A Prospective, Multicenter, Study of Laser-Activated Gold Microparticles for Treating Patients Using Concomitant Topical Retinoids for Mild-to-Moderate Inflammatory Acne.

Gold microparticles are indicated as an accessory to 1064 nm lasers to facilitate photo-thermal heating of sebaceous glands for treating mild-to-moderate inflammatory acne vulgaris (Sebacia Microparticles, Coronado Aesthetics LLC, Southlake, TX). The following study assessed the safety and clinical benefit of gold microparticles/laser therapy when used together with commercially available topical acne products. Healthy patients, 12 to 45 years old with mild-to-moderate inflammatory facial acne were prescribed a topical pre-treatment retinoid for 3 to 4 weeks. The gold microparticle suspension was then applied to the entire face and massaged into the skin. The laser procedure was performed with commercially available 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers with fluence in the 20 to 35 J/cm2 range, a 30 ms pulse duration, and direct cooling. Among participants completing the study (N=52), the mean percent change in inflammatory lesion counts (ILC) was -55% at month 2, reaching -68% at month 12. At that time, 86% of participants achieved a 40% decrease in ILC and 75% achieved a 60% decrease in ILC. Mean Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Scale scores decreased by 41.6% from 2.4 at day 0 to 1.4 at month 12. The percentage of participants with clear or almost clear skin increased from 7% at day 0 to 59% at month 12. Acne therapy with topically applied gold microparticles followed by 1064 nm laser irradiation is an effective treatment for moderate to moderately severe acne. The treatment was well-tolerated with a high degree of participant satisfaction. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(11):1088-1094     doi:10.36849/JDD.7744.

Scar Therapy of Skin.

Scar therapy is truly important in medicine. Patients experience great loss in quality of life with scars. There are many treatment modalities that help treat scars, including topical, intralesional, surgical, and energy-based devices. In addition, early intervention can help mitigate scar formation. Lasers represent a major innovation in the treatment of all types of scars. Treating scars is a multimodal and multispecialty endeavor. This article highlights the use of many therapies to treat scars and scar symptoms including pruritus, pain, and range of motion. This also highlights key literature including multiple recent consensus guidelines in treating scars.

An Atlas of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Elucidating In Vivo Differences of Scar Types Using OCT in Order to Guide Laser Treatment Parameters.

Objective: When using laser therapy to effectively treat scars, the choice of treatment parameters depends on the knowledge accuracy of the underlying scar pathology, which is often difficult to judge by gross physical exam. As such, more quantitative measures are needed. In recent years, optical coherencetomography (OCT) has shown promise as a real-time imaging technolgoy of skin microstructure. A key step in developing a methodology for utilizing OCT to develop a comprehensive 'atlas' of OCT characteristics of a wide variety of scar types. This atlas may then be used as a tool for selecting the optimal treatment modality and parameters for each scar type. Methods: One hundred and fifty scars of a wide range of anatomical locations were imaged using OCT, capturing both vascular and structural data. A variety of scar etiologies (e.g. burn, surgical, traumatic) and types (e.g. hypertrophic, keloidal, atrophic) were included. Comparator scans were also taken from normal, unscarred skin. Results: OCT revealed morphological differences in the epidermis and dermis between scars and normal tissue, and between scar subtypes. Features affected by scar pathology included epidermal thickness, skin surface texture, dermal epidermal junction rugosity, blood vessel density, vessel shape and diameter, vessel direction and vascular network, dermis scattering intensity and non-uniformity. Each scar subtype showed consistent characteristics distinct from other scar subtypes. Limitations: This was a single-site study of a patient population in South Florida. Conclusion: OCT is a powerful new objective tool for the clinician to utilize in the pursuit of effective laser treatment parameters by enabling personalized treatment based on individual scar characteristics in order to maximize treatment capabilities.

Dermal Micro-coring for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Facial Wrinkles.

