Report of a phase I evaluation of dose and schedule of interleukin-1 alpha and cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced tumors: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (PX990) and review of IL-1-based studies of hematopoietic reconstitution.

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a cytokine critical to inflammation, immunological activation, response to infection, and bone marrow hematopoiesis. Cyclophosphamide downmodulates immune suppressor cells and is cytotoxic to a variety of tumors. A phase I trial of IL-1 and cyclophosphamide was conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. This study evaluated 3 dose levels and 3 schedules in patients with solid tumors. The goal was to evaluate the hematopoietic supportive care effect and possible antitumor effect. Toxicity was fever, chills, hypotension, nausea/emesis, hepatic, and neutropenia. Toxicity increased with dose increases of interleukin-1. Treatment at all dose levels resulted in significant increases in total white blood cell (WBC) counts above baseline. Nadir WBC and nadir absolute neutrophil counts were not significantly different by dose level of IL-1 or schedule of IL-1. Toxicity due to IL-1 at higher doses prohibited further evaluation of this agent for hematopoietic support, particularly in view of the activity and tolerability of more lineage-specific hematopoietic cytokines. Therapeutic interventions in the role of IL-1 in inflammatory conditions and cancer may be further informed by our definition of its clinical and biological effects in this evaluation of dose and schedule.

A phase I study of the chinese herbal medicine PHY906 as a modulator of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PHY906 is a novel Chinese herbal preparation that has been used in the Orient for over 1800 years to treat a wide range of gastrointestinal side effects including diarrhea, abdominal cramps, vomiting, fever, and headache. Preclinical and clinical studies were conducted to further investigate the biologic and clinical activities of this herbal medicine. To ensure standardization and maintain interbatch reliability of PHY906, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to establish a "chemical fingerprint" of PHY906. In vivo preclinical studies using the murine Colon 39 tumor model showed that PHY906 protected against the weight loss associated with irinotecan treatment. In the presence of PHY906, mice were able to tolerate otherwise lethal doses of irinotecan. Significantly improved antitumor activity and overall survival were observed in animals treated with the combination of irinotecan and PHY906 versus irinotecan alone. The combination of PHY906 with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) also resulted in at least additive antitumor activity with no increased host toxicity. Based on these in vivo studies, a phase I multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose escalation, cross-over study of PHY906 as a modulator of the weekly, bolus regimen of irinotecan, 5-FU, and LV (IFL) in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) was conducted. The specific objectives of this clinical trial were to determine the safety and tolerability of PHY906 when administered concomitantly with the bolus, weekly IFL regimen. Treatment with PHY906 did not alter the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU, irinotecan, or the irinotecan metabolite SN-38.

Phase I study of bryostatin 1, a protein kinase C modulator, preceding cisplatin in patients with refractory non-hematologic tumors.

PURPOSE: Preclinical data suggested that bryostatin-1 (bryo) could potentiate the cytotoxicity of cisplatin when given prior to this drug. We designed a phase I study to achieve tolerable doses and schedules of bryo and cisplatin in combination and in this sequence. METHODS: Patients with non-hematologic malignancies received bryo followed by cisplatin in several schedules. Bryo was given as an 1 and a 24 h continuous infusion, while cisplatin was always given over 1 h at 50 and 75 mg/m(2); the combined regimen was repeated on an every 3-week and later on an every 2-week schedule. Bryo doses were escalated until recommended phase II doses were defined for each schedule. Patients were evaluated with computerized tomography every 2 cycles. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were entered. In an every 2-week schedule, the 1-h infusion of bryo became limited by myalgia that was clearly cumulative. With cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) its recommended phase II dose was 30 microg/m(2). In the 3-week schedule, dose-limiting toxicities were mostly related to cisplatin effects while myalgias were tolerable. Pharmacokinetics unfortunately proved to be unreliable due to bryo's erratic extraction. Consistent inhibition of PKC isoform eta (eta) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was observed following bryo. CONCLUSIONS: Bryo can be safely administered with cisplatin with minimal toxicity; however, only four patients achieved an objective response. Modulation of cisplatin cytotoxicity by bryo awaits further insight into the molecular pathways involved.

