Dural sinus thrombosis after resection of vestibular schwannoma using suboccipital retrosigmoid approach-thrombosis classification and management proposal.

Dural sinus thrombosis is one of the complications after posterior fossa surgery. However, that topic is not described well with regard to vestibular schwannoma surgery using the unique suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. We analyzed retrospectively medical records and radiological investigations of 116 patients. The including criteria were histopathologically confirmed vestibular schwannoma operated on using the retrosigmoid approach, preoperative and postoperative contrast-enhanced MRI, and at least 1-year follow-up. The patient group included 36% males and 64% females. The average age was 47.3 ± 13.9 years. Sixty percent of the tumors were classified as T4b according to the Hannover scale and their mean volume was 13.73 ± 10.28 cm3. There were no signs of thrombosis preoperatively. Postoperative changes in the dural sinuses were found in 26 (22%) cases. In 7 (27%) cases, there was an external compression by the hemostatic agent, and in 19 (73%) cases, a thrombus was visualized in the sinus lumen. The size of the sinus, age, and the tumor size were not risk factors for thrombosis, whereas an intraoperative sinus injury was a statistically significant risk factor (p = 0.0012). All of the patients diagnosed with thrombosis were in good clinical condition in long-term follow-up, except one fatal case. Complete recanalization was observed in 58% of cases after 1-year follow-up. Postoperative changes in the dural venous sinuses are a frequent finding after vestibular schwannoma surgery using the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. Intraoperative dural injury is a risk factor for thrombosis. Thrombosis in that group of patients is usually asymptomatic and does not influence the prognosis.

Diversion-p64: results from an international, prospective, multicenter, single-arm post-market study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the p64 flow modulation device.

BACKGROUND: The use of flow diversion to treat intracranial aneurysms has increased in recent years. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and angiographic efficacy of the p64 flow modulation device. METHODS: Diversion-p64 is an international, prospective, multicenter, single-arm, study conducted at 26 centers. The p64 flow modulation device was used to treat anterior circulation aneurysms between December 2015 and January 2019. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major stroke or neurologic death at 3-6 months, with the primary efficacy endpoint being complete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification 1) on follow-up angiography. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients met the eligibility criteria and underwent treatment with the p64 flow modulation device (mean age 55±12.0 years, 86.2% female). Mean aneurysm dome width was 6.99±5.28 mm and neck width 4.47±2.28 mm. Mean number of devices implanted per patient was 1.06±0.47, with adjunctive coiling performed in 14.0% of the cases. At the second angiographic follow-up (mean 375±73 days), available for 343 patients (81.7%), complete aneurysm occlusion was seen in 287 (83.7%) patients. Safety data were available for 413 patients (98.3%) at the first follow-up (mean 145±43 days) with a composite morbidity/mortality rate of 2.42% (n=10). CONCLUSIONS: Diversion-p64 is the largest prospective study using the p64 flow modulation device. The results of this study demonstrate that the device has a high efficacy and carries a low rate of mortality and permanent morbidity.

Clipping versus coiling for intracranial aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare results of clipping and coiling for aneurysms of the anterior circle of Willis. Previous studies have not identified a clear superiority of one method over the other. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group included 165 consecutive patients. The assessment took into account the risk of death, neurological status according to the scale of the GOS and mRS, the incidence of early complications and quality of life measured by own surveys and questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 v. 3.0. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was more than four years. Early and late results of treatment after embolization and clipping for all patients did not differ. Evaluation of patients with bleeding aneurysms demonstrated better outcomes after embolization, however statistical significance was observed only in terms of symptomatic scale score of QLQ-C30 questionnaire (p=0.02). For patients with non-bleeding aneurysms better outcomes were obtained after clipping, but statistical significance was found only in the early results: more excellent results in GOS score at discharge (p<0.03) and fewer complications during hospitalization (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Results of treatment after clipping and coiling do not differ in total for all patients, but differ depending on the presence of bleeding. Patients with bleeding aneurysms achieve better outcomes after coiling, and patients with non-bleeding aneurysms achieve better outcomes after clipping.