Micro-coring technology (MCT) removes cores of skin without formation of scars, thereby tightening skin and reducing skin wrinkling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MCT with the dermal micro-coring device for the treatment of facial wrinkles. Methods: This prospective, multicenter clinical trial included fifty-one subjects who underwent MCT treatments of the mid to lower face. The primary study endpoint was change in the Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale. Secondary study endpoints were change in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), participant satisfaction, and evaluation of treatment outcome by an independent review panel. All study endpoints were evaluated at 1, 7, 30, 60, and 150 or 180 days after treatment. Procedure bleeding, pain, and early healing profile were also captured. Results: The mean Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale change was 1.3 grades. Improvement in the GAIS was reported for 89.7% (87/97) of treated sites, and average improvement of GAIS was 1.5. Participants reported satisfaction with 85.6% of treatment sites. The independent review panel correctly identified 84.2% of the post-treatment photographs as post-treatment. Procedure bleeding and pain was mild with good healing responses and patient-reported average down time of 3 days. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the safety and efficacy of MCT with the dermal micro-coring device for the treatment of moderate to severe facial wrinkles. MCT led to significant improvement of facial wrinkles with high patient satisfaction and fast recovery time and should be considered in patients who are seeking minimally invasive treatment for wrinkles of the face.

Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery.

Importance: Laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is used for various medical and cosmetic applications. However, there is insufficient evidence-based guidance to assist clinicians performing LADD. Objective: To develop recommendations for the safe and effective use of LADD. Evidence Review: A systematic literature review of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted in December 2019 to identify publications reporting research on LADD. A multidisciplinary panel was convened to draft recommendations informed by the systematic review; they were refined through 2 rounds of Delphi survey, 2 consensus meetings, and iterative review by all panelists until unanimous consensus was achieved. Findings: Of the 48 published studies of ablative fractional LADD that met inclusion criteria, 4 were cosmetic studies; 21, oncologic; and 23, medical (not cosmetic/oncologic), and 6 publications of nonablative fractional LADD were included at the request of the expert panel, producing a total of 54 studies. Thirty-four studies (63.0%) were deemed to have low risk of bias, 17 studies (31.5%) had moderate risk, and 3 (5.5%) had serious risk. The key findings that informed the guidelines developed by the expert panel were as follows: LADD is safe in adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with all Fitzpatrick skin types and in patients with immunosuppression; it is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ, actinic cheilitis, hypertrophic scars, and keloids; it is useful for epidermal and dermal analgesia; drug delivery may be increased through the application of heat, pressure, or occlusion, or by using an aqueous drug solution; laser settings should be selected to ensure that channel diameter is greater than the delivered molecule; antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, except with impaired wound healing; antiviral prophylaxis is recommended when treating the face and genitalia; and antifungal prophylaxis is not recommended. The guideline's 15 recommendations address 5 areas of LADD use: (I) indications and contraindications; (II) parameters to report; (III) optimization of drug delivery; (IV) safety considerations; and (V) prophylaxis for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review and Delphi consensus approach culminated in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for safe and effective use of LADD in a variety of applications. Future research will further improve our understanding of this novel treatment technique.

