Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
J Health Econ ; 92: 102803, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37688931

RESUMEN

We link data on regional Organized Screening Programs (OSPs) throughout Europe with survey data and population-based cancer registries to estimate effects of OSPs on breast cancer screening (mammography), incidence, and mortality. Identification is from regional variation in the existence and timing of OSPs, and in their age-eligibility criteria. We estimate that OSPs, on average, increase mammography by 25 percentage points, increase breast cancer incidence by 16% five years after the OSPs implementation, and reduce breast cancer mortality by about 10% ten years after.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Tamizaje Masivo , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Incidencia , Mamografía , Mortalidad
2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 9245, 2023 06 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37286569

RESUMEN

This article uses novel data collected on a weekly basis covering more than 35,000 individuals in the EU to analyze the relationship between trust in various dimensions and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. We found that trust in science is negatively correlated, while trust in social media and the use of social media as the main source of information are positively associated with vaccine hesitancy. High trust in social media is found among adults aged 65+, financially distressed and unemployed individuals, and hesitancy is largely explained by conspiracy beliefs among them. Finally, we found that the temporary suspension of the AstraZeneca vaccine in March 2021 significantly increased vaccine hesitancy and especially among people with low trust in science, living in rural areas, females, and financially distressed. Our findings suggest that trust is a key determinant of vaccine hesitancy and that pro-vaccine campaigns could be successfully targeted toward groups at high risk of hesitancy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Emociones , Confianza , Anciano , Masculino
3.
BMC Geriatr ; 20(1): 453, 2020 11 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153444

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence is lacking on the differences between hospitalisation of people with dementia living in nursing homes and those living in the community. The objectives of this study were: 1) to describe the frequency of hospital admission among people with dementia in eight European countries living in nursing homes or in the community, 2) to examine the factors associated with hospitalisation in each setting, and 3) to evaluate the costs associated with it. METHODS: The present study is a secondary data analysis of the RightTimePlaceCare European project. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with data collected from people with dementia living at home or who had been admitted to a nursing home in the last 3 months, as well as from their caregivers. Data on hospital admissions at 3 months, cognitive and functional status, neuropsychiatric symptoms, comorbidity, polypharmacy, caregiver burden, nutritional status, and falls were assessed using validated instruments. Multivariate regression models were used to investigate the factors associated with hospital admission for each setting. Costs were estimated by multiplying quantities of resources used with the unit cost of each resource and inflated to the year 2019. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 1700 people with dementia living in the community and nursing homes. Within 3 months, 13.8 and 18.5% of people living in nursing homes and home care, respectively, experienced ≥1 hospital admission. In the nursing home setting, only polypharmacy was associated with a higher chance of hospital admission, while in the home care setting, unintentional weight loss, polypharmacy, falls, and more severe caregiver burden were associated with hospital admission. Overall, the estimated average costs per person with dementia/year among participants living in a nursing home were lower than those receiving home care. CONCLUSION: Admission to hospital is frequent among people with dementia, especially among those living in the community, and seems to impose a remarkable economic burden. The identification and establishment of an individualised care plan for those people with dementia with polypharmacy in nursing homes, and those with involuntary weight loss, accidental falls, polypharmacy and higher caregiver burden in the home care setting, might help preventing unnecessary hospital admissions.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Estudios Transversales , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/epidemiología , Demencia/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Humanos , Casas de Salud
4.
Health Econ ; 29(2): 209-222, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31755206

RESUMEN

Regulated prices are common in markets for medical care. We estimate the effect of changes in regulated reimbursement prices on volume of hospital care based on a reform of hospital financing in Germany. Uniquely, this reform changed the overall level of reimbursement-with increasing prices for some hospitals and decreasing prices for others-without directly affecting the relative prices for different groups of patients or types of treatment. Based on administrative data, we find that hospitals react to increasing prices by decreasing the service supply and to decreasing prices by increasing the service supply. Moreover, we find some evidence that volume changes for hospitals with different price changes are nonlinear. We interpret our findings as evidence for a negative income effect of prices on volume of care.


Asunto(s)
Administración Financiera de Hospitales/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Hospitales/tendencias , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Adulto , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino
5.
J Health Econ ; 69: 102271, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31874377

RESUMEN

We examine sources of regional variation in ambulatory care utilization in Germany. We exploit patient migration to examine which share of regional variation in ambulatory care utilization can be attributed to demand factors and to supply factors, respectively. Based on administrative claim-level data we find that regional variation can be overwhelmingly explained by patient characteristics. Our results contrast with previous results for other countries, and they suggest that institutional rules in Germany successfully constrain supply-side variation in ambulatory care use between German regions for most patients. Furthermore, we find that both demographics and other patient characteristics substantially contribute to regional variation and that causes of regional variation vary when comparing different regions within Germany.