Randomized phase II trial of cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan compared with cetuximab and bevacizumab alone in irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer: the BOND-2 study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of concurrent administration of two monoclonal antibodies, cetuximab and bevacizumab, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized phase II study in patients with irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer. All patients were naïve to both bevacizumab and cetuximab. Patients in arm A received irinotecan at the same dose and schedule as last received before study entry, plus cetuximab 400 mg/m2 loading dose, then weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m2, plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg administered every other week. Patients in arm B received the same cetuximab and bevacizumab as those in arm A but without irinotecan. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan (CBI) and 40 patients received cetuximab and bevacizumab alone (CB). Toxicities were as would have been expected from the single agents. For the CBI arm, time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7.3 months and the response rate was 37%; for the CB arm, TTP was 4.9 months and the response rate was 20%. The overall survival for the CBI arm was 14.5 months and the overall survival for the CB-alone arm was 11.4 months. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab and bevacizumab can be administered concurrently, with a toxicity pattern that seems to be similar to that which would be expected from the two agents alone. This combination plus irinotecan also seems to be feasible. The activity seen with the addition of bevacizumab to cetuximab, or to cetuximab plus irinotecan, seems to be favorable when compared with historical controls of cetuximab or cetuximab/irinotecan in patients who are naïve to bevacizumab.

Heat shock fusion protein-based immunotherapy for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.

OBJECTIVES: SGN-00101 (HspE7, Nventa, San Diego, CA) is a novel therapeutic vaccine consisting of a fusion protein containing an M. bovis BCG heat shock protein (Hsp65) covalently linked to the entire sequence of HPV 16 E7. This trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of HspE7 in women with CIN III. METHODS: HIV (-) women with biopsy-proven CIN III were eligible. Two cohorts were accrued; one cohort to establish efficacy and a second cohort with a longer follow-up period to improve the precision of the trial to estimate response rates. Each patient underwent 3 monthly subcutaneous vaccinations with 500 microg of HspE7 followed by monthly colposcopic follow-up for 1 month in cohort 1 and an extended observation period (2 months) in cohort 2. All patients then underwent a LEEP or cone biopsy of the cervix. A complete pathologic response (pCR) was defined as no evidence of CIN or CIN I (only HPV changes). A partial response (PR) was defined as colposcopic lesion regression of >50% in size. Cervicovaginal lavage samples were obtained at each visit for HPV typing using MY09/ MY11 HPV PCR. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were registered and screened, of whom 64 were eligible. Fifty-eight patients completed the trial and were evaluable (31 in cohort 1, 27 in cohort 2). There were no significant epidemiologic or HPV type differences between the 2 cohorts so responses were combined for analysis. Of the 58 evaluable patients, 13 (22.5%) had a pCR; 32 (55%) had a PR and 11 (19%) had stable disease. Two (3.5%) patients in cohort 2 had microinvasive disease and were defined as progressive disease. Thirty-three of 58 (57%) of the patients were infected with HPV 16 prior to vaccination or in subsequent visits. There was no significant difference in regression in women infected with HPV 16 compared to those without HPV 16 infection (88% vs. 70%; p=0.12). Women who had a previous LEEP or ablation for CIN were 2.7 times more likely to have a complete response compared to patients without previous treatment, although the difference was not statistically significant (95% CI for rate ratio: 0.95-6.19, p=0.10). At a cellular level, there was a significant association between local inflammation and response; lower grade of lesional inflammation correlated with a response to HspE7 (p=0.04 using Wilcoxon rank sum test). CONCLUSIONS: HspE7 appeared to demonstrate activity in women with CIN III and met a priori assumptions for efficacy; however, it is unclear whether this response was due to natural regression rather than treatment effect. HspE7, which targets the HPV 16 E7 oncoprotein, had efficacy in patients infected with HPV types other than 16, suggesting cross-reactivity. A larger randomized, controlled trial is needed to better define efficacy and to identify subsets of women most likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

Targeted therapy in colorectal cancer.