Prospective study of intense pulsed light versus pulsed dye laser with or without blue light in the activation of PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis and photodamage.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light from the sun is known to have a deleterious effect on the skin. Repeated insults to the dermal matrix from UV radiation result in the clinical signs of photodamage, including changes in skin elasticity, color, and texture. UV radiation also leads to the accumulation of DNA mutations and promotes tumor development, resulting in the formation of cutaneous precancerous and cancerous lesions. Continuous-wave incoherent blue light, intense pulsed light (IPL), and pulsed dye laser (PDL) are safe and efficacious light sources commonly used for aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (PDT). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of PDT for the treatment of photodamage and actinic keratoses using four different combinations of light sources: PDL, PDL + blue light, IPL, and IPL + blue light. STUDY: A total of 220 patients with either photodamage or actinic keratosis (AK) were recruited from the Miami Dermatology Laser Institute (Miami, FL) and were assigned prospectively to undergo one PDT treatment with one of the four light options: PDL, PDL + blue light, IPL or IPL + blue light. Of the 220 patients enrolled in treatment groups, 214 patients completed the study. Of the 214 patients, 88 received treatment for AK, and 126 received treatment for photodamage. All patients gave their consent to participate in the study and to allow their photographs to be utilized for the purpose of scientific presentations. RESULTS: Treatment with IPL resulted in a 70.8% reduction of actinic keratoses at a 1-month follow-up. Treatment with IPL and blue light 84.4% reduction of actinic keratoses at 1 month follow up. Treatment with PDL 70.5% reduction of actinic keratoses at 1 month follow up. Treatment with PDL and blue light 69.3% reduction of actinic keratoses at 1 month follow up. Treatment with IPL resulted in an improvement score of 2.9. Treatment with IPL and blue light resulted in an improvement score of 3.0. Treatment PDL resulted in an improvement score of 1.5. Treatment with PDL and blue light resulted in an improvement score of 1.8. CONCLUSION: Although all four treatment groups led to some improvement in signs of photoaging, IPL + blue light again demonstrated increased efficacy when compared to IPL, PDL, and PDL + blue light treatment groups. Results from our study were limited by an unequal distribution between treatment groups and a lack of follow-up beyond a 1-month period and warrant further research.

1,550 nm Erbium-Doped and 1,927 nm Thulium Nonablative Fractional Laser System: Best Practices and Treatment Setting Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: The Fraxel Dual laser system (Solta Medical, Inc., Bothell, WA) contains a 1,550 and 1,927 nm wavelength single handpiece with different indications for each wavelength. OBJECTIVE: To discuss treatment setting recommendations and best practices for select on-label and investigational applications of the 1,550 and 1,927 nm dual laser system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight board-certified dermatologists with 10 or more years of experience with the 1,550 and 1,927 nm laser system completed an online survey about their clinical experience with the system and then participated in a roundtable to share clinical perspectives and best practices for using the laser system. RESULTS: For all Fitzpatrick skin types, treatment recommendations were described for selected approved indications for the 1,550 and 1,927 nm laser system, including both lasers in combination. Treatment recommendations were also reached for investigational applications with the 1,550 nm laser and 1,927 nm laser. Best practices for using the lasers during the treatment session to achieve optimal outcomes and decrease the post-treatment recovery time were compiled. CONCLUSION: The 1,550 and 1,927 nm dual laser system is effective for a wide range of aesthetic and therapeutic applications, on and off the face and across all Fitzpatrick skin types.

The contribution of itch and skin severity improvements to the Dermatology Life Quality Index in patients with atopic dermatitis in baricitinib phase III trials.

With data from three monotherapy baricitinib phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs), we conducted a posthoc mediator analysis to assess whether changes in itch or skin severity mediated the treatment effect over placebo on changes in health-related quality of life. In this analysis, baricitinib demonstrated significant improvement in the Dermatology Life Quality Index for which itch mediated approximately half of the changes at weeks 4 and 16.

Clinical Tailoring of Baricitinib 2 mg in Atopic Dermatitis: Baseline Body Surface Area and Rapid Onset of Action Identifies Response at Week 16.

INTRODUCTION: Baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, is indicated in the European Union and Japan for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. In the ongoing, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial BREEZE-AD5, once-daily oral baricitinib 2-mg monotherapy improved disease in moderate-to-severe AD patients who had an inadequate response or intolerance to topical corticosteroids. This post-hoc analysis aimed to identify responders to baricitinib 2 mg, using a proposed clinical tailoring approach based on baseline body surface area (BSA) affected and early clinical improvement, in BREEZE-AD5. METHODS: Classification and regression tree method was used to evaluate baseline predictors for the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at week 16 among baricitinib 2-mg-treated patients. Two-by-two contingency tables evaluated the association between early response, defined as ≥ 50% improvement in BSA or ≥ 3-point improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale from baseline at weeks 4 or 8, and response at week 16 for the proportion of patients achieving EASI75, validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) score of 0 or 1, or ≥ 4-point improvement in Itch (Itch ≥ 4), respectively. Missing data were imputed as non-responder. RESULTS: At week 16, EASI75 and vIGA-AD (0,1) were achieved by 37.5% and 31.7% of baricitinib 2-mg-treated patients with baseline BSA 10-50% compared with 9.5% and 4.8% with BSA > 50%. Early response in skin inflammation or itch at week 4 was associated with corresponding EASI75, vIGA-AD (0,1), and Itch ≥ 4 of 55.4%, 48.2%, and 39.3% at week 16, while early response at week 8 was associated with 66.7%, 56.1%, and 42.1% of patients achieving these endpoints. CONCLUSION: Baseline BSA of 10-50% and early clinical improvement after 4 or 8 weeks of baricitinib 2-mg treatment may identify patients most likely to benefit from long-term baricitinib 2-mg therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03435081.

