Flexibility-tilt agreement best predicts shoulder balance following posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: We propose a novel concept, called flexibility-tilt agreement (FTA), which could be applied intra-operatively to improve shoulder balance following posterior spine fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). We retrospectively applied this concept to a cohort with thoracic-only curves, seeking to: (1) evaluate the impact of FTA and other peri-operative variables on post-operative shoulder balance, and (2) evaluate deformity characteristics associated with achieving FTA. METHODS: A single-institution registry was queried for patients undergoing PSF from 2000 to 2017 with main thoracic and double thoracic curves with at least 2-year follow-up. Flexibility was defined as the Cobb angle of the unfused proximal thoracic curve (cephalad to chosen UIV) on pre-operative bender. Tilt refers to post-operative UIV tilt angle. FTA means these values cancel (Flexibility + Tilt = 0 ± 5°). Logistic regression was performed to determine the association between peri-operative variables and shoulder balance. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one patients were included, mean age 13.6 years old, and 47-month mean follow-up. FTA was achieved in 74 (46%) patients and was associated with post-operative (OR = 4.59) and final (OR = 6.98) medial shoulder balance with a threshold of 6° (AUC = 0.77, p = 0.038). FTA was the best predictor of shoulder balance of all tested variables. CONCLUSION: Patients that showed flexibility-tilt agreement, or FTA, had vastly increased odds of medial and lateral shoulder balance at a minimum of 2-year follow-up for all thoracic curves. Future studies can evaluate whether applying FTA to determine intra-operative corrective maneuvers prospectively leads to improvements in shoulder balance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Effect of Cervicothoracic Junction LIV Selection on Posterior Cervical Fusion Mechanical Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Analyze and summarize literature evaluating the role of C7, T1, and T2 lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection in posterior cervical fusion (PCF) and if this affects the progression of mechanical failure and revision surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Literature evaluating mechanical failure and adjacent segment disease in the setting of PCF at or nearby the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) remains limited with studies reporting conflicting results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two reviewers conducted a detailed systematic review using EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar on June 28, 2021, for primary research articles comparing revision and complication rates for posterior fusions ending in the lower cervical spine (C7) and upper thoracic spine (T1-T2). The initial systematic database yielded 391 studies, of which 10 met all inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analyses compared revision and mechanical failure rates between patients with an LIV above the CTJ and patients with an LIV below the CTJ. RESULTS: Data from 10 studies (total sample=2001, LIV above CTJ=1046, and LIV below CTJ=955) were meta-analyzed. No differences were found between the 2 cohorts for all-cause revision [odds ratio (OR)=0.75, 95% CI=0.42-1.34, P<0.0001] and construct-specific revision (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.25-1.53, P<0.0001). The odds of total mechanical failure in the LIV below CTJ cohort compared with the LIV above CTJ cohort were significantly lower (OR=0.38, 95% CI=0.18-0.81, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results show patients with PCFs ending below the CTJ have a lower risk of undergoing total mechanical failure compared with fusions ending above the CTJ. This is important information for both physicians and patients to consider when planning for operative treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes following correction of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescence vs young adulthood.

PURPOSE: The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been well documented, but the impact of age at the time of surgical correction is relatively understudied. In this study, we matched patients undergoing surgical correction of adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS) with a cohort of AIS patients to compare: (1) coronal and sagittal radiographic correction, (2) operative variables, and (3) postoperative complications. METHODS: A single-institution scoliosis registry was queried for patients undergoing idiopathic scoliosis surgery from 2000-2017. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients with idiopathic scoliosis, no previous spine surgery, and 2-year follow-up. AdIS patients were matched 1:2 with AIS patients based on Lenke classification and curve characteristics. Independent sample t-test and Chi-square test was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: 31 adults underwent surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis and were matched with 62 adolescents. Mean age of adults was 26.2 ± 11.05, mean BMI was 25.6 ± 6.0, and 22 (71.0%) were female. Mean age of adolescents was 14.2 ± 1.8, mean BMI was 22.7 ± 5.7, and 41(66.7%) were female. AdIS had significantly less postoperative major Cobb correction (63.9% vs 71.3%, p = 0.006) and final major Cobb correction (60.6% vs 67.9%, p = 0.025). AdIS also had significantly greater postoperative T1PA (11.8 vs 5.8, p = 0.002). AdIS had longer operative times (p = 0.003), higher amounts of pRBCs transfused (p = 0.005), longer LOS (p = 0.016), more ICU requirement (p = 0.013), higher overall complications (p < 0.001), higher rate of pseudarthrosis (p = 0.026), and more neurologic complications (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Adult patients undergoing surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis had significantly worse postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment when compared with adolescent patients. Adult patients also had higher rates of complications, longer operative times, and longer hospital stays. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Radiographic Parameters in Cervical Myelopathy: Review of Current Literature.