Adjuvant therapy can reduce the risk of disease recurrence in patients with stage II-IV colorectal cancer. Recently, 3 monoclonal antibodies have been shown to improve clinical outcome in this group of patients. Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenesis agent that has been shown in clinical and preclinical models to reverse the effects of proangiogenic molecules. Bevacizumab is active in the adjuvant setting and in the treatment of metastatic disease. Cetuximab is targeted to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Panitumumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G2 antibody that also binds to the epidermal growth factor receptor. Combination therapies of monoclonal therapies and chemotherapy have resulted in better clinical outcomes than with either modality alone.

Phase II clinical trial of parenteral hydroxyurea and hyper-fractionated, accelerated external beam radiation therapy in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: toxicity and efficacy with continuous ribonucleoside reductase inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Almost all concurrent chemoradiation regimens for head and neck are platinum based; however, cisplatin is associated with severe renal, oto-, and neurotoxicity. Hydroxyurea (HU) has been associated with fewer irreversible toxicities. We obtained HU in parenteral form to be administered continually during the radiation treatment. Intravenous HU promised better pharmacokinetics and cell cycle blockade. METHODS: Participants had biopsy-proven, untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx (stage IV) and hypopharynx (stages II-IV). Radiation therapy consisted initially of 74.4 Gy administered in twice daily 1.2-Gy fractions. After 20 patients, the radiation dose was reduced to 60.0 Gy, and another 16 patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Patients received HU by Continuous Ambulatory Drug Delivery (CADD) pump on a daily x5 schedule during radiation therapy. Because of persistent long-term dysphagia, after 20 patients, the dose of external beam radiation therapy was reduced from 74 to 60 Gy, and the duration of concurrent HU was correspondingly reduced. The new regimen was much better tolerated. The median survival for the group as a whole was 30 months. Within this small study, there were no significant differences in survival, regional control, or local control between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lower doses of concurrent parenteral HU and hyper-fractionated radiation therapy are tolerable and promising.

Molecular targeting in pancreatic cancer.

The mortality and morbidity of tumors of the upper GI tract are formidable with incidence and mortality nearly the same. Therefore, better therapies are necessary, and these are generally molecularly targeted therapies. This chapter focuses on the treatment of pancreatic cancer with targeted therapy. Important cellular pathways are reviewed, including signal transduction, proteasome inhibition, cell cycle, anti-angiogenesis pathways, immunologic therapies, viral therapy, epigenetic therapies and microarray analysis. Signal transduction pathways include epidermal growth factor receptors, such as cetuximab and Tarceva, as well as other less well-defined pathways. Proteasome inhibition includes inhibition of the 26S proteasome with PS-341. Cell cycle therapies include inhibitors of all the proteins involved in pushing the cell through the cell cycle. Viral therapies mainly cover the adenoviruses, like ONYX-015, and Reolysin, a type 3 serotype Dearing strain with little pathogenicity. Immunological therapies include cytokines, vaccines and cell-based therapies. Epigenetic therapies are mainly centered around histone deacetylases. Microarray analysis analyzes expression of thousands of genes to create a tumor profile, mainly for prognosis or prediction. Various promising treatment strategies are reviewed in terms of treatment with molecularly-guided therapies. Complications of therapy, particularly rash and thrombosis are reviewed.

A phase I safety and dose escalation trial of docetaxel combined with GEM231, a second generation antisense oligonucleotide targeting protein kinase A R1alpha in patients with advanced solid cancers.

