Safety of a short-term infusion of fosnetupitant in patients with gastrointestinal and breast cancer: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Fosnetupitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, is used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Previous phase III trials demonstrated the non-inferiority of its 30-minute infusion to fosaprepitant in efficacy and a favorable safety profile. METHODS: This was a single-arm, phase II study to investigate the safety of a 15-minute infusion of fosnetupitant in patients with gastrointestinal and breast cancer. Patients who had received their dose of fosnetupitant in a 30-minute infusion without developing an allergic reaction were eligible and received their next fosnetupitant dose for 15 minutes. The primary endpoint was the incidence of an allergic reaction during the first 15-minutes infusion, and the secondary endpoints were the incidence of injection site reaction (ISR), the incidence of a grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with fosnetupitant, and complete response (CR) rate. RESULTS: The study period was from February 17, 2023 to June 20, 2023. In an exploratory analysis, medical records from the end of the study period to December 31, 2023 were retrospectively evaluated to assess the time-saving effect and safety of the short-term infusion of fosnetupitant. Fifty-six patients with gastrointestinal and 14 patients with breast cancer were enrolled, one of whom with breast cancer did not receive study treatment at her own request. No allergic reactions occurred during the 15-minutes infusion. Furthermore, there were no allergic reactions across all 280 short-term injections (Table 1). Additionally, no ISR or grade 3 or higher TRAE were reported. The CR rate was 87.0%. CONCLUSION: Short-term infusion of fosnetupitant, administered over 15 minutes, was demonstrated to be safe and effective for patients receiving HEC or MEC (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Trial ID: jRCT1041220144).

Trifluridine/tipiracil with and without ramucirumab for advanced gastric cancer: a comparative observational study.

The combination of trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride (FTD/TPI) plus ramucirumab has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of this combination compared with those of FTD/TPI monotherapy in patients with AGC. We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with AGC who received FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab or FTD/TPI monotherapy as third- or later-line treatment. This study included 36 patients treated with FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab and 70 patients receiving FTD/TPI monotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 25.8% and 58.1%, respectively, in the FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab group and 5.0% and 38.3%, respectively, in the FTD/TPI group (ORR, P = 0.007; DCR, P = 0.081). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab group (median PFS, 2.9 vs. 1.8 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; P = 0.001). A numerical survival benefit was also observed (median overall survival, 7.9 months vs. 5.0 months; HR: 0.68, P = 0.089). In the multivariate analysis, PFS was significantly longer in the FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab group than in the FTD/TPI monotherapy group (HR: 0.61, P = 0.030). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was higher in the FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab group than in the FTD/TPI group (13.8% vs. 2.9%); however, no new safety signals were identified. Compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy, FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab offers clinical benefits with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with AGC. Further investigation via randomized trials is warranted to confirm these findings.

Prognosis of pancreatic cancer with Trousseau syndrome: a systematic review of case reports in Japanese literature.

Trousseau syndrome is a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with a risk of poor prognosis. We reviewed the survival time and prognosis of patients with Trousseau syndrome. We identified 40 cases from 28 reports of Trousseau syndrome due to pancreatic cancer. We analyzed 20 cases based on reports providing sufficient information on the stage/location of pancreatic cancer and survival time after Trousseau syndrome. The median survival time was 2.0 months. There was no statistical difference between performance status (PS) 0-1 and PS 4, stages I-III and IV, and pancreatic head and body/tail. However, statistically significant differences were noted between the median survival time of patients who continued treatment for pancreatic cancer even after Trousseau syndrome and those who discontinued treatment (P = 0.005). Although only a small number of cases were analyzed in this study, the results indicated that patients with pancreatic cancer who developed Trousseau syndrome had a poor prognosis, and chemotherapy should be continued, if possible.

Differential Efficacy of Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Metastatic Cancers.

BACKGROUND: The recommended first-line chemotherapy for RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is bevacizumab (BEV)-containing therapy for right-sided colon cancer (R) and antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody (anti-EGFR)-containing therapy for left-sided colon cancer (L) or rectal cancer (RE). However, anatomical or biological heterogeneity reportedly exists between L and RE. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacies of anti-EGFR and BEV therapies for L and RE, respectively. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 265 patients with KRAS (RAS)/BRAF wild-type mCRC treated with fluoropyrimidine-based doublet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR or BEV as the first-line treatment at a single institution. They were divided into 3 groups: R, L, and RE. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and conversion surgery rate were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients had R (anti-EGFR/BEV: 6/39), 137 patients had L (45/92), and 83 patients had RE (25/58). In patients with R, both median (m) PFS and OS were superior with BEV therapy (mPFS, anti-EGFR vs. BEV: 8.7 vs. 13.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.90, P = .01; mOS, 17.1 vs. 33.9 months, HR: 1.54, P = .38). In patients with L, better mPFS and comparable mOS with anti-EGFR therapy were observed (mPFS, 20.0 vs. 13.4 months, HR: 0.68, P = .08; mOS, 44.8 vs. 36.0 months, HR: 0.87, P = .53), whereas, in patients with RE, comparable mPFS and worse mOS with anti-EGFR therapy were observed (mPFS, 17.2 vs. 17.8 months, HR: 1.08, P = .81; mOS, 29.1 vs. 42.2 months, HR: 1.53, P = .17). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacies of anti-EGFR and BEV therapies may differ between patients with L and RE.

[A case of unresectable advanced gastric cancer with oral mucosal necrosis during combination therapy with nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab].

A 61-year-old patient with advanced gastric cancer was treated with ramucirumab plus albumin-suspended paclitaxel as second-line treatment. The treatment resulted in exposure of the right mandible around an implant. The implant was removed, and sequestration was not observed. The patient was diagnosed with oral mucosal necrosis. Thus, implants may cause mucosal necrosis due to angiogenesis inhibitors.

Clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal metastases from lung cancer: systematic review of the case reports in the Japanese literature.

Since colorectal metastases from primary lung cancer are rare, the location of metastatic lesion and prognostic factors have not been well evaluated. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of Japanese patients with colorectal metastasis from lung cancer. We searched the Ichushi-Web database from January 1964 to December 2020. We found 59 colorectal metastases in 52 cases for this meta-analysis. Small cell carcinoma was shown to have significantly more metastases to the appendix than non-small cell carcinoma. However, there was no significant correlation between location and histology when classified into right and left colons (P = 0.247). The median overall survival after diagnosis was 6 months. Univariate analysis showed that adenocarcinoma (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.383, P = 0.024), simultaneous metastasis (HR 0.325, P = 0.046), and chemotherapy group (HR 0.482, P = 0.044) were good prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that chemotherapy (HR 0.38, P = 0.02) was an independent good prognostic factor for overall survival. In conclusion, although there was no statistical difference, right colon metastases were more frequent than left colon metastases. Chemotherapy may be effective for colorectal metastases from lung cancer.