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a narrative review. OBJECTIVES: Provide a comprehensive review of radiographic alignment parameters and their effect on procedure selection, surgical decision-making, and clinical outcomes for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of radiographic parameters to predict prognosis and surgical outcomes in patients with CSM is an evolving field given the complex presentation of patients with this condition. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed for surgical treatment of CSM, with an emphasis on cervical radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The principal goals of spine surgery can be broken down into decompression, stabilization, and restoration of alignment. The principle of restoring balance takes careful preoperative planning and attention to radiographic parameters including cervical lordosis, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, neck tilt, thoracic inlet angle, T1 slope, K-line, and modified K-line. Surgical interventions for CSM include anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical fusion, or laminoplasty and careful consideration of radiographic measures guide surgical decision-making is essential to ensure optimal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Utilization of key radiographic parameters in surgical planning and decision-making allows surgeons to optimize clinical outcomes for CSM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Outcomes Following Direct Versus Indirect Decompression Techniques for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare outcomes at 3 and 12 months for patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with direct decompression (DD) versus indirect decompression (ID) techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Debate persists regarding the optimal surgical strategy to treat lumbar spondylolisthesis. Novel techniques relying on ID have shown superior radiographic outcomes compared to DD, however, doubt remains regarding their effectiveness in achieving adequate decompression. Currently, there is a paucity of data comparing the clinical efficacy of DD to ID. METHODS: The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), a national, multicenter prospective spine registry, was queried for patients who underwent DD and ID between April 2013 and January 2019. Propensity scores for each treatment were estimated using logistic regression dependent on baseline covariates potentially associated with outcomes. The propensity scores were used to exclude nonsimilar patients. Multivariable regression analysis was performed with the treatment and covariate as independent variables and outcomes as dependent variables. RESULTS: A total of 4163 patients were included in the DD group and 86 in the ID group. The ID group had significantly lower odds of having a longer hospital stay and for achieving 30% improvement in back and leg pain at 3 months. These trends were not statistically significant at 12 months. There were no differences in ED5D scores or Oswestry disability index 30% improvement scores at 3 or 12 months. ID patient had a significantly higher rate of undergoing a repeat operation at 3 months (4.9% vs. 1.5%, P =0.015). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that both DD and ID for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis result in similar clinical outcomes, with the exception that those treated with ID experienced a lower reduction in back and leg pain at 3 months and a higher 3-month reoperation rate. This data can provide surgeons with additional information when counseling patients on the pros and cons of ID versus DD surgery.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients with Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Commercial Insurance.

As more commercial insurance companies adopt a bundled reimbursement model, similar to the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) algorithm for Medicare beneficiaries, accurate risk adjustment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is critical to ensure success. With this movement toward bundled reimbursement, it is unknown if a formula adjusting for similar risks in the Medicare population could be applied to PROs in commercially insured and Medicare Advantage populations undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study was performed to compare PROs after TKA in these insurance groups after adjusting for proposed risks. Demographics and clinical data were abstracted from medical records of 302 patients who underwent TKA performed by a single surgeon at a university-based orthopaedic practice during 2013 to 2017. Differences in PROs between commercially insured, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare patients during the 6 months following surgery were evaluated while controlling for demographics, clinical data, and baseline PRO scores. Medicare and Medicare Advantage patients were older (p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (p = 0.001) than commercial patients. During the first 3 months following TKA, patients in all three groups experienced similar rates of recovery. At 6 months after surgery, outcomes began to diverge by insurance group. Medicare patients reported significantly less ability to perform activities of daily living (78.6 vs. 63.2; p = 0.001), worse physical function (39.6 vs. 44.9; p = 0.003), and more pain interference (57.9 vs. 52.4; p = 0.018) at day 180 than commercially insured patients. There were no statistically significant differences between Medicare Advantage patients and either commercially insured or Medicare patients. Therefore, commercial insurance companies that intend to apply a risk-adjusted equation similar to the CJR algorithm to commercial populations should be cautioned since the postoperative outcomes in this investigation differed after adjusting for the same risk factors that have been proposed for inclusion in the CJR algorithm. Nonetheless, further studies should be performed to ensure that companies participating in bundled reimbursement models have a positive influence on comprehensive health care for patients and providers. This is a level III, retrospective prognostic study.