Effects of intermittent theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognition and hippocampal volumes in bipolar depression.

INTRODUCTION: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly used to treat neurocognitive symptoms in mood disorders. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a brief version of TMS that may preferentially target cognitive functions. This study evaluated whether iTBS leads to cognitive improvements and associated increased hippocampal volumes in bipolar depression. METHODS: In a two-site double-blind randomised sham controlled trial (NCT02749006), 16 patients received active iTBS to the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPF) and 15 patients received sham stimulation across four weeks. A composite neuropsychological score and declarative memory scores served as the cognitive outcomes. Hippocampal volumes were derived from T1 weighted MRI scans using the longitudinal ComBat method to harmonise data across sites. RESULTS: No significant improvements were observed in any cognitive variables in the active relative to the sham group; however, there was a trend for increased left hippocampal volume in the former. Left hippocampal volume increases were associated with improvements in nonverbal memory in the active group. CONCLUSIONS: Although cognitive improvements were not associated with iTBS, the finding that hippocampal volume increases were associated with memory improvement suggests there may be some level of prefrontal-temporal neuroplasticity that could support cognitive change in future studies of iTBS in bipolar disorder.

Remission and recurrence in bipolar disorder: The data from health outcomes and patient evaluations in bipolar disorder (HOPE-BD) study.

BACKGROUND: The HOPE-BD was a naturalistic study established to follow individuals in Canada seeking treatment for bipolar disorder (BD). The study aimed to examine the course of BD and describe how clinical and sociodemographic factors are associated with outcomes. METHODS: Individuals with BD had their clinical data recorded at enrolment and were naturalistically treated. Participant were followed for up to four years, and visits occurred at least once every three months. We investigated the longitudinal outcomes with logistic, Cox, and quantile regressions. RESULTS: Among the 354 participants, 57.3% had BD type I. Depression as first episode, younger ages at onset and older ages of the first professional help predicted longer delays in correct diagnosis. Among the symptomatic patients at baseline, the median time to remission was 10.9 months. Comorbid alcohol use disorder and the severity of baseline depressive symptoms predicted longer times to remission. Among the euthymic participants, the median time to recurrence was 14.5 months. History of anxiety disorder and younger ages at onset predicted shorter times to recurrence. Baseline depression scores predicted recurrence in euthymic patients. LIMITATIONS: We did not investigate the predictors of each polarity. Our findings may not apply to individuals followed in non-specialised outpatient services. CONCLUSION: Our study reinforces the necessity of early diagnosis and interventions, as well as the importance of treating depressive symptoms and comorbidities.

Lurasidone versus treatment as usual for cognitive impairment in euthymic patients with bipolar I disorder: a randomised, open-label, pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is present in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and correlates with impairments in everyday functioning. We aimed to examine the efficacy of lurasidone adjunctive therapy compared with treatment as usual (TAU) in improving cognition. METHODS: For this randomised, open-label, pilot study, we recruited patients aged 19-65 years with euthymic bipolar I disorder from the Mood Disorder Centre in UBC Hospital (Vancouver, Canada). We included patients who were taking lithium, or valproate, or an atypical antipsychotic, or a combination of these for mood stabilisation and who showed reduced cognitive functioning (SD≤ -0·25 relative to demographics-corrected norms) on either the Trail Making Test-B or the California Verbal Learning Test-II. Patients were randomly assigned using a randomised block design with a block size of four to TAU or lurasidone adjunctive therapy (20-80 mg/day) for 6 weeks. A research coordinator masked to group allocation administered the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Battery for Assessment of Neurocognition (ISBD-BANC) at baseline and at endpoint. The primary outcome was change in global cognition score, which consisted of the mean demographics-corrected t-score value of the several ISBD-BANC measures, analysed in all patients who completed both tests. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02147379. FINDINGS: Between July 2, 2014, and Oct 19, 2015, 34 patients were randomly allocated to lurasidone adjunctive therapy (17 patients) or TAU (17 patients). Two patients from each group did not complete the study. The mean lurasidone dose was 48·24 (SD 15·90) mg/day. Lurasidone adjunctive therapy was more effective than TAU in improving the primary efficacy measure of ISBD-BANC global cognition score (mean difference 2·92 [95% CI 0·27-5·57]; time × treatment interaction F=5·09; p=0·032). The between-group effect size (0·82) on baseline versus study-end difference scores in the ISBD global cognition score was of moderate to large magnitude. The magnitude of benefit with lurasidone adjunctive therapy in improving global cognition (effect size 0·46) was greater compared with the improvement observed in the TAU group (0·04). Adverse events were reported by nine (60%) patients in the luradisone group and two (13%) in the TAU group. INTERPRETATION: Our results provide some preliminary evidence for the efficacy of lurasidone in improving cognition in euthymic patients with bipolar I disorder. The strengths of this study were the characterisation of the sample and use of tests sensitive to cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder. Its limitations were the sample size and inability to completely control for other medication use. Larger double-blind trials are warranted to investigate this further. FUNDING: Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adjunctive calcitonin nasal spray in acute refractory mania.

OBJECTIVES: Calcitonin, a neuropeptide, has been shown in preliminary double-blind trials to reduce agitation in patients with acute mania. Given that it has effects similar to those of lithium and anticonvulsants on modulation of second-messenger signaling pathways and stabilization of neuronal membranes, this study examined the efficacy of calcitonin nasal spray in treating acute manic symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant mania using a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. METHODS: A total of 46 hospitalized patients experiencing either a manic or a mixed episode, who were refractory to treatment with adequate doses of either a mood stabilizer or an antipsychotic, or a mood stabilizer/antipsychotic combination, and had a score of ≥16 on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), were randomized to receive adjunctive nasal calcitonin 200 IU (n = 24) or saline (n = 22) spray for three weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the change in YMRS scores using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. RESULTS: The clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. Patients had a mean YMRS score of 26 in the placebo group and a mean score of 25 in the calcitonin group. There were no significant differences in YMRS scores or percentage responders at three weeks between patients who received calcitonin and those who received placebo. There were also no significant differences in change scores on any other scales. Few patients experienced any adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not support the use of nasal calcitonin in the treatment of treatment-resistant mania.