The Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Childhood.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy in children is performed either lapa - roscopically (LA) or by open surgery (OA). We studied whether, and how, the outcome is affected by the technique used and by the intraoperative conversion of LA to OA. METHODS: We analyzed routine data from children and adolescents in three age groups (1-5 years, 6-12 years, and 13-17 years) who were insured by the AOK statutory health insurance carrier in Germany and who underwent appendectomy in the period 2017-2019. General surgical complications and reoperations within 90 days were assessed with relevant indicators. Associations between the surgical technique and these indicators were studied with logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 21 541 patients included in the study, general surgical complications were observed in 2.1% and reoperations in 1.8% overall. Broken down by age group, the corresponding figures were 5.4% and 4.4% (age 1 to 5), 2.5% and 1.8% (age 6 to 12), and 1.5% and 1.6% (age 13 to 17). The main risk factors for complications and reoperations were acute complicated appendicitis and conversion from LA to OA. Regression analysis revealed similar outcomes with OA compared to LA in the 1-to-5 age group, (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals: 1.1 [0.6; 2.1] for general surgical complications and 1.5 [0.8; 2.7] for reoperations), but worse outcomes with OA in the other two age groups (age 6 to 12: 1.9 [1.2; 2.9] and 2.1 [1.5; 2.9]; age 13 to 17: 1.7 [1.0; 2.9] and 2.2 [1.4; 3.6]). When conversions were assigned to the LA group, the odds ratio (OA compared to LA) for reoperation across all age groups was 3.5 [2.8; 4.4] in patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis and 4.2 [3.4; 5.3] in patients with complicated appendicitis. Complicated appendicitis also increased the rate of general surgical complications and the length of stay in hospital. CONCLUSION: Among children in the two older age groups, LA was followed by fewer general surgical complications and reoperations than OA. These differences were less pronounced when conversions were counted as belonging to the LA group. Children aged 1-5 appear to benefit the least from the lapa - roscopic technique.

Rates of Complications After Appendectomy in Children and Adolescents: Pediatric Surgical Compared to General Surgical Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomies in children and adolescents are performed in Germany in pediatric surgical (PS) or general surgical hospitals (GS). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the surgery in a PS or GS hospital has an influence on the postoperative course after appendectomy in children and adolescents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nationwide routine data from children and adolescents aged 1-17 y insured by the Local Health Insurance Fund who underwent appendectomy between 2014 and 2016 were analyzed (cohort study). Descriptive statistics were calculated both overall and in the two groups (PS and GS). Patients were additionally examined by age (1-5, 6-12, and 13-17 y), treatment (laparoscopic, open surgical, and conversion), and appendicitis type (nonacute: K36/K37/K38/R10, acute simple: K35.30/K35.8, and acute complex: K35.2/K35.31/K35.32). The influence of surgeon specialization on 90-d secondary surgery and 90-d general complications was assessed by multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Altogether, 25,065 patients who underwent surgery in 83 PS and 906 GS hospitals were included. Logistic regression analysis revealed that PS was associated with a reduced risk of interventions in the 1-5- and 6-12-y age groups (odds ratio: 0.44, 0.62). Acute complex appendicitis, comorbidities, and open surgery significantly increased the risk for reintervention. PS was associated with an increased risk for complications in the 13-17-y age group (odds ratio: 1.66). CONCLUSIONS: PS and GS hospitals provided safe appendectomies in children and adolescents with low reintervention and complication rates. PS hospitals demonstrated advantages for patients in the 1-5- and 6-12-y age groups and GS hospitals for patients 13-17 y.

[Quality Assurance Using Administrative/Routine Data for Cholelithiasis - Changes Over Time and Current Status]. / Qualitätssicherung mit Routinedaten bei Cholelithiasis ­ Veränderungen und aktueller Stand.

Quality assurance using administrative/routine data (QSR) is a relatively new measure to assess outcome quality. This approach is methodologically distinct from external quality assurance, as well as from quality assurance based upon registries. Since 2011, QSR for cholelithiasis within AOK patients has been overseen by the Scientific Institute of the AOK (WIdO). Following the introduction of an expert panel in 2013, numerous changes were put into place, whereby the indicator rates for transfusion/bleeding, various complications as well as the overall indicator were reduced. Interestingly, the risk adjusted quality differences between hospitals remained solid.