Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19?

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is redefining the world we live in, and scientists are struggling to find the best severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic tool. Routine testing is currently performed using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) of upper or lower respiratory tract secretions. We sought to demonstrate the importance of conducting RT-PCR using deep sampling when initial upper respiratory testing is negative in cases of high index of suspicion for COVID-19. We present the case of a 47-year-old man admitted for fever and bilateral pneumonia diagnosed via chest computed tomographic scan amidst the early peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two RT-PCR results from nasopharyngeal swab samples were negative. A bronchoscopy was then performed, and RT-PCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage samples yielded positive results, confirming the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. RT-PCR samples of the lower respiratory tract likely contain a higher virus load and thus retain a higher sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment's severe complications: A single institution review of incidence, presentation and treatment outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment for superficial bladder cancer is interrupted in approximatively 8% of cases as a result of complications. The objective is to report the severe related complications of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) following an intravesical instillation for bladder tumor encountered at our institution for the past 5 years. METHODS: Medical records of a tertiary teaching hospital, located in Beirut, Lebanon, were retrospectively analyzed from June 2014 to June 2019 searching for severe related complications of BCG. A comprehensive review of articles on this subject was conducted. RESULTS: The incidence of severe systemic adverse events related to BCG instillation was 1.5% (5 out of 332 patients). A total of five patients were found to have a severe BCG related complication, with fever, chills, and irritative urinary signs being the most frequent symptoms. All patients received antituberculosis therapy (Isoniazid, Rifampin and Ethambutol). Two were put on add-on corticosteroids. Three patients had a computed tomography scan image in favor of an infection. Two patients had a favorable outcome, three patients died. CONCLUSION: BCG severe adverse events were mostly seen in patients with a traumatic instillation. Treatment used at our institution was similar to most cases reported in the literature. A standardized diagnostic and treatment approach should be implemented to help physicians tackle these life-threatening complications.

[Screening for diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus photography: First national campaign in Lebanon]. / Dépistage de la rétinopathie diabétique par rétinographie non mydriatique : première campagne nationale au Liban.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Non-mydriatic fundus photography (NMFP) has been adopted as a screening tool for this disease. We aim to determine the prevalence of DR through this method in Lebanese diabetic patients and to evaluate the impact of such screening in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study explores data from an awareness and screening campaign conducted in Lebanon. Diabetic patients from multiple regions were referred by their endocrinologists to undergo NMFP using the Optomed SmartScope® handheld fundus camera. Photographs were interpreted by a remote observer, and recommendations were given accordingly. The prevalence of DR was calculated, and statistical analyses were performed on the clinical characteristics, fundus findings and number of referrals to ophthalmologists. RESULTS: The campaign lasted 11 months, during which 2205 patients were examined in 37 screening locations. Out of the 97.41% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, 12.56% had signs of DR, with no significant difference between the regions. 6.28% of the photos were uninterpretable. Positive results were associated with a longer duration of diabetes (P<0.01), treatment with insulin (P<0.01), as well as the presence and chronicity of systemic hypertension (P=0.01). 25% of patients with positive testing were retrospectively asked about their follow-up; only one third had an ophthalmologic examination as per the recommendation, among whom 68.18% underwent treatment for proliferative DR and/or diabetic macular edema. CONCLUSION: Tele-ophthalmology is useful in mass screening for DR. The importance of dilated fundus examinations still needs to be highlighted for diabetic patients, and better collaboration between endocrinologists and ophthalmologists is required to improve screening outcomes.