Asunto(s)
Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Alemania , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Área Pequeña , Adulto Joven
6.
Z Gerontol Geriatr ; 52(8): 751-757, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30770992

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The balance of care approach is a strategic planning framework that can be used to research the adequacy of care arrangements and the cost implications. It seeks to identify people who are on the margins of care, i. e. whose care and nursing needs could be met in more than one setting, and explores the relative costs of the possible alternatives. This article describes a balance of care application for people with dementia in a transitional phase between home and institutional care in Germany. METHODS: A sequential mixed-methods design was applied that combined empirical data, the decision of healthcare professionals (panels) and cost estimates in a structured way. Data were collected as part of the RightTimePlaceCare project from 235 people with dementia and their caregivers in 2 settings, in nursing homes and domestic care. RESULTS: Based on five key variables, case types of people with dementia with comparable needs were developed. In panels with healthcare professionals there was consensus that people represented by four of these case types could by cared for at home while the reference group of actual study participants was currently being cared for in nursing homes. For these four case types, exemplary home care arrangements were formulated, costs were estimated and compared to institutional care costs. CONCLUSION: There is a potential for home care for a significant group of people with dementia currently admitted to institutional care. Some of the alternative home care arrangements were cost-saving. Despite some limitations, the study demonstrated the utility of the balance of care approach to support the development of empirically based expert recommendations on care provision.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Casas de Salud , Cuidadores , Alemania , Humanos
7.
Health Econ Rev ; 8(1): 25, 2018 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30259207

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This paper analyses the volume-outcome relationship and the effects of minimum volume regulations in the German hospital sector. METHODS: We use a full sample of administrative data from the unselected, complete German hospital population for the years 2005 to 2007. We apply regression methods to analyze the association between volume and hospital quality. We measure hospital quality with a binary variable, which indicates whether the patient has died in hospital. Using simulation techniques we examine the impact of the minimum volume regulations on the accessibility of hospital services. RESULTS: We find a highly significant negative relationship between case volume and mortality for complex interventions at the pancreas and oesophagus as well as for knee replacement. For liver, kidney and stem cell transplantation as well as for CABG we could not find a strong association between volume and quality. Access to hospital care is only moderately affected by minimum volume regulations. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of minimum volume regulations depends on the type of intervention. Depending on the type of intervention, quality gains can be expected at the cost of slightly decreased access to care.

8.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 19(1): 95.e1-95.e10, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29275939

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the additional societal costs for people living with dementia (PwD) with agitation in home care (HC) and institutional long-term care (ILTC) settings in 8 European countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional data from the RightTimePlaceCare cohort. SETTING: HC and ILTC settings from 8 European countries (Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and England). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1997 PwD (1217 in HC group and 780 lived in an ILTC) and their caregivers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical care, community care, and informal care were recorded using the Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) questionnaire. Agitation was assessed based on the agitation symptoms cluster defined by the presence of agitation and/or irritability and/or disinhibition and/or aberrant motor behavior items of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q). RESULTS: Total monthly mean cost differences due to agitation were 445€ in the HC setting and 561€ in the ILTC setting (P = .01 and .02, respectively). Informal care costs were the main driver in the HC group (73% of total costs) and institutional care costs were the main driver in the ILTC group (53% of total costs). After adjustments, the log link generalized linear mixed model showed an association between agitation symptoms and an increase of informal care costs by 17% per month in HC setting (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This study found that agitation symptoms have a substantial impact on informal care costs in the community care setting. Future research is needed to evaluate which strategies may be efficient by improving the cost-effectiveness ratio and reducing the burden associated with informal care in the management of agitation in PwD.


Asunto(s)
Demencia/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Casas de Salud , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/economía , Agitación Psicomotora/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Transversales , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/terapia , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Masculino , Atención al Paciente/economía , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Agitación Psicomotora/diagnóstico , Agitación Psicomotora/terapia
9.
J Health Econ ; 56: 330-351, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29248059

RESUMEN

To equalize differences in health plan premiums due to differences in risk pools, the German legislature introduced a simple Risk Adjustment Scheme (RAS) based on age, gender and disability status in 1994. In addition, effective 1996, consumers gained the freedom to choose among hundreds of existing health plans, across employers and state-borders. This paper (a) estimates RAS pass-through rates on premiums, financial reserves, and expenditures and assesses the overall RAS impact on market price dispersion. Moreover, it (b) characterizes health plan switchers and investigates their annual and cumulative switching rates over time. Our main findings are based on representative enrollee panel data linked to administrative RAS and health plan data. We show that sickness funds with bad risk pools and high pre-RAS premiums lowered their total premiums by 42 cents per additional euro allocated by the RAS. Consequently, post-RAS, health plan prices converged but not fully. Because switchers are more likely to be white collar, young and healthy, the new consumer choice resulted in more risk segregation and the amount of money redistributed by the RAS increased over time.


Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados , Selección Tendenciosa de Seguro , Seguro de Salud/economía , Ajuste de Riesgo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Algoritmos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
10.
Health Policy ; 119(11): 1459-71, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26518906

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Informal (dementia) care has economic consequences throughout the health care system. Whilst the health and wellbeing of the care recipient might improve, the health of the caregiver might also change, typically for the worse. Therefore, this analysis aims to examine the association between caregiving intensity and caregivers' health and health care utilization. DATA AND METHODS: The empirical analysis is based on cross-sectional survey data generated by the European Project "RightTimePlaceCare" (RTPC). RTPC was a prospective cohort study conducted in eight European countries (Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Spain and the United Kingdom). The health status of 1029 informal caregivers was assessed by measures of psychological wellbeing (GHQ-12) and self-rated overall health (EQ-VAS). Health care utilization was measured by (i) the self-stated proportion of health care use influenced by caregiving and (ii) the probability of at least one visit to a general practitioner within in the last 30 days. The association between caregiving intensity and caregivers' health and health care utilization was assessed by descriptive analysis and multivariate OLS- and probit-models. RESULTS: A higher amount of informal care was significantly related to negative health outcomes for informal caregivers. On average, one additional hour of informal caregiving per day was associated with a decrease of psychological wellbeing and self-rated overall health by 0.16 and 0.42 index points respectively. Furthermore, one more hour of informal caregiving corresponded with increased self-stated proportion of health care use by 0.56 percentage points. However, the claim of increased health care demand due to caregiving as measured by GP visits was only partly confirmed. CONCLUSION: When evaluating the full economic effect of informal care, the impact of providing care on caregivers' health and health care utilization has to be taken into account.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Demencia , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Investigación Empírica , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Psicológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Eur J Health Econ ; 16(7): 689-707, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25069577

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dementia is the most common cause of functional decline among elderly people and is associated with high costs of national healthcare in European countries. With increasing functional and cognitive decline, it is likely that many people suffering from dementia will receive institutional care in their lifetime. To delay entry to institutional care, many European countries invest in home and community based care services. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare costs for people with dementia (PwD) at risk for institutionalization receiving professional home care (HC) with cost for PwD recently admitted to institutional long-term nursing care (ILTC) in eight European countries. Special emphasis was placed on differences in cost patterns across settings and countries, on the main predictors of costs and on a comprehensive assessment of costs from a societal perspective. METHODS: Interviews using structured questionnaires were conducted with 2,014 people with dementia and their primary informal caregivers living at home or in an ILTC facility. Costs of care were assessed with the resource utilization in dementia instrument. Dementia severity was measured with the standardized mini mental state examination. ADL dependence was assessed using the Katz index, neuropsychiatric symptoms using the neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) and comorbidities using the Charlson. Descriptive analysis and multivariate regression models were used to estimate mean costs in both settings. A log link generalized linear model assuming gamma distributed costs was applied to identify the most important cost drivers of dementia care. RESULTS: In all countries costs for PwD in the HC setting were significantly lower in comparison to ILTC costs. On average ILTC costs amounted to 4,491 Euro per month and were 1.8 fold higher than HC costs (2,491 Euro). The relation of costs between settings ranged from 2.4 (Sweden) to 1.4 (UK). Costs in the ILTC setting were dominated by nursing home costs (on average 94%). In the HC setting, informal care giving was the most important cost contributor (on average 52%). In all countries costs in the HC setting increased strongly with disease severity. The most important predictor of cost was ADL independence in all countries, except Spain and France where NPI severity was the most important cost driver. A standard deviation increase in ADL independence translated on average into a cost decrease of about 22%. CONCLUSION: Transition into ILTC seems to increase total costs of dementia care from a societal perspective. The prevention of long-term care placement might be cost reducing for European health systems. However, this conclusion depends on the country, on the valuation method for informal caregiving and on the degree of impairment.