PURPOSE: GEM231 is a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide targeting the mRNA of the R1alpha regulatory subunit of cAMP dependent protein kinase A. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic antitumor activity when GEM231 is combined with docetaxel. This trial assesses the safety of this combination. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Docetaxel was administered once every three weeks (one-cycle) at doses between 50-75 mg/m2. GEM231 was administered twice weekly at 220 mg/m2 for 3 (schedule-A), or 2 (schedule-B) weeks. RESULTS: Twenty patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced cancer received a total of 39 cycles of therapy. Six patients in schedule-A received docetaxel 50 mg/m2, and 14 patients in schedule-B received docetaxel 50-75 mg/m2. In schedule-A, 2 of 6 patients developed cycle-1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT)-grade-3 fatigue or grade-3 serum transaminase elevation. In schedule-B, 1 of 4 patients developed cycle-1 DLT at the highest dose of docetaxel tested (75 mg/m2)--grade-3 febrile neutropenia. Subsequent dose escalations were not pursued since the overall incidence of grade-3 toxicities (including those that occurred after cycle 1) was 75%, and this dose was close to the single agent MTD of docetaxel. Grade-3 toxicities included fatigue (2 patients), transaminase elevation (4 patients), and altered mentation (1 patient). The mean post-infusion aPTT was significantly higher than the pre-infusion value [14.8 seconds; p<0.001]; however, there were no hemorrhagic episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for further development of the combination of docetaxel and GEM231 is 75 mg/m2 and 220 mg/m2, respectively. It is important to administer GEM231 twice weekly for 2 consecutive weeks followed by a one-week break.

Phase I/II study of preoperative oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and external-beam radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 89901.

PURPOSE: The addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves survival. This phase I/II study evaluated the addition of weekly oxaliplatin to preoperative continuous infusion fluorouracil (FU) and external-beam radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical T3/T4 rectal adenocarcinoma and no evidence of metastases were treated with weekly oxaliplatin, continuous infusion FU 200 mg/m2 intravenously, and RT. A total of 6 weekly doses of oxaliplatin were planned. RT dose was 1.8 Gy/fraction to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. In the phase I portion, oxaliplatin was escalated from 30 to 60 mg/m2. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were entered onto the study, 18 on the phase I portion and 26 on the phase II portion. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for oxaliplatin was determined to be 60 mg/m2. At the MTD, 12 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, two patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia, and one patient experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Fifty-six percent of patients entered at the MTD completed all 6 weeks of oxaliplatin. Eight (25%) of 32 patients enrolled at the phase II dose experienced a pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter study, the addition of oxaliplatin to intravenous continuous infusion FU and RT for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was associated with a high pathologic complete response rate but more toxicity than when FU is used alone. A regimen of weekly oxaliplatin, continuous infusion FU, and radiation therapy is now being evaluated by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project.

Phase II trial of thalidomide for advanced and recurrent gynecologic sarcoma: a brief communication from the New York Phase II consortium.

OBJECTIVE: To define the efficacy of thalidomide on the overall survival of patients with metastatic recurrent gynecologic sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with sarcoma or carcinosarcoma of gynecologic origin and documented recurrence or persistence of disease after appropriate surgery, radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy were recruited to the study. All patients were ambulatory and had measurable disease that could be documented on CT scan. Patients were started on 200 mg/day of thalidomide orally every night and escalated by 100-200 mg every 7 to 14 days. The length of the treatment was separated into 2 cycles with the first 84 days defined as the first cycle and the next 56 days as the second cycle. Common Toxicity Criteria were used to record toxicities. Because thalidomide was postulated to induce cytostasis, the end-points were progression-free and overall survival in this mixed group of patients. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled. The drug was not well tolerated because of constipation, fatigue, worsening performance status, drowsiness and sleepiness. The total dosage of medication given to each patient ranged from 3200 mg to 40,500 mg. The maximum dosage reached in each patient ranged from 300 mg to 750 mg, with the total time of treatment ranging from 13 to 99 days. All patients had progression of disease with a median progression-free survival time of 1.84 months (CI 1.54-2.79 months) and a median overall survival of 6.64 months. DISCUSSION: Thalidomide has no activity in patients with advanced or recurrent gynecologic sarcomas and was not well-tolerated. The overall survival was <7 months. The progression-free survival was <3 months, and, since the therapy was not tolerated well, we unanimously decided to close the study at this point. Despite the poor result, we still believe in the strategy of anti-angiogenesis and will continue to pursue other potential treatment options using the same concept.

