipoprotein(a), are promising as future treatment options. Currently, lipoprotein apheresis, which has a reimbursement guideline in Germany, is the therapy of choice for patients with Lp(a)-associated progressive ASCVD, with the aim of sustained prevention of further cardiovascular events.

Modelling the internalisation process of prostate cancer cells for PSMA-specific ligands.

INTRODUCTION: In prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting radioligand therapy, small molecules are regularly internalised by the tumour cells. To determine the effectiveness of these ligands, the internalised fraction over time is derived from cell studies. Parameters, such as the ligand concentration and the number of cells, are experiment-specific and therefore a comparison between ligands is difficult. A more objective approach that allows better comparison is desirable. Therefore, the aim of this work was to develop a compartmental model that fully describes all relevant pharmacokinetic interactions of PSMA-specific ligands with prostate cancer cells. METHODS: Internalisation studies were performed using the lymph node carcinoma of the prostate cell line LNCaP C4-2 and the prostatic carcinoma cell line PC-3. A new protocol was established for the determination of the PSMA-binding specificity by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The experimental data in combination with parameters from literature were used for the modelling approach. RESULTS: A compartmental model which includes the relevant physiological mechanisms was developed. The basic model structure and some parameters originate from the literature. The PSMA-specific association and dissociation rates of Ga-PSMA-11 were measured using surface plasmon resonance technology. The ligand-induced internalisation and PSMA synthesis rates were estimated by fitting the developed model to experimental data obtained using LNCaP C4-2 cells. For all [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 concentrations and including four various incubation times, the ligand-induced internalisation was determined to be (3.6 ±â€¯0.1) % min-1. CONCLUSIONS: The presented approach is a prerequisite for better estimation and thus comparison of important ligand-cell interaction parameters, by combining SPR measurements, cell experiments and mathematical modelling. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT: A compartmental model was developed for evaluation and comparison of PSMA-binding small molecules. A SPR protocol was established for the determination of PSMA-binding specificity.

Lipoprotein(a)-antisense therapy.

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) contribute to the risk of early and severe cardiovascular disease (CVD) and Lp(a) is acknowledged as a risk factor to be included in risk assessment. The established lipid-modifying medical therapies do not lower Lp(a) except niacin but no data of endpoint trials are available. Of the new lipid-modifying drugs a few have some impact on Lp(a). Whether the Lp(a) lowering effect contributes to the reduction of CVD events would have to be shown in Lp(a) dedicated trials. None of the available agents is indicated to lower Lp(a). Lipoprotein apheresis lowers levels of Lp(a) significantly by >60% per treatment. Trial data and data of the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry show that regular apheresis reduces cardiovascular events. The Apo(a) antisense oligonucleotide is the only approach to specifically lower Lp(a). The IONIS-APO(a)Rx phase 1 and 2 trials showed very substantial decreases of Lp(a) and good tolerability. The hepatospecific variant IONIS-APO(a)-LRx is 30 times more potent. The results of the IONIS-APO(a)-LRx phase 2 trial were presented recently. The highest dosages reduced Lp(a) by 72 and 80%; in about 81 and 98% Lp(a) levels <50 mg/dl were achieved. Tolerability and safety were confirmed, whereby injection site reactions were the most common side effects. This raises hope that the planned phase 3 trial will reproduce these findings and show a reduction of cardiovascular events.

Treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors reduces atherogenic VLDL remnants in a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9-I) reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in human studies. Previous studies suggest that PCSK9-I may also affect very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL). We therefore studied VLDL size and composition in a "real-world" study population with the use of ß-quantification. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 350 patients (62 ±â€¯11 years old, 58% men, 22% with diabetes mellitus) with different concomitant lipid lowering therapies, and in whom PCSK9-I treatment was indicated, received either evolocumab (140 mg) or alirocumab (75 or 150 mg). The major lipoprotein fractions were separated by ß-quantification and lipid and apolipoprotein compositions were determined before and 4 weeks after initiation of PCSK9-I treatment. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of PCSK9-I treatment, the ratio of triglycerides to apolipoprotein B in VLDL particles (VLDL-TG/apoB ratio) increased by 40% (p < .0001). VLDL-associated apolipoproteins E, CII, and CIII were reduced by 29.4%, 16.4%, and 12.4%, respectively (all p < .0001). CONCLUSION: PCSK9-I treatment increased VLDL size (estimated by an increased VLDL-TG/apoB ratio) and reduced VLDL-associated apolipoproteins in a heterogeneous "real-world" study-population, reflecting a higher clearance of small atherogenic VLDL remnant particles by PCSK9-I. This may potentially lower cardiovascular risk in clinical routine patients beyond low-density cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction.

