Increasing the bioavailability of oral esketamine by a single dose of cobicistat: A case study.

BACKGROUND: Intranasal esketamine is an approved drug for treatment­resistant depression (TRD); however, it is costly and may result in specific adverse effects. In this single case study, we explored if oral esketamine can be a suitable alternative. METHODS: In collaboration with a 39­year­old female with TRD, we compared plasma concentration curves of intranasal (84 mg) and oral (1, 2 and 4 mg/kg) esketamine. Because oral esketamine has a relatively low bioavailability, it results in a different ratio between esketamine and its primary metabolite noresketamine. To increase the bioavailability of oral esketamine, we co­administered a single dose of the cytochrome P­450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor cobicistat (150 mg). RESULTS: For all doses administered, oral esketamine resulted in lower esketamine but higher noresketamine peak plasma concentrations compared with intranasal treatment. Using oral esketamine it was not possible to generate a similar esketamine plasma concentration curve as with the intranasal treatment, except when combined with cobicistat (esketamine 2 mg/kg plus cobicistat 150 mg). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that cobicistat effectively increases the bioavailability of oral esketamine. Further research is required in a larger population, especially to investigate the clinical benefit of cobicistat as a booster drug for oral esketamine.

A genetic risk score to predict treatment nonresponse in psychotic depression.

Psychotic depression is a severe and difficult-to-treat subtype of major depressive disorder for which higher rates of treatment-resistant depression were found. Studies have been performed aiming to predict treatment-resistant depression or treatment nonresponse. However, most of these studies excluded patients with psychotic depression. We created a genetic risk score (GRS) based on a large treatment-resistant depression genome-wide association study. We tested whether this GRS was associated with nonresponse, nonremission and the number of prior adequate antidepressant trials in patients with a psychotic depression. Using data from a randomized clinical trial with patients with a psychotic depression (n = 122), we created GRS deciles and calculated positive prediction values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and odds ratios (OR). Nonresponse and nonremission were assessed after 7 weeks of treatment with venlafaxine, imipramine or venlafaxine plus quetiapine. The GRS was negatively correlated with treatment response (r = -0.32, p = 0.0023, n = 88) and remission (r = -0.31, p = 0.0037, n = 88), but was not correlated with the number of prior adequate antidepressant trials. For patients with a GRS in the top 10%, we observed a PPV of 100%, a NPV of 73.7% and an OR of 52.4 (p = 0.00072, n = 88) for nonresponse. For nonremission, a PPV of 100%, a NPV of 51.9% and an OR of 21.3 (p = 0.036, n = 88) was observed for patients with a GRS in the top 10%. Overall, an increased risk for nonresponse and nonremission was seen in patients with GRSs in the top 40%. Our results suggest that a treatment-resistant depression GRS is predictive of treatment nonresponse and nonremission in psychotic depression.

The Relationship of Early Sleep Improvement With Response to Pharmacotherapy in Unipolar Psychotic Depression.

BACKGROUND: Since insomnia and depression are interrelated, improved sleep early in antidepressant pharmacotherapy may predict a positive treatment outcome. We investigated whether early insomnia improvement (EII) predicted treatment outcome in psychotic depression (PD) and examined if there was an interaction effect between EII and treatment type to assess if findings were treatment-specific. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial comparing 7 weeks treatment with the antidepressants venlafaxine, imipramine and venlafaxine plus the antipsychotic quetiapine in PD ( n = 114). Early insomnia improvement, defined as ≥20% reduced insomnia after 2 weeks, was assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17). Associations between EII and treatment outcome were examined using logistic regressions. Subsequently, we added interaction terms between EII and treatment type to assess interaction effects. The predictive value of EII was compared with early response on overall depression (≥20% reduced HAM-D-17 score after 2 weeks). RESULTS: EII was associated with response (odds ratio [OR], 7.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-23.4; P = <0.001), remission of depression (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.6-22.3; P = 0.009), and remission of psychosis (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.6-10.9; P = 0.004). We found no interaction effects between EII and treatment type on depression outcome. Early insomnia improvement and early response on overall depression had a comparable predictive ability for treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Early insomnia improvement was associated with a positive outcome in pharmacotherapy of PD, regardless of the medication type. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings and to examine the generalizability of EII as predictor in treatment of depression.

[Prevention of delirium in the Intensive Care Unit]. / Preventie van delier op de intensive care.