Prolonged topotecan infusion with cisplatin in the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: an NYGOG and ECOG study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the toxicity and efficacy of combined therapy with cisplatin and prolonged infusion topotecan as front line therapy in women with epithelial ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with previously untreated, measurable and non-measurable epithelial ovarian cancer, stages Ic-IV were eligible. Patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by topotecan 0.3 to 0.4 mg/m(2)/day given as a continuous infusion over 14-21 days, every 28 days. Dose levels and duration of infusion were adjusted for toxicity as appropriate. Patients were evaluated for response to treatment and treatment toxicity by standard NYGOG criteria. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. Among the 20 patients with post-surgical residual disease >2 cm, 80% [95% CI (56.3%, 94.3%)] demonstrated an objective response to therapy. The median progression-free survival for all 60 patients enrolled was 19.3 months with a median overall survival of 45.6 months given the median follow-up of 55 months (range 6-81 months). Five year survival is estimated to be 41%. Toxicity was observed in the first four patients treated with topotecan (0.4 mg/m(2)/day x 21 days) and dosing was continued at 0.3 mg/m(2)/day x 14 days thereafter. Of the 56 patients treated at the amended dose level, marrow suppression continued to be dose-limiting, with 86% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, 55% experiencing grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and 50% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 anemia. Nonetheless, only 11/245 cycles administered were associated with febrile neutropenia and/or infection (8 port-related). Other non-hematologic toxicity was as expected. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: This large, multicenter phase II study of prolonged infusion topotecan in combination with cisplatin demonstrated similar response, time to progression and survival compared with reported results of taxane and platinum combinations. Hematologic toxicity was greater but tolerated. Further studies investigating topotecan in combination with platinum therapy as a first line agent are warranted.

A multicenter Phase II study of bortezomib in recurrent or metastatic sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Based on evidence of activity in preclinical and Phase I studies, the authors undertook a study of bortezomib, a reversible proteasome inhibitor, for patients with metastatic sarcomas. METHODS: Two arms were opened, each using a Simon two-stage design. Arm A included patients with osteogenic sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. Arm B accrued patients with other types of soft tissue sarcomas. Patients were not allowed to have received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The initial dose of bortezomib was a 1.5 mg/m2 intravenous push twice weekly followed by a rest week. The dose was escalated to 1.7 mg/m2 if patients tolerated Cycle 1 well. The dose escalation was eliminated due to toxicity observed in the first six patients. RESULTS: Painful neuropathy, myalgias, and asthenia were the most significant observed toxicities. The most frequent toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, constipation, and nausea. Pharmacodynamic data from 18 patients with complete data collection did not show consistent differences between patients with or without Grade 2 or Grade 3 neuropathy (toxicity graded according the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). Arm A had low accrual and was closed. One confirmed partial response among 21 evaluable patients was observed on Arm B in a patient with leiomyosarcoma. Due to the inactivity of this agent, the study was closed after the first stage of accrual. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib has minimal activity in soft tissue sarcoma as a single agent. If studied further in sarcomas, bortezomib should be investigated in combination with agents with demonstrated preclinical synergy.