Baricitinib is a medication that helps a dysregulated immune system readjust. This leads to improvements in the inflammatory disease atopic dermatitis (AD). Baricitinib is approved for adults with moderate-to-severe AD in over 40 countries. In the ongoing study BREEZE-AD5, baricitinib 2 mg improved moderate-to-severe AD in patients who previously did not respond to or could not tolerate topical corticosteroids. Understanding which patients are likely to benefit most from a medication can improve patient experience with treatment. It can also ensure that only patients who are likely to benefit from a medication are exposed to it. This analysis aimed to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from baricitinib 2 mg in BREEZE-AD5, using an approach based on baseline body surface area (BSA) affected and early clinical improvement. We showed that patients with moderate-to-severe AD affecting between 10% and 50% of their BSA account for the majority of patients who respond to baricitinib 2 mg after 16 weeks of treatment. Clinical assessment of skin inflammation or itch in patients after 4­8 weeks of initiation of baricitinib 2-mg treatment further improved the ability to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from long-term therapy. This proposed clinical tailoring approach of baseline BSA of 10­50% and early clinical improvement after 4 or 8 weeks of baricitinib 2-mg treatment may allow for the treatment of patients who are most likely to respond to therapy, and rapid decision on discontinuation of treatment for those who are not likely to benefit from baricitinib 2 mg.

Medical and aesthetic improvement of photodamaged skin by the combination of intense pulsed light and photodynamic therapy with 10% aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride gel.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with the novel 10% aminolevulinic acid (ALA) hydrochloride gel (10% ALA gel) and BF-RhodoLED® light (635 nm; 37 J/cm2 ) in combination with intense pulsed light (IPL) to augment the medical and aesthetic improvement of photodamaged skin of the décolleté. METHODS: This was a single-site prospective, randomized, intraindividual split chest pilot study with 20 female subjects with moderate to severe photodamage of the décolleté. Subjects were randomized to ALA-PDT + IPL to one split-side of the chest and ALA-PDT only to the contralateral side. Three blinded raters assessed aesthetic improvement using the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS). RESULTS: Eighteen subjects completed the study. Superior GAIS results were achieved on the ALA-PDT + IPL treatment side than on the ALA-PDT only treatment side (p < 0.001) after 24 weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ALA-PDT using 10% ALA hydrochloride gel and BF-RhodoLED® light had superior rejuvenation effects on the décolleté when combined with IPL compared to ALA-PDT alone.