Delirium is highly prevalent in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and is strongly associated with negative patient outcomes. We aimed to present an overview of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in ICU patients. Multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions are proven effective in the prevention of delirium. These interventions are aimed at multiple domains, including re-orientation, providing a safe and healing environment, cognitive stimulation, mobilization and family engagement. A special type of multicomponent intervention is the ''A-F bundle'', comprising both non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. Multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions and the ''A-F bundle'' are recommended. There is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of pharmacological prophylaxis using antipsychotics, dexmedetomidine, melatonin or thiamin, except for delirium due to substance withdrawal. Therefore, pharmacological interventions should be aimed at minimizing delirogenousmedication (especially benzodiazepines and opiates), adequate pain management and the prevention of deep and continuous sedation.

[Consider (es)ketamine for treatment-resistant depression]. / Overweeg (es)ketamine bij therapieresistente depressie.

Major depressive disorder has a high prevalence globally. Although pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy are effective for most patients, about one third is treatment resistant. Ketamine, known as an anesthetic, is a new treatment option that can be effective in patients with treatment-resistant depression. (es)ketamine works relatively fast. However, the long-term effects are still relatively unknown. In the Netherlands, S-Ketamine is currently administered in various forms, of which only the nasal spray is registered for treatment-resistant depression. Currently, many studies have been conducted on the use of (es)ketamine. In this article we describe the latest state of affairs regarding its effectiveness and safety.

Effectiveness of Genotype-Specific Tricyclic Antidepressant Dosing in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Evidence of the clinical benefit of pharmacogenetics-informed treatment (PIT) with antidepressants is still limited. Especially for tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), pharmacogenetics may be of interest because therapeutic plasma concentrations are well defined, identification of optimal dosing can be time consuming, and treatment is frequently accompanied by adverse effects. Objective: To determine whether PIT results in faster attainment of therapeutic TCA plasma concentrations compared with usual treatment in patients with unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial compared PIT with usual treatment among 111 patients at 4 centers in the Netherlands. Patients were treated with the TCAs nortriptyline, clomipramine, or imipramine, with clinical follow-up of 7 weeks. Patients were enrolled from June 1, 2018, to January 1, 2022. At inclusion, patients had unipolar nonpsychotic MDD (with a score of ≥19 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAMD-17]), were aged 18 to 65 years, and were eligible for TCA treatment. Main exclusion criteria were a bipolar or psychotic disorder, substance use disorder, pregnancy, interacting comedications, and concurrent use of psychotropic medications. Intervention: In the PIT group, the initial TCA dosage was based on CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes. The control group received usual treatment, which comprised the standard initial TCA dosage. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was days until attainment of a therapeutic TCA plasma concentration. Secondary outcomes were severity of depressive symptoms (measured by HAMD-17 scores) and frequency and severity of adverse effects (measured by Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Rating scores). Results: Of 125 patients randomized, 111 (mean [SD] age, 41.7 [13.3] years; 69 [62.2%] female) were included in the analysis; of those, 56 were in the PIT group and 55 were in the control group. The PIT group reached therapeutic concentrations faster than the control group (mean [SD], 17.3 [11.2] vs 22.0 [10.2] days; Kaplan-Meier χ21 = 4.30; P = .04). No significant difference in reduction of depressive symptoms was observed. Linear mixed-model analyses showed that the interaction between group and time differed for the frequency (F6,125 = 4.03; P = .001), severity (F6,114 = 3.10; P = .008), and burden (F6,112 = 2.56; P = .02) of adverse effects, suggesting that adverse effects decreased relatively more for those receiving PIT. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, PIT resulted in faster attainment of therapeutic TCA concentrations, with potentially fewer and less severe adverse effects. No effect on depressive symptoms was observed. These findings indicate that pharmacogenetics-informed dosing of TCAs can be safely applied and may be useful in personalizing treatment for patients with MDD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03548675.

Biomarkers as predictors of treatment response to tricyclic antidepressants in major depressive disorder: A systematic review.