Decreased short- and long-term swallowing problems with altered radiotherapy dosing used in an organ-sparing protocol for advanced pharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a reduced radiotherapy dose on short- and long-term swallowing problems after organ-sparing treatment. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 29 patients with advanced oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer who were treated with intravenous hydroxyurea and concomitant hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy. INTERVENTIONS: Initial experience with 74.4 Gy of radiation demonstrated severe long-term swallowing problems, prompting a dose reduction to 60.0 Gy. Eighteen patients were followed up for this study in the 74.4-Gy group, while 11 were in the 60.0-Gy group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Swallowing variables were assessed in both patient groups at 4 months and at 12 months following completion of therapy. RESULTS: Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were similar in each group, while significant differences were noted in the posttreatment clinical swallowing variables. Persistent severe odynophagia at 4 months (89% [16/18] vs 30% [3/10]) and at 12 months (64% [7/11] vs 11% [1/9]) was greater in the 74.4-Gy group (P =.002). Clinical signs of aspiration were also increased in the 74.4-Gy group, with 81% (13/16) vs 11% (1/9) at 4 months and 60% (6/10) vs 11% (1/9) at 12 months (P<.05). Most striking, however, was the incidence of long-term gastrostomy, with 78% (14/18) of patients receiving 74.4 Gy requiring gastrostomy feedings at 12 months compared with 18% (2/11) in the 60.0-Gy group (P =.002). Local control was unchanged by the altered dosing, with median follow-ups of 43.5 and 24.0 months in the 74.4-Gy and 60.0-Gy groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Decreased radiation doses can maintain disease control and reduce treatment-related long-term swallowing complications.

Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea.

PURPOSE: To update and expand on previously published clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea. METHODS: An expert multidisciplinary panel was convened to review the recent literature and discuss recommendations for updating the practice guidelines previously published by this group in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 1998. MEDLINE searches were performed and the relevant literature published since 1998 was reviewed by all panel members. The treatment recommendations and algorithm were revised by panel consensus. RESULTS: A recent review of early toxic deaths occurring in two National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative group trials of irinotecan plus high-dose fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer has led to the recognition of a life-threatening gastrointestinal syndrome and highlighted the need for vigilant monitoring and aggressive therapy for this serious complication. Loperamide remains the standard therapy for uncomplicated cases. However, the revised guidelines reflect the need for recognition of the early warning signs of complicated cases of diarrhea and the need for early and aggressive management, including the addition of antibiotics. Management of radiation-induced diarrhea is similar but may not require hospitalization, and chronic low- to intermediate-grade symptoms can be managed with continued loperamide. CONCLUSION: With vigilant monitoring and aggressive therapy for cancer treatment-induced diarrhea, particularly in patients with early warning signs of severe complications, morbidity and mortality may be reduced.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor, 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone, administered by 96-hour intravenous continuous infusion.

PURPOSE: 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP; Triapine; Vion Pharmaceuticals Inc, New Haven, CT) is a potent inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase, with activity in preclinical tumor model systems. A phase I trial was initiated to determine the dose-limiting toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of a 96-hour intravenous (IV) continuous infusion in patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Initially, courses were administered every 3 weeks, using an accelerated titration design. Subsequently, courses were administered every 2 weeks, and the dose was escalated in cohorts of three to six patients. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled, seven on the every-3-week schedule and 14 on the every-other-week schedule. Three of six patients at 160 mg/m(2)/d developed dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia, hyperbilirubinemia, and nausea or vomiting. Based on these initial results, the dose for 3-AP was re-escalated beginning at 80 mg/m(2)/d but administered every 2 weeks. At 120 mg/m(2)/d, three of seven patients had dose-limiting but reversible asthenia, hyperbilirubinemia, and azotemia or acidosis; however, in the case of renal and hepatic adverse events, the events were related to pre-existing borderline abnormal organ function. Therefore, the recommended phase II dose for 3-AP administered by 96-hour IV infusion is 120 mg/m(2)/d every 2 weeks. Detailed pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated linear kinetics up to 160 mg/m(2), with substantial inter-patient variability. There was no correlation between dose and clearance (R(2) = 0.0137). There were no objective responses, but there was prolonged stabilization of disease or decreases in serum tumor markers associated with stable disease in four patients. CONCLUSION: The 96-hour infusion of 3-AP is safe and well tolerated at the recommended phase II doses. Phase II trials of Triapine are ongoing.