Lipid-modifying therapy and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in Germany: The CaReHigh Registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is amongst the most common genetic disorders encountered in primary care. Yet, only a minority of affected patients is diagnosed and treated. This interim analysis of the CaRe High Registry aims at examining the state of treatment and attainment of lipid goals in German FH patients. METHODS: The CaRe High registry includes FH patients from lipid clinics and private practices. Data have been collected using questionnaires filled in by the recruiting physicians and by interviewing the participating patients. RESULTS: We examined 512 F H patients diagnosed according to clinical criteria. Median age at the time of the first FH diagnosis was 39 (25th and 75th percentile: 27-50) years, median treatment naïve LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) was 239.4 mg/dl (6.19 mmol/l), 25th to 75th percentile 191.8-342.5 mg/dl (4.96-8.86 mmol/l). 27% of the participants did not receive lipid-lowering drugs. Among the patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs, 19% received a PCSK9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) in combination with a statin, 9% were treated with a PCSK9i alone and 3% were treated with a combination of PCSK9i and a non-statin drug. Patients with pre-existing CVD were more likely to be treated with lipid-lowering drugs and more likely to receive a PCSK9i, but LDL-C targets were only achieved by a minority of patients (<20%). Gap to target LDL-C was lowest and the median achieved LDL-C reduction was 1.4 times higher with PCSK9i treatment than with (oral) lipid-lowering therapy without PCSK9i. CONCLUSIONS: The Care High registry has included patients with the typical clinical features of familial hypercholesterolemia. PCSK9i treatment in addition to standard therapy allows attainment of target values in many patients with initially very high LDL-C.

Autosomal Recessive Hypercholesterolemia: Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH) is a rare lipid disorder characterized by premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). There are sparse data for clinical management and cardiovascular outcomes in ARH. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of changes in lipid management, achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals and cardiovascular outcomes in ARH. METHODS: Published ARH cases were identified by electronic search. All corresponding authors and physicians known to treat these patients were asked to provide follow-up information, using a standardized protocol. RESULTS: We collected data for 52 patients (28 females, 24 males; 31.1 ± 17.1 years of age; baseline LDL-C: 571.9 ± 171.7 mg/dl). During a mean follow-up of 14.1 ± 7.3 years, there was a significant increase in the use of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe in combination with lipoprotein apheresis; in 6 patients, lomitapide was also added. Mean LDL-C achieved at nadir was 164.0 ± 85.1 mg/dl (-69.6% from baseline), with a better response in patients taking lomitapide (-88.3%). Overall, 23.1% of ARH patients reached LDL-C of <100 mg/dl. During follow-up, 26.9% of patients had incident ASCVD, and 11.5% had a new diagnosis of aortic valve stenosis (absolute risk per year of 1.9% and 0.8%, respectively). No incident stroke was observed. Age (≥30 years) and the presence of coronary artery disease at diagnosis were the major predictors of incident ASCVD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite intensive treatment, LDL-C in ARH patients remains far from targets, and this translates into a poor long-term cardiovascular prognosis. Our data highlight the importance of an early diagnosis and treatment and confirm the fact that an effective treatment protocol for ARH is still lacking.

Lipoprotein(a)-apheresis in the light of new drug developments.

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) contribute to the risk of early and severe cardiovascular disease (CVD). Recently <50 mg/dl was recommended as the desirable level for clinical use and decision making. All established medical therapies to lower cholesterol levels have no impact on lowering Lp(a) except niacin which is all too often poorly tolerated and not obtainable everywhere. Lipoprotein apheresis is an extracorporeal treatment to lower levels of Lp(a) significantly by > 60%. In some countries it is recommended in very high risk patients with early or progressive CVD. Retrospective data indicate that regular apheresis reduces cardiovascular events, which was substantiated by a recent prospective observational trial. Apheresis is very well tolerated with very few side effects, but it is expensive, time consuming, and offered by specialised centres only. To improve the overall treatment new drug therapies are required. Some of the recently approved lipid modifying drugs lower Lp(a) in addition to LDL-cholesterol: Mipomersen âˆ¼ 25%, CETP-inhibitors âˆ¼ 50%, PCSK9-inhibitors âˆ¼ 30%. If the Lp(a) lowering effect contributes to the expected reduction of CVD events has to be shown in the future. The apo(a) antisense oligonucleotide is the only approach to specifically lower Lp(a). A phase 1 trial showed a decrease in a dose dependant manner (up to 88.8%) in healthy volunteers. Despite the lack of prospective randomised trials apheresis these days remains the standard of care in patients with elevated Lp(a) and severe CVD.

Relationship of hyperlipidemia to comorbidities and lung function in COPD: Results of the COSYCONET cohort.

Although hyperlipidemia is common in COPD, its relationship to comorbidities, risk factors and lung function in COPD has not been studied in detail. Using the baseline data of the COSYCONET cohort we addressed this question. Data from 1746 COPD patients (GOLD stage 1-4; mean age 64.6 y, mean FEV1%pred 57%) were evaluated, focusing on the comorbidities hyperlipidemia, diabetes and cardiovascular complex (CVC; including arterial hypertension, cardiac failure, ischemic heart disease). Risk factors comprised age, gender, BMI, and packyears of smoking. The results of linear and logistic regression analyses were implemented into a path analysis model describing the multiple relationships between parameters. Hyperlipidemia (prevalence 42.9%) was associated with lower intrathoracic gas volume (ITGV) and higher forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) when adjusting for its multiple relationships to risk factors and other comorbidities. These findings were robust in various statistical analyses. The associations between comorbidities and risk factors were in accordance with previous findings, thereby underlining the validity of our data. In conclusion, hyperlipidemia was associated with less hyperinflation and airway obstruction in patients with COPD. This surprising result might be due to different COPD phenotypes in these patients or related to effects of medication.