Energy-based devices for the treatment of Acne Scars: 2022 International consensus recommendations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acne scars are one of the most distressing and long-term consequences of acne vulgaris, with damaging effect on a person's physical, mental, and social well-being. Numerous treatment options are available including surgical and nonsurgical techniques, depending on the clinical presentation. Although considerable advances in the development of new treatment technologies and applications have been made in the last decade, international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes have not yet caught up with current knowledge and practice in many centers. The authors intend to highlight the potential utility of energy-based devices (EBDs) for acne scarring, offer recommendations for safe and efficacious treatment, and provide consensus-based EBD treatment options based on varying presentations demonstrated in a series of real-life clinical photographs. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international panel of 24 dermatologists and plastic surgeons from 12 different countries and a variety of practice backgrounds was self-assembled to develop updated consensus recommendations for the treatment of acne scars. A two-step modified Delphi method took place between March 2020 and February 2021 consisting of two rounds of emailed questionnaires. The panel members approved the final manuscript via email correspondence. RESULTS: The manuscript includes a comprehensive discussion and panel recommendations regarding the following topics: 1. the role of EBD in mitigating and treating acne scars in a patient with active acne, 2. the use of various EBDs for the treatment of different acne scar types with special focus on commonly used laser platform such as vascular lasers, ablative fractional lasers (AFLs) and non-AFLs (NAFLs), 3. treatment combinations, and 4. acne scar treatments in skin of color. The last part comprised of 10 photos of real-life clinical cases with the panel recommendation treatment plan to achieve best aesthetic outcome. CONCLUSION: Panel members were unanimous in their view that EBDs have a role in the management of acne scars, with AFLs, NAFLs, vascular lasers, and RF devices preferentially selected by most of the panel experts. EBDs are considered a first-line treatment for a variety of acne scar types and patients without access to these treatments may not be receiving the best available care for optimal cosmetic results. Future high-quality research and updated international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes should reflect this status.

Analysis of port-wine birthmark vascular characteristics by location: Utility of optical coherence tomography mapping.

INTRODUCTION: Port-wine birthmarks (PWBs) are congenital capillary malformations that can be located on any area of the body. Vascular features include vessel size, depth, and density, which can greatly differ between patients, individual lesions, and even sites within the same lesion. Previous studies have determined that the location of PWB lesions has impacted their clinical response to laser treatment. OBJECTIVE: We utilized dynamic optical coherence tomography (D-OCT) to measure in vivo vessel diameter, density, and superficial plexus depth in patients of all ages with PWB on various sites of the body. We hypothesized that these vascular characteristics would differ according to body location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had a PWB and presented to clinic at three sites for treatment with the pulsed dye laser (PDL) were enrolled into the study. A D-OCT scanner was utilized for noninvasive, in vivo imaging of PWB lesions. The depth of the top portion of the superficial vascular plexus was estimated as the depth at which the vessel density reaches 50% of the maximum. Vessel diameter and density were calculated by incorporated software algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were enrolled into the study. There was a total of 204 measurements of PWB lesions. Of all patients, 56.5% (n = 61) reported having a previous treatment with PDL. Of all D-OCT scans, 62.3% (n = 127) were located on the head, 14.2% (n = 29) the upper extremities, 8.3% (n = 17) the lower extremities, 7.8% (n = 16) the trunk, and 7.8% (n = 15) the neck. All locations were compared for each vascular characteristic. For superficial plexus depth, lesions on the head were significantly shallower than those on the upper extremities (217 vs. 284 µm; p < 0.001) and lower extremities (217 vs. 309 µm; p < 0.001). For vessel diameter, lesions on the head had significantly larger vessels than those on the upper extremities (100 vs. 72 µm; p = 0.001). For vessel density, lesions on the head had significantly denser vessels than those on the trunk (19% vs. 9.6%; p = 0.039) and upper extremities (19% vs. 9.3%; p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: PWB lesions have distinct vascular characteristics, which can be associated with their body location. This includes superficial vascular plexus depth as well as vessel diameter and density.

Optimizing Outcomes With the 1550/1927 nm Dual Wavelength Non-Ablative Fractional Laser: Experienced User Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Fractional laser treatment was introduced in 2004 as a non-invasive technique to treat sun-damaged and aging skin. Since then, numerous ablative and non-ablative photothermolysis technologies and devices have been introduced, increasing the options for clinicians and patients but also increasing the complexity regarding which system to use and the techniques to optimize outcomes. No two devices are the same and the user-manuals preset dosimetry does not address many clinical situations, which can create confusion for new and inexperienced users. METHODS: An online survey addressing use of a 1550 nm /1927 nm dual wavelength, non-ablative, fractional laser was sent to eight (8) US board certified dermatologists with extensive experience in the use of the device. The survey included 39 questions, addressing experience, best practices and recommendations for use. RESULTS: The survey data suggests that the device can be used to treat patients of all ages and skin types for indications including photoaging and photodamage, periorbital wrinkles, freckles, (ephelides), solar lentigines, poikiloderma, scarring due to acne or surgery. It can be used on both facial and non-facial areas, including neck, chest, hands, arms, abdomen, legs, and buttocks. Unexpected and adverse effects were rarely reported and those that did were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS: This position paper provides practical real-world guidelines resulting from a small survey of experienced users, for new and early uses of the novel 1550 nm /1927 nm dual wavelength, non-ablative, fractional laser. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(11):1150-1157. doi:10.36849/JDD.6181.

Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study on Efficacy of Copaiba Oil in Silicone-Based Gel to Reduce Scar Formation.

INTRODUCTION: Scars are the end result of a biologic and natural process of wound repair after injury, surgery, acne, illness, burns, and infection. When skin is damaged, a fast and coordinated body response is triggered by four highly integrated and overlapping phases including homeostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and tissue remodeling. Healing of a skin wound may result in an abnormal scar if the balance among these four phases is lost during the healing process. Various topical treatments have been used for their ability to reduce unsightly scar formation. Recently, studies have shown improvement in scar appearance after treating with silicone gels containing natural herbal ingredients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a novel silicone-based gel containing copaiba oil (Copaderm) for prevention and/or appearance reduction of different types of abnormal scars. METHODS: This study was designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 42 patients with abnormal scars, divided into two groups. Each group received either a topical scar formulation consisting of copaiba oil in silicone gel or a placebo gel twice a day for 84 days. Assessments of the scars were performed at 0, 28, and 84 days following the onset of topical application using three methods: a clinical assessment using the Manchester Scar Scale, a photographic assessment to establish before and after treatment improvements, and at the end of the study period, patients completed a final satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the original 42 patients, 32 completed the evaluation. There was a significant difference with respect to the overall score of the Manchester Scar Scale between the two groups from baseline to 84 days (P < 0.05). All patients with copaiba oil in silicone gel achieved improvement of their scars, based on overall score at 84 days. A visible scar reduction was observed with photographic assessment. Eighty-nine percent of subjects (n = 16) with copaiba oil in silicone gel rated as being satisfied or very satisfied after 84 days of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the hypothesis that copaiba oil in silicone-derivative gel was able obtain significant improvement in color, contour, distortion, and texture for different types of scar through the Manchester Scar Scale analysis. These findings contribute to reducing abnormal scar formation during the healing process.

Vascular characteristics of port wine birthmarks as measured by dynamic optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: Port wine birthmarks (PWBs) are congenital capillary malformations. Vessel characteristics, such as diameter and depth, may impact presentation and outcomes. They can be imaged using dynamic optical coherence tomography, a high-resolution, noninvasive imaging method. PURPOSE: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study to measure in vivo vascular characteristics as a function of PWB color. METHODS: Patients undergoing treatment for PWB were recruited from 3 sites. PWBs were classified by color. Dynamic optical coherence tomography images with calculations were obtained. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients were enrolled. Mean age correlated with PWB color, with birthmarks being lighter in younger patients and darker in older patients (P < .01). Mean superficial plexus depth was significantly shallower in purple PWBs than in pink PWBs. Color was not associated with significant differences in mean superficial vessel density or diameter. Among pink PWBs, each 10-year increase in age was associated with a 10.6-µm increase in superficial plexus depth. Among purple PWBs, each 10-year increase in age was associated with a 16.2-µm reduction in superficial plexus depth. In lesions without prior treatment, vessel density was 12.7% lower in purple PWBs than in pink PWBs. CONCLUSION: Superficial vessels of purple PWBs were significantly closer to the epidermis than those of pink PWBs, which might impact optimal laser parameters.

Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from a randomized monotherapy phase 3 trial in the United States and Canada (BREEZE-AD5).