Phase II trial of the combination of bryostatin-1 and cisplatin in advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: a New York Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

OBJECTIVES: Bryostatin-1 is a macrocyclic lactone that has been shown to regulate protein kinase C (PKC) activity and thereby potentially inhibit tumor invasion, angiogenesis, cell adhesion, and multidrug resistance. In preclinical experiments, bryostatin-1 induces tumor growth inhibition and enhances cytotoxicity when combined with other agents including cisplatin in cervical cancer cells. It was therefore anticipated that combination bryostatin-1-cisplatin therapy would be effective in patients with cervical cancer. The current study was conducted to evaluate this therapeutic approach in patients with recurrent or advanced-stage cervical carcinoma. METHODS: An IRB-approved New York Gynecologic Oncology Group (NYGOG) trial was activated for patients with a histological diagnosis of metastatic cervical cancer or in patients with recurrent disease not eligible for surgery or radiation. Enrolled patients received bryostatin-1 (50-65 microg/m(2)) as a 1-h infusion followed by cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)). The combined treatment was administered every 21 days. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled. The majority of patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Ten out of fourteen patients had recurrent disease. Fifty percent of the patients received bryostatin at 50 microg/m(2) and 50% received bryostatin at 65 microg/m(2). Seventy-one percent completed two cycles of treatment. The most common grade II-III toxicities were myalgia, anemia, and nausea or vomiting. One patient developed a hypersensitivity reaction and one developed grade III nephrotoxicity. Seventy-one percent (10/14) of patients were evaluated for tumor response. Eight out of ten (80%) of patients had progressive disease and 2/10 (20%) had stable disease. There were no treatment responses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite promising preclinical data, this clinical trial indicates that the combination of cisplatin and bryostatin-1 at the doses and schedule used is not effective in patients with advanced-stage or recurrent cervical cancer. There is even the possibility of therapeutic antagonism. The development of a serum assay for bryostatin-1 and additional mechanistic studies would be useful for future bryostatin clinical trials.

A phase II trial of interleukin-12 in patients with advanced cervical cancer: clinical and immunologic correlates. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E1E96.

PURPOSE: The ability to mount lymphoproliferative responses to peptides derived from the human papillomavirus (HPV) E6 and E7 oncoproteins has been associated with regression of dysplastic lesions of the uterine cervix and loss of associated HPV infection. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a potent immunopotentiator of T-cell function, and has been shown in phase I clinical trials to be tolerable. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were required to have measurable metastatic, recurrent or inoperable cervical carcinoma. Patients could have had one prior adjuvant regimen and one prior regimen for advanced disease. Treatment consisted of IL-12 administered at 250 ng/kg IV as a rapid push in the outpatient setting daily x 5 every 21 days. Whole blood samples were acquired twice before treatment then approximately every 3 weeks to assess lymphoproliferative response in vitro to HPV type 16 (HPV 16) E4, E6, and E7 peptides. These responses were correlated with demographics and with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled; 29 were evaluable. Over half had received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The most common serious toxicities were hematologic or hepatic, and all were reversible. There was one partial responder (3%). The median survival was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.8, 11.5 months). Eighteen of 29 eligible patients had evaluable laboratory data both pre- and post-therapy. There was a statistically significant increase in lymphoproliferative responses for HPV 16 E4, E6, and E7 peptides (P=0.020, 0.020, 0.043). There was a significant association between change in lymphoproliferative response to HPV 16 E6 peptides and number of cycles of treatment administered (P=0.048). There was no correlation between change in lymphoproliferative response to any peptide with age, performance status, race, prior chemotherapy, time from diagnosis to treatment, or with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: IL-12 treatment was associated with improved lymphoproliferative responses to HPV 16 E4, E6, and E7 peptides. This is the first clinical trial to demonstrate induction of cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses to specific antigens (peptides) following treatment with IL-12 in women with cervical cancer. This improvement in immune response was not associated with enhanced objective response or survival.