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are frequently prescribed in case of non-response to first-line antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Treatment of MDD often entails a trial-and-error process of finding a suitable antidepressant and its appropriate dose. Nowadays, a shift is seen towards a more personalized treatment strategy in MDD to increase treatment efficacy. One of these strategies involves the use of biomarkers for the prediction of antidepressant treatment response. We aimed to summarize biomarkers for prediction of TCA specific (i.e. per agent, not for the TCA as a drug class) treatment response in unipolar nonpsychotic MDD. We performed a systematic search in PubMed and MEDLINE. After full-text screening, 36 papers were included. Seven genetic biomarkers were identified for nortriptyline treatment response. For desipramine, we identified two biomarkers; one genetic and one nongenetic. Three nongenetic biomarkers were identified for imipramine. None of these biomarkers were replicated. Quality assessment demonstrated that biomarker studies vary in endpoint definitions and frequently lack power calculations. None of the biomarkers can be confirmed as a predictor for TCA treatment response. Despite the necessity for TCA treatment optimization, biomarker studies reporting drug-specific results for TCAs are limited and adequate replication studies are lacking. Moreover, biomarker studies generally use small sample sizes. To move forward, larger cohorts, pooled data or biomarkers combined with other clinical characteristics should be used to improve predictive power.

Tricyclic antidepressants for major depressive disorder: a comprehensive evaluation of current practice in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) have an important place in treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Today, often other antidepressant medications are considered as first step in the pharmacological treatment of MDD, mainly because they are associated with less adverse effects, whereby the position of TCAs appears unclear. In this study we aimed to examine the current practice of TCAs in treatment of unipolar MDD. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was applied. First, a selection of leading international and national guidelines was reviewed. Second, actual TCA prescription was examined by analyzing health records of 75 MDD patients treated with the TCAs nortriptyline, clomipramine or imipramine in different centers in the Netherlands. Third, promotors and barriers influencing the choice for TCAs and dosing strategies were explored using semi-structured interviews with 24 Dutch psychiatrists. RESULTS: Clinical practice guidelines were sometimes indirective and inconsistent with each other. Health records revealed that most patients (71%) attained therapeutic plasma concentrations within two months of TCA use. Patients who achieved therapeutic plasma concentrations reached them on average after 19.6 days (SD 10.9). Both health records and interviews indicated that therapeutic nortriptyline concentrations were attained faster compared to other TCAs. Various factors were identified influencing the choice for TCAs and dosing by psychiatrists. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline recommendations and clinical practice regarding TCA prescription for MDD vary. To increase consistency in clinical practice we recommend development of an up-to-date guideline integrating selection and dosing of TCAs, including the roles of therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetics. Such a guideline is currently lacking and would contribute to optimal TCA treatment, whereby efficacy and tolerability may be increased.

Association of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and white blood cell count with response to pharmacotherapy in unipolar psychotic depression: An exploratory analysis.

Background: Low-grade inflammation occurs in a subgroup of patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and may be associated with response to antidepressant medications. The Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and total White Blood cell Count (WBC) are markers of systemic inflammation which have not been investigated as predictors for outcome to pharmacotherapy in unipolar depression yet. Moreover, the association between inflammation and treatment response has not been studied in unipolar Psychotic Depression (PD). We conducted an exploratory analysis to examine the prognostic significance of NLR and WBC in pharmacotherapy of PD. Methods: Baseline NLR and WBC were examined in their association with response to seven weeks of treatment with antidepressants (venlafaxine or imipramine) and the combination of an antidepressant with an antipsychotic (venlafaxine plus quetiapine) in 87 patients with PD. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), depression severity, duration of the current episode and number of previous depressive episodes. Secondary outcomes were remission of depression and disappearance of psychotic symptoms. Results: Higher NLR was associated with increased response to pharmacotherapy (Exp(B) 1.66, 95 % CI 1.03-2.66, p = 0.036), but not with remission of depression or disappearance of psychotic symptoms. WBC was not associated with any of the outcome measures. Conclusion: NLR may be a novel, inexpensive and widely available biomarker associated with response to pharmacotherapy in PD. The association between white blood cell measures and treatment outcome should be further investigated for different types of antidepressants in PD and in non-psychotic MDD.

Successful treatment of severe, treatment resistant GHB withdrawal through thiopental-coma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) use disorder (GUD), withdrawal can have a fulminant course with rapid progression of severe, potentially life-threatening complications. Case: We present a 45-year old man with severe GHB withdrawal, resistant to conventional treatment with pharmaceutical GHB, high doses of benzodiazepines and baclofen. GHB withdrawal finally responded to thiopental-induced coma therapy, with burst suppression pattern on electroencephalography (EEG). The patient fully recovered, without withdrawal or residual neuropsychiatric symptoms. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first case report in which barbiturates were used to induce a coma to treat severe, treatment resistant GHB withdrawal. This case suggests barbiturate coma therapy might be considered in severe GHB withdrawal which does not respond to conventional treatment.