RESUMEN
The presence of a lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) should prompt a more detailed preprocedural evaluation of the vertebral column to accurately determine spinal levels. An LSTV should prompt the use of corroborating intraprocedural imaging to verify morphology. The most important factors in treating lumbosacral transitional segments are communication among treating physicians to ensure segmental enumeration consistency and associated appropriate patient treatment.
Asunto(s)
Variación Biológica Individual , Inyecciones Epidurales , Vértebras Lumbares/anatomía & histología , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Sacro/anatomía & histología , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Sacro/patología , Esteroides/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Understanding the functional effects of the wide-range of aberrant genetic characteristics associated with the human chromosome 8q24 region in cancer remains daunting due to the complexity of the locus. The most logical target for study remains the MYC proto-oncogene, a prominent resident of 8q24 that was first identified more than a quarter of a century ago. However, many of the amplifications, translocation breakpoints, and viral integration sites associated with 8q24 are often found throughout regions surrounding large expanses of the MYC locus that include other transcripts. In addition, chr.8q24 is host to a number of single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with cancer risk. Yet, the lack of a direct correlation between cancer risk alleles and MYC expression has also raised the possibility that MYC is not always the target of these genetic associations. The 8q24 region has been described as a "gene desert" because of the paucity of functionally annotated genes located within this region. Here we review the evidence for the role of other loci within the 8q24 region, most of which are non-coding transcripts, either in concert with MYC or independent of MYC, as possible candidate gene targets in malignancy.
RESUMEN
Tumor progression is the continual selection of variant subpopulations of malignant cells that have acquired increasing levels of genetic instability (Nowell Science 1976, 194, 23-28). This instability is manifested as chromosomal aneuploidy or translocations, viral integration or somatic mutations that typically affect the expression of a gene (oncogene) that is especially damaging to the proper function of a cell. With the recent discovery of non-coding RNAs such as microRNAs (miRNAs), the concept that a target of genetic instability must be a protein-encoding gene is no longer tenable. Over the years, we have conducted several studies comparing the location of miRNA genes to positions of genetic instability, principally retroviral integration sites and chromosomal translocations in the mouse as a means of identifying miRNAs of importance in carcinogenesis. In this current study, we have used the most recent annotation of the mouse miRome (miRBase, release 16.0), and several datasets reporting the sites of integration of different retroviral vectors in a variety of mouse strains and mouse models of cancer, including for the first time a model that shows a propensity to form solid tumors, as a means to further identify or define, candidate oncogenic miRNAs. Several miRNA genes and miRNA gene clusters stand out as interesting new candidate oncogenes due to their close proximity to common retroviral integration sites including miR-29a/b/c and miR106a~363. We also discussed some recently identified miRNAs including miR-1965, miR-1900, miR-1945, miR-1931, miR-1894, and miR-1936 that are close to common retroviral integration sites and are therefore likely to have some role in cell homeostasis.