BACKGROUND: Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1/Janus kinase 2 inhibitor, is being studied for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib monotherapy in a North American phase 3 trial (BREEZE-AD5/NCT03435081) of adults with moderate-to-severe AD who responded inadequately or were intolerant to topical therapy. METHODS: Patients (N = 440) were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily placebo or baricitinib (1 mg or 2 mg). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ≥75% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index at week 16. A key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD score of 0 (clear)/1(almost clear) with ≥2-point improvement. RESULTS: At week 16, the proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index was 8%, 13%, and 30% (P < .001, 2 mg vs placebo) and those with a validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD score of 0/1 were 5%, 13%, and 24% (P < .001, 2 mg vs placebo) for placebo, baricitinib 1 mg, and baricitinib 2 mg, respectively. Safety findings were similar to those of other baricitinib AD studies. LIMITATIONS: Short-term clinical trial results may not be generalizable to real-world settings. CONCLUSION: Baricitinib was efficacious for patients with moderate-to-severe AD with no new safety findings over 16 weeks.

Improvement of Burn Scars Treated With Fractional Ablative CO2 Lasers-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Using the Vancouver Scar Scale.

Fractional ablative CO2 laser is being used increasingly to treat burn scars; however, objective measures of outcome success vary widely. This systematic review and meta-analysis extracts and pools available data to assess the outcomes of patients with burn scars treated with fractional ablative CO2 laser. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the gray literature was performed. The review included studies that reported patients with a confirmed diagnosis of scarring as a result of a burn injury, who were treated with fractional ablative CO2 laser and whose progress was recorded using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). Eight studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Treatment regimens varied amongst studies, as did patient outcomes. Pooled data revealed an average VSS improvement of 29% across 282 patients following fractional CO2 ablative laser treatment. Although the heterogeneity of treatment regimens across studies limits this systematic review's ability to provide specific treatment recommendations, the overall trend towards improvement of burns scars treated with fractional CO2 laser based on the VSS encourages further exploration of this modality as a therapeutic tool.

Incorporating Aesthetic Devices into a Dermatologic Practice.

Background: Lasers and energy-based devices allow physicians to provide quality care to patients and achieve optimal clinical results. Objective: We sought to review the benefits and drawbacks of purchasing and leasing energy-based devices and to highlight key factors that are important to consider when incorporating these devices into a practice. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for articles on purchasing or leasing lasers and energy-based devices in dermatology. Key reports and personal commentaries on incorporating these technologies into practice are summarized in this review. Results: Energy-based devices are clinical and financial investments and can provide outstanding results for patients and result in substantial gratification for a practice. There are a variety of factors to consider when selecting specific lasers and energy-based devices. Conclusions: Capital resources, aesthetic practice values, expertise in using the device, patient demographics, location of the practice, clinic space requirements, and regulations should be considered when buying or leasing a device.

Laser Treatment of Traumatic Scars and Contractures: 2020 International Consensus Recommendations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is currently intense multidisciplinary interest and a maturing body of literature regarding laser treatments for traumatic scars, but international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes have not yet caught up with current knowledge and practice in many centers. The authors intend to highlight the tremendous potential of laser techniques, offer recommendations for safe and efficacious treatment, and promote wider patient access guided by future high-quality research. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international panel of 26 dermatologists and plastic and reconstructive surgeons from 13 different countries and a variety of practice backgrounds was self-assembled to develop updated consensus recommendations for the laser treatment of traumatic scars. A three-step modified Delphi method took place between March 2018 and March 2019 consisting of two rounds of emailed questionnaires and supplementary face-to-face meetings. The panel members approved the final manuscript via email correspondence, and the threshold for consensus was at least 80% concurrence among the panel members. RESULTS: The manuscript includes extensive detailed discussion regarding a variety of laser platforms commonly used for traumatic scar management such as vascular lasers and ablative and non-ablative fractional lasers, special considerations such as coding and laser treatments in skin of color, and 25 summary consensus recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Lasers are a first-line therapy in the management of traumatic scars and contractures, and patients without access to these treatments may not be receiving the best available care after injury. Updated international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes, additional high-quality research, and patient access should reflect this status. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.