Asunto(s)
Demencia/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Casas de Salud/economía , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidadores/economía , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Institucionalización/economía , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Eur J Health Econ ; 15(5): 497-514, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23744174

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this study I aim to explore the statistical causes of country differences in mammography screening among women aged 50-69 years in 13 European countries. I focus on the relative importance of individual (e.g. age, education, etc.) and institutional (e.g. public screening programmes) factors in explaining these differences. DATA AND METHODS: I use individual level data from the first three waves (2004-2006-2009) of the SHARE as well as regional and country level data on institutional factors. The analytical approach is based on multilevel statistical models, which allow me to analyse the contribution of individual and institutional factors in explaining the variation in breast cancer screening across European countries. RESULTS: I find that the standard deviation in screening rates across countries increases slightly from 19.5 to 20.8 per cent after controlling for individual factors. Observed individual factors such as age, education, health status, etc., do not significantly contribute to the explanation of cross-country differences. In contrast, after controlling for observed institutional factors such as the availability of an organised screening programme, the standard deviation drops from 20.86 to 12.92 per cent. These factors can statistically explain about 40 per cent of the between-country differences in screening rates. Moreover, I found that these institutional factors seem to prevent a woman from considering a mammogram "not necessary". CONCLUSION: This analysis provides important insights about patient's attitudes and understanding of benefits of breast cancer prevention and highlights the importance of the availability of an organised screening programme for screening differences across European countries.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Internacionalidad , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos
13.
Health Econ ; 20(11): 1281-97, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20949645

RESUMEN

We analyse the determinants of influenza vaccination take-up of Europeans above the age of 50 years using the first two waves of the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement (SHARE). Using quality-of-care indicators, special emphasis is put on the measurement and the impact of physician quality. We find that age, health status, lifestyle, labour-force status, and the family structure are important determinants of the decision to get a flu shot. Physician quality, as measured by four indicators, also positively affects the probability of getting a flu shot.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales/normas , Estado de Salud , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Empleo , Europa (Continente) , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Estilo de Vida , Modelos Lineales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos
14.
Patient Educ Couns ; 84(2): 208-16, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20708897

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that patients' ratings of physician empathy (PE) would be higher among those with private health insurance (PHI, referring to financial incentive) than among patients with statutory health insurance (SHI). METHODS: A postal survey was administered to 710 cancer patients. PE was assessed using the Consultation-and-Relational-Empathy measure. T-tests were conducted to analyse whether PHI and SHI-patients differ in their ratings of PE and variables relating to contact time with the physician. Structural-equation-modelling (SEM) verified mediating effects. RESULTS: PHI-patients rated physician empathy higher. SEM revealed that PHI-status has a strong significant effect on frequency of talking with the physician, which has a strong significant effect (1) on PE and (2) has a moderate effect on patients' perception of medical staff stress, thereby also affecting patients' ratings of PE. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that PHI-status is one necessary precondition for physicians spending more time with the patient. Spending more time with the PHI-patient has two major effects: it results in a more positive perception of PE and positively impacts PHI-patients' perception of medical staff stress, which in turn, again influences PE. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Health policy should discuss these findings in terms of equality in receiving high-quality care.


Asunto(s)
Empatía , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Motivación , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Capitación , Comunicación , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Financiación Personal , Política de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Médicos/psicología , Sector Privado , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Eur J Health Econ ; 12(5): 405-16, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20496158

RESUMEN

This paper shows that patients with private health insurance (PHI) are being offered significantly shorter waiting times than patients with statutory health insurance (SHI) in German acute hospital care. This behavior may be driven by the higher expected profitability of PHI relative to SHI holders. Further, we find that hospitals offering private insurees shorter waiting times when compared with SHI holders have a significantly better financial performance than those abstaining from or with less discrimination.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Seguro de Salud , Prejuicio , Sector Privado , Listas de Espera , Algoritmos , Alemania , Hospitales Privados/economía , Hospitales Públicos/economía , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
Int J Equity Health ; 8: 44, 2009 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20025744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate in Germany about the assumption that patients with private health insurance (PHI) benefit from better access to medical care, including shorter waiting times (Lüngen et al. 2008), compared to patients with statutory health insurance (SHI). PROBLEM: Existing analyses of the determinants for waiting times in Germany are a) based on patient self-reports and b) do not cover the inpatient sector. This paper aims to fill both gaps by (i) generating new primary data and (ii) analyzing waiting times in German hospitals. METHODS: We requested individual appointments from 485 hospitals within an experimental study design, allowing us to analyze the impact of PHI versus SHI on waiting times (Asplin et al. 2005). RESULTS: In German acute care hospitals patients with PHI have significantly shorter waiting times than patients with SHI. CONCLUSION: Discrimination in waiting times by insurance status does occur in the German acute hospital sector. Since there is very little transparency in treatment quality in Germany, we do not know whether discrimination in waiting times leads to discrimination in the quality of treatment. This is an important issue for future research.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...